Spinal Cord InjuryPhase 1NCT02482194
Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation for Spinal Cord Injury- A Phase I Clinical Study
A Phase 1 study testing mesenchymal stem cells in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by National Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplant (NIBMT), Pakistan at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
The conventional treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) includes physical therapy and rehabilitation and in some cases may require surgical intervention. Although improved emergency care and aggressive treatment can help in preventing further damage and even restore minimal sensory functions, still a large proportion… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury
- What is being tested?
- mesenchymal stem cells
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 9 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to Mar 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients suffering from sub-acute and chronic phase of spinal cord injury
- Traumatic spinal cord injury at the thoracic level
- American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale "A"
- Confirmation by MRI of injury level
- Time between injury and enrollment greater than 2 weeks
- Ability to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- Axonic brain injury
- Inability to provide consent
- Open injuries
- Active infectious diseases
- Terminal patients
- Neurodegenerative diseases
Show all 13Show fewer
- Evidence of meningitis
- Cerebral palsy
- Primary haematologic diseases
- Coagulopathies
- Pregnancy
- Other medical complications that contra-indicate surgery, including major respiratory complications
- Use of metal implants close to vascular structures (such as cardiac pacemaker or prosthesis) that contraindicate MRI.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Autologous Transplantation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients of Spinal Cord Injury-Phase I Clinical Trial
The conventional treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) includes physical therapy and rehabilitation and in some cases may require surgical intervention. Although improved emergency care and aggressive treatment can help in preventing further damage and even restore minimal sensory functions, still a large proportion of patients suffer with prolonged disabilities. It led neurologists to search out for new treatment options for this otherwise debilitating disorder. Recent advances in research have developed a better understanding of stem cell biology especially their role in tissue repair and regeneration. Encouraging results in pre-clinical phase and limited human trials have proved that stem cells can be safely and effectively delivered to the injured site for regeneration of damaged tissue. Although a variety of cell types have been tried for their role in repair of spinal cord injury, majority of clinical trials employed stem cells taken from bone marrow especially mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). Bone marrow MSCs are a good choice for regenerative therapies owing to advantages like ease of collection and ex-vivo culturing, immune tolerance and their ability to differentiate into a variety of cell types including neuronal lineage cells. Intravenous application or direct injection of MSCs into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) via lumber puncture in animal models of SCI and brain trauma had shown that MSCs can migrate towards and integrate into injured spinal tissue and reduce cyst size and increase functional recovery. The literature indicates that acute, sub-acute and chronic injury can be a therapeutic target for MSC grafting. The mechanism of action may however vary among these conditions. In acute phase, MSC administration play anti-inflammatory role, while in sub-acute/chronic setting it may be used as neurostimulator and for cell bridging effect and possibly glial or neuronal cell replacement. The investigators propose a non-randomized, single group, open label, phase-I, interventional study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intrathecal delivery of patient's own (autologous) bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of spinal cord injury. This will include determination of functional recovery (neuro-muscular control and sensation) in the affected area and overall improvement in quality of life of the patients and also take into account any side effects, if observed.
Read the detailed description
The role of regenerative therapies has gained more importance due to increased number of SCI in the wake of recent anti-terrorism operations by the armed forces and non-availability of any curative treatment for this category of patients. The promising results of preliminary clinical trials have proved that adult stem cells especially multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells can be safely injected and well tolerated and have shown functional improvement in SCI patients. The successful treatment in these patients will not only improve functional status of these otherwise debilitating patients, but can also reduce the burden on health care facilities. Mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to promote anatomical and functional recovery in animal models of SCI by promoting tissue sparing, axonal regeneration, and remyelination. Therapeutic effects of MSCs are primarily due to the secretion of soluble factors and the provision of extracellular matrix that provide protection and support repair. MSC are attractive candidates for transplantation into human patients because they can be easily harvested, expanded and banked, or derived directly from the patient allowing for autologous transplantation, obviating the need for immune suppression. In this study patients suffering from sub-acute and chronic phase of spinal cord injury shall be included. Patients will undergo detailed screening through MRI and motor and sensory assessment by ASIA score. Further evaluation will include electromyography (EMG) and tests for electroneurophysiological assessment like nerve conduction velocity (NCV) will also be done. Bone marrow aspiration will be done from iliac crest of the patients, followed by mononuclear cells (MNCs) separation by density gradient centrifugation. MNCs will be washed and cultured in tissue culture flasks. After 48 hours non-adherent cells will be removed from culture. Medium will be changed twice weekly till MSCs reach 70-80 % confluence. At that point MSCs will be harvested and after microbiological and other quality control testing the cellular preparation will be diluted to final concentration and infused by intrathecal injection.
Primary outcome measure is safety which will be determined by clinical evaluation by two independent neurologists during one month of hospital stay after receiving treatment course.
Secondary outcome measures will include American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale and NCV/EMG.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Being tested
- mesenchymal stem cells
- Keywords
- Spinal cord injury, mesenchymal stem cells, transplantation
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
mesenchymal stem cellsBiological
Also called MSC
autologous transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells in spinal cord injury patients
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Autologous mesenchymal stem cells | Experimental | use of mesenchymal stem cells as therapeutic intervention for spinal cord injury patients by autologous transplantation Receives: Biological: mesenchymal stem cells |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of adverse events
Number of adverse events occurring in given time frame shall be reported to evaluate overall safety of the procedure
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (3)
Sensory and motor strength
Improvement in sensitivity and motor strength will be measured through change in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score from baseline
Measured: 1 year
Functional Independence
Functional Independence will be measured by FIM scoring
Measured: 1 year
Muscle strength assessment
Shall be done using Frankel scale
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013
- Primary completionJan 2016
- Study completionMar 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplant (NIBMT), Pakistan
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Parvez Ahmed, Principal investigator, Commandant Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02482194
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AFBMTC-SCI-2013
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Legos JJ, Gopez JJ, Young WF. Non-surgical management of spinal cord injury. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2002 Apr;11(4):469-82. doi: 10.1517/13543784.11.4.469.
PubMed 11922856Zhang HT, Cheng HY, Cai YQ, Ma X, Liu WP, Yan ZJ, Jiang XD, Xu RX. Comparison of adult neurospheres derived from different origins for treatment of rat spinal cord injury. Neurosci Lett. 2009 Jul 24;458(3):116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.04.045. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
PubMed 19394407Mackay-Sim A, St John JA. Olfactory ensheathing cells from the nose: clinical application in human spinal cord injuries. Exp Neurol. 2011 May;229(1):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
PubMed 20832402Hernandez J, Torres-Espin A, Navarro X. Adult stem cell transplants for spinal cord injury repair: current state in preclinical research. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2011 Sep;6(3):273-87. doi: 10.2174/157488811796575323.
PubMed 21476980Tetzlaff W, Okon EB, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Hill CE, Sparling JS, Plemel JR, Plunet WT, Tsai EC, Baptiste D, Smithson LJ, Kawaja MD, Fehlings MG, Kwon BK. A systematic review of cellular transplantation therapies for spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2011 Aug;28(8):1611-82. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1177. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
PubMed 20146557Karamouzian S, Nematollahi-Mahani SN, Nakhaee N, Eskandary H. Clinical safety and primary efficacy of bone marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation in subacute spinal cord injured patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012 Sep;114(7):935-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
PubMed 22464434Dasari VR, Veeravalli KK, Dinh DH. Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of spinal cord injuries: A review. World J Stem Cells. 2014 Apr 26;6(2):120-33. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i2.120.
PubMed 24772239All AH, Gharibani P, Gupta S, Bazley FA, Pashai N, Chou BK, Shah S, Resar LM, Cheng L, Gearhart JD, Kerr CL. Early intervention for spinal cord injury with human induced pluripotent stem cells oligodendrocyte progenitors. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0116933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116933. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 25635918Satti HS, Waheed A, Ahmed P, Ahmed K, Akram Z, Aziz T, Satti TM, Shahbaz N, Khan MA, Malik SA. Autologous mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation for spinal cord injury: A Phase I pilot study. Cytotherapy. 2016 Apr;18(4):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.01.004.
PubMed 26971680
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Autologous Transplantation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients of Spinal Cord Injury-Phase I Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02482194
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AFBMTC-SCI-2013
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Keywords
- Spinal cord injury, mesenchymal stem cells, transplantation
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplant (NIBMT), PakistanOther government
- Collaborators
- Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine
- Study start
- Jun 2013
- Primary completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The conventional treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) includes physical therapy and rehabilitation and in some cases may require surgical intervention. Although improved emergency care and aggressive treatment can help in preventing further damage and even restore minimal sensory functions, still a large proportion of patients suffer with prolonged disabilities. It led neurologists to search out for new treatment options for this otherwise debilitating disorder. Recent advances in research have developed a better understanding of stem cell biology especially their role in tissue repair and regeneration. Encouraging results in pre-clinical phase and limited human trials have proved that stem cells can be safely and effectively delivered to the injured site for regeneration of damaged tissue. Although a variety of cell types have been tried for their role in repair of spinal cord injury, majority of clinical trials employed stem cells taken from bone marrow especially mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). Bone marrow MSCs are a good choice for regenerative therapies owing to advantages like ease of collection and ex-vivo culturing, immune tolerance and their ability to differentiate into a variety of cell types including neuronal lineage cells. Intravenous application or direct injection of MSCs into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) via lumber puncture in animal models of SCI and brain trauma had shown that MSCs can migrate towards and integrate into injured spinal tissue and reduce cyst size and increase functional recovery. The literature indicates that acute, sub-acute and chronic injury can be a therapeutic target for MSC grafting. The mechanism of action may however vary among these conditions. In acute phase, MSC administration play anti-inflammatory role, while in sub-acute/chronic setting it may be used as neurostimulator and for cell bridging effect and possibly glial or neuronal cell replacement. The investigators propose a non-randomized, single group, open label, phase-I, interventional study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intrathecal delivery of patient's own (autologous) bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of spinal cord injury. This will include determination of functional recovery (neuro-muscular control and sensation) in the affected area and overall improvement in quality of life of the patients and also take into account any side effects, if observed.
Detailed description
The role of regenerative therapies has gained more importance due to increased number of SCI in the wake of recent anti-terrorism operations by the armed forces and non-availability of any curative treatment for this category of patients. The promising results of preliminary clinical trials have proved that adult stem cells especially multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells can be safely injected and well tolerated and have shown functional improvement in SCI patients. The successful treatment in these patients will not only improve functional status of these otherwise debilitating patients, but can also reduce the burden on health care facilities. Mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to promote anatomical and functional recovery in animal models of SCI by promoting tissue sparing, axonal regeneration, and remyelination. Therapeutic effects of MSCs are primarily due to the secretion of soluble factors and the provision of extracellular matrix that provide protection and support repair. MSC are attractive candidates for transplantation into human patients because they can be easily harvested, expanded and banked, or derived directly from the patient allowing for autologous transplantation, obviating the need for immune suppression. In this study patients suffering from sub-acute and chronic phase of spinal cord injury shall be included. Patients will undergo detailed screening through MRI and motor and sensory assessment by ASIA score. Further evaluation will include electromyography (EMG) and tests for electroneurophysiological assessment like nerve conduction velocity (NCV) will also be done. Bone marrow aspiration will be done from iliac crest of the patients, followed by mononuclear cells (MNCs) separation by density gradient centrifugation. MNCs will be washed and cultured in tissue culture flasks. After 48 hours non-adherent cells will be removed from culture. Medium will be changed twice weekly till MSCs reach 70-80 % confluence. At that point MSCs will be harvested and after microbiological and other quality control testing the cellular preparation will be diluted to final concentration and infused by intrathecal injection.
Primary outcome measure is safety which will be determined by clinical evaluation by two independent neurologists during one month of hospital stay after receiving treatment course.
Secondary outcome measures will include American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale and NCV/EMG.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Autologous mesenchymal stem cells | Experimental | Biological: mesenchymal stem cellsuse of mesenchymal stem cells as therapeutic intervention for spinal cord injury patients by autologous transplantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients suffering from sub-acute and chronic phase of spinal cord injury
- Traumatic spinal cord injury at the thoracic level
- American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale "A"
- Confirmation by MRI of injury level
- Time between injury and enrollment greater than 2 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Axonic brain injury
- Inability to provide consent
- Open injuries
- Active infectious diseases
- Terminal patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| mesenchymal stem cellsAlso: MSCautologous transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells in spinal cord injury patients | Biological | Autologous mesenchymal stem cells |
Primary outcome
Number of adverse events
Time frame: 1 month
Number of adverse events occurring in given time frame shall be reported to evaluate overall safety of the procedure
3 secondary outcomes
Sensory and motor strength
Time frame: 1 year
Functional Independence
Time frame: 1 year
Muscle strength assessment
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2016.
- Background: PubMed 11922856Legos JJ, Gopez JJ, Young WF. Non-surgical management of spinal cord injury. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2002 Apr;11(4):469-82. doi: 10.1517/13543784.11.4.469.
- Background: PubMed 19394407Zhang HT, Cheng HY, Cai YQ, Ma X, Liu WP, Yan ZJ, Jiang XD, Xu RX. Comparison of adult neurospheres derived from different origins for treatment of rat spinal cord injury. Neurosci Lett. 2009 Jul 24;458(3):116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.04.045. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 20832402Mackay-Sim A, St John JA. Olfactory ensheathing cells from the nose: clinical application in human spinal cord injuries. Exp Neurol. 2011 May;229(1):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
- Background: PubMed 21476980Hernandez J, Torres-Espin A, Navarro X. Adult stem cell transplants for spinal cord injury repair: current state in preclinical research. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2011 Sep;6(3):273-87. doi: 10.2174/157488811796575323.
- Background: PubMed 20146557Tetzlaff W, Okon EB, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Hill CE, Sparling JS, Plemel JR, Plunet WT, Tsai EC, Baptiste D, Smithson LJ, Kawaja MD, Fehlings MG, Kwon BK. A systematic review of cellular transplantation therapies for spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2011 Aug;28(8):1611-82. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1177. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
- Background: PubMed 22464434Karamouzian S, Nematollahi-Mahani SN, Nakhaee N, Eskandary H. Clinical safety and primary efficacy of bone marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation in subacute spinal cord injured patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012 Sep;114(7):935-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
- Background: PubMed 24772239Dasari VR, Veeravalli KK, Dinh DH. Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of spinal cord injuries: A review. World J Stem Cells. 2014 Apr 26;6(2):120-33. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i2.120.
- Background: PubMed 25635918All AH, Gharibani P, Gupta S, Bazley FA, Pashai N, Chou BK, Shah S, Resar LM, Cheng L, Gearhart JD, Kerr CL. Early intervention for spinal cord injury with human induced pluripotent stem cells oligodendrocyte progenitors. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0116933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116933. eCollection 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26971680Satti HS, Waheed A, Ahmed P, Ahmed K, Akram Z, Aziz T, Satti TM, Shahbaz N, Khan MA, Malik SA. Autologous mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation for spinal cord injury: A Phase I pilot study. Cytotherapy. 2016 Apr;18(4):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.01.004.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Parvez Ahmed principal investigator
Commandant Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing mesenchymal stem cells in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by National Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplant (NIBMT), Pakistan at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of adverse events (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02482194, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2016.