AzTrials
AzTrials

Pelvic Organ ProlapseNCT02465658

Risk Factors for Co-existence of Cervical Elongation in Uterine Prolapse

An observational study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The presence of co-existence of cervical elongation in women of uterine prolapse may decrease the patients' satisfaction of uterine-preservation surgery for uterine prolapse, and additional surgery, such as Manchester surgery, may be needed to solve the problem.Thus the aim of this study is to investigate the risk… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
What is being tested?
Medical records were reviewed.
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
Mar 2015to Mar 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Women with uterine prolapse and underwent vaginal total hysterectomy

Who may be able to join

  • All women with uterine prolapse underwent vaginal total hysterectomy
  • > 20 years old.

Who cannot join

  • nil

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, Taiwan, 100

    Ho-Hsiung Lin, MD, PhD, 886-2-23123456 ext. 71557, hhlin@ntuh.gov.tw

    Sheng-Mou Hsiao, 886-2-89667000 ext. 1818, smhsiao2@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

The presence of co-existence of cervical elongation in women of uterine prolapse may decrease the patients' satisfaction of uterine-preservation surgery for uterine prolapse, and additional surgery, such as Manchester surgery, may be needed to solve the problem.Thus the aim of this study is to investigate the risk factors of co-existence of cervical elongation in uterine prolapse.

Read the detailed description

Purpose:

Thus the aim of this study is to investigate the risk factors of co-existence of cervical elongation in uterine prolapse.

Patients and Methods:

Between January 1994 and October 2014, all women underwent vaginal total hysterectomy in a medical center were enrolled in this study. Medical records were reviewed. Cervical elongation is defined as the presence of cervical length >3.38 cm or cervix to corpus ratio >0.79.

Expected Results:

The investigators will get the risk factors of co-existence of cervical elongation in uterine prolapse, and the result should be helpful for preoperative consultation, especially for uterine-preserving pelvic floor reconstruction surgery.

Being tested
Medical records were reviewed.
Keywords
uterine prolapse, cervical elongation, pelvic floor reconstruction surgery
Medical subject headings
Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Uterine Prolapse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Medical records were reviewed.Other

    retrospective study

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Factors associated with coexistent cervical elongation in cases with uterine prolapse

    Medical record review

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2015
  3. Primary completionMar 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02465658
Sponsor's protocol ID
201503073RIND
Status last verified
Dec 2015
First submitted
4 Jun 2015
Last updated
16 Dec 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ho-Hsiung Lin, MD,PhD (886-2-23123456 ext. 71557, hhlin@ntuh.gov.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Factors associated with coexistent cervical elongation in cases with uterine prolapse (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in