AzTrials
AzTrials

Neovascular Age-related Macular DegenerationNCT02457026

Adjunctive Photodynamic Therapy + Aflibercept vs. Afilbercept Alone for PDA in NV AMD

A study testing Aflibercept, Triamcinolone Acetonide and Verteporfin in people with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this prospective interventional study is to assess whether adjunctive verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) is effective for the treatment of persistent disease activity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV AMD), as compared to anti-VEGF therapy (aflibercept) alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 years and older
What is being tested?
Aflibercept, Triamcinolone Acetonide and Verteporfin
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2016to Jan 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of either 1) NV AMD with PDA in spite of standard-of-care intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy, either loading dose or maintenance therapy or 2) Clinical diagnosis of NV AMD with Progressive Disease in spite of standard-of-care intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy, either loading dose or maintenance therapy
  • Best-corrected visual acuity equivalent of 20/25-20/320
  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • Presence of discernible choroidal neovascular lesion by ICG angiography

Who cannot join

  • History of porphyria or sensitivity to any component of verteporfin preparation
  • Presence of systemic fungal infection or sensitivity to any component of triamcinolone acetonide preparation
  • Presence of ocular or periocular infection or sensitivity to any component to aflibercept
  • Prior vitrectomy surgery
  • Prior thermal laser for macular photocoagulation
  • Inability to avoid exposure of skin or eyes to direct sunlight or bright indoor light for 5 days following verteporfin PDT treatment sessions
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Presence of large submacular hemorrhage in association with choroidal neovascular lesion
  • Known or suspected allergy to fluorescein and/or indocyanine green
  • Known history of open angle glaucoma
  • Known history of diabetic macular edema or macular edema attributable to central retinal vein occlusion
  • Recent history (within prior 6 months) of cerebrovascular accident (i.e. stroke) or myocardial infarction.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Duke Eye Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Adjunctive Photodynamic Therapy + Aflibercept vs. Afilbercept Alone for PDA in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

The purpose of this prospective interventional study is to assess whether adjunctive verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) is effective for the treatment of persistent disease activity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV AMD), as compared to anti-VEGF therapy (aflibercept) alone. This study will enroll individuals with NV AMD who have persistent disease activity in spite of either loading dose (initial 3-5 anti-VEGF treatments) or maintenance (established course) anti-VEGF therapy to determine whether PDT can improve disease activity, facilitate sustained visual acuity gains, and decrease burden of frequent anti-VEGF treatments for affected patients. Risks of study are related to treatment with study drugs: intravenous verteporfin, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, and intravitreal aflibercept. All have been studied extensively in clinical trials and are established treatments used routinely in NV AMD. Adverse events will be monitored by the principal investigator and study team.

Read the detailed description

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV AMD) remains the leading cause of vision loss among people over 65. Intravitreal injections with drugs that block vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a major protein mediator of angiogenesis and vascular leakage, have revolutionized treatment of NV AMD. This class of drugs includes the FDA-approved medications ranibizumab (Lucentis ®, Genentech) and aflibercept (Eylea ®, Regeneron), as well as bevacizumab (Avastin ®, Genentech), which is not FDA-approved for the treatment of NV AMD but is used off-label with demonstrated clinical efficacy. However, these therapies are not a cure. Even when effective, the vast majority of NV AMD patients require continued treatment with anti-VEGF drugs indefinitely for the rest of their lives, to sustain stable visual acuity. Further, in spite of continuous monthly anti-VEGF therapy, up to 40-50% of patients demonstrate persistent disease activity (PDA). Patients with persistent disease activity in spite of ongoing anti-VEGF therapy remain at increased risk for long-term vision loss. Persistent disease activity is defined as (1) unresolved intraretinal, subretinal, or sub-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) fluid or exudation; (2) progressive lesion enlargement and fibrosis; and/or (3) persistent or new hemorrhage. Several large, multicenter, prospective clinical trials have demonstrated ~75% rate of PDA following loading dose therapy (i.e. three consecutive monthly injections), and ~ 40-50% PDA following one year of continued anti-VEGF therapy.

The treatment burden to sustain visual acuity for patients with PDA is especially high, since undertreatment or cessation of therapy assures visual decline. The PIER study assessed the efficacy of quarterly (i.e. every-three-months) anti-VEGF therapy with ranibizumab, following initiation with loading dose therapy. Patients who had resolution of disease activity following loading dose maintained visual acuity gains with subsequent quarterly therapy. In contrast, patients with PDA following loading dose had progressive loss of visual acuity gains when switched to subsequent quarterly therapy. Several subsequent clinical trials (CATT, IVAN, others) have demonstrated that patients with PDA typically require continued monthly therapy to sustain improved visual acuity. Though "do-able" in the short term, indefinite long-term therapy with monthly injections is often impractical for patients and for retina physicians, and as a result, undertreatment occurs with high frequency.

Verteporfin (Visudyne ®, Bausch + Lomb) PDT is an FDA-approved treatment for NV AMD that was initially approved over 10 years ago, prior to the advent of anti-VEGF therapy. As a first-line therapy, verteporfin PDT is much less effective than anti-VEGF therapy in improving vision for NV AMD patients. PDT has been studied as an adjunctive therapy in previously treatment-naïve patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy. It was not found to offer significant visual acuity benefit over anti-VEGF therapy alone, in this population. However, it is unknown whether adjunctive PDT may be effective in improving treatment response in patients with PDA in spite of anti-VEGF therapy. The investigators have performed several retrospective studies of NV AMD patients in the Duke Medical Retina practice to assess the role of adjunctive PDT in cases of PDA. Preliminary results indicate that adjunctive verteporfin PDT reduces disease activity (i.e. decreased fluid and exudation) in patients with PDA, facilitates treatment with fewer anti-VEGF injections (i.e. reduces treatment burden), and reduces risk of subsequent vision loss. However, no studies have prospectively evaluated the efficacy of adjunctive PDT in patients with PDA in spite of anti-VEGF therapy. The present study will assess the efficacy of adjunctive PDT for the treatment of PDA in NV AMD. The investigators will compare administration of anti-VEGF therapy with adjunctive PDT to the standard-of-care treatment approach, anti-VEGF monotherapy administered according to a "treat-and-extend" approach, where the interval between intravitreal injections is as short as every 1 month (approximately 4 weeks) but can be gradually lengthened to the longest interval between treatments that ensures disease quiescence.

Being tested
Aflibercept, Triamcinolone Acetonide, Verteporfin
Keywords
neovascular age-related macular degeneration, age-related macular degeneration, verteporfin, persistent disease activity, photodynamic therapy, Aflibercept
Medical subject headings
Macular Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AfliberceptDrug

    Also called Eylea

    Aflibercept is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of portions of human VEGF receptors 1 and 2 extracellular domains fused to the Fc portion of human IgG1.

  • Triamcinolone AcetonideDrug

    Also called Triesence

    Triamcinolone Acetonide is a synthetic corticosteroid indicated for treatment of ocular inflammatory conditions, uveitis, sympathetic ophthalmia, and temporal arteritis.

  • VerteporfinDrug

    Also called Visudyne

    Verteporfin is a benzoporphyrin derivative, and is a medication used as a photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy.

Study groups in NCT02457026
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adjunctive PDT + AfliberceptExperimentalParticipants will receive adjunctive verteporfin PDT at Study Visit 1 as well as intravitreal aflibercept at Study Visits 1, 2, 3. At Study Visit 4, participants will have repeat assessment of disease activity. If disease activity is resolved or trivial, the individual will be maintained on aflibercept injections. If PDA remains unresolved, the individual will undergo repeat verteporfin PDT at Study Visit 4, as well as intravitreal aflibercept at Study Visits 4, 5, and 6. Disease activity will be reassessed at Study Visit 7. If disease activity is resolved or trivial, the individual will be switched to aflibercept injections once every three months. If PDA remains unresolved, then the individual will default to a standard-of-care treatment strategy with aflibercept (monthly injections).
Receives: Drug: Aflibercept; Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide; Drug: Verteporfin
Aflibercept AloneActive comparatorParticipants in this group will receive intravitreal aflibercept at Study Visits 1, 2, and 3. At Study Visit 4, participants will have repeat assessment of disease activity. From Study Visit 4 onwards, aflibercept will be administered according to a "treat-and-extend" strategy. If disease activity is considered to be resolved or trivial, then the interval between treatments can be initially "extended" from every 28 days to every 42 days. If disease activity remains stable, treatments can be extended in 14-day increments, up to 10 weeks between treatments. For individuals who have PDA that remains unresolved, aflibercept will continue to be administered every days, but if disease quiescence is achieve at a later time point, the treatment period can be extended at that time.
Receives: Drug: Aflibercept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of individuals with resolution or major reduction in PDA

    Measured: up to 8 weeks after loading dose

  2. Percentage of individuals with sustained visual acuity

    Measured: 1 year after loading dose

  3. Average number of aflibercept injections

    Measured: 1 year after loading dose

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Frequency of case with progressive disease on therapy

    Measured: 6 months post-PDT treatment

  2. Mean change in choroidal neovascularization lesion size by fluorescein angiography from baseline

    Measured: 6 months post-PDT treatment

  3. Mean change in central foveal thickness by SD-OCT

    Measured: 6 months post-PDT treatment

  4. Mean change in best-corrected ETDRS visual acuity from baseline

    Measured: 6 months post-PDT treatment

  5. Percentage of participants with 2-line ETDRS visual acuity gain

    Measured: 6 months post-PDT treatment

  6. Percentage of participants with 2-line ETDRS visual acuity loss

    Measured: 6 months post-PDT treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionJan 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02457026
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00063930
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
21 May 2015
Last updated
26 Jul 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Aflibercept, Triamcinolone Acetonide and Verteporfin in people with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of individuals with resolution or major reduction in PDA (time frame: up to 8 weeks after loading dose). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in