BronchiolitisPhase 2NCT02469597
Single Dose of Furosemide to Improve Respiratory Distress in Moderate to Severe Bronchiolitis
A Phase 2 study testing Furosemide in people with Bronchiolitis, run by Northwell Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess if administration of an early single dose of a diuretic (furosemide) to children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis can reduce extravascular lung water in an effort to reduce respiratory rate, retractions, intubations, and length of stay. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 48 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Bronchiolitis
- What is being tested?
- Furosemide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2013to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 48 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of Acute Bronchiolitis
- Admission required per Emergency Department Physician
Who cannot join
- No legal guardian present
- Sulfa allergy
- Patient currently on existing diuretic therapy
- Tracheostomy
- Mild respiratory distress (not requiring admission)
- Hypotension / Hemodynamic Instability (defined by age specific criteria at time of intervention)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Supplemental Oxygen at home
- History of Dialysis / Renal Disease
- Those enrolled in another drug interventional study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York
New Hyde Park, New York, 11040
About this study
The purpose of this study is to assess if administration of an early single dose of a diuretic (furosemide) to children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis can reduce extravascular lung water in an effort to reduce respiratory rate, retractions, intubations, and length of stay.
Read the detailed description
Randomization and Blinding:
Subjects will be randomly assigned by a 1:1 ratio to either furosemide or placebo. The Biostatistics Unit will develop a randomization procedure using a permuted block design. The randomization will be stratified by mode of delivery of furosemide: IV or PO. Blinding will be maintained at all times throughout the study. The only unblinded study personnel will be the pharmacy department who will dispense either of placebo or furosemide to each patient. Blinding will be broken only in the case of allergic reaction in which case a pediatric attending physician, not involved with the study (designated prior to study initiation) will be notified to access the intervention of that patient. If such an event should occur, the primary investigator and IRB will be notified by e-mail/phone, and an adverse event will be documented.
Materials / Methods:
All patients aged 0-4 years old with primary diagnosis of bronchiolitis on assessment by the Emergency Department will be evaluated for inclusion to study. The goal patient enrollment is 100 patients, which is required to achieve statistical significance (see below). As this study focuses on moderate (admitted) to severe (requiring mechanical ventilation) patients with bronchiolitis, further documentation would be completed on a data collection sheet. Randomization will occur upon consent to study. In collaboration with the Biostatistics Unit, patients will be randomly assigned by a 1:1 ratio to either furosemide or placebo. There will be a randomization procedure using a permuted block design. The randomization will be stratified by mode of delivery of intervention: IV or PO. The corresponding intervention (placebo or furosemide) will then be dispensed by pharmacy for administration in a blinded manner by the patient's nurse and/or physician. Either a single dose furosemide (1mg/kg or 10mg - whichever is less) will be administered orally PO (or intravenously [IV] if IV is present), or a placebo of equal volume. Ideally, the intervention dose will be administered as early as possible (immediately after decision to admit was made and consent obtained). Subsequent retrieval of that data will be done by study personnel. Data recorded on the data collection sheet can include: O2 Saturation/Weight (pre-intervention and, 2 and 4 hours post-furosemide/control), Age, Gender, Prematurity (<32 weeks gestation), history of mechanical ventilation, history of wheeze / asthma, history of furosemide use, interventions prior to furosemide (racemic epinephrine, albuterol, or non-invasive ventilation), RSV / Influenza status, degree of dehydration (mild / moderate / severe), onset of symptoms prior to triage, +/- apnea, timing from initiation of visit until furosemide administration and/or non-invasive/invasive ventilator support, and reason for admission to ICU if necessary.
Considerations for all analyses:
All analyses will be carried out under the intention to treat principle; patients will be analyzed according to the groups to which they were randomized. (However, it is likely that the intention to treat population will be the same as the per protocol population.)
The primary analyses will be carried out for all patients. Mode of delivery of furosemide (IV vs. PO) will not be included in the analysis, as the aim of the study is to examine the effects of furosemide, regardless of mode of delivery. Randomization will be stratified by mode of delivery, so that the distribution of mode of delivery will be the same for the two treatment groups. Secondary subgroup analyses will be performed analyzing each mode of delivery (IV, PO), separately. These secondary subgroup analyses will be the same as the primary analyses.
Analyses for Specific Aims:
- The association between treatment (furosemide) and control (placebo) groups will be compared using the chi-square test for the categorical outcomes (25% decrease in respiratory rate, intubation, etc).
Percent change in respiratory rate will be compared using the two sample t-test. If the usual assumptions required for the t-test are not met, then either a suitable transformation, or an appropriate non-parametric test (the Mann-Whitney test), will be used.
Length of stay (LOS) will be compared using the Mann-Whitney test. In the event that not all participants are followed until discharge from the hospital (in-hospital mortality, not discharged by end of study period), survival methods will be used (LOS will be estimated using the product-limit method, and the treatment groups will be compared using the log-rank test).
Sample Size Justification:
Based on clinical experience, we believe that very few patients who are admitted with bronchiolitis will have a response (as described in the primary outcome: a decrease in respiratory rate of 25% or more, or a return to their age appropriate respiration rate), at 2 hours post administration of placebo. To be conservative, it is assumed that the response to placebo will be no higher than 5%. It is believed that a clinically meaningful response rate would be 25% of patients at 2 hours after administration of furosemide. The proposed sample size of 49 subjects per group will yield 80% power to detect such a difference using a chi-square test with a 0.05 significance level.
Clinical Outcomes Justification:
Given the transient nature of bronchiolitis, as symptoms typically peak treatment is sought. Along with furosemide's half life of approximately 6hrs, there could be a correlation drawn between those children intubated (respiratory failure) or not, as it relates to when furosemide was given. Twenty-four hours is a reasonable observation period to correlate to the intervention. Intubation beyond that time point may infer that similar treatments of furosemide were warranted given the disease.
- Conditions
- Bronchiolitis
- Being tested
- Furosemide, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Bronchiolitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FurosemideDrug
Also called Lasix
1 mg/kg intravenous or oral (will give oral unless patient has peripheral IV access in place), maximum dose 10mg (1ml), x 1 dose
PlaceboDrug
0.1ml/kg intravenous or oral (Normal Saline) (will give oral unless patient has peripheral IV access in place), maximum dose 1ml, x 1 dose
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single Dose of Furosemide | Experimental | Furosemide 1 dose Receives: Drug: Furosemide |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Normal saline 1 dose Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Respiratory Rate
Measured: 2 hours after medication adminstration
Respiratory Rate
Measured: 4 hours after medication adminstration
Oxygen Saturation
Measured: 2 hours after medication adminstration
Oxygen Saturation
Measured: 4 hours after medication adminstration
Secondary outcomes (2)
Patient Needing Endotracheal Intubation
Measured: Within 72 hours of medication administration
Length of Hospital Stay
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay up to 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2013
- Primary completionApr 2016
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BronchiolitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Northwell HealthThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Northwell Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sandeep Gangadharan, Northwell Health
- Investigators
- Sandeep Gangadharan, MD, Principal investigator, Northwell Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02469597
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12-260B
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 24 May 2015
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Pelletier AJ, Mansbach JM, Camargo CA Jr. Direct medical costs of bronchiolitis hospitalizations in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):2418-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1193.
PubMed 17142527Baker MD. Pitfalls in the use of clinical asthma scoring. Am J Dis Child. 1988 Feb;142(2):183-5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150020085035.
PubMed 3341321Farias JA, Fernandez A, Monteverde E, Flores JC, Baltodano A, Menchaca A, Poterala R, Panico F, Johnson M, von Dessauer B, Donoso A, Zavala I, Zavala C, Troster E, Pena Y, Flamenco C, Almeida H, Nilda V, Esteban A; Latin-American Group for Mechanical Ventilation in Children. Mechanical ventilation in pediatric intensive care units during the season for acute lower respiratory infection: a multicenter study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;13(2):158-64. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182257b82.
PubMed 21725275Hernando Puente M, Lopez-Herce Cid J, Bellon Cano JM, Villaescusa JU, Santiago Lozano MJ, Sanchez Galindo A. [Prognostic factors for bronchiolitis complications in a pediatric intensive care unit]. An Pediatr (Barc). 2009 Jan;70(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Nov 25. Spanish.
PubMed 19174116National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network; Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 15;354(24):2564-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062200. Epub 2006 May 21.
PubMed 16714767Rush MG, Engelhardt B, Parker RA, Hazinski TA. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of alternate-day furosemide therapy in infants with chronic bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Pediatr. 1990 Jul;117(1 Pt 1):112-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82458-8.
PubMed 2196353Stewart A, Brion LP. Intravenous or enteral loop diuretics for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD001453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001453.pub2.
PubMed 21901676Hagadorn JI, Sanders MR, Staves C, Herson VC, Daigle K. Diuretics for very low birth weight infants in the first 28 days: a survey of the U.S. neonatologists. J Perinatol. 2011 Oct;31(10):677-81. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.11. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
PubMed 21394079Green TP. The pharmacologic basis of diuretic therapy in the newborn. Clin Perinatol. 1987 Dec;14(4):951-64.
PubMed 3322632Hufnagle KG, Khan SN, Penn D, Cacciarelli A, Williams P. Renal calcifications: a complication of long-term furosemide therapy in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 1982 Sep;70(3):360-3.
PubMed 7110808Ross BS, Pollak A, Oh W. The pharmacologic effects of furosemide therapy in the low-birth-weight infant. J Pediatr. 1978 Jan;92(1):149-52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80098-5.
PubMed 22591Ghanekar AG, Das Gupta V, Gibbs CW Jr. Stability of furosemide in aqueous systems. J Pharm Sci. 1978 Jun;67(6):808-11. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600670621.
PubMed 660463Williamson K, Bredin G, Avarello J, Gangadharan S. A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Single Dose Furosemide to Improve Respiratory Distress in Moderate to Severe Bronchiolitis. J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;54(1):40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.099. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
PubMed 29174754
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Single Dose of Furosemide to Improve Respiratory Distress in Moderate to Severe Bronchiolitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02469597
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12-260B
- Conditions
- Bronchiolitis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Northwell HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2013
- Primary completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 12 Aug 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess if administration of an early single dose of a diuretic (furosemide) to children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis can reduce extravascular lung water in an effort to reduce respiratory rate, retractions, intubations, and length of stay.
Detailed description
Randomization and Blinding:
Subjects will be randomly assigned by a 1:1 ratio to either furosemide or placebo. The Biostatistics Unit will develop a randomization procedure using a permuted block design. The randomization will be stratified by mode of delivery of furosemide: IV or PO. Blinding will be maintained at all times throughout the study. The only unblinded study personnel will be the pharmacy department who will dispense either of placebo or furosemide to each patient. Blinding will be broken only in the case of allergic reaction in which case a pediatric attending physician, not involved with the study (designated prior to study initiation) will be notified to access the intervention of that patient. If such an event should occur, the primary investigator and IRB will be notified by e-mail/phone, and an adverse event will be documented.
Materials / Methods:
All patients aged 0-4 years old with primary diagnosis of bronchiolitis on assessment by the Emergency Department will be evaluated for inclusion to study. The goal patient enrollment is 100 patients, which is required to achieve statistical significance (see below). As this study focuses on moderate (admitted) to severe (requiring mechanical ventilation) patients with bronchiolitis, further documentation would be completed on a data collection sheet. Randomization will occur upon consent to study. In collaboration with the Biostatistics Unit, patients will be randomly assigned by a 1:1 ratio to either furosemide or placebo. There will be a randomization procedure using a permuted block design. The randomization will be stratified by mode of delivery of intervention: IV or PO. The corresponding intervention (placebo or furosemide) will then be dispensed by pharmacy for administration in a blinded manner by the patient's nurse and/or physician. Either a single dose furosemide (1mg/kg or 10mg - whichever is less) will be administered orally PO (or intravenously [IV] if IV is present), or a placebo of equal volume. Ideally, the intervention dose will be administered as early as possible (immediately after decision to admit was made and consent obtained). Subsequent retrieval of that data will be done by study personnel. Data recorded on the data collection sheet can include: O2 Saturation/Weight (pre-intervention and, 2 and 4 hours post-furosemide/control), Age, Gender, Prematurity (<32 weeks gestation), history of mechanical ventilation, history of wheeze / asthma, history of furosemide use, interventions prior to furosemide (racemic epinephrine, albuterol, or non-invasive ventilation), RSV / Influenza status, degree of dehydration (mild / moderate / severe), onset of symptoms prior to triage, +/- apnea, timing from initiation of visit until furosemide administration and/or non-invasive/invasive ventilator support, and reason for admission to ICU if necessary.
Considerations for all analyses:
All analyses will be carried out under the intention to treat principle; patients will be analyzed according to the groups to which they were randomized. (However, it is likely that the intention to treat population will be the same as the per protocol population.)
The primary analyses will be carried out for all patients. Mode of delivery of furosemide (IV vs. PO) will not be included in the analysis, as the aim of the study is to examine the effects of furosemide, regardless of mode of delivery. Randomization will be stratified by mode of delivery, so that the distribution of mode of delivery will be the same for the two treatment groups. Secondary subgroup analyses will be performed analyzing each mode of delivery (IV, PO), separately. These secondary subgroup analyses will be the same as the primary analyses.
Analyses for Specific Aims:
- The association between treatment (furosemide) and control (placebo) groups will be compared using the chi-square test for the categorical outcomes (25% decrease in respiratory rate, intubation, etc).
Percent change in respiratory rate will be compared using the two sample t-test. If the usual assumptions required for the t-test are not met, then either a suitable transformation, or an appropriate non-parametric test (the Mann-Whitney test), will be used.
Length of stay (LOS) will be compared using the Mann-Whitney test. In the event that not all participants are followed until discharge from the hospital (in-hospital mortality, not discharged by end of study period), survival methods will be used (LOS will be estimated using the product-limit method, and the treatment groups will be compared using the log-rank test).
Sample Size Justification:
Based on clinical experience, we believe that very few patients who are admitted with bronchiolitis will have a response (as described in the primary outcome: a decrease in respiratory rate of 25% or more, or a return to their age appropriate respiration rate), at 2 hours post administration of placebo. To be conservative, it is assumed that the response to placebo will be no higher than 5%. It is believed that a clinically meaningful response rate would be 25% of patients at 2 hours after administration of furosemide. The proposed sample size of 49 subjects per group will yield 80% power to detect such a difference using a chi-square test with a 0.05 significance level.
Clinical Outcomes Justification:
Given the transient nature of bronchiolitis, as symptoms typically peak treatment is sought. Along with furosemide's half life of approximately 6hrs, there could be a correlation drawn between those children intubated (respiratory failure) or not, as it relates to when furosemide was given. Twenty-four hours is a reasonable observation period to correlate to the intervention. Intubation beyond that time point may infer that similar treatments of furosemide were warranted given the disease.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single Dose of Furosemide | Experimental | Drug: FurosemideFurosemide 1 dose |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboNormal saline 1 dose |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 48 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosis of Acute Bronchiolitis
- Admission required per Emergency Department Physician
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- No legal guardian present
- Sulfa allergy
- Patient currently on existing diuretic therapy
- Tracheostomy
- Mild respiratory distress (not requiring admission)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FurosemideAlso: Lasix1 mg/kg intravenous or oral (will give oral unless patient has peripheral IV access in place), maximum dose 10mg (1ml), x 1 dose | Drug | Single Dose of Furosemide |
| Placebo0.1ml/kg intravenous or oral (Normal Saline) (will give oral unless patient has peripheral IV access in place), maximum dose 1ml, x 1 dose | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Respiratory Rate
Time frame: 2 hours after medication adminstration
Respiratory Rate
Time frame: 4 hours after medication adminstration
Oxygen Saturation
Time frame: 2 hours after medication adminstration
Oxygen Saturation
Time frame: 4 hours after medication adminstration
2 secondary outcomes
Patient Needing Endotracheal Intubation
Time frame: Within 72 hours of medication administration
Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay up to 1 week
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Aug 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17142527Pelletier AJ, Mansbach JM, Camargo CA Jr. Direct medical costs of bronchiolitis hospitalizations in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):2418-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1193.
- Background: PubMed 3341321Baker MD. Pitfalls in the use of clinical asthma scoring. Am J Dis Child. 1988 Feb;142(2):183-5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150020085035.
- Background: PubMed 21725275Farias JA, Fernandez A, Monteverde E, Flores JC, Baltodano A, Menchaca A, Poterala R, Panico F, Johnson M, von Dessauer B, Donoso A, Zavala I, Zavala C, Troster E, Pena Y, Flamenco C, Almeida H, Nilda V, Esteban A; Latin-American Group for Mechanical Ventilation in Children. Mechanical ventilation in pediatric intensive care units during the season for acute lower respiratory infection: a multicenter study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;13(2):158-64. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182257b82.
- Background: PubMed 19174116Hernando Puente M, Lopez-Herce Cid J, Bellon Cano JM, Villaescusa JU, Santiago Lozano MJ, Sanchez Galindo A. [Prognostic factors for bronchiolitis complications in a pediatric intensive care unit]. An Pediatr (Barc). 2009 Jan;70(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Nov 25. Spanish.
- Background: PubMed 16714767National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network; Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 15;354(24):2564-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062200. Epub 2006 May 21.
- Background: PubMed 2196353Rush MG, Engelhardt B, Parker RA, Hazinski TA. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of alternate-day furosemide therapy in infants with chronic bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Pediatr. 1990 Jul;117(1 Pt 1):112-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82458-8.
- Background: PubMed 21901676Stewart A, Brion LP. Intravenous or enteral loop diuretics for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD001453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001453.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 21394079Hagadorn JI, Sanders MR, Staves C, Herson VC, Daigle K. Diuretics for very low birth weight infants in the first 28 days: a survey of the U.S. neonatologists. J Perinatol. 2011 Oct;31(10):677-81. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.11. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
- Background: PubMed 3322632Green TP. The pharmacologic basis of diuretic therapy in the newborn. Clin Perinatol. 1987 Dec;14(4):951-64.
- Background: PubMed 7110808Hufnagle KG, Khan SN, Penn D, Cacciarelli A, Williams P. Renal calcifications: a complication of long-term furosemide therapy in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 1982 Sep;70(3):360-3.
- Background: PubMed 22591Ross BS, Pollak A, Oh W. The pharmacologic effects of furosemide therapy in the low-birth-weight infant. J Pediatr. 1978 Jan;92(1):149-52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80098-5.
- Background: PubMed 660463Ghanekar AG, Das Gupta V, Gibbs CW Jr. Stability of furosemide in aqueous systems. J Pharm Sci. 1978 Jun;67(6):808-11. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600670621.
Related trials for Bronchiolitis
Active, not recruiting
Respiratory Support and Treatment for Efficient and Cost-Effective Care
Bronchiolitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Not yet recruiting
Influence of Patient Positioning During Nasal Lavage
Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections, Nasal Obstruction
Recruiting
Effect of Anomia Rehabilitation Combined With Metacognitive Training in Patients With Chronic Vascular Aphasia
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
A New ECP Protocol for the Treatment of cGVHD
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sandeep Gangadharan, MD principal investigator
Northwell Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Furosemide in people with Bronchiolitis, run by Northwell Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Aug 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Respiratory Rate (time frame: 2 hours after medication adminstration). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02469597, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2016.