AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityNCT02471573

Freeze All Protocol Versus Fresh Embryo Transfer in Women Undergoing In-vitro Fertilization (IVF)

A study testing Freeze-all protocol and Fresh transfer protocol in people with Infertility, run by Vietnam National University at 1 site in Vietnam.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the effectiveness of freeze-all and subsequent frozen embryo transfer (freeze all protocol) with fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 42 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Infertility
What is being tested?
Freeze-all protocol and Fresh transfer protocol
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
782 participants
Where
1 siteVietnam
Study dates
30 Jun 2015to 1 Feb 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 42 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Undergoing In-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment
  • Number of previous failed embryo transfers ≤ 2
  • Permanent living in Viet Nam
  • Ovarian hyperstimulation with Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol
  • Eligible for embryo transfer (ET) on day 3
  • Having at least one top-quality embryo on day 3.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Number of embryos transferred ≤ 2
  • Willing to participate in the study
  • Not to participate in another IVF study at the same time

Who cannot join

  • women with polycystic ovary syndrome
  • In vitro maturation (IVM) cycles
  • Oocyte donation cycles
  • Using GnRH agonist for triggering

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Vietnam1 site
  • My Duc Hospital, IVFMD

    Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh

Other trials in Vietnam

About this study

Official title: The Effectiveness of a Freeze All Protocol Versus Fresh Embryo Transfer in Women Undergoing In-vitro Fertilization (IVF) - Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI)

To compare the effectiveness of freeze-all and subsequent frozen embryo transfer (freeze all protocol) with fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET).

Read the detailed description

All patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) will be treated with GnRH antagonist protocol. Recombinant Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) will be given on day 2 or day 3 of menstrual cycle for 5 days. The starting dose is individualized for each patient based on the following criteria: Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) < 0.7 ng/ml, dose 300 IU/day, AMH 0.7 -2.1 ng/ml, dose 225 IU/day, AMH > 2.1 ng/ml, dose 150 IU/day. After that, investigators can titrate the dose based on their clinical judgment. Follicular development will be monitored by ultrasound scanning and measurement of estradiol, progesterone starting on day 5 of stimulation. Scanning and hormonal measurement will be repeated every 2 to 3 days, depending on the size of follicles. Antagonist is routinely used on day 5 until the day of Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Criteria for recombinant hCG (6,500 IU) administration is the presence of at least three leading follicles of 17 mm. Oocyte retrieval is performed 36 hours after recombinant hCG administration.

We will measure progesterone levels during stimulation on the day 5 and day 7, as well as on the day of oocyte triggering.

Insemination will be performed by using intracytoplasmic sperm injection, 3 - 4 hours after oocyte retrieval. Only matured oocytes are inseminated. Fertilization are performed under inverted microscope at period of 16-18 hours after insemination.

On day 3, endometrium thickness will be measured and embryo evaluation will be performed at fixed time point 68±1 hours after fertilization, using Istanbul consensus. After grading embryo, eligible patients will be invited to participate in the study. Written consent will be obtained from each patient for participation into the study. Patients will be randomized into 2 groups fresh embryo transfer and freeze-all. Randomization will be done by third party via telephone, using a computer-generated random list, with block size of 2, 4, 8.

Study Procedures

Freeze all group

All grade 1 and grade 2 embryos were cryopreserved using vitrification method. In the next cycle, endometrium will be prepared by using estradiol orally, starting from day 2-3 of menstrual cycle. When endometrium thickness reaches 8mm or more, patients start to use progesterone vaginally. Embryo transfer is performed 3 days after using progesterone. On the day of embryo transfer, maximum two embryos will be thawed. Two hours after thawing, surviving embryos will be transferred into the uterus under ultrasound guidance. Luteal-phase support is done with estradiol 8mg/day and vaginal progesterone 800mg/day until 7th week of gestation.

Fresh ET group

In fresh ET group, maximum 2 embryos will be transferred into the uterus under ultrasound guidance. The remain grade 1 and 2 embryos will be frozen. Luteal phase support is done with estradiol 8mg/day and vaginal progesterone 800mg/day until 7th week of gestation.

In both of groups, serum hCG was measured 2 weeks after embryo transferred, and if positive, an ultrasound scan of the uterus was performed at gestational weeks 7 and 12.

METHODS

SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION

At IVFMD, the current ongoing pregnancy rate (with 2 embryos transferred) is 30%. To show an improvement in the freeze-all group of 10% (from 30% to 40%), it was calculated that 712 couples (356 in each group) would be needed (power 0.80, alpha-error 5%, two-sided test). To account for an estimated loss to follow-up rate of 10%, the number of patients needed was defined as 780 (390 patients per group).

STUDY ENDPOINTS

Primary endpoint

Ongoing pregnancy (OP). Ongoing pregnancy is explained as a pregnancy with positive heart beat beyond 12 weeks of gestation (twins is count as a single pregnancy).

Secondary endpoints

  • Implantation rate: defined as the number of gestational sacs per number of embryos transferred.
  • Clinical pregnancy: defined as the presence of a gestational sac seen by transvaginal sonography 7 weeks after embryo replacement.
  • Multiple pregnancy rate. defined as a pregnancy with two or more fetal heart beats by transvaginal sonography at 7 weeks of gestation.
  • Vanishing twins: defined as a pregnancy with tow or more gestational sacs or positive heart beats at 7 weeks of gestation, but only one at 12 weeks' gestation.

Treatment complications

  • Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): classified as moderate or severe by RCOG guidelines [Green-top Guideline No. 5, 2006].
  • Miscarriage: defined as the complete loss of a clinical pregnancy prior to 24 weeks' gestation.
  • Ectopic pregnancy: defined as the ectopic nidation of a pregnancy, confirmed by sonography or laparoscopy.

Obstetric outcomes

  • Live birth rate, defined as the birth of a newborn, irrespective of the duration of gestation, that exhibits any sign of life, such as respiration, heart-beat, umbilical pulsation or movement of voluntary muscles.
  • Gestational age at delivery.
  • Birth weight.
  • Congenital malformations.
  • Macrosomia (birth weight >90th percentile)
  • Small for gestational age (birth weight <10th percentile)
  • NICU admittance
  • Perinatal mortality: defined as the death of a fetus or infant from 24 weeks of gestation to the end of the neonatal period of 4 weeks after birth.

Pregnancy complications

  • Pregnancy-associated hypertension: defined as a diagnosis of pregnancy-induced hypertension made after the 20th week of gestation, excluding intraoperative blood pressures and intrapartum systolic pressures, with systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mmHg or diastolic pressure of ≥90 mmHg on two occasions 2 hours apart, or a severely elevated single blood pressure measurement that led to treatment with an antihypertensive medication.
  • Preeclampsia: defined as any type of hypertension combined with proteinuria (total protein excretion of 300 mg or other organ involvement [such as renal insufficiency, liver involvement, neurological or hematological complications, uteroplacental dysfunction, or fetal growth restriction]) according to the International Society of Studies in Hypertension in Pregnancy.
  • HELLP syndrome: defined as elevated liver enzyme levels (aspartate aminotransferase ≥100 U/L), thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000/mm3), elevated serum creatinine level (≥1.5 mg/dL [132.6 μmol/L]) and/or hemolysis (hemoglobin <10 g/dL).
  • Prematurity: defined as iatrogenic preterm birth at <32 weeks' gestation, spontaneous preterm birth at <32 weeks' gestation; iatrogenic preterm birth at <37 weeks gestation; spontaneous preterm birth at <37 weeks' gestation
  • Antepartum hemorrhage: defined as bleeding from the genital tract in the second half of pregnancy.
  • Gestational diabetes mellitus: diagnosed using a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (Fasting: 92 mg/dL [5.1 mmol/L]; 2 h: 153 mg/dL [8.5 mmol/L]) [American Diabetes Association 2013].

Labor

Induction of labor

  • Cesarean section
  • Elective
  • Suspected fetal distress
  • Non-progressive labor
  • Vaginal instrumental delivery
  • Suspected fetal distress
  • Non-progressive labor
  • Peripartum increased blood loss (≥1000 mL)

SUBJECT INFORMED CONSENT A review of patient information should be done prior to enrolment to determine preliminary eligibility according to patient inclusion and exclusion criteria. When a patient signs an informed consent she is considered to be enrolled in the study.

WITHDRAWAL OF INDIVIDUAL PATIENTS Patients can leave the study at any time for any reason if they wish to do so without any consequences for their treatment. The investigator can decide to withdraw a subject from the study or urgent medical reasons.

STATISTICAL EVALUATION

Event rates will be calculated for dichotomous endpoints. These will be compared by calculating relative risk and 95% confidence interval values. Between-group differences in non-continuous variables will be assessed using the Fisher exact test. Continuous variables will be reported as mean values ± standard deviation (SD) or as percentages. Between-group differences in continuous variables will be assessed with the Student's t-test.

In a secondary analysis we will assess whether the biomarkers progesterone at triggering day and endometrial thickness on day 3 after oocyte pick up can be used to identify patients in whom the freeze all strategy is particularly effective. To do so, we will look for interaction between progesterone or endometrial thickness and treatment effect.

A p-value <0.05 is defined as indicating a statistically significant difference. The analysis will be done with R statistical package (R version 3.3.1).

INTERIM ANALYSIS

Interim analysis will be performed after recruitment of the first 400 patients. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) will evaluate the data. A specific stopping rule will not be formulated, but continuation of the study will depend on the advice of the DSMC.

SAFETY REPORTING

The investigator will inform the subjects and the reviewing accredited medical research ethics committee; if anything occurs, on the basis of which it appears that the disadvantages of participation may be significantly greater than was foreseen in the research proposal. The investigator will take care that all subjects are kept informed.

ADVERSE AND SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS All observed or volunteered adverse events, regardless of treatment group or suspected causal relationship to intervention, will be recorded. Adverse events are defined as any undesirable experience occurring to a subject during a clinical trial, whether or not considered related to the intervention. All adverse events reported spontaneously by the subject or observed by the investigator or his staffs will be recorded.

A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death;

  • is life threatening (at the time of the event);
  • requires hospitalisation or prolongation of existing inpatients' hospitalisation;
  • results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity;
  • is a congenital anomaly or birth defect;
  • is a new event of the trial likely to affect the safety of the subjects, such as an unexpected outcome of an adverse reaction.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

RECRUITMENT AND CONSENT The subject should be given the time to read and understand the statement herself before signing her consent and dating the document. The subject should receive a copy of the written statement once signed.

PRIVACY ASPECTS Participating subjects will be registered by a 5-digit number. This personal code will be on all forms retrieved from participants.

BENEFITS AND RISKS ASSESSMENT, GROUP RELATEDNESS There is insufficient evidence for a rational policy in between the 2 strategies, freeze all or fresh ET. The potential benefits of freeze all are higher pregnancy rate, with a lower incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or ectopic pregnancy. The potential harm would be time-consuming.

Conditions
Infertility
Being tested
Freeze-all protocol, Fresh transfer protocol
Keywords
IVF, Freeze-all, frozen embryo transfer, fresh transfer
Medical subject headings
Infertility

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Freeze-all protocolProcedure or surgery

    Embryos are selected for cryopreservation using vitrification technique. Two vitrified embryos will be warmed and transferred in subsequent cycle.

  • Fresh transfer protocolProcedure or surgery

    Two embryos are selected and transferred fresh in the same cycle.

Study groups in NCT02471573
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Freeze-all protocolActive comparatorEmbryos are selected for cryopreservation using vitrification technique. Two vitrified embryos will be warmed and transferred in subsequent cycle.
Receives: Procedure: Freeze-all protocol
Fresh transfer protocolActive comparatorTwo embryos are selected and transferred fresh in the same cycle.
Receives: Procedure: Fresh transfer protocol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ongoing pregnancy

    Ongoing pregnancy is defined as a pregnancy with at least one positive heart beat beyond 12 weeks of gestation.

    Measured: 12 weeks of gestation

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Clinical pregnancy

    Clinical pregnancy is explained as the presence of a gestational sac seen by transvaginal sonography.

    Measured: 5 weeks after embryo placement

  2. Implantation rate

    Implantation rate is explained as as the number of gestational sacs per number of embryos transferred.

    Measured: 3 weeks after embryo transferred

  3. Multiple pregnancy rate

    Multiple pregnancy is explained as two or more gestational sacs or positive heart beats by transvaginal sonography.

    Measured: 5 weeks after embryo placement

  4. Live birth

    Live birth is defined if a live newborn delivered.

    Measured: at the time of delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start30 Jun 2015
  3. Primary completion10 Apr 2016
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
782 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02471573
Sponsor's protocol ID
NCKH/CGRH_ 03_2015
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
11 Jun 2015
Last updated
7 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Zaat T, Zagers M, Mol F, Goddijn M, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3.

    PubMed 33539543
  • Vuong LN, Ly TT, Nguyen NA, Nguyen LMT, Le XTH, Le TK, Le KTQ, Le TV, Nguyen MHN, Dang VQ, Norman RJ, Mol BW, Ho TM. Development of children born from freeze-only versus fresh embryo transfer: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2020 Sep;114(3):558-566. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.041. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

    PubMed 32560970
  • Vuong LN, Dang VQ, Ho TM, Huynh BG, Ha DT, Pham TD, Nguyen LK, Norman RJ, Mol BW. IVF Transfer of Fresh or Frozen Embryos in Women without Polycystic Ovaries. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):137-147. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703768.

    PubMed 29320655

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Freeze-all protocol and Fresh transfer protocol in people with Infertility, run by Vietnam National University at 1 site in Vietnam.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ongoing pregnancy (time frame: 12 weeks of gestation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02471573, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in