AzTrials
AzTrials

LeprosyNCT02484469

Impact of the Virtual Human Project on Team-based Learning: A Randomized-controlled Trial

A study testing The Virtual Human Project in people with Leprosy, run by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior..

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Team-based learning (TBL) is a learner-centered, instructor-directed strategy for small group active learning in large group educational settings. When TBL is conducted correctly, the students' performances are equivalent or improved in comparison to either lecture-based formats or more traditional small group… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Leprosy
What is being tested?
The Virtual Human Project
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
94 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2014to Mar 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • undergraduate medical students in the third year of Medical School at the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul.

Who cannot join

  • students previously exposed to dermatologic research, extracurricular activities involving dermatology or dermatology rotation in that year

About this study

Official title: Educational Virtual Objects (The Virtual Human Project) Assessment Inserted in Learning Based on Team (Team-based Learning) in Leprosy Education on Undergraduate Medical Setting

Team-based learning (TBL) is a learner-centered, instructor-directed strategy for small group active learning in large group educational settings. When TBL is conducted correctly, the students' performances are equivalent or improved in comparison to either lecture-based formats or more traditional small group learning models.1 Nevertheless, few studies have been published regarding the insertion of innovative audiovisual tools in the TBL context. The Virtual Human Project is described as powerful sequences of three dimension (3D) computer graphics video of the human body that aids learning by facilitating an understanding in relation to a specific subject. The Virtual Human is composed by video sequences combining anatomy, physiology, and morphology in the context of various diseases. There are video sequences available for many disciplines, including dermatology and with capacity to produce anatomical structures by 3D printer. Despite the incredible potential applications of the Virtual Human, few studies have assessed its impact on medical education. The investigators did not find any study evaluating TBL with the insertion of iconographic educational material that assessed whether this intervention could change the learning progress of students. This is the aim of the present study, by comparing students tests scores after a TBL session with the VIrtual Human videos about leprosy or a standard TBL session, and to evaluate the student's satisfaction with the Virtual Human videos.

Conditions
Leprosy
Being tested
The Virtual Human Project
Medical subject headings
Leprosy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The Virtual Human ProjectDevice

    Virtual Human educational videos about leprosy

Study groups in NCT02484469
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExposedExperimentalThe Virtual Human Project videos and Team-Based learning session about leprosy
Receives: Device: The Virtual Human Project
UnexposedPlacebo comparatorStandard Team-Based learning session about leprosy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Average of Individual readiness assessment test (IRAT) grades

    The average of the IRAT scores achieved by students

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. The Average of group readiness assessment test (GRAT) grades

    The average of the GRAT scores achieved by students

    Measured: One year

  2. The Average of clinical case scores

    The average of the clinical case scores achieved by students

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jun 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2014
  3. Primary completionMar 2015
  4. Study completionMar 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
94 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02484469
Sponsor's protocol ID
001
Status last verified
Jun 2015
First submitted
25 Jun 2015
Last updated
29 Jun 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing The Virtual Human Project in people with Leprosy, run by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior..

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Average of Individual readiness assessment test (IRAT) grades (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in