AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaNCT02458482

Trial of AccuPAP Device Versus Standard Nebulizer Therapy in Acute Asthma Exacerbation in Children

A study testing AccuPAP and Albuterol and Ipratropium Continuous Nebulizer in people with Asthma, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this randomized control trial is to investigate the efficacy of an adjunct positive airway pressure (PAP) nebulizer device known as "AccuPAP" in the treatment of moderate-severity acute asthma exacerbations in children ages 6 - 17 years in comparison with an institutional standard continuous… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Asthma
What is being tested?
AccuPAP and Albuterol and Ipratropium Continuous Nebulizer
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2015to 11 Nov 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Investigators will enroll children ages 6 - 17 years (inclusive) with a previous diagnosis of asthma who present in an acute exacerbation to the Pediatric Emergency Department.
  • Patients will be evaluated using the Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS) which has been validated at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and is currently the standard of care when triaging patients with asthma.
  • An included patient's severity of current exacerbation must be qualified using the AAIRS and fall in the moderate category of 7 to 11 points.
  • Patients who have received nebulized bronchodilator medications at either a referring facility or at home will be included.
  • Patients who present from a referring facility or Primary Care Physician (PCP) and have received systemic corticosteroids (SCS) within one hour of initial AAIRS scoring will also be included.

Who cannot join

  • Exclusion criteria will include the following: other medical conditions contributing to respiratory distress (e.g., pneumonia, cystic fibrosis, anaphylaxis),
  • developmental delay or any impedance to following basic AccuPAP use instructions,
  • any condition precluding a patient from receiving beta-agonist therapy (ie- predisposition to Supraventricular Tachycardia).
  • Patients with a history of spontaneous pneumothorax, recent facial, oral or skull surgery/trauma, history of esophageal surgery, known or suspected tympanic membrane rupture or other middle ear pathology, acute sinusitis, epistaxis, active hemoptysis or nausea will be excluded as these are contraindications for AccuPAP use.
  • Patients who have received additional adjunctive therapies beyond repeated SABA and atrovent nebulizers or those who have received SCS greater than 1 hour prior to initial ED evaluation, those who have received intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion, or subcutaneous terbutaline or epinephrine will be excluded.
  • Those patients whose parents are require a translator for consent will also be excluded (ie, exclusively Spanish speaking or other non-English speaking families/patients). The justification for this exclusion is that patients with respiratory distress often need rapid initiation of treatment and the delay that may be caused by coordination efforts required in order to obtain a translator for study consent and explanation may delay care for these patients and result in adverse outcomes that may potentially result in harm.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center Monroe Carell Jr. Childrens Hospital Pediatric Emergency Department

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized Control Trial of AccuPAP Device Versus Standard Nebulizer Therapy in Acute Asthma Exacerbation in Children

The objective of this randomized control trial is to investigate the efficacy of an adjunct positive airway pressure (PAP) nebulizer device known as "AccuPAP" in the treatment of moderate-severity acute asthma exacerbations in children ages 6 - 17 years in comparison with an institutional standard continuous dual-therapy nebulizer treatment.

The investigators main goal, more specifically, is to determine if the additional positive airway pressure provided by the AccuPAP device when used in treating children with moderate-severity asthma exacerbations provides a more optimal delivery of bronchodilator therapy when compared to institutional standard protocol nebulizer delivery mask which does not employ the use of positive airway pressure in medication delivery. The investigators have determined that the change in a study-validated Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS) which will be considered statistically significant for a patient is 2 points or greater after the first treatment has been completed.

Read the detailed description

Currently the standard of care for acute asthma exacerbations in children involves immediate administration of an inhaled short acting beta agonist (SABA), most commonly Albuterol, paired with parasympatholytic (Ipratropium) both of which are administered via continuous nebulizer. Additionally, a course of oral or intravenous systemic corticosteroid such as methylprednisolone or decadron are also given to combat acute airway inflammation. Medical providers may also initiate the use of a respiratory support device that can range from supplemental oxygen delivered via nasal cannula (NC) and escalate to the use of Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) or endotracheal intubation in order to increase delivery of medication to distal airways. Because asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood, there have been ongoing studies on many fronts which are being undertaken to minimize morbidity, shorten hospitalization duration and more rapidly reduce a patient's level of respiratory distress.

When nebulized medication is delivered to a patient with active bronchospasm it might not be immediately delivered to the smallest bronchioles and terminal airways which are most affected by bronchospasm causing air trapping and poor gas exchange. Current modalities rely on dilation of larger airways first thus allowing medication to diffuse passively to the smaller airways as dilation occurs down the bronchial tree. Medication delivery is passive and dependent upon the progressive relaxation of these larger airways before reaching the smaller airways which is the ultimate goal of nebulized therapies. The critical pressure required for medication to reach these obstructed airways and keep them stented open is higher than in an otherwise healthy individual due to the natural consequences of airway remodeling seen in asthmatics which includes narrowing of the diameter of the airways, increased atelectasis of hypoventilated areas, and overall increased ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch. The concomitant processes of mucous plugging also commonly seen in asthma further complicates the efficient distribution of these medications in a thoracic cross section. However, application of positive pressure in patients with obstructive airways diseases such as asthma has potential to increase air-trapping, dynamic hyperinflation, and auto-peep and, in turn, aggravate ventilation-perfusion mismatch, all of which has potential to delay clinical improvement. With these considerations, we seek to determine if the physiologic benefit of proposed improved bronchodilator delivery by using added positive airway pressure (ie, active delivery of medication) is of sufficient magnitude to provide overall benefit to patients with acute asthma exacerbation.

The investigators propose to test this hypothesis through the following aim: To conduct a single-blinded (clinical team), randomized clinical trial to determine the efficacy of the AccuPAP device in comparison with the standard nebulizer to decrease acute exacerbation severity measured with the Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS), an objective and validated asthma scoring system, at 0, 1 and 2 hours after initiation of treatment. Secondary outcomes will include Emergency Department (ED) length-of-stay (LOS), general pediatrics floor hospitalization rate, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admission rate, number of patients who do not improve with AccuPAP, and rate of relapse within 24 hours of discharge from the ED. The investigators propose that outcome of the study findings have potential to not only shorten hospital stay duration which is cost efficient but also decrease the burden of the disease process on patient by implementing improved medication delivery strategies.

Conditions
Asthma
Being tested
AccuPAP, Albuterol and Ipratropium Continuous Nebulizer
Keywords
Children, Positive Airway Pressure, Nebulizer, Moderate, Acute, AccuPAP
Medical subject headings
Asthma, Lymphoma, Follicular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AccuPAPDevice

    The AccuPAP device used by participants will give 2.5mg and 0.5mg nebulized Albuterol and Ipratropium over 5 minutes. Inspiratory and expiratory pressures to be set at 6 and 12 cm H20 respectively. This therapy is repeated at 20 and 40 minutes for a total of three AccuPAP treatments.

  • Albuterol and Ipratropium Continuous NebulizerDrug

    Also called Duoneb treatment

    10mg Albuterol and 1.5mg Ipratropium continuous nebulizer treatment will be administered to a Control group over a one hour period.

Study groups in NCT02458482
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard Nebulizer Mask GroupActive comparatorPatients randomized to this "Control" or "standard therapy" group are to receive current institutional standard therapy for moderate asthma exacerbation which includes 10 mg Albuterol combined with 1.5mg Ipratropium nebulized therapy over one hour.
Receives: Drug: Albuterol and Ipratropium Continuous Nebulizer
AccuPAP GroupExperimentalPatients randomized to this group must also have moderate asthma exacerbation and will use an investigational device called "AccuPAP" to receive three allotments of Albuterol and Ipratropium in nebulized form.
Receives: Device: AccuPAP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS)

    A validated asthma scoring system at Vanderbilt University Medical Center used to determine the severity of acute asthma exacerbation

    Measured: From Initial AAIRS scoring in Triage until the end of hour 1 and 2 of treatment during study enrollment

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Length of Stay (LOS)

    Time of triage in the Pediatric Emergency Department until Discharge

    Measured: To be determined at the time of patient disposition, usually occuring on average between hours 2 and 4 of emergency department evaluation.

  2. Rate of Admission to the General Pediatrics Floor

    The rate at which patients in both study groups require admission to the general pediatrics hospital floor.

    Measured: Within 24 hours of study enrollment

  3. Rate of Admission to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU)

    The rate at which patients in both study groups require admission to the PICU.

    Measured: Within 24 hours of study enrollment

  4. Number of Patients Who Do Not Show Improvement on AccuPAP After the First Hour of Treatment

    If a patient appears to worsen on experimental treatment (AccuPAP) by any clinical assessment at any time during their treatment (AAIRS or other clinician assessment), they will automatically be converted to standard nebulizer treatment and dropped from the experimental study group. If a patient's second AAIRS score remains the same as their initial score at 1 hour, they will also be converted to standard nebulizer therapy.

    Measured: Within 2 hours of study enrollment

  5. Rate of Relapse

    All patients who return to the Pediatric Emergency Department within 24 hours of discharge with persistent asthma exacerbation will be recorded.

    Measured: Within 24 Hours of Discharge form the Pediatric Emergency Department

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jun 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2015 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion11 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion11 Nov 2020

Why it stopped: The trainee for whom I designed the study did not begin enrollment and has left our institution.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02458482
Sponsor's protocol ID
150070
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
22 May 2015
Last updated
13 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AccuPAP and Albuterol and Ipratropium Continuous Nebulizer in people with Asthma, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS) (time frame: From Initial AAIRS scoring in Triage until the end of hour 1 and 2 of treatment during study enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in