AzTrials
AzTrials

BronchiolitisPhase 2NCT02469597

Single Dose of Furosemide to Improve Respiratory Distress in Moderate to Severe Bronchiolitis

A Phase 2 study testing Furosemide in people with Bronchiolitis, run by Northwell Health at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess if administration of an early single dose of a diuretic (furosemide) to children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis can reduce extravascular lung water in an effort to reduce respiratory rate, retractions, intubations, and length of stay. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 48 months
Conditions the study is for
Bronchiolitis
What is being tested?
Furosemide
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
46 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2013to Apr 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 48 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of Acute Bronchiolitis
  • Admission required per Emergency Department Physician

Who cannot join

  • No legal guardian present
  • Sulfa allergy
  • Patient currently on existing diuretic therapy
  • Tracheostomy
  • Mild respiratory distress (not requiring admission)
  • Hypotension / Hemodynamic Instability (defined by age specific criteria at time of intervention)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Supplemental Oxygen at home
  • History of Dialysis / Renal Disease
  • Those enrolled in another drug interventional study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York

    New Hyde Park, New York, 11040

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to assess if administration of an early single dose of a diuretic (furosemide) to children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis can reduce extravascular lung water in an effort to reduce respiratory rate, retractions, intubations, and length of stay.

Read the detailed description

Randomization and Blinding:

Subjects will be randomly assigned by a 1:1 ratio to either furosemide or placebo. The Biostatistics Unit will develop a randomization procedure using a permuted block design. The randomization will be stratified by mode of delivery of furosemide: IV or PO. Blinding will be maintained at all times throughout the study. The only unblinded study personnel will be the pharmacy department who will dispense either of placebo or furosemide to each patient. Blinding will be broken only in the case of allergic reaction in which case a pediatric attending physician, not involved with the study (designated prior to study initiation) will be notified to access the intervention of that patient. If such an event should occur, the primary investigator and IRB will be notified by e-mail/phone, and an adverse event will be documented.

Materials / Methods:

All patients aged 0-4 years old with primary diagnosis of bronchiolitis on assessment by the Emergency Department will be evaluated for inclusion to study. The goal patient enrollment is 100 patients, which is required to achieve statistical significance (see below). As this study focuses on moderate (admitted) to severe (requiring mechanical ventilation) patients with bronchiolitis, further documentation would be completed on a data collection sheet. Randomization will occur upon consent to study. In collaboration with the Biostatistics Unit, patients will be randomly assigned by a 1:1 ratio to either furosemide or placebo. There will be a randomization procedure using a permuted block design. The randomization will be stratified by mode of delivery of intervention: IV or PO. The corresponding intervention (placebo or furosemide) will then be dispensed by pharmacy for administration in a blinded manner by the patient's nurse and/or physician. Either a single dose furosemide (1mg/kg or 10mg - whichever is less) will be administered orally PO (or intravenously [IV] if IV is present), or a placebo of equal volume. Ideally, the intervention dose will be administered as early as possible (immediately after decision to admit was made and consent obtained). Subsequent retrieval of that data will be done by study personnel. Data recorded on the data collection sheet can include: O2 Saturation/Weight (pre-intervention and, 2 and 4 hours post-furosemide/control), Age, Gender, Prematurity (<32 weeks gestation), history of mechanical ventilation, history of wheeze / asthma, history of furosemide use, interventions prior to furosemide (racemic epinephrine, albuterol, or non-invasive ventilation), RSV / Influenza status, degree of dehydration (mild / moderate / severe), onset of symptoms prior to triage, +/- apnea, timing from initiation of visit until furosemide administration and/or non-invasive/invasive ventilator support, and reason for admission to ICU if necessary.

Considerations for all analyses:

All analyses will be carried out under the intention to treat principle; patients will be analyzed according to the groups to which they were randomized. (However, it is likely that the intention to treat population will be the same as the per protocol population.)

The primary analyses will be carried out for all patients. Mode of delivery of furosemide (IV vs. PO) will not be included in the analysis, as the aim of the study is to examine the effects of furosemide, regardless of mode of delivery. Randomization will be stratified by mode of delivery, so that the distribution of mode of delivery will be the same for the two treatment groups. Secondary subgroup analyses will be performed analyzing each mode of delivery (IV, PO), separately. These secondary subgroup analyses will be the same as the primary analyses.

Analyses for Specific Aims:

  1. The association between treatment (furosemide) and control (placebo) groups will be compared using the chi-square test for the categorical outcomes (25% decrease in respiratory rate, intubation, etc).

Percent change in respiratory rate will be compared using the two sample t-test. If the usual assumptions required for the t-test are not met, then either a suitable transformation, or an appropriate non-parametric test (the Mann-Whitney test), will be used.

Length of stay (LOS) will be compared using the Mann-Whitney test. In the event that not all participants are followed until discharge from the hospital (in-hospital mortality, not discharged by end of study period), survival methods will be used (LOS will be estimated using the product-limit method, and the treatment groups will be compared using the log-rank test).

Sample Size Justification:

Based on clinical experience, we believe that very few patients who are admitted with bronchiolitis will have a response (as described in the primary outcome: a decrease in respiratory rate of 25% or more, or a return to their age appropriate respiration rate), at 2 hours post administration of placebo. To be conservative, it is assumed that the response to placebo will be no higher than 5%. It is believed that a clinically meaningful response rate would be 25% of patients at 2 hours after administration of furosemide. The proposed sample size of 49 subjects per group will yield 80% power to detect such a difference using a chi-square test with a 0.05 significance level.

Clinical Outcomes Justification:

Given the transient nature of bronchiolitis, as symptoms typically peak treatment is sought. Along with furosemide's half life of approximately 6hrs, there could be a correlation drawn between those children intubated (respiratory failure) or not, as it relates to when furosemide was given. Twenty-four hours is a reasonable observation period to correlate to the intervention. Intubation beyond that time point may infer that similar treatments of furosemide were warranted given the disease.

Conditions
Bronchiolitis
Being tested
Furosemide, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Bronchiolitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FurosemideDrug

    Also called Lasix

    1 mg/kg intravenous or oral (will give oral unless patient has peripheral IV access in place), maximum dose 10mg (1ml), x 1 dose

  • PlaceboDrug

    0.1ml/kg intravenous or oral (Normal Saline) (will give oral unless patient has peripheral IV access in place), maximum dose 1ml, x 1 dose

Study groups in NCT02469597
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single Dose of FurosemideExperimentalFurosemide 1 dose
Receives: Drug: Furosemide
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNormal saline 1 dose
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Respiratory Rate

    Measured: 2 hours after medication adminstration

  2. Respiratory Rate

    Measured: 4 hours after medication adminstration

  3. Oxygen Saturation

    Measured: 2 hours after medication adminstration

  4. Oxygen Saturation

    Measured: 4 hours after medication adminstration

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Patient Needing Endotracheal Intubation

    Measured: Within 72 hours of medication administration

  2. Length of Hospital Stay

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay up to 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jun 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2013
  3. Primary completionApr 2016
  4. Study completionApr 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02469597
Sponsor's protocol ID
12-260B
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
24 May 2015
Last updated
12 Aug 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Pelletier AJ, Mansbach JM, Camargo CA Jr. Direct medical costs of bronchiolitis hospitalizations in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):2418-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1193.

    PubMed 17142527
  • Baker MD. Pitfalls in the use of clinical asthma scoring. Am J Dis Child. 1988 Feb;142(2):183-5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150020085035.

    PubMed 3341321
  • Farias JA, Fernandez A, Monteverde E, Flores JC, Baltodano A, Menchaca A, Poterala R, Panico F, Johnson M, von Dessauer B, Donoso A, Zavala I, Zavala C, Troster E, Pena Y, Flamenco C, Almeida H, Nilda V, Esteban A; Latin-American Group for Mechanical Ventilation in Children. Mechanical ventilation in pediatric intensive care units during the season for acute lower respiratory infection: a multicenter study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;13(2):158-64. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182257b82.

    PubMed 21725275
  • Hernando Puente M, Lopez-Herce Cid J, Bellon Cano JM, Villaescusa JU, Santiago Lozano MJ, Sanchez Galindo A. [Prognostic factors for bronchiolitis complications in a pediatric intensive care unit]. An Pediatr (Barc). 2009 Jan;70(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Nov 25. Spanish.

    PubMed 19174116
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network; Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 15;354(24):2564-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062200. Epub 2006 May 21.

    PubMed 16714767
  • Rush MG, Engelhardt B, Parker RA, Hazinski TA. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of alternate-day furosemide therapy in infants with chronic bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Pediatr. 1990 Jul;117(1 Pt 1):112-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82458-8.

    PubMed 2196353
  • Stewart A, Brion LP. Intravenous or enteral loop diuretics for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD001453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001453.pub2.

    PubMed 21901676
  • Hagadorn JI, Sanders MR, Staves C, Herson VC, Daigle K. Diuretics for very low birth weight infants in the first 28 days: a survey of the U.S. neonatologists. J Perinatol. 2011 Oct;31(10):677-81. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.11. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

    PubMed 21394079
  • Green TP. The pharmacologic basis of diuretic therapy in the newborn. Clin Perinatol. 1987 Dec;14(4):951-64.

    PubMed 3322632
  • Hufnagle KG, Khan SN, Penn D, Cacciarelli A, Williams P. Renal calcifications: a complication of long-term furosemide therapy in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 1982 Sep;70(3):360-3.

    PubMed 7110808
  • Ross BS, Pollak A, Oh W. The pharmacologic effects of furosemide therapy in the low-birth-weight infant. J Pediatr. 1978 Jan;92(1):149-52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80098-5.

    PubMed 22591
  • Ghanekar AG, Das Gupta V, Gibbs CW Jr. Stability of furosemide in aqueous systems. J Pharm Sci. 1978 Jun;67(6):808-11. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600670621.

    PubMed 660463
  • Williamson K, Bredin G, Avarello J, Gangadharan S. A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Single Dose Furosemide to Improve Respiratory Distress in Moderate to Severe Bronchiolitis. J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;54(1):40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.099. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

    PubMed 29174754

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Furosemide in people with Bronchiolitis, run by Northwell Health at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Aug 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Respiratory Rate (time frame: 2 hours after medication adminstration). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02469597, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in