Heel Fat Pad AtrophyNCT02465333
Fat Grafting and Retention for Heel Fat Pad Atrophy
A study testing Heel Fat Grafting in people with Heel Fat Pad Atrophy, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Plantar heel pain is the most common problem of the foot. Plantar fasciitis is the leading cause of this pain, accounting for 11-15% of all foot symptoms seeking professional care, and occurs in 10% of the US population. The cause of heel pain can be from bone, soft tissue, nerve, or systemic disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heel Fat Pad Atrophy
- What is being tested?
- Heel Fat Grafting
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2015to Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 years or older and able to provide informed consent
- Patients with foot pain at the plantar surface of the foot near the head of the metacarpals
- 6 months post any surgical intervention to the foot
- Willing and able to comply with follow up examinations, including ultrasounds and pedobarographic studies
Who cannot join
- Age less than 18 years
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Feet with open ulcerations or osteomyelitis
- Poorly controlled Diabetics with hemoglobinA1C > 7.
- Active infection anywhere in the body
- Diagnosed with cancer within the last 12 months and /or presently receiving chemotherapy or radiation treatment
Show all 11Show fewer
- Known coagulopathy
- Systemic disease that would render the fat harvest and injection procedure, along with associated anesthesia, unsafe to the patient.
- Pregnancy
- Subjects with a diagnosis of Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder (Subjects who are found to be stable on medication and receive psychiatric clearance could be eligible for study participation per the Physician's discretion).
- Tobacco use: Last use within 1 year per patient report
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UPMC Department of Plastic Surgery
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
About this study
Plantar heel pain is the most common problem of the foot. Plantar fasciitis is the leading cause of this pain, accounting for 11-15% of all foot symptoms seeking professional care, and occurs in 10% of the US population. The cause of heel pain can be from bone, soft tissue, nerve, or systemic disease. The second most common cause of heel pain is fat pad atrophy, followed by a combination of both fat pad atrophy and plantar fasciitis. [1-4] Fat pad displacement may be seen in the heel as well.
Current treatments for plantar fasciitis include stretching and external support with orthotics with the goal of reducing local pressure as well as tissue breakdown.[5] However, patient compliance with extrinsic devices is challenging, and they may experience increased friction, irritation and breakdown at a different location on the foot due to thickness of the device in the shoe. Also, the patient must replace the device as soon as it breaks down but the breakdown often goes unnoticed. Failure of conservative management may lead to treatment with steroids or surgical intervention by endoscopic plantar fasciotomy, open fasciotomy or excision of bone spurs. Injection of steroids can instigate or exacerbate pre-existing heel fat pad atrophy. Autologous fat grafting to the heel may reduce plantar pressures, and thus serve as a treatment for heel pain. Autologous fat grafting is currently under investigation for a myriad of clinical scenarios.[6-19] Even though autologous fat grafting is not yet an established therapeutic approach for the cited indications, some of the reported results have been intriguing.[19] The variable resorption of fat, however, is an important confounding factor in all these studies. Currently the literature reports fat retention rates ranging from 25% to 80%.[20]
The specific aim of this study is to assess the adipose stem cell characteristics in patients undergoing autologous fat grafting for heel fat pad atrophy and correlate these characteristics with fat retention. Data from this study will help determine the characteristics of the adipose stem cells in this population and open the door to additional studies. This pilot study will also help build new collaborative efforts between Foot and Ankle Specialists, Plastic Surgery, and Adipose Stem Cell Biologists, combining biomechanical expertise with fat grafting and basic science expertise.
Read the detailed description
With the growth of the investigators diabetic and geriatric populations today, greater demand is being placed on the medical arena to treat their complications. There is currently no effective treatment for diabetic neuropathy which is one of the leading reasons for the development of diabetic ulcerations with high peak plantar pressure. An optical pedobarograph has been used to help study the pressures under the foot.[24] By minimizing high peak plantar pressures through autologous fat transfer, pain and skin lesions have the potential to be minimized.
Restoring the plantar fat pad with autologous fat grafting has the potential to improve foot function, decrease foot pain, bone pain, and nerve pain in the sensate foot and potentially decrease the incidence of foot ulceration in diabetics. It also serves to increase shock absorption during gait. Research has shown greater viability and cellular function with fat grafts processed using the Coleman technique than with other techniques.[25] It is the investigators aim to implement the Coleman technique to increase pedal shock absorption on a long term basis. Increasing shock absorption is prophylactic for reducing calcaneal contusions and stress fractures. By limiting an antalgic, compensatory gait, this will limit injury to the patient's superstructure and/or the contralateral foot and leg, ultimately improving the patient's overall systemic health.
By minimizing high peak plantar pressures through autologous fat transfer, more severe diabetic complications may be minimized. Heel fat pad augmentation may reduce ulcer formation and/or reformation, and reduce the subsequent comorbid conditions of osteomyelitis and amputation. Typically, ulceration due to bone prominence may be best treated by surgical resection of the prominent bone. However, there exists a population of diabetics that will have a greater chance of developing an acute Charcot event post-surgery or transfer lesions that will ultimately break down. Transfer lesions and re-ulceration is considered a common complication after diabetic foot ulcer surgery.[26] Also some patients may not be medically stable making an aggressive osseous surgical procedure inadvisable. If autologous fat grafting does prove to be effective in the foot, it could become a concomitant procedure performed with osseous procedures for a target population of diabetics to limit transfer lesions and ulceration post operatively.
If the proposed aims are achieved, patients will be able to have long lasting reconstruction of the heel fat pad with a minimally invasive procedure using autologous tissue. The ultimate costs of maintaining specialized extrinsic padding, shoe gear, and issues with patient compliance can be reduced or eliminated. It could potentially save the medical arena the costs of treating diabetic ulcerations and the resultant complications. The need for other fillers such as silicone which can migrate and involve lymph nodes can be eliminated, as can the need for repeat injections of other temporary fillers which are currently used without any evidence-based medicine. This project will improve scientific knowledge, technical capability, and clinical practice in both the field of plastic surgery and podiatry. Not only will it influence these fields, but augmenting the heel fat pad has the potential to benefit diabetics, geriatric patients, Wounded Warriors with amputations whom have differential loading of their remaining lower extremity, athletes, and cosmetic patients who would like a more active lifestyle than their current foot pain allows.
Determining the intrinsic fat properties that lead to a consistent and high fat retention rate can have an enormous impact on the current clinical field of fat grafting. Over 80,000 autologous fat grafting procedures were documented in 2013 by The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.[27] Determining the factors related to fat retention can aid surgeons in determining the potential amount of fat that may be necessary for optimizing retention, and potentially avoid need for recurrent treatments. Further on, this data would also allow bioengineers to specifically develop fillers using the constituents known to be of importance for the final retention. This project will increase scientific knowledge, technical capability, and improve clinical collaboration between Foot and Ankle Specialists, Plastic Surgeons, and Adipose Stem Cell Biologists.
- Conditions
- Heel Fat Pad Atrophy
- Being tested
- Heel Fat Grafting
- Keywords
- heel, atrophy, fat, adipose tissue, fat pad
- Medical subject headings
- Atrophy, Platelet Glycoprotein IV Deficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Heel Fat GraftingProcedure or surgery
Fat grafting is widely used by plastic surgeons and is considered a standard of care procedure in plastic surgery. Fat tissue to be used for grafting is harvested with a small liposuction cannula. The fat is then centrifuged, cleaned, and loaded into 1cc syringes and injected into the heel fat pad using specialized cannulas.
Postoperatively, the foot will be bandaged for twenty-four hours and the subject will be advised to limit ambulation. Over the next three weeks, the patient will be instructed to wear a cushioned, supportive sneaker and participate in only activities of normal daily living, with no excessive aerobic activity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pathway A | Other | Screening visit followed by heel fat grafting procedure with local anesthetic and visits at:
1 week Post op study visit 2 (1 month) Post op study visit 3 (2 month) Post op study visit 4 (6 month) Post op study visit 5 (12 month) Crossover to standard podiatry visits Study visit 6 (18 months) Study visit 7 (24 months) Receives: Procedure: Heel Fat Grafting |
| Pathway B | Other | Screening visit followed by:
Study visit 1 (6 months) Study Visit 2 (12 months) Crossover to Pathway A
Heel fat grafting procedure and local anesthetic and visits at:
1 week Post op study visit 2 (1 month post procedure) Post op study visit 3 (2 month post procedure) Post op study visit 4 (6 month post procedure) Post op study visit 5 (12 month post procedure) Receives: Procedure: Heel Fat Grafting |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pedobarograph to measure foot pressure
Change in foot pressure will be measured on the pedobarograph in kg/cm2 or psi. These measures will be performed before and after treatment with fat grafting to assess changes over time.
Measured: baseline and 2 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Adipose stem cell counts
Extra fat from the liposuction procedure will be sent for adipose stem cell analysis to correlate to retention of the fat over time.
Measured: baseline and 2 years
Ultrasound to measure tissue thickness
Tissue thickness will be measured by ultrasound as mm. These measures will be performed before and after treatment with fat grafting to assess changes over time.
Measured: baseline 2 years
Manchester Foot Disability Index for pain
Pain will be evaluated with the Manchester Foot Disability Index.These measures will be performed before and after treatment with fat grafting to assess changes over time.
Measured: baseline and 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2015
- Primary completionJun 2021
- Study completionJul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heel Fat Pad AtrophyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PittsburghThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jeffrey A. Gusenoff, MD, University of Pittsburgh
- Investigators
- Jeffrey A Gusenoff, MD, Principal investigator, University of Pittsburgh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02465333
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRO14110358
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 27 May 2015
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bowling FL, Metcalfe SA, Wu S, Boulton AJ, Armstrong DG. Liquid silicone to mitigate plantar pedal pressure: a literature review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;4(4):846-52. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400412.
PubMed 20663447Abouaesha F, van Schie CH, Armstrong DG, Boulton AJ. Plantar soft-tissue thickness predicts high peak plantar pressure in the diabetic foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2004 Jan-Feb;94(1):39-42. doi: 10.7547/87507315-94-1-39.
PubMed 14729989Abouaesha F, van Schie CH, Griffths GD, Young RJ, Boulton AJ. Plantar tissue thickness is related to peak plantar pressure in the high-risk diabetic foot. Diabetes Care. 2001 Jul;24(7):1270-4. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.7.1270.
PubMed 11423514Boulton AJ, Franks CI, Betts RP, Duckworth T, Ward JD. Reduction of abnormal foot pressures in diabetic neuropathy using a new polymer insole material. Diabetes Care. 1984 Jan-Feb;7(1):42-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.7.1.42.
PubMed 6546713Young MJ, Cavanagh PR, Thomas G, Johnson MM, Murray H, Boulton AJ. The effect of callus removal on dynamic plantar foot pressures in diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 1992 Jan-Feb;9(1):55-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1992.tb01714.x.
PubMed 1551311Chairman EL. Restoration of the plantar fat pad with autolipotransplantation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1994 Jul-Aug;33(4):373-9.
PubMed 7951190van Schie CH, Whalley A, Armstrong DG, Vileikyte L, Boulton AJ. The effect of silicone injections in the diabetic foot on peak plantar pressure and plantar tissue thickness: a 2-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jul;83(7):919-23. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.33058.
PubMed 12098150Pu LLQ, Coleman SR, Cui X, Ferguson REH Jr, Vasconez HC. Autologous fat grafts harvested and refined by the Coleman technique: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Sep;122(3):932-937. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181811ff0.
PubMed 18766062Kwan RL, Zheng YP, Cheing GL. The effect of aging on the biomechanical properties of plantar soft tissues. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Jul;25(6):601-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 May 8.
PubMed 20457479Veves A, Boulton AJ. The optical pedobarograph. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1993 Jul;10(3):463-70.
PubMed 8364849Walter Stephen Snyder 1909-1977. Health Phys. 1978 Jan;34(1):1-2. No abstract available.
PubMed 340428Balkin SW. Injectable silicone and the foot: a 41-year clinical and histologic history. Dermatol Surg. 2005 Nov;31(11 Pt 2):1555-9; discussion 1560. doi: 10.2310/6350.2005.31241.
PubMed 16416638van Schie CH, Whalley A, Vileikyte L, Wignall T, Hollis S, Boulton AJ. Efficacy of injected liquid silicone in the diabetic foot to reduce risk factors for ulceration: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2000 May;23(5):634-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.5.634.
PubMed 10834422Nicoletti G, Brenta F, Jaber O, Laberinti E, Faga A. Lipofilling for functional reconstruction of the sole of the foot. Foot (Edinb). 2014 Mar;24(1):21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
PubMed 24656457Hsu CC, Tsai WC, Hsiao TY, Tseng FY, Shau YW, Wang CL, Lin SC. Diabetic effects on microchambers and macrochambers tissue properties in human heel pads. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009 Oct;24(8):682-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
PubMed 19619918
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Fat Grafting and Retention for Heel Fat Pad Atrophy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02465333
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRO14110358
- Conditions
- Heel Fat Pad Atrophy
- Keywords
- heel, atrophy, fat, adipose tissue, fat pad
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PittsburghUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2015
- Primary completion
- Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Plantar heel pain is the most common problem of the foot. Plantar fasciitis is the leading cause of this pain, accounting for 11-15% of all foot symptoms seeking professional care, and occurs in 10% of the US population. The cause of heel pain can be from bone, soft tissue, nerve, or systemic disease. The second most common cause of heel pain is fat pad atrophy, followed by a combination of both fat pad atrophy and plantar fasciitis. [1-4] Fat pad displacement may be seen in the heel as well.
Current treatments for plantar fasciitis include stretching and external support with orthotics with the goal of reducing local pressure as well as tissue breakdown.[5] However, patient compliance with extrinsic devices is challenging, and they may experience increased friction, irritation and breakdown at a different location on the foot due to thickness of the device in the shoe. Also, the patient must replace the device as soon as it breaks down but the breakdown often goes unnoticed. Failure of conservative management may lead to treatment with steroids or surgical intervention by endoscopic plantar fasciotomy, open fasciotomy or excision of bone spurs. Injection of steroids can instigate or exacerbate pre-existing heel fat pad atrophy. Autologous fat grafting to the heel may reduce plantar pressures, and thus serve as a treatment for heel pain. Autologous fat grafting is currently under investigation for a myriad of clinical scenarios.[6-19] Even though autologous fat grafting is not yet an established therapeutic approach for the cited indications, some of the reported results have been intriguing.[19] The variable resorption of fat, however, is an important confounding factor in all these studies. Currently the literature reports fat retention rates ranging from 25% to 80%.[20]
The specific aim of this study is to assess the adipose stem cell characteristics in patients undergoing autologous fat grafting for heel fat pad atrophy and correlate these characteristics with fat retention. Data from this study will help determine the characteristics of the adipose stem cells in this population and open the door to additional studies. This pilot study will also help build new collaborative efforts between Foot and Ankle Specialists, Plastic Surgery, and Adipose Stem Cell Biologists, combining biomechanical expertise with fat grafting and basic science expertise.
Detailed description
With the growth of the investigators diabetic and geriatric populations today, greater demand is being placed on the medical arena to treat their complications. There is currently no effective treatment for diabetic neuropathy which is one of the leading reasons for the development of diabetic ulcerations with high peak plantar pressure. An optical pedobarograph has been used to help study the pressures under the foot.[24] By minimizing high peak plantar pressures through autologous fat transfer, pain and skin lesions have the potential to be minimized.
Restoring the plantar fat pad with autologous fat grafting has the potential to improve foot function, decrease foot pain, bone pain, and nerve pain in the sensate foot and potentially decrease the incidence of foot ulceration in diabetics. It also serves to increase shock absorption during gait. Research has shown greater viability and cellular function with fat grafts processed using the Coleman technique than with other techniques.[25] It is the investigators aim to implement the Coleman technique to increase pedal shock absorption on a long term basis. Increasing shock absorption is prophylactic for reducing calcaneal contusions and stress fractures. By limiting an antalgic, compensatory gait, this will limit injury to the patient's superstructure and/or the contralateral foot and leg, ultimately improving the patient's overall systemic health.
By minimizing high peak plantar pressures through autologous fat transfer, more severe diabetic complications may be minimized. Heel fat pad augmentation may reduce ulcer formation and/or reformation, and reduce the subsequent comorbid conditions of osteomyelitis and amputation. Typically, ulceration due to bone prominence may be best treated by surgical resection of the prominent bone. However, there exists a population of diabetics that will have a greater chance of developing an acute Charcot event post-surgery or transfer lesions that will ultimately break down. Transfer lesions and re-ulceration is considered a common complication after diabetic foot ulcer surgery.[26] Also some patients may not be medically stable making an aggressive osseous surgical procedure inadvisable. If autologous fat grafting does prove to be effective in the foot, it could become a concomitant procedure performed with osseous procedures for a target population of diabetics to limit transfer lesions and ulceration post operatively.
If the proposed aims are achieved, patients will be able to have long lasting reconstruction of the heel fat pad with a minimally invasive procedure using autologous tissue. The ultimate costs of maintaining specialized extrinsic padding, shoe gear, and issues with patient compliance can be reduced or eliminated. It could potentially save the medical arena the costs of treating diabetic ulcerations and the resultant complications. The need for other fillers such as silicone which can migrate and involve lymph nodes can be eliminated, as can the need for repeat injections of other temporary fillers which are currently used without any evidence-based medicine. This project will improve scientific knowledge, technical capability, and clinical practice in both the field of plastic surgery and podiatry. Not only will it influence these fields, but augmenting the heel fat pad has the potential to benefit diabetics, geriatric patients, Wounded Warriors with amputations whom have differential loading of their remaining lower extremity, athletes, and cosmetic patients who would like a more active lifestyle than their current foot pain allows.
Determining the intrinsic fat properties that lead to a consistent and high fat retention rate can have an enormous impact on the current clinical field of fat grafting. Over 80,000 autologous fat grafting procedures were documented in 2013 by The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.[27] Determining the factors related to fat retention can aid surgeons in determining the potential amount of fat that may be necessary for optimizing retention, and potentially avoid need for recurrent treatments. Further on, this data would also allow bioengineers to specifically develop fillers using the constituents known to be of importance for the final retention. This project will increase scientific knowledge, technical capability, and improve clinical collaboration between Foot and Ankle Specialists, Plastic Surgeons, and Adipose Stem Cell Biologists.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pathway A | Other | Procedure: Heel Fat GraftingScreening visit followed by heel fat grafting procedure with local anesthetic and visits at: 1 week Post op study visit 2 (1 month) Post op study visit 3 (2 month) Post op study visit 4 (6 month) Post op study visit 5 (12 month) Crossover to standard podiatry visits Study visit 6 (18 months) Study visit 7 (24 months) |
| Pathway B | Other | Procedure: Heel Fat GraftingScreening visit followed by: Study visit 1 (6 months) Study Visit 2 (12 months) Crossover to Pathway A Heel fat grafting procedure and local anesthetic and visits at: 1 week Post op study visit 2 (1 month post procedure) Post op study visit 3 (2 month post procedure) Post op study visit 4 (6 month post procedure) Post op study visit 5 (12 month post procedure) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Aged 18 years or older and able to provide informed consent
- Patients with foot pain at the plantar surface of the foot near the head of the metacarpals
- 6 months post any surgical intervention to the foot
- Willing and able to comply with follow up examinations, including ultrasounds and pedobarographic studies
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Age less than 18 years
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Feet with open ulcerations or osteomyelitis
- Poorly controlled Diabetics with hemoglobinA1C > 7.
- Active infection anywhere in the body
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Heel Fat GraftingFat grafting is widely used by plastic surgeons and is considered a standard of care procedure in plastic surgery. Fat tissue to be used for grafting is harvested with a small liposuction cannula. The fat is then centrifuged, cleaned, and loaded into 1cc syringes and injected into the heel fat pad using specialized cannulas. Postoperatively, the foot will be bandaged for twenty-four hours and the subject will be advised to limit ambulation. Over the next three weeks, the patient will be instructed to wear a cushioned, supportive sneaker and participate in only activities of normal daily living, with no excessive aerobic activity. | Procedure or surgery | Pathway A, Pathway B |
Primary outcome
Pedobarograph to measure foot pressure
Time frame: baseline and 2 years
Change in foot pressure will be measured on the pedobarograph in kg/cm2 or psi. These measures will be performed before and after treatment with fat grafting to assess changes over time.
3 secondary outcomes
Adipose stem cell counts
Time frame: baseline and 2 years
Ultrasound to measure tissue thickness
Time frame: baseline 2 years
Manchester Foot Disability Index for pain
Time frame: baseline and 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 20663447Bowling FL, Metcalfe SA, Wu S, Boulton AJ, Armstrong DG. Liquid silicone to mitigate plantar pedal pressure: a literature review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;4(4):846-52. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400412.
- Background: PubMed 14729989Abouaesha F, van Schie CH, Armstrong DG, Boulton AJ. Plantar soft-tissue thickness predicts high peak plantar pressure in the diabetic foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2004 Jan-Feb;94(1):39-42. doi: 10.7547/87507315-94-1-39.
- Background: PubMed 11423514Abouaesha F, van Schie CH, Griffths GD, Young RJ, Boulton AJ. Plantar tissue thickness is related to peak plantar pressure in the high-risk diabetic foot. Diabetes Care. 2001 Jul;24(7):1270-4. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.7.1270.
- Background: PubMed 6546713Boulton AJ, Franks CI, Betts RP, Duckworth T, Ward JD. Reduction of abnormal foot pressures in diabetic neuropathy using a new polymer insole material. Diabetes Care. 1984 Jan-Feb;7(1):42-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.7.1.42.
- Background: PubMed 1551311Young MJ, Cavanagh PR, Thomas G, Johnson MM, Murray H, Boulton AJ. The effect of callus removal on dynamic plantar foot pressures in diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 1992 Jan-Feb;9(1):55-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1992.tb01714.x.
- Background: PubMed 7951190Chairman EL. Restoration of the plantar fat pad with autolipotransplantation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1994 Jul-Aug;33(4):373-9.
- Background: PubMed 12098150van Schie CH, Whalley A, Armstrong DG, Vileikyte L, Boulton AJ. The effect of silicone injections in the diabetic foot on peak plantar pressure and plantar tissue thickness: a 2-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jul;83(7):919-23. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.33058.
- Background: PubMed 18766062Pu LLQ, Coleman SR, Cui X, Ferguson REH Jr, Vasconez HC. Autologous fat grafts harvested and refined by the Coleman technique: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Sep;122(3):932-937. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181811ff0.
- Background: PubMed 20457479Kwan RL, Zheng YP, Cheing GL. The effect of aging on the biomechanical properties of plantar soft tissues. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Jul;25(6):601-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 May 8.
- Background: PubMed 8364849Veves A, Boulton AJ. The optical pedobarograph. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1993 Jul;10(3):463-70.
- Background: PubMed 340428Walter Stephen Snyder 1909-1977. Health Phys. 1978 Jan;34(1):1-2. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16416638Balkin SW. Injectable silicone and the foot: a 41-year clinical and histologic history. Dermatol Surg. 2005 Nov;31(11 Pt 2):1555-9; discussion 1560. doi: 10.2310/6350.2005.31241.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeffrey A Gusenoff, MD principal investigator
University of Pittsburgh
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Heel Fat Grafting in people with Heel Fat Pad Atrophy, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pedobarograph to measure foot pressure (time frame: baseline and 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02465333, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.