Actinic KeratosisPhase 4NCT02464709
Daylight PDT for Actinic Keratoses: a Multicentre Study Comparing Two Photosensitizers (BF-200 ALA Versus MAL)
A Phase 4 study testing Aminolevulinic Acid and Methyl 5-aminolevulinate in people with Actinic Keratosis and Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy, run by Joint Authority for Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care at 3 sites in Finland.
Trial summary
This study compares two photosensitizing creams' BF-200 ALA's (aminolevulinic acid, Ameluz®) and MAL's (methyl 5-aminolevulinate, Metvix®) efficacy on actinic keratoses in natural daylight photodynamic therapy (NDL-PDT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Actinic Keratosis, Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Aminolevulinic Acid and Methyl 5-aminolevulinate
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesFinland
- Study dates
- Jun 2015to Oct 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with widespread AK lesions symmetrically on face or scalp (at least 3 actinic keratoses symmetrically on face or scalp)
- AKs of grade I-II
Who cannot join
- Thick grade III AKs
- Previous treatment for actinic keratosis on the same skin area during preceding 6 months
- Porfyria or solar dermatitis
- Allergy for photosensitizers used in the study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
- Impaired general condition (patient can't manage required 2 hours in sunlight outdoors)
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Finland3 sites
Päijät-Häme Central Hospital
Lahti
Tampere University Hospital
Tampere
Vaasa Central Hospital
Vaasa
About this study
Official title: Daylight Mediated Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses: a Multicentre Study Comparing Two Photosensitizers (BF-200 ALA Versus MAL)
This study compares two photosensitizing creams' BF-200 ALA's (aminolevulinic acid, Ameluz®) and MAL's (methyl 5-aminolevulinate, Metvix®) efficacy on actinic keratoses in natural daylight photodynamic therapy (NDL-PDT). The participants' facial skin or scalp will be randomized in two sides and one side is treated with BF-200 ALA and the other side with MAL. Result of the treatment is assessed with clinical examination 12 months after treatment. The investigators will also compare delayed skin reactions after treatment and cost-effectiveness of both photosensitizer creams.
Read the detailed description
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a widely used method in dermatology clinics for treatment of superficial skin cancers and premalignant lesions. Actinic keratoses (AKs) are premalignant skin lesions which develop due to long-lasting sun exposure and in time can progress into squamocellular skin cancer if left untreated. The incidence of AKs and skin cancers is rapidly booming as the elderly population increases in western countries. It is crucial to treat AKs early and effectively considering their tendency to progress into malign cancer. The current general consensus for treating AKs is to treat large sun-damaged skin areas simultaneously instead of separate AK lesions. Term "skin field cancerization" refers to presence of different degrees of visible and invisible dysplastic changes in widely sun-damaged skin. Natural daylight mediated photodynamic therapy (NDL-PDT) is a well-suited method for treating large field-cancerized skin areas.
In PDT a photosensitizing cream is applied on the skin and let to absorb. After absorption to the skin cells the photosensitizer changes into protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). PpIX reacts with visible light causing a phototoxic reaction which destroys cancer cells targetedly. After absorption the skin can be illuminated using a red lamp (conventional PDT) or natural daylight (NDL-PDT) as the absorption spectrum peaks of PpIX are within the visual spectrum of light.
In Finland the approved photosensitizers for PDT are methyl 5-aminolevulinate cream (MAL, Metvix®, Galderma) and aminolevulinic acid gel (BF-200 ALA, Ameluz®, Biofrontera AG). They both have been clinically studied and proved effective in conventional PDT but in NDL-PDT mainly MAL has been in focus of studies. To our knowledge there is only research report concerning the use of BF-200 ALA in NDL-PDT (Neittaanmaki-Perttu et al 2014) which is a study of our own research group. In this study BF-200 ALA appeared to be more effective than MAL.
- Being tested
- Aminolevulinic Acid, Methyl 5-aminolevulinate
- Keywords
- Actinic Keratosis, Photodynamic Therapy, Natural Daylight
- Medical subject headings
- Keratosis, Actinic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Aminolevulinic AcidDrug
Also called BF-200 ALA, Ameluz®
A 0,25mm-thick layer of BF-200 ALA (aminolevulinic acid, Ameluz®) light sensitizer gel is applied on one randomized treatment side of face.
Methyl 5-aminolevulinateDrug
Also called MAL, Metvix®
A 0,25mm-thick layer of MAL (methyl 5-aminolevulinate, Metvix®) light sensitizer cream is applied on one randomized treatment side of face.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Actinic keratosis patients | Experimental | Participant's AKs in facial skin or scalp are first clinically graded and demarcated in two symmetric treatment areas on different sides of face. The areas will be curettaged thinly and next a SPF20 sun protection cream is applied on all sun-exposed areas of the skin. Then a 0,25mm-thick layer of BF-200 ALA (aminolevulinic acid) gel is applied on one treatment side and MAL (methyl 5-aminolevulinate) cream on the other side. The sides will be randomized and the participant doesn't know which side is treated with which light sensitizer. After appropriate absorption time of 30 minutes the patients will be taken to the hospital balcony or yard for 2 hour illumination with natural daylight to accomplish the phototoxic reaction. Maximum dosage of light sensitizer will be 2 grams. Receives: Drug: Aminolevulinic Acid; Drug: Methyl 5-aminolevulinate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical healing of actinic keratoses
Participant's AKs in the treatment areas are counted and categorized clinically in three grades I-III (Olsen et al. 1991) before the NDL-PDT treatment. The clinical healing of actinic keratoses will be assessed by a dermatologist 12 months after the treatment.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Assessing pain experienced by participants: comparing the difference in symmetrical treatment areas of face or scalp
Participants will be asked to fill visual analogue scales (VAS) about pain experienced on both treatment sides of the face or scalp. Pain is assessed during the DL-PDT and after the treatment until the evening.
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2015
- Primary completionOct 2017
- Study completionOct 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Actinic KeratosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Joint Authority for Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Päijänne Tavastia Central Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland, Tampere University, STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority: Finland
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janne Rasanen, Lic. Med., Principal investigator, Päijänne Tavastia Central HospitalMari Gronroos, D.Med.Sc., Study director, Päijänne Tavastia Central HospitalNoora Neittaanmaki-Perttu, D.Med.Sc., Study chair, Helsinki University Central HospitalMari Salmivuori, Lic. Med., Study chair, Päijänne Tavastia Central HospitalLeea Ylitalo, D.Med.Sc., Study chair, Tampere University HospitalJohanna Hagman, D.Med.Sc., Study chair, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, FinlandIda Knutar, Lic. Med., Study chair, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02464709
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Q282dnro3/2015
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 29 May 2015
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Rasanen JE, Neittaanmaki N, Ylitalo L, Hagman J, Rissanen P, Ylianttila L, Salmivuori M, Snellman E, Gronroos M. 5-aminolaevulinic acid nanoemulsion is more effective than methyl-5-aminolaevulinate in daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a nonsponsored randomized double-blind multicentre trial. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Aug;181(2):265-274. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17311. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
PubMed 30329163
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Daylight Mediated Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses: a Multicentre Study Comparing Two Photosensitizers (BF-200 ALA Versus MAL)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02464709
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Q282dnro3/2015
- Keywords
- Actinic Keratosis, Photodynamic Therapy, Natural Daylight
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Joint Authority for Päijät-Häme Social and Health CareUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Päijänne Tavastia Central Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland, Tampere University, STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority: Finland
- Study start
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study compares two photosensitizing creams' BF-200 ALA's (aminolevulinic acid, Ameluz®) and MAL's (methyl 5-aminolevulinate, Metvix®) efficacy on actinic keratoses in natural daylight photodynamic therapy (NDL-PDT). The participants' facial skin or scalp will be randomized in two sides and one side is treated with BF-200 ALA and the other side with MAL. Result of the treatment is assessed with clinical examination 12 months after treatment. The investigators will also compare delayed skin reactions after treatment and cost-effectiveness of both photosensitizer creams.
Detailed description
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a widely used method in dermatology clinics for treatment of superficial skin cancers and premalignant lesions. Actinic keratoses (AKs) are premalignant skin lesions which develop due to long-lasting sun exposure and in time can progress into squamocellular skin cancer if left untreated. The incidence of AKs and skin cancers is rapidly booming as the elderly population increases in western countries. It is crucial to treat AKs early and effectively considering their tendency to progress into malign cancer. The current general consensus for treating AKs is to treat large sun-damaged skin areas simultaneously instead of separate AK lesions. Term "skin field cancerization" refers to presence of different degrees of visible and invisible dysplastic changes in widely sun-damaged skin. Natural daylight mediated photodynamic therapy (NDL-PDT) is a well-suited method for treating large field-cancerized skin areas.
In PDT a photosensitizing cream is applied on the skin and let to absorb. After absorption to the skin cells the photosensitizer changes into protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). PpIX reacts with visible light causing a phototoxic reaction which destroys cancer cells targetedly. After absorption the skin can be illuminated using a red lamp (conventional PDT) or natural daylight (NDL-PDT) as the absorption spectrum peaks of PpIX are within the visual spectrum of light.
In Finland the approved photosensitizers for PDT are methyl 5-aminolevulinate cream (MAL, Metvix®, Galderma) and aminolevulinic acid gel (BF-200 ALA, Ameluz®, Biofrontera AG). They both have been clinically studied and proved effective in conventional PDT but in NDL-PDT mainly MAL has been in focus of studies. To our knowledge there is only research report concerning the use of BF-200 ALA in NDL-PDT (Neittaanmaki-Perttu et al 2014) which is a study of our own research group. In this study BF-200 ALA appeared to be more effective than MAL.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Actinic keratosis patients | Experimental | Drug: Aminolevulinic Acid, Drug: Methyl 5-aminolevulinateParticipant's AKs in facial skin or scalp are first clinically graded and demarcated in two symmetric treatment areas on different sides of face. The areas will be curettaged thinly and next a SPF20 sun protection cream is applied on all sun-exposed areas of the skin. Then a 0,25mm-thick layer of BF-200 ALA (aminolevulinic acid) gel is applied on one treatment side and MAL (methyl 5-aminolevulinate) cream on the other side. The sides will be randomized and the participant doesn't know which side is treated with which light sensitizer. After appropriate absorption time of 30 minutes the patients will be taken to the hospital balcony or yard for 2 hour illumination with natural daylight to accomplish the phototoxic reaction. Maximum dosage of light sensitizer will be 2 grams. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with widespread AK lesions symmetrically on face or scalp (at least 3 actinic keratoses symmetrically on face or scalp)
- AKs of grade I-II
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Thick grade III AKs
- Previous treatment for actinic keratosis on the same skin area during preceding 6 months
- Porfyria or solar dermatitis
- Allergy for photosensitizers used in the study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Aminolevulinic AcidAlso: BF-200 ALA, Ameluz®A 0,25mm-thick layer of BF-200 ALA (aminolevulinic acid, Ameluz®) light sensitizer gel is applied on one randomized treatment side of face. | Drug | Actinic keratosis patients |
| Methyl 5-aminolevulinateAlso: MAL, Metvix®A 0,25mm-thick layer of MAL (methyl 5-aminolevulinate, Metvix®) light sensitizer cream is applied on one randomized treatment side of face. | Drug | Actinic keratosis patients |
Primary outcome
Clinical healing of actinic keratoses
Time frame: 12 months
Participant's AKs in the treatment areas are counted and categorized clinically in three grades I-III (Olsen et al. 1991) before the NDL-PDT treatment. The clinical healing of actinic keratoses will be assessed by a dermatologist 12 months after the treatment.
1 secondary outcome
Assessing pain experienced by participants: comparing the difference in symmetrical treatment areas of face or scalp
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 30329163Rasanen JE, Neittaanmaki N, Ylitalo L, Hagman J, Rissanen P, Ylianttila L, Salmivuori M, Snellman E, Gronroos M. 5-aminolaevulinic acid nanoemulsion is more effective than methyl-5-aminolaevulinate in daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a nonsponsored randomized double-blind multicentre trial. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Aug;181(2):265-274. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17311. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
Related trials for Actinic Keratosis
Not yet recruiting
Acupuncture Combined With Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Anxiety State
IBS, Constipation Predominant, Anxiety State
RecruitingPhase 3
Using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool for Melanoma Diagnosis
Malignant Melanoma of Skin, Other and Unspecified Malignant Neoplasm of Skin
RecruitingPhase 3
Basal Cell Carcinoma Chemoprevention Trial
Basal Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Cryotherapy in Combination With Red Light PDT for Actinic Keratosis of Full Face
Actinic Keratoses
Not yet recruiting
Therapeutic Induction of Dermal Remodeling in Veterans to Prevent Actinic Neoplasia Caused by Chronic Environmental Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer, Actinic Keratosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janne Rasanen, Lic. Med. principal investigator
Päijänne Tavastia Central Hospital
Mari Gronroos, D.Med.Sc. study director
Päijänne Tavastia Central Hospital
Noora Neittaanmaki-Perttu, D.Med.Sc. study chair
Helsinki University Central Hospital
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Aminolevulinic Acid and Methyl 5-aminolevulinate in people with Actinic Keratosis and Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy, run by Joint Authority for Päijät-Häme Social and Health Care at 3 sites in Finland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical healing of actinic keratoses (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02464709, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2019.