AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HF-rEF)Phase 3PARALLEL-HFNCT02468232

Study of Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 in Japanese Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

A Phase 3 study testing LCZ696 and Enalapril in people with Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HF-rEF), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 49 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of LCZ696 at a target dose of 200 mg b.i.d. compared to enalapril 10 mg b.i.d., in addition to the background heart failure (HF) treatment, on delaying time to first occurrence of either cardiovascular (CV) death or HF hospitalization events in Japanese patients with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
What is being tested?
LCZ696 and Enalapril
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
225 participants
Where
49 sitesJapan
Study dates
15 Jun 2015to 18 Feb 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed.
  • Outpatients with a diagnosis of CHF NYHA class II-IV and reduced ejection fraction:
  • LVEF ≤ 35% at Visit 1 (any local measurement, made within the past 6 months using echocardiography, MUGA, CT scanning, MRI or ventricular angiography is also acceptable, provided no subsequent measurement above 35%)
  • NT-proBNP ≥ 600 pg/ml at Visit 1 OR NT-proBNP ≥ 400 pg/ml at Visit 1 and a hospitalization for HF within the last 12 months (according to central laboratory measurements)
  • Patients must be on an ACEI or an ARB at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks before Visit 1.
  • Patients must be treated with a β-blocker, unless contraindicated or not tolerated, at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 (reason should be documented if patients reported contraindications or intolerance).
  • An aldosterone antagonist should also be considered in all patients, taking account of renal function, serum potassium and tolerability. If given, the dose of aldosterone antagonist should be optimized according to guideline recommendations and patient tolerability, and should be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. Other evidence-based therapy for HF should also be considered e.g. cardiac resynchronization therapy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in selected patients, as recommended by guidelines.

Who cannot join

  • History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to drugs of similar chemical classes, ACEIs, ARBs, NEP inhibitors as well as known or suspected contraindications to the study drugs.
  • Previous documented history of intolerance to ACEIs or ARBs.
  • Known history of angioedema.
  • Requirement of treatment with both ACEIs and ARBs.
  • Current acute decompensated HF (exacerbation of chronic HF manifested by signs and symptoms that may require intravenous therapy).
  • Symptomatic hypotension and/or a SBP < 100 mmHg at screening or < 95 mmHg at the end of run-in.
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Estimated GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 as measured by the Japanese formula at screening, or the end of run-in or > 35% decline in eGFR between screening and end of run-in (according to local measurements).
  • Serum potassium > 5.2 mmol/L (mEq/L) at screening or > 5.4 mmol/L (mEq/L) at the end of run-in (according to local measurements).
  • Acute coronary syndrome, stroke, transient ischemic attack, cardiac, carotid or other major CV surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or carotid angioplasty within the 3 months prior to Visit 1.
  • Documented untreated ventricular arrhythmia with syncopal episodes within the 3 months prior to Visit 1.
  • Symptomatic bradycardia or second (except asymptomatic Wenckebach block) or third degree heart block without a pacemaker.
  • Presence of hemodynamically significant mitral and/or aortic valve disease, except mitral regurgitation secondary to left ventricular dilatation.
  • Presence of other hemodynamically significant obstructive lesions of left ventricular outflow tract, including aortic and sub-aortic stenosis.
  • Presence of bilateral renal artery stenosis.

Trial locations and contacts

49 sites in 1 country.

49 sites in 1 country

Japan49 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Amagasaki, Hyōgo, 660 8550

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Asahikawa, Hokkaido, 078-8211

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chikushino-shi, Fukuka, 818-8516

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8309

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chuo Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 810-0001

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fukushima, Fukushima, 960 1295

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hachiōji, Tokyo, 192-0918

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hatsukaichi, Hiroshima, 738 8503

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Iizuka, Fukuoka, 820-8505

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kashihara, Nara, 634 8522

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kishiwada, Osaka, 596-0042

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kofu, Yamanashi, 400-8506

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kōriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-8577

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kusatsu, Shiga, 525 8585

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kyoto, Kyoto, 607-8062

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Maebashi, Gunma, 371 8511

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 880-2102

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Morioka, Iwate, 020 0066

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 453-8511

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ōita, Oita Prefecture, 870-0192

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Okayama, Okayama-ken, 700-8558

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Osaka, Osaka, 530-8480

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Osaka, Osaka, 559-0012

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Otaru, Hokkaido, 047-8510

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saitama, 330 8503

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saku, Nagano, 3850051

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060 8648

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sendai, Miyagi, 980 8574

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seto, Aichi-ken, 489-8642

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8666

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shizuoka, Shizuoka, 420-8630

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shūnan, Yamaguchi, 745-8522

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    tabashi City, Tokyo, 173-8610

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Takamatsu, Kagawa-ken, 760 8557

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Takarazuka, Hyōgo, 665-0873

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-1096

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1141

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-8565

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Uji, Kyoto, 611-0042

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Yokohama, Kanagawa, 227-8501

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Yonago, Tottori, 683-8504

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality in Japanese Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of LCZ696 at a target dose of 200 mg b.i.d. compared to enalapril 10 mg b.i.d., in addition to the background heart failure (HF) treatment, on delaying time to first occurrence of either cardiovascular (CV) death or HF hospitalization events in Japanese patients with stable chronic heart failure (CHF), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II-IV and reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%).

Read the detailed description

The study consisted of two parts: the core part and the Open label extension (OLE) epoch.

The core part of this study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, active-controlled study to assess the effect of LCZ696 at a target dose of 200 mg b.i.d. and enalapril 10 mg b.i.d. on CV mortality and morbidity reduction in Japanese HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. Patients who met the eligibility criteria at screening entered a 2 week, single-blind, active treatment run-in epoch in which they received LCZ696 50 mg b.i.d. Patients who tolerated LCZ696 50 mg b.i.d. for 2 weeks were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive LCZ696 100 mg b.i.d. or enalapril 5 mg b.i.d. for 4 weeks during the double-blind treatment epoch. The patient randomization was stratified by using NT-proBNP measured at the screening visit as a stratification factor. The patients were then titrated up to the target dose of LCZ696 200 mg b.i.d. or enalapril 10 mg b.i.d. if they tolerated 4 weeks treatment of LCZ696 100 mg b.i.d. or enalapril 5 mg b.i.d. Dose adjustment (LCZ696 50-100 mg b.i.d. \& enalapril 2.5-5 mg b.i.d.) was permitted if not tolerated at the target dose of study drugs during the double-blind treatment epoch.

This was an event-driven study in which subjects remained on the study (regardless of whether receiving investigational medications) until the projected number of patients with primary events (approximately 57 events) had been reached.

The Open label extension (OLE) epoch was conducted following the completion of the core part, with the aim to provide access to LCZ696 for eligible subjects until the marketed product was available in Japan or 2 years from the date of the first subject enrolled in the OLE epoch, whichever occurred first, and also to obtain the safety and tolerability data of long-term treatment with LCZ696.

Upon completion of the core part, the eligibility of the subjects to enter the OLE epoch was assessed by the investigator at OLE baseline (Visit 301), which occurred on the same day as the end of study (EOS) visit of the core part (Visit 299). At this visit, subjects were switched to open-label LCZ696.

At Visit 302 (2 to 4 weeks after Visit 301), subjects who tolerated the open-label LCZ696 and met the safety monitoring criteria were up-titrated to the next higher level of daily dose. Thereafter, subject visits occurred at 8 weeks, and then every 4 months until EOS visit for OLE epoch.

Being tested
LCZ696, Enalapril, Placebo to LCZ696, Placebo to Enalapril
Keywords
chronic heart failure, cardiovascular death, hospitalization, outcome study, worsening heart failure, NT-proBNP, NYHA, KCCQ, HF-rEF

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LCZ696Drug

    The target dose during the study was LCZ696 200 mg bid given orally. LCZ696 was supplied as 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg film-coated tablets.

  • EnalaprilDrug

    The target dose during the study was enalapril 10 mg bid given orally. Enalapril was provided as 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg tablets.

  • Placebo to LCZ696Drug

    LCZ696 Placebo 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg film-coated tablets

  • Placebo to EnalaprilDrug

    Enalapril Placebo 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg tablets

Study groups in NCT02468232
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LCZ696ExperimentalBefore randomization, all patients received 2 week LCZ696 50 mg twice daily (b.i.d) as single blind run-in active treatment epoch. In double blind epoch, randomized patients in this arm started with 100 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) for 4 weeks. Patients were then up-titrated to 200 mg b.i.d. at week 4 if they were tolerant to 100 mg b.i.d. Total duration of treatment was up to approximately 40 months.
Receives: Drug: LCZ696; Drug: Placebo to Enalapril
EnalaprilActive comparatorBefore randomization, all patients received 2 week LCZ696 50 mg twice daily (b.i.d) as single blind run-in active treatment epoch. In double blind period, all randomized patients in this arm received enalapril 5mg twice daily (b.i.d.) for 4 weeks. Patients were then up-titrated to 10 mg b.i.d. at week 4 if they were tolerant to 5 mg b.i.d. Total duration of treatment was up to approximately 40 months.
Receives: Drug: Enalapril; Drug: Placebo to LCZ696

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Who Had CEC (Clinical Endpoint Committee) Confirmed Composite Endpoints

    Composite endpoint is defined as either cardiovascular (CV) death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and reduced ejection fraction. The composite endpoint events occurred on and after End-of-study (EOS) declaration were reported by investigators but those events were not required to be adjudicated by Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC) and not included in the efficacy analysis.

    Measured: up to 40 months

  2. Exposure-adjusted Incident Rate (EAIR) of CEC Confirmed Composite Endpoints

    Composite endpoint is defined as either cardiovascular (CV) death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and reduced ejection fraction. EAIR = n/T where n = Total number of events included in the analysis. T (100 patient years) = total up-to-event/censoring duration-time summarized over participants in the respective treatment group. The composite endpoint events occurred on and after EOS declaration were reported by investigators but those events were not required to be adjudicated by CEC and not included in the efficacy analysis.

    Measured: up to 40 months

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Key Secondary: Change From Baseline to the Pre-defined Time-points in Log-transformed Concentration of N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)

    NT-proBNP is small protein produced in large amounts when the heart senses it needs to work harder, such as in heart failure. Change from baseline to the pre-defined time-points in logarithmic scale were analyzed using a repeated measures ANCOVA model with treatment, the stratification factor screening NT-proBNP classification recorded in the Interactive Web Response System (IWRS), visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effect factors and the logarithmic baseline biomarker value as a covariate, with a common unstructured covariance matrix among visits for each treatment. The analysis is using all available data up to month 6 based on likelihood method with an assumption of missing at random (MAR) for missing data.

    This record summarizes the estimates of ratio Post-baseline /Baseline NT-proBNP.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and Month 6

  2. Key Secondary: Number of Participants With CEC-confirmed First Triple Composite Endpoint (Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization, or Worsening of HF in Outpatients)

    Composite endpoint is defined as either cardiovascular (CV) death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and reduced ejection fraction. Worsening HF defined as: worsening signs and symptoms of HF requiring addition of a new drug for HF treatment, initiation of IV treatment, increase of diuretic dose for persistent use for ≥4 consecutive weeks, or institution of mechanical or circulatory support such as mechanical ventilation, ultrafiltration, hemodialysis, intra-aortic balloon pump or ventricular assist device. The composite endpoint events occurred on and after EOS declaration were reported by investigators but those events were not required to be adjudicated by CEC and not included in the efficacy analysis.

    Measured: up to 40 months

  3. Key Secondary: EAIR of CEC-confirmed First Triple Composite Endpoint (Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization, or Worsening of HF in Outpatients)

    Worsening HF defined as: worsening signs and symptoms of HF requiring addition of a new drug for HF treatment, initiation of IV treatment, increase of diuretic dose for persistent use for ≥4 consecutive weeks, or institution of mechanical or circulatory support such as mechanical ventilation, ultrafiltration, hemodialysis, intra-aortic balloon pump or ventricular assist device.

    EAIR(Exposure-adjusted incidence rate per 100 patient years)= n/T:

    n: Total number of events included in the analysis. T(100 patient years): total up-to-event/censoring duration-time summarized over patients in the respective treatment group. The composite endpoint events occurred on and after EOS declaration were reported by investigators but those events were not required to be adjudicated by CEC and not included in the efficacy analysis.

    Measured: up to 40 months

  4. Key Secondary: Number of Participants by Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification From Baseline at Predefined Timepoints

    NYHA classification is a subjective physician's assessment of heart failure patient's functional capacity and symptomatic status.

    Class I - No limitation of physical activity. Class II - Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III - Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV - Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

    The NYHA class change was analyzed as a three category ordinal variable with levels: "improved", "unchanged", and "worsened", defined by at least one class improvement, no change, at least one class worsening, in NYHA class, respectively. NYHA class after patients who died was categorized into "worsened".

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and Month 6

  5. Key Secondary: Change From Baseline in Clinical Summary Score for Heart Failure Symptoms and Physical Limitations Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ).

    The KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire and requires, on average, 4-6 minutes to complete. It contains 23 items, covering physical function, clinical symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and Quality of Life (QoL), each with different Likert scaling wording, including limitations, frequency, bother, change in condition, understanding, etc. The clinical summary score is a mean of the physical limitation and total symptom scores. The total symptom score is the mean of the symptom frequency and symptom burden scores. Each scale score (the physical limitation, symptom frequency or symptom burden) is calculated as the mean of its item scores and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher score indicating higher level of functioning. A score of 100 represents perfect health whereas a score of 0 represents dead. A change of 5 points on the scale scores, either as a group mean difference or an intra-individual change appears to be clinically significant.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 8 and Month 6

  6. Total Number of CEC Confirmed Composite of CV Death and Total (First and Recurrent) HF Hospitalizations for Heart Failure

    Total number of CEC-confirmed CV death and total (first and recurrent) HF hospitalizations per patient was analyzed using the negative binomial regression model. CV deaths and HF hospitalizations occurred on and after EOS declaration were reported by investigators but those events were not required to be adjudicated by CEC and not included in the efficacy analysis.

    Measured: up tp 40 months

  7. Number of Participants by Changes in Clinical Composite Score (as Assessed by NYHA Classification and Patient Global Assessment) at Predefined Timepoints

    The global assessment was derived from the 7-category classification of the global assessment of disease activity to a three-category classification: Improved (Markedly improved; moderately improved), Unchanged (Slightly improved, unchanged, slightly worsened), and Worsened (Moderately worsened, markedly worsened).

    The clinical composite assessment was defined as follows:

    • Improved: 1) If NYHA class decreased at least one level and Global Assessment was not worse at the selected visit and there was no major AE up to the selected visit; or 2) Global assessment was improved and NYHA class did not increase at the selected visit, and there was no major AE up to the selected visit.
    • Worsened: 1) If NYHA class increased at the selected visit; or 2) Global Assessment was worse at the selected visit; or 3) experienced a major AE up to the selected visit.
    • Unchanged: If neither "Improved" nor "Worsened".

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6

  8. Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality

    The number of participants who died due to any cause. Deaths occurred on and after EOS declaration were reported by investigators but those events were not required to be adjudicated by CEC and not included in the efficacy analysis.

    Measured: up to 40 months

  9. EAIR of All-cause Mortality

    EAIR (Exposure-adjusted incidence rate per 100 patient years)= n/T:

    n: Total number of events included in the analysis. T(100 patient years): total up-to-event/censoring duration-time summarized over patients in the respective treatment group. Deaths occurred on and after EOS declaration were reported by investigators but those events were not required to be adjudicated by CEC and not included in the efficacy analysis.

    Measured: up to 40 months

  10. Percentage of Participants Hospitalized

    Percentage of participants with hospitalized admissions

    Measured: up to 40 months

  11. Hospitalization Admissions Events Per-participant Per Year

    The number of hospital admission events per-participant per year was calculated as total number of hospital admission divided by total up-to-event/censoring duration-time summarized over patients.

    Measured: up to 40 months

  12. Days in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Per Participant Per Year

    The number of days in ICU per participant per year was calculated as total number of days in ICU divided by total up-to-event/censoring duration-time summarized over patients.

    Measured: up to 40 months

  13. Percentage of Re-hospitalizations

    The percentage of participants who had re-hospitalizations.

    Measured: up to 40 months

  14. Emergency Department/Urgent Care Facility Visits for HF Per Patient Per Year

    The number of emergency department/urgent care facility visits for HF per patient per year was calculated as total number of emergency department/urgent care facility visits for HF divided by total up-to-event/censoring duration-time summarized over patients.

    Measured: up to 40 months

  15. Change in Blood NT-proBNP From Baseline

    NT-proBNP is small protein produced in large amounts when the heart senses it needs to work harder, such as in heart failure. Mean change from baseline (post-baseline value - baseline value) in plasma NT-proBNP was caluculated.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and Month 6

  16. Change in Procollagen Type III N-Terminal Propeptide From Baseline

    Procollagen Type III N-Terminal Propeptide (PIIINP) is a serum marker of collagen turnover, generated during the synthesis of type III collagen. Increased circulating PIIINP is a marker not only of muscle growth, but also of muscle repair and fibrosis. Mean change from baseline (post-baseline value - baseline value) in serum PIIINP was calculated.

    Measured: Baseline and Month 18

  17. Changes in Urine Cyclic Guanosine 3',5'-Monophosphate (cGMP) From Baseline

    Urinary Cyclic GMP (cGMP) is a biomarker measured in the urine that reflects the activity of biomarkers such as BNP (Brain Natriuretic Peptide). First morning void (FMV) urine samples were collected. Mean change from baseline (post-baseline value - baseline value) in urine cGMP was calculated.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and Month 6

  18. Percentage of Participants Reaching Target Dose Level 3 at Week 8 and Maintained at Month 4 (Open Label Extension (OLE))

    The percentage of participants who reached target dose level (200 mg b.i.d.) at Week 8 and maintained at Month 4(OLE). This indicates how tolerabile to LCZ696 at target dose.

    Measured: Month 4 of OLE

  19. Change in NYHA Classification From OLE Baseline (OLE)

    NYHA classification is a subjective physician's assessment of heart failure patient's functional capacity and symptomatic status.

    Class I - No limitation of physical activity. Class II - Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III - Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV - Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

    The NYHA class change was analyzed as a three category ordinal variable with levels: "improved", "unchanged", and "worsened", defined by at least one class improvement, no change, at least one class worsening, in NYHA class, respectively. NYHA class after patients who died was categorized into "worsened".

    Measured: OLE Baseline, Month 12 (OLE)

  20. Change in Key Echocardiographic Parameters From OLE Baseline at Month 12 (OLE)

    Key echocardiographic parameters:

    LAVi- left atrial volume index, LVEDVi- left ventricular end diastolic volume index, LVESVi- left ventricular end systolic volume index.

    A two-dimensional and doppler echo examination was done to assess echo parameters. Mean changes from baseline (post-baseline value - baseline value) in each parameter were calculated. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12 (OLE)

  21. Change in Cardiac Measurements by Key Echocardiographic Parameter LVEF, From OLE Baseline at Month 12 (OLE)

    Key echocardiographic parameter:

    LVEF- left ventricular ejection fraction. LVEF is a measurement expressed as a percentage of how much blood the left ventricle pumps out with each contraction. Mean changes from baseline (post-baseline value - baseline value) in LVEF were calculated.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12 (OLE)

  22. Change in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) From OLE Baseline to Predefined Timepoints (OLE)

    BNP is small protein produced in large amounts when the heart senses it needs to work harder, such as in heart failure. Mean change from baseline (post-baseline value - OLE baseline value) in plasma BNP was calculated.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2-4, Week 8, Months 4 and 12 (OLE)

  23. Change in N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) From OLE Baseline to Predefined Timepoints (OLE)

    NT-proBNP is small protein produced in large amounts when the heart senses it needs to work harder, such as in heart failure. Mean change from baseline (post-baseline value - OLE baseline value) in plasma NT-proBNP was calculated.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2-4, Week 8, Months 4 and 12 (OLE)

  24. Change in Urine cGMP From OLE Baseline to Predefined Timepoints (OLE)

    Urinary Cyclic GMP (cGMP) is a biomarker measured in the urine that reflects the activity of biomarkers such as BNP (Brain Natriuretic Peptide). Spot urine samples were collected. Mean change from baseline (post-baseline value - OLE baseline value) in urine cGMP was calculated.

    Measured: Weeks 2-4, Week 8, Months 4 and 12 (OLE)

  25. Association Between Change in NT-proBNP Concentration and Change in Echocardiographic Parameters From OLE Baseline at Month 12 (OLE)

    Association (using the Pearson correlation coefficient) between change from OLE baseline in log-transformed NT-proBNP and echocardiographic parameters (LAVi, LVEDVi, LVESVi \& LVEF)

    Measured: Month 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jun 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Jun 2015
  3. Primary completion8 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion18 Feb 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
225 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02468232
Sponsor's protocol ID
CLCZ696B1301
Acronym
PARALLEL-HF
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
8 Jun 2015
Last updated
8 Dec 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing LCZ696 and Enalapril in people with Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HF-rEF), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 49 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 49 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Dec 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Who Had CEC (Clinical Endpoint Committee) Confirmed Composite Endpoints (time frame: up to 40 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in