Pacemaker MalfunctionCIED-MRINCT02459379
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registry
An observational study of Pacemaker Malfunction and Implantable Defibrillator Malfunction, run by NYU Langone Health.
Trial summary
This is a prospective registry evaluating the safety of performing magnetic resonance (MRI) scans on patients who have cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs). This includes pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pacemaker Malfunction, Implantable Defibrillator Malfunction
- What is being tested?
- MRI Scan
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2016to 1 Apr 2017
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with CIED that is not labeled as MRI Conditionally Safe that require an MRI scan for their clinical care.
Who may be able to join
- Male or female, age 18 or older
- Permanent pacemaker or ICD (single, dual or multichamber), generator implanted AFTER 2001
- Only non-MRI Conditionally Safe pacemakers and leads (but otherwise approved by the U.S. FDA ) will be included
- Clinical indication for MRI imaging for which no other imaging modality will give adequate results to manage the patient
- Device must have been implanted for 6 weeks or longer
- Patient or patient's advocate must be able and willing to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- Presence of a lead without fixation (e.g. stand-alone SVC coil)
- Presence of abandoned lead(s)
- Presence of non-transvenous lead(s)
- Other contra-indications to MRI scan (e.g. certain metallic implants)
- Has an ICD, is pacemaker dependent, AND device not capable of asynchronous pacing mode
- Battery voltage at replacement time indicator
Show all 13Show fewer
- Pacemaker or ICD labeled as MRI-Conditionally safe
- Other contra-indication for MRI (e.g. morbid obesity, claustrophobia)
- Pregnant patients
- Systems that include lead adapters
- Patients that have transvenous or transcutaneous temporary pacemaker
- Leadless pacemakers
- Other implants that are not compatible with MRI scans
About this study
Official title: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registry (CIED-MRI Registry)
This is a prospective registry evaluating the safety of performing magnetic resonance (MRI) scans on patients who have cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs). This includes pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). This is not a a new device approval or new MRI scanner approval, only for a registry of patients who need to have an MRI scan who already have an FDA approved CIED that is not currently labeled for use in conjunction with an MRI scan. This registry is very similar to the previously approved MagnaSafe Registry that is now closed to new enrollment.
Read the detailed description
This Registry is an investigator initiated project designed to follow in the footsteps of the MagnaSafe Registry. MagaSafe was initiated to determine the risks of performing MRI for patients with pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs). The latter is closed to new enrollments as of April 2014; however, there is still a need to accumulate data on these devices. There is also a significant clinical need, in that patients who are insured by CMS are currently excluded from having MRI scans if they have a pacemaker or ICD. The only option available to them is to undergo removal of their entire system, have the MRI scan, and then have a new system implanted. This is impossible for many patients who are "pacemaker dependent". It also exposes the patient to a well-known risk of complication from the removal/extraction process as well as the re-implant procedure. This must be contrasted to the negligible risk of having an MRI scan with the device in place (assuming proper precautions are taken), based on MagaSafe data as well as a large body of supporting literature.
Magnetic resonance is the imaging modality of choice for the diagnosis of many diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and musculoskeletal system. For some disease states, no acceptable alternative diagnostic imaging method is available. MRI is not only a superior imaging and diagnostic modality for many disorders, but also does not expose patients to ionizing radiation as does CT. The number of patients living with permanent pacemakers or ICDs is well into the millions (some estimates are up to 4 million in the US), and continues to increase. Likewise, the use of MRI continues to rise annually in all patient groups, however, as people advance in age, they are the most likely to need an MRI scan. As the device population is disproportionally weighted towards the older population, it is exactly this group that has the greatest need for MRI scans, yet may be denied.
As noted in the MagnaSafe information, "To provide optimal care to the increasing number of patients with an implanted cardiac device, health care professionals must have the capability to perform MR imaging with minimal risk and full knowledge of the possible complications." This registry recreates the protocol, safety monitoring and follow up in a manner very similar to other registries. The intent is to provide not only data that will hopefully continue to support the use of MRI scanning in device patients, but to allow this essential imaging technique to be available to patients without the need to expose them to 2 otherwise unnecessary procedures of removal and replacement of the implanted device.
This is a physician and institutional based registry that will start with New York University Langone Medical Center as collaboration between the Division of Cardiology (Electrophysiology Section) and the Department of Radiology (MRI imaging section). It is anticipated that additional sites may join in the registry over time, FDA permitting. The protocol is based on the widely published "Hopkins protocol" as attached to this submission. Several thousand patients have safely been scanned using this technique which emphasizes patient safety. Patients are monitored by experienced device personnel (ACLS certified) for vital signs (non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, pulse oximeter, and cardiac rhythm monitor (EKG)) while performing scans on patients with implanted devices. Scans are done at a major medical center equipped to manage any device or heart rhythm based complication should one occur. Only patients for whom no other imaging technique will provide adequate information are allowed to be scanned. The latter must be attested to by the physician who requires the information, and agreed upon by the electrophysiologist and the radiologist. IRB approval and a written investigator agreement will be required of any centers that may eventually participate in this registry.
- Being tested
- MRI Scan
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MRI ScanRadiation
MRI will be performed for clinical reason for which no other imaging study will provide the data required on patients with pacemaker or implantable defibrillator
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Device function change relative to pre-scan function
Evaluation of the device post scan and then at 3 months post scan
Measured: Within 1 hour following the MRI Scan and at 3 months following the Scan
Lead function change relative to pre-scan function
Evaluation of the lead system 1 hour post scan and then at 3 months post scan
Measured: Within 1 hour following the MRI Scan and at 3 months following the Scan
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2016
- Primary completion1 Apr 2017
- Study completion1 Apr 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pacemaker MalfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by NYU Langone HealthThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 3 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NYU Langone Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02459379
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IDE G150066
- Acronym
- CIED-MRI
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 21 May 2015
- Last updated
- 9 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registry (CIED-MRI Registry)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02459379
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIED-MRI / IDE G150066
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Withdrawn
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NYU Langone HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective registry evaluating the safety of performing magnetic resonance (MRI) scans on patients who have cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs). This includes pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). This is not a a new device approval or new MRI scanner approval, only for a registry of patients who need to have an MRI scan who already have an FDA approved CIED that is not currently labeled for use in conjunction with an MRI scan. This registry is very similar to the previously approved MagnaSafe Registry that is now closed to new enrollment.
Detailed description
This Registry is an investigator initiated project designed to follow in the footsteps of the MagnaSafe Registry. MagaSafe was initiated to determine the risks of performing MRI for patients with pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs). The latter is closed to new enrollments as of April 2014; however, there is still a need to accumulate data on these devices. There is also a significant clinical need, in that patients who are insured by CMS are currently excluded from having MRI scans if they have a pacemaker or ICD. The only option available to them is to undergo removal of their entire system, have the MRI scan, and then have a new system implanted. This is impossible for many patients who are "pacemaker dependent". It also exposes the patient to a well-known risk of complication from the removal/extraction process as well as the re-implant procedure. This must be contrasted to the negligible risk of having an MRI scan with the device in place (assuming proper precautions are taken), based on MagaSafe data as well as a large body of supporting literature.
Magnetic resonance is the imaging modality of choice for the diagnosis of many diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and musculoskeletal system. For some disease states, no acceptable alternative diagnostic imaging method is available. MRI is not only a superior imaging and diagnostic modality for many disorders, but also does not expose patients to ionizing radiation as does CT. The number of patients living with permanent pacemakers or ICDs is well into the millions (some estimates are up to 4 million in the US), and continues to increase. Likewise, the use of MRI continues to rise annually in all patient groups, however, as people advance in age, they are the most likely to need an MRI scan. As the device population is disproportionally weighted towards the older population, it is exactly this group that has the greatest need for MRI scans, yet may be denied.
As noted in the MagnaSafe information, "To provide optimal care to the increasing number of patients with an implanted cardiac device, health care professionals must have the capability to perform MR imaging with minimal risk and full knowledge of the possible complications." This registry recreates the protocol, safety monitoring and follow up in a manner very similar to other registries. The intent is to provide not only data that will hopefully continue to support the use of MRI scanning in device patients, but to allow this essential imaging technique to be available to patients without the need to expose them to 2 otherwise unnecessary procedures of removal and replacement of the implanted device.
This is a physician and institutional based registry that will start with New York University Langone Medical Center as collaboration between the Division of Cardiology (Electrophysiology Section) and the Department of Radiology (MRI imaging section). It is anticipated that additional sites may join in the registry over time, FDA permitting. The protocol is based on the widely published "Hopkins protocol" as attached to this submission. Several thousand patients have safely been scanned using this technique which emphasizes patient safety. Patients are monitored by experienced device personnel (ACLS certified) for vital signs (non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, pulse oximeter, and cardiac rhythm monitor (EKG)) while performing scans on patients with implanted devices. Scans are done at a major medical center equipped to manage any device or heart rhythm based complication should one occur. Only patients for whom no other imaging technique will provide adequate information are allowed to be scanned. The latter must be attested to by the physician who requires the information, and agreed upon by the electrophysiologist and the radiologist. IRB approval and a written investigator agreement will be required of any centers that may eventually participate in this registry.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 3 Months
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with CIED that is not labeled as MRI Conditionally Safe that require an MRI scan for their clinical care.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female, age 18 or older
- Permanent pacemaker or ICD (single, dual or multichamber), generator implanted AFTER 2001
- Only non-MRI Conditionally Safe pacemakers and leads (but otherwise approved by the U.S. FDA ) will be included
- Clinical indication for MRI imaging for which no other imaging modality will give adequate results to manage the patient
- Device must have been implanted for 6 weeks or longer
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Presence of a lead without fixation (e.g. stand-alone SVC coil)
- Presence of abandoned lead(s)
- Presence of non-transvenous lead(s)
- Other contra-indications to MRI scan (e.g. certain metallic implants)
- Has an ICD, is pacemaker dependent, AND device not capable of asynchronous pacing mode
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MRI ScanMRI will be performed for clinical reason for which no other imaging study will provide the data required on patients with pacemaker or implantable defibrillator | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Device function change relative to pre-scan function
Time frame: Within 1 hour following the MRI Scan and at 3 months following the Scan
Evaluation of the device post scan and then at 3 months post scan
Lead function change relative to pre-scan function
Time frame: Within 1 hour following the MRI Scan and at 3 months following the Scan
Evaluation of the lead system 1 hour post scan and then at 3 months post scan
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Nov 2017.
Related trials for Pacemaker Malfunction
RecruitingObservational study
Product Performance Report: Evaluate Long-term Reliability & Performance of Medtronic Marketed Cardiac Therapy Products
Arrhythmia, Bradycardia
Recruiting
PrEcision Pacing in HFpEF: the PEP-HFpEF Trial
Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure New York Heart Association Class III
Recruiting
Danish Pragmatic Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effect of HeartLogic-Guided Management on Heart Failure Outcomes
Heart Failure
RecruitingObservational study
BIO|STREAM.CSP Study
Cardiac Pacing, Cardiac Pacemaker
Active, not recruiting
BIO|MASTER.CSP Study
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Cardiac Pacemaker, Artificial
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pacemaker Malfunction and Implantable Defibrillator Malfunction, run by NYU Langone Health.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Device function change relative to pre-scan function (time frame: Within 1 hour following the MRI Scan and at 3 months following the Scan). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Nov 2017.