Acute DiseaseNCT02474277
How Well Does the 30-Second Chair Stand Test Predict Rehabilitation Needs in Acutely Admitted Elderly Patients
A study testing 30 sec chair stand test in people with Acute Disease, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The aims are to identify predictive indicators of hospitalized elderly medical patients' need for rehabilitation and to validate (known group validity) the Chair Stand Test Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Disease
- What is being tested?
- 30 sec chair stand test
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 156 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to May 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Can speak and understand Danish
- Can report personal data
- Within the first 48 hours of admission are able to sin on an ordinary chair
Who cannot join
- Patients ordinarily unable to walk
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: How Well Does the 30-second Chair Stand Test Predict Rehabilitation Needs in Acutely Admitted Elderly Patients?
The aims are to identify predictive indicators of hospitalized elderly medical patients' need for rehabilitation and to validate (known group validity) the Chair Stand Test
Read the detailed description
In the emergency department the assessment of acutely admitted elderly medical patients' need for rehabilitation is difficult as it has to been performed within 48 hours. Is it possible to use the the Chair Stand Test in combination with admission complaints and identified risk factors to predict the need for rehabilitation? An investigating of the Chair Stand Test is needed, as its validity with hospitalized patients is undocumented.
- Conditions
- Acute Disease
- Being tested
- 30 sec chair stand test
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
30 sec chair stand testOther
diagnostic test for functional impairment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 30 sec chair stand test | Other | all patients in this Group receives a diagnostic test for functional impairment Receives: Other: 30 sec chair stand test |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
30-Second Chair Stand Test
Measured: 14 days after admission at the hospital
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completionApr 2015
- Study completionMay 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 156 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern Denmark
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Christian Backer Mogensen, University of Southern Denmark
- Investigators
- Christian B Mogensen, MD PHD, Principal investigator, University of Southern Denmark
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02474277
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SLB-ED-08-2014
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 10 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bruun IH, Maribo T, Norgaard B, Schiottz-Christensen B, Mogensen CB. A prediction model to identify hospitalised, older adults with reduced physical performance. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Dec 7;17(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0671-5.
PubMed 29216838
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- How Well Does the 30-second Chair Stand Test Predict Rehabilitation Needs in Acutely Admitted Elderly Patients?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02474277
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SLB-ED-08-2014
- Conditions
- Acute Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 156 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern DenmarkUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2014
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aims are to identify predictive indicators of hospitalized elderly medical patients' need for rehabilitation and to validate (known group validity) the Chair Stand Test
Detailed description
In the emergency department the assessment of acutely admitted elderly medical patients' need for rehabilitation is difficult as it has to been performed within 48 hours. Is it possible to use the the Chair Stand Test in combination with admission complaints and identified risk factors to predict the need for rehabilitation? An investigating of the Chair Stand Test is needed, as its validity with hospitalized patients is undocumented.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 30 sec chair stand test | Other | Other: 30 sec chair stand testall patients in this Group receives a diagnostic test for functional impairment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Can speak and understand Danish
- Can report personal data
- Within the first 48 hours of admission are able to sin on an ordinary chair
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients ordinarily unable to walk
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 30 sec chair stand testdiagnostic test for functional impairment | Other | 30 sec chair stand test |
Primary outcome
30-Second Chair Stand Test
Time frame: 14 days after admission at the hospital
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29216838Bruun IH, Maribo T, Norgaard B, Schiottz-Christensen B, Mogensen CB. A prediction model to identify hospitalised, older adults with reduced physical performance. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Dec 7;17(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0671-5.
Related trials for Acute Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Pivotal Open-label Phase 3 Clinical Study of QTX-2101 in Adult Patients With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL), Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Anti-CRLF2-R/TSLPR Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (TSLPR-CART) in Participants With Recurrent or Refractory CRLF2-R/TSLPR-Overexpressing B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Active, not recruiting
High-Intensity Parent Intervention Program in Improving Learning and School Functioning in Latino Children With Acute Leukemia or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of REM-422 in Patients With AML or Higher Risk MDS
Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian B Mogensen, MD PHD principal investigator
University of Southern Denmark
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 30 sec chair stand test in people with Acute Disease, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
30-Second Chair Stand Test (time frame: 14 days after admission at the hospital). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02474277, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2015.