Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT02485483
Study for Validation of Standardized Questionnaires on Depression and Investigation of the Frequency of Depression in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Participants
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 10 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to validate standardized questionnaires on depression for RA and to investigate the frequency of depression with RA. The study will include 2 parts, VADERA I and VADERA II. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- How many people
- 1,292 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Nov 2012to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: VADERA I was conducted in 9 clinical centers across Germany. VADERA II was conducted in 10 centers representing the spectrum of clinical settings in Germany where participants are diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and included large academic medical centers, community hospitals and private rheumatology practices across Germany.
Who may be able to join
- VADERA I: Participants diagnosed with RA, who did not suffer from a concurrent, manifest depressive disorder and had been scheduled for a RA consultation at one of the participating clinics
- VADERA II: All participants diagnosed with RA who were able to complete the questionnaires and had been scheduled for a RA consultation at one of the participating clinics
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
Germany10 sites
Study site
Berlin, 14059
Study site
Dresden, 01307
Study site
Erlangen, 91054
Study site
Erlangen, 91056
Study site
Frankfurt, 60528
Study site
Leipzig, 04103
Study site
München, 81541
Study site
Osnabrück, 49074
Study site
Rostock, 18059
Study site
Würzburg, 97080
About this study
Official title: Validation of Standardized Questionnaires on Depression for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (VADERA I) and Investigation of the Frequency of Depression in RA (VADERA II)
The purpose of this study is to validate standardized questionnaires on depression for RA and to investigate the frequency of depression with RA. The study will include 2 parts, VADERA I and VADERA II. In VADERA I, 300 participants will be surveyed twice at an interval of 3 months regarding their current emotional condition using standardized questionnaires. On the basis of the results of VADERA I, in VADERA II, the selected questionnaire will be used to assess the prevalence of depression with RA in approximately 1000 participants.
Read the detailed description
VADERA I is regarded as interventional epidemiologic study. The study was considered as interventional because of the use of the questionnaires and interview for the diagnosis of depression. VADERA II is a cross-sectional epidemiologic study.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| VADERA I | RA participants without a concurrent history of depression and who have not received psychotherapy, antidepressants, or inpatient psychiatric treatment in the 3 months before baseline (T0) will be asked to complete the World Health Organization Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Beck Depression Inventory (2nd edition) (BDI-II) questionnaires and a subsequent structured interview using Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 2 time-points (T0 and T1 [12 ± 2 weeks]) with a 10-14 week interval between assessments. | |
| VADERA II | All RA participants who are able to complete the PHQ-9 and BDI-II questionnaires, and have been scheduled for a RA consultation at one of the participating clinics will be eligible for participation. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PHQ-9 Score at Baseline: VADERA I
The PHQ-9 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring depressive symptoms.This is a nine item measure with a response score for each item on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Thus, the total score ranges from 0 to 27; with 0-4 being minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild depression, 10-14 moderate depression, 15-19 moderately severe depression, 20-27 severe depression.
Measured: Baseline
PHQ-9 Score at Week 12 ± 2: VADERA I
The PHQ-9 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring depressive symptoms. This is a nine item measure with a response score for each item on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Thus, the total score ranges from 0 to 27; with 0-4 being minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild depression, 10-14 moderate depression, 15-19 moderately severe depression, 20-27 severe depression.
Measured: Week 12 ± 2
BDI-II Score at Baseline: VADERA I
BDI-II Scale is a 21-item self-reported questionnaire which measures the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. Each of the 21 items on BDI-II tool represents a depressive symptom. The symptoms are each scored on a 4-point Likert scale of 0 to 3 (0=symptom is absent; 3=symptom is severe). Scores for each symptom are added up to obtain the total scores for all 21 items. Total score ranges from 0-63; of which 0-8 is considered no depression, 0-13 is minimal depression, 14-19 is mild depression, 20-28 is moderate depression and 29-63 is severe depression.
Measured: Baseline
BDI-II Score at Week 12 ± 2: VADERA I
BDI-II Scale is a 21-item self-reported questionnaire which measures the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. Each of the 21 items on BDI-II tool represent a depressive symptom. The symptoms are each scored on a 4-point Likert scale of 0 to 3 (0=symptom is absent; 3=symptom is severe). Scores for each symptom are added up to obtain the total scores for all 21 items. Total score ranges from 0-63; of which 0-8 is considered no depression, 0-13 is minimal depression, 14-19 is mild depression, 20-28 is moderate depression and 29-63 is severe depression.
Measured: Week 12 ± 2
WHO-5 Index at Baseline: VADERA I
WHO-5 questionnaire contains five items related to cheerfulness, calmness, feelings of vigor, feelings of being well rested after sleep, and personal interest. The respondent rated each question on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 ("at no time") to 5 ("all of the time") according to the proportion of time over the preceding 2 weeks that applied to the attribute in question. Scores were summated, with raw score ranging from 0 to 25. Then the scores were transformed to 0-100 by multiplying by 4, whereas 0 indicated the worst possible emotional well-being and 100 the best.
Measured: Baseline
WHO-5 Index at Week 12 ± 2: VADERA I
WHO-5 questionnaire contains five items related to cheerfulness, calmness, feelings of vigor, feelings of being well rested after sleep, and personal interest. The respondent rated each question on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 ("at no time") to 5 ("all of the time") according to the proportion of time over the preceding 2 weeks that applied to the attribute in question. Scores were summated, with raw score ranging from 0 to 25. Then the scores were transformed to 0-100 by multiplying by 4, whereas 0 indicated the worst possible emotional well-being and 100 the best.
Measured: Week 12 ± 2
MADRS at Baseline: VADERA I
The MADRS, an interview addressing 10 characteristics of depressive symptomatology, was used as the gold standard. The symptom-related information provided by each participant was rated on item-specific scales ranging from 0 (best) to 6 (worst) in order to evaluate individual symptom severity. Total score was sum of 10 characteristics, ranging from 0 to 60; 0, no depression; 60, severely depressed. Sum scores exceeding 12 indicated clinical relevance suggested mild to severe symptomatology.
Measured: Baseline
MADRS at Week 12 ± 2: VADERA I
The MADRS, an interview addressing 10 characteristics of depressive symptomatology, was used as the gold standard. The symptom-related information provided by each participant was rated on item-specific scales ranging from 0 (best) to 6 (worst) in order to evaluate individual symptom severity. Total score was sum of 10 characteristics, ranging between 0 to 60; 0, no depression; 60, severely depressed. Sum scores exceeding 12 indicated clinical relevance suggested mild to severe symptomatology.
Measured: Week 12 ± 2
PHQ-9 Summary Score: VADERA II
The PHQ-9 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring depressive symptoms. This is a nine item measure with a response score for each item on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Thus, the total score ranges from 0 to 27; with 0-4 being minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild depression, 10-14 moderate depression, 15-19 moderately severe depression, 20-27 severe depression.
Measured: Baseline
BDI-II Summary Score: VADERA II
BDI-II Scale is a 21-item self-reported questionnaire which measures the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. Each of the 21 items on BDI-II tool represent a depressive symptom. The symptoms are each scored on a 4-point Likert scale of 0 to 3 (0=symptom is absent; 3=symptom is severe). Scores for each symptom are added up to obtain the total scores for all 21 items. Total score ranges from 0-63; of which 0-8 is considered no depression, 0-13 is minimal depression, 14-19 is mild depression, 20-28 is moderate depression and 29-63 is severe depression.
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Depressive Symptomatology Based on a BDI-II Score Greater Than or Equal to (≥)14 or PHQ-9 Score ≥5: VADERA II
PHQ-9 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring depressive symptoms. This is a 9-item measure with a response score for each item on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 27; with 0-4 indicating no depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, and 20-27 severe depression. BDI-II Scale is a 21-item self-reported questionnaire measuring existence and severity of depression symptoms. Symptoms are each scored on a 4-point scale of 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). Total score ranges from 0-63; of which 0-8 is considered no depression, 0-13 minimal, 14-19 mild, 20-28 moderate, and 29-63 severe depression. Participants with a BDI-II score ≥14 or a PHQ-9 score ≥5 were classified as having depressive symptomatology. Participants were evaluated by positive depressive symptomatology for each questionnaire as well as being positive for both questionnaires combined or at least one of the questionnaires.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2012
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,292 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Chugai Pharmaceutical
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02485483
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML29326
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 17 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Englbrecht M, Alten R, Aringer M, Baerwald CG, Burkhardt H, Eby N, Flacke JP, Fliedner G, Henkemeier U, Hofmann MW, Kleinert S, Kneitz C, Kruger K, Pohl C, Schett G, Schmalzing M, Tausche AK, Tony HP, Wendler J. New insights into the prevalence of depressive symptoms and depression in rheumatoid arthritis - Implications from the prospective multicenter VADERA II study. PLoS One. 2019 May 28;14(5):e0217412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217412. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31136632Englbrecht M, Alten R, Aringer M, Baerwald CG, Burkhardt H, Eby N, Fliedner G, Gauger B, Henkemeier U, Hofmann MW, Kleinert S, Kneitz C, Krueger K, Pohl C, Roske AE, Schett G, Schmalzing M, Tausche AK, Peter Tony H, Wendler J. Validation of Standardized Questionnaires Evaluating Symptoms of Depression in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Approaches to Screening for a Frequent Yet Underrated Challenge. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jan;69(1):58-66. doi: 10.1002/acr.23002.
PubMed 27482854
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation of Standardized Questionnaires on Depression for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (VADERA I) and Investigation of the Frequency of Depression in RA (VADERA II)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02485483
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML29326
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,292 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Chugai Pharmaceutical
- Study start
- Nov 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Oct 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to validate standardized questionnaires on depression for RA and to investigate the frequency of depression with RA. The study will include 2 parts, VADERA I and VADERA II. In VADERA I, 300 participants will be surveyed twice at an interval of 3 months regarding their current emotional condition using standardized questionnaires. On the basis of the results of VADERA I, in VADERA II, the selected questionnaire will be used to assess the prevalence of depression with RA in approximately 1000 participants.
Detailed description
VADERA I is regarded as interventional epidemiologic study. The study was considered as interventional because of the use of the questionnaires and interview for the diagnosis of depression. VADERA II is a cross-sectional epidemiologic study.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| VADERA I | – | –RA participants without a concurrent history of depression and who have not received psychotherapy, antidepressants, or inpatient psychiatric treatment in the 3 months before baseline (T0) will be asked to complete the World Health Organization Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Beck Depression Inventory (2nd edition) (BDI-II) questionnaires and a subsequent structured interview using Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 2 time-points (T0 and T1 [12 ± 2 weeks]) with a 10-14 week interval between assessments. |
| VADERA II | – | –All RA participants who are able to complete the PHQ-9 and BDI-II questionnaires, and have been scheduled for a RA consultation at one of the participating clinics will be eligible for participation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- VADERA I was conducted in 9 clinical centers across Germany. VADERA II was conducted in 10 centers representing the spectrum of clinical settings in Germany where participants are diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and included large academic medical centers, community hospitals and private rheumatology practices across Germany.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- VADERA I: Participants diagnosed with RA, who did not suffer from a concurrent, manifest depressive disorder and had been scheduled for a RA consultation at one of the participating clinics
- VADERA II: All participants diagnosed with RA who were able to complete the questionnaires and had been scheduled for a RA consultation at one of the participating clinics
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
PHQ-9 Score at Baseline: VADERA I
Time frame: Baseline
The PHQ-9 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring depressive symptoms.This is a nine item measure with a response score for each item on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Thus, the total score ranges from 0 to 27; with 0-4 being minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild depression, 10-14 moderate depression, 15-19 moderately severe depression, 20-27 severe depression.
PHQ-9 Score at Week 12 ± 2: VADERA I
Time frame: Week 12 ± 2
The PHQ-9 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring depressive symptoms. This is a nine item measure with a response score for each item on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Thus, the total score ranges from 0 to 27; with 0-4 being minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild depression, 10-14 moderate depression, 15-19 moderately severe depression, 20-27 severe depression.
BDI-II Score at Baseline: VADERA I
Time frame: Baseline
BDI-II Scale is a 21-item self-reported questionnaire which measures the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. Each of the 21 items on BDI-II tool represents a depressive symptom. The symptoms are each scored on a 4-point Likert scale of 0 to 3 (0=symptom is absent; 3=symptom is severe). Scores for each symptom are added up to obtain the total scores for all 21 items. Total score ranges from 0-63; of which 0-8 is considered no depression, 0-13 is minimal depression, 14-19 is mild depression, 20-28 is moderate depression and 29-63 is severe depression.
BDI-II Score at Week 12 ± 2: VADERA I
Time frame: Week 12 ± 2
BDI-II Scale is a 21-item self-reported questionnaire which measures the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. Each of the 21 items on BDI-II tool represent a depressive symptom. The symptoms are each scored on a 4-point Likert scale of 0 to 3 (0=symptom is absent; 3=symptom is severe). Scores for each symptom are added up to obtain the total scores for all 21 items. Total score ranges from 0-63; of which 0-8 is considered no depression, 0-13 is minimal depression, 14-19 is mild depression, 20-28 is moderate depression and 29-63 is severe depression.
WHO-5 Index at Baseline: VADERA I
Time frame: Baseline
WHO-5 questionnaire contains five items related to cheerfulness, calmness, feelings of vigor, feelings of being well rested after sleep, and personal interest. The respondent rated each question on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 ("at no time") to 5 ("all of the time") according to the proportion of time over the preceding 2 weeks that applied to the attribute in question. Scores were summated, with raw score ranging from 0 to 25. Then the scores were transformed to 0-100 by multiplying by 4, whereas 0 indicated the worst possible emotional well-being and 100 the best.
WHO-5 Index at Week 12 ± 2: VADERA I
Time frame: Week 12 ± 2
WHO-5 questionnaire contains five items related to cheerfulness, calmness, feelings of vigor, feelings of being well rested after sleep, and personal interest. The respondent rated each question on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 ("at no time") to 5 ("all of the time") according to the proportion of time over the preceding 2 weeks that applied to the attribute in question. Scores were summated, with raw score ranging from 0 to 25. Then the scores were transformed to 0-100 by multiplying by 4, whereas 0 indicated the worst possible emotional well-being and 100 the best.
MADRS at Baseline: VADERA I
Time frame: Baseline
The MADRS, an interview addressing 10 characteristics of depressive symptomatology, was used as the gold standard. The symptom-related information provided by each participant was rated on item-specific scales ranging from 0 (best) to 6 (worst) in order to evaluate individual symptom severity. Total score was sum of 10 characteristics, ranging from 0 to 60; 0, no depression; 60, severely depressed. Sum scores exceeding 12 indicated clinical relevance suggested mild to severe symptomatology.
MADRS at Week 12 ± 2: VADERA I
Time frame: Week 12 ± 2
The MADRS, an interview addressing 10 characteristics of depressive symptomatology, was used as the gold standard. The symptom-related information provided by each participant was rated on item-specific scales ranging from 0 (best) to 6 (worst) in order to evaluate individual symptom severity. Total score was sum of 10 characteristics, ranging between 0 to 60; 0, no depression; 60, severely depressed. Sum scores exceeding 12 indicated clinical relevance suggested mild to severe symptomatology.
PHQ-9 Summary Score: VADERA II
Time frame: Baseline
The PHQ-9 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring depressive symptoms. This is a nine item measure with a response score for each item on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Thus, the total score ranges from 0 to 27; with 0-4 being minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild depression, 10-14 moderate depression, 15-19 moderately severe depression, 20-27 severe depression.
BDI-II Summary Score: VADERA II
Time frame: Baseline
BDI-II Scale is a 21-item self-reported questionnaire which measures the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. Each of the 21 items on BDI-II tool represent a depressive symptom. The symptoms are each scored on a 4-point Likert scale of 0 to 3 (0=symptom is absent; 3=symptom is severe). Scores for each symptom are added up to obtain the total scores for all 21 items. Total score ranges from 0-63; of which 0-8 is considered no depression, 0-13 is minimal depression, 14-19 is mild depression, 20-28 is moderate depression and 29-63 is severe depression.
Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Depressive Symptomatology Based on a BDI-II Score Greater Than or Equal to (≥)14 or PHQ-9 Score ≥5: VADERA II
Time frame: Baseline
PHQ-9 is a self-reported questionnaire measuring depressive symptoms. This is a 9-item measure with a response score for each item on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 27; with 0-4 indicating no depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, and 20-27 severe depression. BDI-II Scale is a 21-item self-reported questionnaire measuring existence and severity of depression symptoms. Symptoms are each scored on a 4-point scale of 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). Total score ranges from 0-63; of which 0-8 is considered no depression, 0-13 minimal, 14-19 mild, 20-28 moderate, and 29-63 severe depression. Participants with a BDI-II score ≥14 or a PHQ-9 score ≥5 were classified as having depressive symptomatology. Participants were evaluated by positive depressive symptomatology for each questionnaire as well as being positive for both questionnaires combined or at least one of the questionnaires.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Oct 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31136632Englbrecht M, Alten R, Aringer M, Baerwald CG, Burkhardt H, Eby N, Flacke JP, Fliedner G, Henkemeier U, Hofmann MW, Kleinert S, Kneitz C, Kruger K, Pohl C, Schett G, Schmalzing M, Tausche AK, Tony HP, Wendler J. New insights into the prevalence of depressive symptoms and depression in rheumatoid arthritis - Implications from the prospective multicenter VADERA II study. PLoS One. 2019 May 28;14(5):e0217412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217412. eCollection 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27482854Englbrecht M, Alten R, Aringer M, Baerwald CG, Burkhardt H, Eby N, Fliedner G, Gauger B, Henkemeier U, Hofmann MW, Kleinert S, Kneitz C, Krueger K, Pohl C, Roske AE, Schett G, Schmalzing M, Tausche AK, Peter Tony H, Wendler J. Validation of Standardized Questionnaires Evaluating Symptoms of Depression in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Approaches to Screening for a Frequent Yet Underrated Challenge. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jan;69(1):58-66. doi: 10.1002/acr.23002.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 10 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PHQ-9 Score at Baseline: VADERA I (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02485483, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2016.