AzTrials
AzTrials

Celiac DiseasePhase 2WHETMITNCT02472119

Wheat Flour Treatment With Microbial Transglutaminase and Lysine Ethyl Ester: New Frontiers in Celiac Disease Treatment.

A Phase 2 study testing rusks made of wheat flour enzymatically treated, rusks made of wheat flour not enzimatically modified and Gluten-free diet in people with Celiac Disease, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Celiac disease is one of the most common forms of food intolerance (prevalence 1/200). The disease occurs in genetically predisposed individuals after ingestion of foods containing gluten. Celiac patients can suffer from severe malabsorption syndrome, mainly characterized by diarrhea and weight loss. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Celiac Disease
What is being tested?
rusks made of wheat flour enzymatically treated, rusks made of wheat flour not enzimatically modified and Gluten-free diet
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Jun 2015to Aug 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • diagnosis of celiac disease according to ESPGHAN criteria: class III according to Marsh-Oberhuber classification, clear response to gluten-free diet, serological antiendomysium and antitransglutaminase antibodies positive results before GFD;
  • HLA DQ2-DQ8 positive results;
  • gluten-free diet from at least one year;
  • negative serology from at least 1 year;

Who cannot join

  • inflammatory bowel diseases;
  • tumors;
  • infectious liver disease;
  • renal impairment.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Antonio Picarelli, medicine contact

+39 06 49978370

antonio.picarelli@uniroma1.it

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Sapienza University - Policlinico Umberto I

    Rome, Italy, 00186

    Antonio Picarelli, medicine, +390649978370, antonio.picarelli@uniroma1.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Wheat Flour Subjected to Microbial Transglutaminase Enzymatic Treatment in the Presence of Lysine Ethyl Ester for Alimentary Use in the Treatment of Celiac Disease.

Celiac disease is one of the most common forms of food intolerance (prevalence 1/200). The disease occurs in genetically predisposed individuals after ingestion of foods containing gluten. Celiac patients can suffer from severe malabsorption syndrome, mainly characterized by diarrhea and weight loss. The only therapeutic approach currently recognized is a life-long gluten-free diet.

Specific regions of gluten molecule become recognizable by lymphocytes and activate them, due to changes made by tissue transglutaminase. These changes consist in the conversion of specific residues of glutamine into glutamic acid. The consequence is an increased binding affinity between gluten and histocompatibility molecule (HLA-DQ2), localized on the surface of the "antigen presenting cells" (APC); the exposure of the fragments of modified gluten on the surface of APC is a phenomenon that eventually activates T lymphocytes.

Read more

Recent studies on modified gluten confirmed the hypothesis that it is possible to block the presentation of gluten to lymphocytes by means of lysine ethyl ester binding exclusively to those gluten regions responsible for lymphocyte activation.

The enzymatic treatment is performed directly on flour instead of extracted gluten, maintaining the same anti-inflammatory effectiveness.

The procedure uses a food-grade enzyme, the microbial transglutaminase (mTGasi) isolated from Streptoverticillium mobarensis, able to catalyze the formation of intermolecular "cross-links" that modify the functional properties of the products.

Objective of the study is to validate the ability of the enzyme treatment of wheat flour with mTGasi and lysine ethyl ester to block the toxic effect of gluten in celiac patients.

Read the detailed description

Celiac disease is one of the most common forms of food intolerance (prevalence 1/200). The disease occurs in genetically predisposed individuals after ingestion of foods containing wheat gluten and similar proteins found in other common cereals such as barley and rye. Celiac patients can suffer from severe malabsorption syndrome, mainly characterized by diarrhea, weight loss and growth retardation. The only therapeutic approach currently recognized is a life-long gluten-free diet.

Specific regions of gluten molecule become recognizable by lymphocytes and activate them, due to changes made by tissue transglutaminase. These changes consist in the conversion of specific residues of glutamine (Q) into glutamic acid (E). The consequence is an increased binding affinity between gluten and histocompatibility molecule (HLA-DQ2), localized on the surface of the "antigen presenting cells" (APC); the exposure of the fragments of modified gluten on the surface of APC is a phenomenon that eventually activates T lymphocytes.

Recent studies on modified gluten confirmed the hypothesis that it is possible to block the presentation of gluten to lymphocytes by means of lysine ethyl ester binding exclusively to those gluten regions responsible for lymphocyte activation.

Specifically, it is possible to perform the enzymatic treatment directly on flour instead of extracted gluten, maintaining the same anti-inflammatory effectiveness. The final procedure consists in dissolving the flour in water in the presence of appropriate concentrations of enzyme and lysine ethyl ester, maintaining the suspension in constant motion for two hours at room temperature.

The procedure uses a food-grade enzyme, the microbial transglutaminase (mTGasi) isolated from Streptoverticillium mobarensis, already used for the preparation of food. The mTgasi is able to catalyze the formation of intermolecular "cross-links" modifying the functional properties of the products through the aggregation and polymerization of proteins. The peculiar method identified by our laboratory reduces the possibility of cross-links between proteins: consequently, minimal changes involve the gluten structure and, consequently, the visco-elastic properties of the dough.

Objective of the study is to validate the ability of the enzyme treatment of wheat flour with mTGasi and lysine ethyl ester to block the toxic effect of gluten in celiac patients.

Conditions
Celiac Disease
Being tested
rusks made of wheat flour enzymatically treated, rusks made of wheat flour not enzimatically modified, Gluten-free diet
Keywords
Celiac disease, Gluten-free diet, Wheat flour treatment, Microbial transglutaminase, Lysine Ethyl Ester, Celiac Disease Treatment
Medical subject headings
Celiac Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • rusks made of wheat flour enzymatically treatedDietary supplement

    100 g of rusks obtained from commercial wheat flour enzymatically treated with mTGasi and lysine ethyl ester, every day for 3 months

  • rusks made of wheat flour not enzimatically modifiedDietary supplement

    100 g of rusks obtained from commercial wheat flour NOT enzymatically treated with mTGasi and lysine ethyl ester, every day for 3 months

  • Gluten-free dietDietary supplement

    gluten-free diet

Study groups in NCT02472119
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
rusks made with treated flourExperimentalGluten-free diet adding rusks (100g / day) produced with commercial wheat flour enzymatically treated with mTGasi and lysine ethyl ester.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: rusks made of wheat flour enzymatically treated; Dietary Supplement: Gluten-free diet
rusks made with not-treated flourActive comparatorGluten-free diet adding rusks (100g / day) produced with untreated wheat flour.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: rusks made of wheat flour not enzimatically modified; Dietary Supplement: Gluten-free diet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibodies at 30 days

    Proof of any positivization of specific serological antibodies for celiac disease. Results quantified by an ELISA reader at 450 nm (A450nm) is expressed in U/mL and the antibody level 10 U/mL was used as a cutoff value to identify anti-tTG positive results.

    Measured: After 1 month

  2. Change from baseline in IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibodies at 60 days

    Proof of any positivization of specific serological antibodies for celiac disease. Results quantified by an ELISA reader at 450 nm (A450nm) is expressed in U/mL and the antibody level 10 U/mL was used as a cutoff value to identify anti-tTG positive results.

    Measured: After 2 months

  3. Change from baseline in IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibodies at 90 days

    Proof of any positivization of specific serological antibodies for celiac disease. Results quantified by an ELISA reader at 450 nm (A450nm) is expressed in U/mL and the antibody level 10 U/mL was used as a cutoff value to identify anti-tTG positive results.

    Measured: After 3 months

  4. Change from baseline in IgA anti-endomysium antibodies (EMA) at 30 days

    Test used to confirm serological activation of celiac disease. IgA EMA were searched in sera diluted 1:5 by indirect immunofluorescence analysis on cryostat sections of monkey esophagus. The results are expressed as ''positive/negative''.

    Measured: After 1 month

  5. Change from baseline in IgA anti-endomysium antibodies (EMA) at 60 days

    Test used to confirm serological activation of celiac disease. IgA EMA were searched in sera diluted 1:5 by indirect immunofluorescence analysis on cryostat sections of monkey esophagus. The results are expressed as ''positive/negative''.

    Measured: After 2 months

  6. Change from baseline in IgA anti-endomysium antibodies (EMA) at 90 days

    Test used to confirm serological activation of celiac disease. IgA EMA were searched in sera diluted 1:5 by indirect immunofluorescence analysis on cryostat sections of monkey esophagus. The results are expressed as ''positive/negative''.

    Measured: After 3 months

  7. Pathologic variations in histologic analysis from baseline

    Proof of duodenal mucosa histological alterations induced by celiac disease, consisting in altered (<3:1) villous height/crypt depth ratio and increased (>25) intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 intestinal epithelial cells, according to Marsh-Oberhuber classification.

    Measured: After 3 months, or in case of serum anti-tTG IgA/EMA IgA positive results

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Presence of bloating at baseline

    Evaluation of bloating intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: At baseline

  2. Presence of abdominal pain at baseline

    Evaluation of abdominal pain intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: At baseline

  3. Presence of diarrhea at baseline

    Evaluation of diarrhea intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: At baseline

  4. Presence of asthenia at baseline

    Evaluation of asthenia intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: At baseline

  5. Variation of bloating from baseline at 30 days

    Evaluation of bloating intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 1 month

  6. Variation of abdominal pain from baseline at 30 days

    Evaluation of abdominal pain intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 1 month

  7. Variation of diarrhea from baseline at 30 days

    Evaluation of diarrhea intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 1 month

  8. Variation of asthenia from baseline at 30 days

    Evaluation of asthenia intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 1 month

  9. Variation of bloating from baseline at 60 days

    Evaluation of bloating intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 2 months

  10. Variation of abdominal pain from baseline at 60 days

    Evaluation of abdominal pain intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 2 months

  11. Variation of diarrhea from baseline at 60 days

    Evaluation of diarrhea intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 2 months

  12. Variation of asthenia from baseline at 60 days

    Evaluation of asthenia intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 2 months

  13. Variation of bloating from baseline at 90 days

    Evaluation of bloating intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 3 months

  14. Variation of abdominal pain from baseline at 90 days

    Evaluation of abdominal pain intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 3 months

  15. Variation of diarrhea from baseline at 90 days

    Evaluation of diarrhea intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 3 months

  16. Variation of asthenia from baseline at 90 days

    Evaluation of asthenia intensity is reported according to the Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS), with a range of 0-10.

    Measured: After 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2015
  3. Primary completionAug 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02472119
Sponsor's protocol ID
672/10 Rif. 1907 / 22.07.2010
Acronym
WHETMIT
Status last verified
Jun 2015
First submitted
3 Jun 2015
Last updated
15 Jun 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Branski D, Fasano A, Troncone R. Latest developments in the pathogenesis and treatment of celiac disease. J Pediatr. 2006 Sep;149(3):295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.06.003. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16939736
  • Nilsen EM, Jahnsen FL, Lundin KE, Johansen FE, Fausa O, Sollid LM, Jahnsen J, Scott H, Brandtzaeg P. Gluten induces an intestinal cytokine response strongly dominated by interferon gamma in patients with celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 1998 Sep;115(3):551-63. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70134-9.

    PubMed 9721152
  • Molberg O, Mcadam SN, Korner R, Quarsten H, Kristiansen C, Madsen L, Fugger L, Scott H, Noren O, Roepstorff P, Lundin KE, Sjostrom H, Sollid LM. Tissue transglutaminase selectively modifies gliadin peptides that are recognized by gut-derived T cells in celiac disease. Nat Med. 1998 Jun;4(6):713-7. doi: 10.1038/nm0698-713.

    PubMed 9623982
  • Gianfrani C, Siciliano RA, Facchiano AM, Camarca A, Mazzeo MF, Costantini S, Salvati VM, Maurano F, Mazzarella G, Iaquinto G, Bergamo P, Rossi M. Transamidation of wheat flour inhibits the response to gliadin of intestinal T cells in celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2007 Sep;133(3):780-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.023. Epub 2007 Jun 20.

    PubMed 17678925
  • Yokoyama K, Nio N, Kikuchi Y. Properties and applications of microbial transglutaminase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 May;64(4):447-54. doi: 10.1007/s00253-003-1539-5. Epub 2004 Jan 22.

    PubMed 14740191
  • Fink ML, Chung SI, Folk JE. gamma-Glutamylamine cyclotransferase: specificity toward epsilon-(L-gamma-glutamyl)-L-lysine and related compounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):4564-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4564.

    PubMed 6107907
  • Catassi C, Fabiani E, Iacono G, D'Agate C, Francavilla R, Biagi F, Volta U, Accomando S, Picarelli A, De Vitis I, Pianelli G, Gesuita R, Carle F, Mandolesi A, Bearzi I, Fasano A. A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to establish a safe gluten threshold for patients with celiac disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jan;85(1):160-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.1.160.

    PubMed 17209192
  • Picarelli A, Di Tola M, Sabbatella L, Anania MC, Calabro A, Renzi D, Bai JC, Sugai E, Carroccio A, Di Prima L, Bardella MT, Barisani D, Ribes-Koninckx C, Aliaga ED, Gasparin M, Bravi E; Multicentre Organ Culture System Study Group. Usefulness of the organ culture system in the in vitro diagnosis of coeliac disease: a multicentre study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;41(2):186-90. doi: 10.1080/00365520510024151.

    PubMed 16509042
  • Picarelli A, Maiuri L, Frate A, Greco M, Auricchio S, Londei M. Production of antiendomysial antibodies after in-vitro gliadin challenge of small intestine biopsy samples from patients with coeliac disease. Lancet. 1996 Oct 19;348(9034):1065-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03060-7.

    PubMed 8874458
  • Marino M, Casale R, Borghini R, Di Nardi S, Donato G, Angeloni A, Moscaritolo S, Grasso L, Mazzarella G, Di Tola M, Rossi M, Picarelli A. The effects of modified versus unmodified wheat gluten administration in patients with celiac disease. Int Immunopharmacol. 2017 Jun;47:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

    PubMed 28343108

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing rusks made of wheat flour enzymatically treated, rusks made of wheat flour not enzimatically modified and Gluten-free diet in people with Celiac Disease, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Antonio Picarelli, medicine (+39 06 49978370, antonio.picarelli@uniroma1.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibodies at 30 days (time frame: After 1 month). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02472119, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in