Healthy VolunteersNCT02486120
Are Genetic Counselors Screening for Adolescent Suicide Risk?
An observational study of Healthy Volunteers, run by National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Background: Suicide is one of the main causes of death for adolescents in the U.S. The most effective way to decrease suicide is by training doctors to recognize the risk factors in their clients. One risk factor for suicide is chronic illness. So pediatric genetic counselors come across high-risk clients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy Volunteers
- How many people
- 267 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Jun 2015to 24 May 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants in this study will be English speaking women and men who are graduates of accredited genetic counseling programs. Those who currently or within the past year have worked in-person with adolescent patients between the ages of 10 and 21 may be included in the survey.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
About this study
Official title: Are Genetic Counselors Screening Adolescents for Suicide Risk? A Mixed Methods Study
Background:
- Suicide is one of the main causes of death for adolescents in the U.S. The most effective way to decrease suicide is by training doctors to recognize the risk factors in their clients. One risk factor for suicide is chronic illness. So pediatric genetic counselors come across high-risk clients. But the suicide risk assessment (SRA) practices of these counselors are not well known. Researchers want to study learn more about this.
Read more
Objectives:
- To describe the practices, attitudes, and beliefs of genetic counselors about SRA of adolescents.
Eligibility:
- Genetic counselors who see adolescents ages 10 21
Design:
- A study will be open to a listserv for genetic counselors.
- Participants will take a survey on their own.
- The survey will be online on a secure website.
- Participants will give data about themselves. This can include age, gender, job, etc.
- The survey will be about 60 questions.
- The survey will take around 20 25 minutes.
- The questions are about participants experiences, practices, attitudes, and beliefs about SRA.
Read the detailed description
This study proposes to describe the practices, attitudes, and beliefs of genetic counselors in relation to suicide risk assessment (SRA) of their adolescent clients. Suicide is a major public health issue and one of the leading causes of death for adolescents in the U.S. Analysis of suicide prevention campaigns has shown that the most effective way to decrease suicide is by training physicians to recognize suicide risk factors in their patients . However, pediatricians do not consistently screen youth for suicide risk during routine check-ups. As chronic illness is an additional risk factor for suicide, pediatric genetic counselors encounter particularly high-risk clients and are well-positioned to assess for suicide risk due to the psychosocial nature of their work. However, the SRA practices of genetic counselors are largely unknown. In this study, the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change is used as a framework to describe how genetic counselors SRA self-efficacy and perceptions of the pros and cons of SRA relate to stages of readiness and practices of assessing clients for suicide risk. Specifically, we will be surveying genetic counselors about their practices, attitudes and beliefs concerning SRA of adolescent clients. First, we will determine genetic counselors frequency of SRA and their stage of readiness for routine screening. Second, we will measure genetic counselors SRA self-efficacy and their perceptions of the pros and cons of screening their clients. We will examine whether self-efficacy and perceptions of pros and cons are predictors of genetic counselors stage of readiness for routine suicide screening. Finally, we will qualitatively assess genetic counselors perceptions of the usability of a validated suicide screening tool (the ASQ) in genetic counseling sessions and their interest in receiving suicide screening training. We will use a cross-sectional, mixed-methods design in which counselors will complete an online questionnaire with quantitative components and open-ended responses. Participants will be recruited through the National Society of Genetic Counselors Student Research Survey listserv.
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Keywords
- Genetic Counseling, Clinical Decision-Making
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Previous performance of adolescent patient suicide risk assessment
Measured: Ongoing
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study start22 Jun 2015
- Primary completion31 May 2016
- Study completion24 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Healthy VolunteersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 267 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lori Erby, Ph.D., Principal investigator, National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02486120
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 999915152
- Other IDs
- 15-HG-N152
- Status last verified
- 24 May 2017
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Are Genetic Counselors Screening Adolescents for Suicide Risk? A Mixed Methods Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02486120
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 999915152
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Keywords
- Genetic Counseling, Clinical Decision-Making
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 267 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- 22 Jun 2015
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
- Suicide is one of the main causes of death for adolescents in the U.S. The most effective way to decrease suicide is by training doctors to recognize the risk factors in their clients. One risk factor for suicide is chronic illness. So pediatric genetic counselors come across high-risk clients. But the suicide risk assessment (SRA) practices of these counselors are not well known. Researchers want to study learn more about this.
Objectives:
- To describe the practices, attitudes, and beliefs of genetic counselors about SRA of adolescents.
Eligibility:
- Genetic counselors who see adolescents ages 10 21
Design:
- A study will be open to a listserv for genetic counselors.
- Participants will take a survey on their own.
- The survey will be online on a secure website.
- Participants will give data about themselves. This can include age, gender, job, etc.
- The survey will be about 60 questions.
- The survey will take around 20 25 minutes.
- The questions are about participants experiences, practices, attitudes, and beliefs about SRA.
Detailed description
This study proposes to describe the practices, attitudes, and beliefs of genetic counselors in relation to suicide risk assessment (SRA) of their adolescent clients. Suicide is a major public health issue and one of the leading causes of death for adolescents in the U.S. Analysis of suicide prevention campaigns has shown that the most effective way to decrease suicide is by training physicians to recognize suicide risk factors in their patients . However, pediatricians do not consistently screen youth for suicide risk during routine check-ups. As chronic illness is an additional risk factor for suicide, pediatric genetic counselors encounter particularly high-risk clients and are well-positioned to assess for suicide risk due to the psychosocial nature of their work. However, the SRA practices of genetic counselors are largely unknown. In this study, the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change is used as a framework to describe how genetic counselors SRA self-efficacy and perceptions of the pros and cons of SRA relate to stages of readiness and practices of assessing clients for suicide risk. Specifically, we will be surveying genetic counselors about their practices, attitudes and beliefs concerning SRA of adolescent clients. First, we will determine genetic counselors frequency of SRA and their stage of readiness for routine screening. Second, we will measure genetic counselors SRA self-efficacy and their perceptions of the pros and cons of screening their clients. We will examine whether self-efficacy and perceptions of pros and cons are predictors of genetic counselors stage of readiness for routine suicide screening. Finally, we will qualitatively assess genetic counselors perceptions of the usability of a validated suicide screening tool (the ASQ) in genetic counseling sessions and their interest in receiving suicide screening training. We will use a cross-sectional, mixed-methods design in which counselors will complete an online questionnaire with quantitative components and open-ended responses. Participants will be recruited through the National Society of Genetic Counselors Student Research Survey listserv.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants in this study will be English speaking women and men who are graduates of accredited genetic counseling programs. Those who currently or within the past year have worked in-person with adolescent patients between the ages of 10 and 21 may be included in the survey.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Previous performance of adolescent patient suicide risk assessment
Time frame: Ongoing
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2019.
Related trials for Healthy Volunteers
RecruitingObservational study
Studies of Blood Flow to the Brain During Thought
Healthy Volunteer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Screening for Hematology Branch Protocols
Hematologic Disease and Disorders, Donors
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Collection of Tissue Specimens From Patients With Solid Tumors or Blood Disorders and Their HLA-Compatible Family Members
Neoplasms, Hematologic Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
Collection and Analysis of Blood, Bone Marrow, and Buccal Mucosa Samples From Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
RecruitingObservational study
Imaging Techniques in MRI
Cardiac Risk Factors, Healthy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lori Erby, Ph.D. principal investigator
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Healthy Volunteers, run by National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Previous performance of adolescent patient suicide risk assessment (time frame: Ongoing). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.