Acute StrokeNCT02465346
"Mobile Stroke Unit"-Concept for Delivery of Specialized Acute Stroke Care to Patients in Remote Areas
A study testing MSU-based stroke management in people with Acute Stroke, run by University Hospital, Saarland at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Treatment of acute stroke must be fast. The aim of this trial is to show feasibility, safety and clinical benefit of a strategy of diagnosis and treatment directly at the emergency site for hyperacute treatment and transfer to the most appropriate target hospital. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Stroke
- What is being tested?
- MSU-based stroke management
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 116 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Jun 2015to Feb 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Symptoms of acute stroke reported to the EMS dispatcher office (extended FAST Score, Table I) and verified by the EMS (after glucose testing)
- Reported onset of symptoms until call ≤ 8 hours
- Patients with "wake up stroke"
- Age older than 18 years
- Patient (or representative) is willing to participate voluntarily and to sign a written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Cardiopulmonary unstable medical conditions requiring immediate treatment in an intensive care unit
- Patients with preexisting severe functional impairment and disease
- Known allergy or contraindications to contrast agents
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Department of Neurology, University Hospital of the Saarland
Homburg/Saar, Saarland, 66424
About this study
Treatment of acute stroke must be fast. The aim of this trial is to show feasibility, safety and clinical benefit of a strategy of diagnosis and treatment directly at the emergency site for hyperacute treatment and transfer to the most appropriate target hospital. The effects on reduction delays until different stroke treatments will be assessed. First estimations of cost-effectiveness will also be performed.
Read the detailed description
Stroke is a medical emergency for which "time-is-brain". Indeed, a huge body of animal experimental and clinical evidence exists that demonstrates that reducing the time to thrombolytic therapy is the most important variable in prevention of the disability. However, most stroke patients arrive to hospital too late for any type of acute stroke treatment: Only an estimated 19-60% of stroke patients present within 3 hours after symptom onset. Today, for stroke patients 3 different treatment options exist.
- Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is an effective treatment for many acute stroke patients as evidenced by several large randomized trials.
- More recently, mechanical clot removal via catheters has been developed. There is currently increasing evidence that in obstruction of large brain vessels such endovascular treatment is superior to systemic thrombolysis in regard to recanalization rates and outcome.
- Patients with intracranial hemorrhage can profit if transferred to hospitals with neurosurgical treatment options such as ventricular drainage or hematoma removal.
However, each of these treatment are highly time sensitive and due the availability of endovascular and neurosurgical treatment options only in very few highly specialized neurovascular centres decision in which institution the patient should be transported is of high medical and financial relevance. The aim of this trial is to show feasibility, safety and clinical benefit of a strategy of diagnosis and treatment directly at the emergency site and its role in decision regarding transfer to appropriate target institution, thus potentially allowing reduction of time until treatment and delays until specialized treatment also in remote regions. First estimations of cost-effectiveness will also be performed.
- Conditions
- Acute Stroke
- Being tested
- MSU-based stroke management, Control stroke management
- Keywords
- acute stroke, prehospital, treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MSU-based stroke managementDevice
Prehospital stroke treatment with a mobile stroke unit
Control stroke managementDevice
Conventional stroke management
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MSU-based stroke management | Experimental | The Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) and the conventional emergency medical Service (EMS) will meet at the emergency site. The patient's medical history, the physical examination will directly be performed by a physician. Laboratory tests will be analyzed by a point of care laboratory. CT will be performed. After performance of the acute stroke diagnostic work-up the patients and, if indicated thrombolysis, the patient will be transported according to the diagnostic results: Stroke due to large vessel occlusion or to intracranial hemorrhage-> Neurovascular centre; Stroke without large vessel occlusion or without hemorrhage-> primary hospital with regional stroke unit. Receives: Device: MSU-based stroke management |
| Control stroke management | Active comparator | After performing patient's medical history, physical examination (reassessment of the extended Face Arm Speech Time score) and glucose testing by the (stroke trained) emergency personnel, the patient will be transported according to current best clinical practice and relevant guidelines to the next stroke unit or neurovascular centre. The hospital stroke team will be prenotified by the EMS. According to the patients needs the patient might be further transferred. Receives: Device: Control stroke management |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of stroke patients with accurate decision regarding transfer to the most appropriate target hospital
Measured: within 3 month
Secondary outcomes (7)
Proportion of patients with large vessel occlusion a) being directly transferred to a neurovascular centre, and b) being evaluated/ treated by an interventionalist
Measured: within 3 month
Time between symptom onset/alarm and evaluation/treatment by an interventional radiologist in case of large vessel occlusion
Measured: within 3 month
Proportion of patients with haemorrhage being a) directly transferred to a neurovascular centre, and being b) evaluated/treated by a neurosurgeon.
Measured: within 3 month
Time between symptom onset/alarm and evaluation/treatment by a neurosurgeon in case of haemorrhage
Measured: within 3 month
Proportion of patients treated with rt-PA and time between symptom onset/ alarm and start of thrombolysis
Measured: within 3 month
Functional neurological status (mRS) (D7, D90)
Measured: within 3 month
Proportion of secondary transfers of stroke patients between primary stroke unit and neurovascular centre in all stroke patients, and in subgroups with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke
Measured: within 3 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2015
- Primary completionNov 2017
- Study completionFeb 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 116 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Saarland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Klaus C Fassbender, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Neurology, Saarland University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02465346
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- USaarland
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 31 May 2015
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Walter S, Kostopoulos P, Haass A, Keller I, Lesmeister M, Schlechtriemen T, Roth C, Papanagiotou P, Grunwald I, Schumacher H, Helwig S, Viera J, Korner H, Alexandrou M, Yilmaz U, Ziegler K, Schmidt K, Dabew R, Kubulus D, Liu Y, Volk T, Kronfeld K, Ruckes C, Bertsch T, Reith W, Fassbender K. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012 May;11(5):397-404. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70057-1. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
PubMed 22497929Helwig SA, Ragoschke-Schumm A, Schwindling L, Kettner M, Roumia S, Kulikovski J, Keller I, Manitz M, Martens D, Grun D, Walter S, Lesmeister M, Ewen K, Brand J, Fousse M, Kauffmann J, Zimmer VC, Mathur S, Bertsch T, Guldner J, Magull-Seltenreich A, Binder A, Spuntrup E, Chatzikonstantinou A, Adam O, Kronfeld K, Liu Y, Ruckes C, Schumacher H, Grunwald IQ, Yilmaz U, Schlechtriemen T, Reith W, Fassbender K. Prehospital Stroke Management Optimized by Use of Clinical Scoring vs Mobile Stroke Unit for Triage of Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1484-1492. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2829.
PubMed 31479116
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- "Mobile Stroke Unit"-Concept for Delivery of Specialized Acute Stroke Care to Patients in Remote Areas
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02465346
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- USaarland
- Conditions
- Acute Stroke
- Keywords
- acute stroke, prehospital, treatment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 116 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, SaarlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Treatment of acute stroke must be fast. The aim of this trial is to show feasibility, safety and clinical benefit of a strategy of diagnosis and treatment directly at the emergency site for hyperacute treatment and transfer to the most appropriate target hospital. The effects on reduction delays until different stroke treatments will be assessed. First estimations of cost-effectiveness will also be performed.
Detailed description
Stroke is a medical emergency for which "time-is-brain". Indeed, a huge body of animal experimental and clinical evidence exists that demonstrates that reducing the time to thrombolytic therapy is the most important variable in prevention of the disability. However, most stroke patients arrive to hospital too late for any type of acute stroke treatment: Only an estimated 19-60% of stroke patients present within 3 hours after symptom onset. Today, for stroke patients 3 different treatment options exist.
- Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is an effective treatment for many acute stroke patients as evidenced by several large randomized trials.
- More recently, mechanical clot removal via catheters has been developed. There is currently increasing evidence that in obstruction of large brain vessels such endovascular treatment is superior to systemic thrombolysis in regard to recanalization rates and outcome.
- Patients with intracranial hemorrhage can profit if transferred to hospitals with neurosurgical treatment options such as ventricular drainage or hematoma removal.
However, each of these treatment are highly time sensitive and due the availability of endovascular and neurosurgical treatment options only in very few highly specialized neurovascular centres decision in which institution the patient should be transported is of high medical and financial relevance. The aim of this trial is to show feasibility, safety and clinical benefit of a strategy of diagnosis and treatment directly at the emergency site and its role in decision regarding transfer to appropriate target institution, thus potentially allowing reduction of time until treatment and delays until specialized treatment also in remote regions. First estimations of cost-effectiveness will also be performed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MSU-based stroke management | Experimental | Device: MSU-based stroke managementThe Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) and the conventional emergency medical Service (EMS) will meet at the emergency site. The patient's medical history, the physical examination will directly be performed by a physician. Laboratory tests will be analyzed by a point of care laboratory. CT will be performed. After performance of the acute stroke diagnostic work-up the patients and, if indicated thrombolysis, the patient will be transported according to the diagnostic results: Stroke due to large vessel occlusion or to intracranial hemorrhage-> Neurovascular centre; Stroke without large vessel occlusion or without hemorrhage-> primary hospital with regional stroke unit. |
| Control stroke management | Active comparator | Device: Control stroke managementAfter performing patient's medical history, physical examination (reassessment of the extended Face Arm Speech Time score) and glucose testing by the (stroke trained) emergency personnel, the patient will be transported according to current best clinical practice and relevant guidelines to the next stroke unit or neurovascular centre. The hospital stroke team will be prenotified by the EMS. According to the patients needs the patient might be further transferred. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 95 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Symptoms of acute stroke reported to the EMS dispatcher office (extended FAST Score, Table I) and verified by the EMS (after glucose testing)
- Reported onset of symptoms until call ≤ 8 hours
- Patients with "wake up stroke"
- Age older than 18 years
- Patient (or representative) is willing to participate voluntarily and to sign a written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Cardiopulmonary unstable medical conditions requiring immediate treatment in an intensive care unit
- Patients with preexisting severe functional impairment and disease
- Known allergy or contraindications to contrast agents
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MSU-based stroke managementPrehospital stroke treatment with a mobile stroke unit | Device | MSU-based stroke management |
| Control stroke managementConventional stroke management | Device | Control stroke management |
Primary outcome
Proportion of stroke patients with accurate decision regarding transfer to the most appropriate target hospital
Time frame: within 3 month
7 secondary outcomes
Proportion of patients with large vessel occlusion a) being directly transferred to a neurovascular centre, and b) being evaluated/ treated by an interventionalist
Time frame: within 3 month
Time between symptom onset/alarm and evaluation/treatment by an interventional radiologist in case of large vessel occlusion
Time frame: within 3 month
Proportion of patients with haemorrhage being a) directly transferred to a neurovascular centre, and being b) evaluated/treated by a neurosurgeon.
Time frame: within 3 month
Time between symptom onset/alarm and evaluation/treatment by a neurosurgeon in case of haemorrhage
Time frame: within 3 month
Proportion of patients treated with rt-PA and time between symptom onset/ alarm and start of thrombolysis
Time frame: within 3 month
Functional neurological status (mRS) (D7, D90)
Time frame: within 3 month
Proportion of secondary transfers of stroke patients between primary stroke unit and neurovascular centre in all stroke patients, and in subgroups with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke
Time frame: within 3 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jan 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 22497929Walter S, Kostopoulos P, Haass A, Keller I, Lesmeister M, Schlechtriemen T, Roth C, Papanagiotou P, Grunwald I, Schumacher H, Helwig S, Viera J, Korner H, Alexandrou M, Yilmaz U, Ziegler K, Schmidt K, Dabew R, Kubulus D, Liu Y, Volk T, Kronfeld K, Ruckes C, Bertsch T, Reith W, Fassbender K. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012 May;11(5):397-404. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70057-1. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31479116Helwig SA, Ragoschke-Schumm A, Schwindling L, Kettner M, Roumia S, Kulikovski J, Keller I, Manitz M, Martens D, Grun D, Walter S, Lesmeister M, Ewen K, Brand J, Fousse M, Kauffmann J, Zimmer VC, Mathur S, Bertsch T, Guldner J, Magull-Seltenreich A, Binder A, Spuntrup E, Chatzikonstantinou A, Adam O, Kronfeld K, Liu Y, Ruckes C, Schumacher H, Grunwald IQ, Yilmaz U, Schlechtriemen T, Reith W, Fassbender K. Prehospital Stroke Management Optimized by Use of Clinical Scoring vs Mobile Stroke Unit for Triage of Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1484-1492. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2829.
Related trials for Acute Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
RecruitingObservational study
Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke
Ischemic Stroke, Acute Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial With Blinded Endpoint Assessment of Early Tirofiban After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Klaus C Fassbender, MD principal investigator
Department of Neurology, Saarland University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MSU-based stroke management in people with Acute Stroke, run by University Hospital, Saarland at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of stroke patients with accurate decision regarding transfer to the most appropriate target hospital (time frame: within 3 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02465346, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2019.