Staphylococcus Aureus BacteremiaPETCT4SABNCT02476487
The Benefit of FDG PET CT in the Treatment Algorithm of Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
A study testing FDG PET CT in people with Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia, run by Rambam Health Care Campus at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
Background: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is frequently encountered in hospitals, with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Duration of antimicrobial treatment for SAB, other than in cases of Infective endocarditis (IE), recommended by different guidelines relies on risk stratification for relapse of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
- What is being tested?
- FDG PET CT
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 143 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2015to 31 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients >18y old with SAB, defined as at least one positive blood culture and at least two of the criteria of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) (33):
- a temperature of more than 38°C or less than 36°C;
- an elevated heart rate greater than 90beats per minute;
- tachypnea, manifested by a respiratory rate greater than 20 breaths per minute or hyperventilation, as indicated by a partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide of less than 32 mmHg;
- an alteration in the white blood cell count, such as a count greater than 12,000/cu mm, a count less than 4,000/cu mm; or the presence of more than 10% immature neutrophils.
- Patients with polymicrobial bacteremia will be included, but we will mandate growth of S. aureus in at least two blood culture bottles.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Infective endocarditis
- Patients with background survival expectation of less than 1 week.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Benefit of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in the Treatment Algorithm of Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
Background: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is frequently encountered in hospitals, with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Duration of antimicrobial treatment for SAB, other than in cases of Infective endocarditis (IE), recommended by different guidelines relies on risk stratification for relapse of infection rather than definite diagnosis of septic foci that eventually determine the relapse rate. In recently published studies fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET CT was found to be a sensitive imaging test for identifying metastatic infectious foci in Gram-positive bacteremia, including SAB.
Objectives: To examine the impact of using FDG PET CT in the diagnostic algorithm of non-IE SAB compared to standard treatment recommendations on treatment duration and clinical outcomes.
Read more
Methods: A prospective interventional non-comparative cohort study conducted at Rambam Health Care Campus. Patients with SAB, defined as microbiologically and clinically, will undergo FDG PET CT 10-14 days following the first positive blood culture for diagnosis of septic extra-cardiac foci of infection. Patients with IE will be excluded. Short (2 weeks) versus long treatment (4-6 weeks) will be recommended for negative and positive PET CT tests, respectively. Patients will be followed-up for 1 year for relapse of infection and mortality.
We will document the sensitivity and specificity of PET CT for detection of complications among patients with SAB. We will examine the percentage of patients in whom the use of PET CT changed treatment duration compared to standard recommendations. We will compare also, the relapse rate and 1 year mortality rate with data from previous studies and local data. Assuming a 15% rate of management changes compared to consensus recommendations, a sample of 150 patients will achieve the required 95% CI.
Significance: Our trial will serve for improving decision making in patients with non-IE SAB, shortening treatment duration in unnecessary cases and decreasing relapse rate by giving prolonged appropriate treatment for metastatic infection not identified by standard management algorithms. PET CT is assuming an increasingly important role in infection diagnosis and management. The current study will be the first to examine the role of PET CT in directing management of patients with SAB.
Read the detailed description
Objectives :
Since it has been shown that PET CT is a sensitive modality for detecting complications of Gram-positive bacteremia, mainly S. aureus, we sought to examine a diagnostic algorithm of SAB using PET CT. Specifically, we plan to examine:
- In patients fulfilling current criteria for a short course of antibiotic treatment for SAB, are there patients who should receive longer treatment due to the presence of undetected foci of infection on PET CT?
- In patients with risk factors mandating prolonged antibiotic treatment according to current guidelines (without IE) and a negative PET CT, is treatment discontinuation after two weeks of treatment safe?
- For patients with primary bacteremia, does a PET CT improve outcome (relapses, length of stay (LOS), survival)?
Study design:
A prospective, interventional, non-comparative cohort study
Setting and location:
Rambam Health Care Campus, a primary and tertiary 900-bed university-affiliated hospital.
Treatment algorithm:
All patients will be managed using a uniform diagnostic/ treatment algorithm, supervised by an infectious disease consultant.
Patients will be classified into two groups (table 1):
Group 1- patients fulfilling criteria of complicated bacteremia Group 2- patients with uncomplicated bacteremia PET CT will be performed on day 7-14 since the first positive blood culture. If findings suggestive of infection will be demonstrated on FDG-PET imaging, the treating clinician will consider these finding, in consultation with a PET-expert radiologist and an infectious disease consultant. If an infection is considered likely, the clinician may consider attempting to obtain a tissue specimen in order to confirm the suspicion.
- Patients fulfilling current criteria for a short course of antibiotic treatment: treatment will be prolonged if PET CT demonstrates a focus of residual infection.
- Patients with risk factors mandating prolonged antibiotic treatment according to current guidelines without IE: antibiotics will be stopped at 2 weeks if PET CT is normal.
Participant recruitment and data collection:
Patients will be identified through a daily report of S. aureus growth in blood cultures. The researchers will apply inclusion and exclusion criteria on this preliminary cohort. All patients fulfilling inclusion criteria and providing informed consent will be consecutively enrolled. Patients will be followed up by clinical consultations until discharge. Post-discharge patients will be followed-up until 1 year after end of treatment through telephone interviews and through clinical consultations if re-admitted to our hospital.
Diagnostic test:
Imaging Protocols:
FDG-PET/CT will be performed 60-90 min after radiopharmaceutical injection from the skull to the half thigh. Oral contrast will be given during the uptake time. Analysis of the PET/CT images include:
- Visual inspection to exclude misregistration between the PET and the CT components.
- Visual inspection of images and semiquantitative evaluation by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) evaluation.
- Localizing any focus of abnormal radioactivity accumulation indicating infection.
Analysis:
The percentage of management changes triggered by PET CT will be documented per patient group. To refute the null hypothesis, i.e. no difference in patient management with or without PET CT, we will define that the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the percentage of management changes be >10%. Assuming a 15% rate of management changes, a sample of 150 will achieve the required 95% CI. If the percentage will be 20%, we will need only 60 patients. The number of patients to be included will depend on the percentage of management changes and will be monitored every 10 patients. We will compare outcomes documented in the study cohort to those reported in the literature.
- Conditions
- Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
- Being tested
- FDG PET CT
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FDG PET CTProcedure or surgery
FDG-PET CT will be performed on day 7-14 since the first positive blood culture. 1. Patients fulfilling current criteria for a short course (2 weeks) of antibiotic treatment: treatment will be prolonged if PET CT demonstrates a focus of residual infection.
- Patients with risk factors mandating prolonged antibiotic treatment (4-6 weeks) according to current guidelines without IE: antibiotics will be stopped at 2 weeks if PET CT is normal.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FDG PET CT | Experimental | FDG PET CT Receives: Procedure: FDG PET CT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Management changes triggered by PET CT (percentage of management changes triggered by PET CT will be documented per patient group)
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study start1 Aug 2015
- Primary completion30 Dec 2020
- Study completion31 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Staphylococcus Aureus BacteremiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rambam Health Care Campus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mical Paul, MD, Study director, Head of Infectious Diseases Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02476487
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0377-14CTIL
- Acronym
- PETCT4SAB
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 27 May 2015
- Last updated
- 23 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymized database will be made available in access/ Epi-Info format from the authors upon request
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Benefit of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in the Treatment Algorithm of Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02476487
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PETCT4SAB / 0377-14CTIL
- Conditions
- Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rambam Health Care CampusUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is frequently encountered in hospitals, with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Duration of antimicrobial treatment for SAB, other than in cases of Infective endocarditis (IE), recommended by different guidelines relies on risk stratification for relapse of infection rather than definite diagnosis of septic foci that eventually determine the relapse rate. In recently published studies fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET CT was found to be a sensitive imaging test for identifying metastatic infectious foci in Gram-positive bacteremia, including SAB.
Objectives: To examine the impact of using FDG PET CT in the diagnostic algorithm of non-IE SAB compared to standard treatment recommendations on treatment duration and clinical outcomes.
Methods: A prospective interventional non-comparative cohort study conducted at Rambam Health Care Campus. Patients with SAB, defined as microbiologically and clinically, will undergo FDG PET CT 10-14 days following the first positive blood culture for diagnosis of septic extra-cardiac foci of infection. Patients with IE will be excluded. Short (2 weeks) versus long treatment (4-6 weeks) will be recommended for negative and positive PET CT tests, respectively. Patients will be followed-up for 1 year for relapse of infection and mortality.
We will document the sensitivity and specificity of PET CT for detection of complications among patients with SAB. We will examine the percentage of patients in whom the use of PET CT changed treatment duration compared to standard recommendations. We will compare also, the relapse rate and 1 year mortality rate with data from previous studies and local data. Assuming a 15% rate of management changes compared to consensus recommendations, a sample of 150 patients will achieve the required 95% CI.
Significance: Our trial will serve for improving decision making in patients with non-IE SAB, shortening treatment duration in unnecessary cases and decreasing relapse rate by giving prolonged appropriate treatment for metastatic infection not identified by standard management algorithms. PET CT is assuming an increasingly important role in infection diagnosis and management. The current study will be the first to examine the role of PET CT in directing management of patients with SAB.
Detailed description
Objectives :
Since it has been shown that PET CT is a sensitive modality for detecting complications of Gram-positive bacteremia, mainly S. aureus, we sought to examine a diagnostic algorithm of SAB using PET CT. Specifically, we plan to examine:
- In patients fulfilling current criteria for a short course of antibiotic treatment for SAB, are there patients who should receive longer treatment due to the presence of undetected foci of infection on PET CT?
- In patients with risk factors mandating prolonged antibiotic treatment according to current guidelines (without IE) and a negative PET CT, is treatment discontinuation after two weeks of treatment safe?
- For patients with primary bacteremia, does a PET CT improve outcome (relapses, length of stay (LOS), survival)?
Study design:
A prospective, interventional, non-comparative cohort study
Setting and location:
Rambam Health Care Campus, a primary and tertiary 900-bed university-affiliated hospital.
Treatment algorithm:
All patients will be managed using a uniform diagnostic/ treatment algorithm, supervised by an infectious disease consultant.
Patients will be classified into two groups (table 1):
Group 1- patients fulfilling criteria of complicated bacteremia Group 2- patients with uncomplicated bacteremia PET CT will be performed on day 7-14 since the first positive blood culture. If findings suggestive of infection will be demonstrated on FDG-PET imaging, the treating clinician will consider these finding, in consultation with a PET-expert radiologist and an infectious disease consultant. If an infection is considered likely, the clinician may consider attempting to obtain a tissue specimen in order to confirm the suspicion.
- Patients fulfilling current criteria for a short course of antibiotic treatment: treatment will be prolonged if PET CT demonstrates a focus of residual infection.
- Patients with risk factors mandating prolonged antibiotic treatment according to current guidelines without IE: antibiotics will be stopped at 2 weeks if PET CT is normal.
Participant recruitment and data collection:
Patients will be identified through a daily report of S. aureus growth in blood cultures. The researchers will apply inclusion and exclusion criteria on this preliminary cohort. All patients fulfilling inclusion criteria and providing informed consent will be consecutively enrolled. Patients will be followed up by clinical consultations until discharge. Post-discharge patients will be followed-up until 1 year after end of treatment through telephone interviews and through clinical consultations if re-admitted to our hospital.
Diagnostic test:
Imaging Protocols:
FDG-PET/CT will be performed 60-90 min after radiopharmaceutical injection from the skull to the half thigh. Oral contrast will be given during the uptake time. Analysis of the PET/CT images include:
- Visual inspection to exclude misregistration between the PET and the CT components.
- Visual inspection of images and semiquantitative evaluation by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) evaluation.
- Localizing any focus of abnormal radioactivity accumulation indicating infection.
Analysis:
The percentage of management changes triggered by PET CT will be documented per patient group. To refute the null hypothesis, i.e. no difference in patient management with or without PET CT, we will define that the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the percentage of management changes be >10%. Assuming a 15% rate of management changes, a sample of 150 will achieve the required 95% CI. If the percentage will be 20%, we will need only 60 patients. The number of patients to be included will depend on the percentage of management changes and will be monitored every 10 patients. We will compare outcomes documented in the study cohort to those reported in the literature.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FDG PET CT | Experimental | Procedure: FDG PET CTFDG PET CT |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adult patients >18y old with SAB, defined as at least one positive blood culture and at least two of the criteria of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) (33):
- Patients with polymicrobial bacteremia will be included, but we will mandate growth of S. aureus in at least two blood culture bottles.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Infective endocarditis
- Patients with background survival expectation of less than 1 week.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FDG PET CTFDG-PET CT will be performed on day 7-14 since the first positive blood culture. 1. Patients fulfilling current criteria for a short course (2 weeks) of antibiotic treatment: treatment will be prolonged if PET CT demonstrates a focus of residual infection. 2. Patients with risk factors mandating prolonged antibiotic treatment (4-6 weeks) according to current guidelines without IE: antibiotics will be stopped at 2 weeks if PET CT is normal. | Procedure or surgery | FDG PET CT |
Primary outcome
Management changes triggered by PET CT (percentage of management changes triggered by PET CT will be documented per patient group)
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Nov 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymized database will be made available in access/ Epi-Info format from the authors upon request
Related trials for Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Nasal Intracellular Reservoir of Staphylococcus Aureus in Patients With S. Aureus Bacteremia
Bacteria Infection Mechanism
RecruitingPhase 2
Combination Cefazolin With Ertapenem for Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia, Staphylococcus Aureus Septicemia
RecruitingPhase 4
Combination Antibiotic Therapy for Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
RecruitingPhase 4
Dabigatran vs. Oral Anti-Xa Inhibitors in S. Aureus Bacteremia
Staphylococcus Aureus Endocarditis, Staphylococcus Aureus Septicemia
RecruitingPhase 4
Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients With S. Aureus Bacteremia
Staphylococcus Aureus Endocarditis, Staphylococcus Aureus Septicemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mical Paul, MD study director
Head of Infectious Diseases Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing FDG PET CT in people with Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia, run by Rambam Health Care Campus at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Management changes triggered by PET CT (percentage of management changes triggered by PET CT will be documented per patient group) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Nov 2022.