Pain, PostoperativeNCT02487303
Intravenous Versus Oral Acetaminophen for Postoperative Pain Control After Cesarean Delivery
A study testing Acetaminophen Intravenous and Acetaminophen Oral in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will compare IV (intravenous) versus oral (PO) acetaminophen for postoperative pain after scheduled, elective Cesarean delivery. All patients will receive a standardized spinal anesthetic for operative anesthesia and will be randomized into one of three groups: (group 1) 1 gram IV acetaminophen every 8… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Postoperative
- What is being tested?
- Acetaminophen Intravenous and Acetaminophen Oral
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 148 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Mar 2015to 27 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Parturients 18 years
- Elective Cesarean delivery
- Spinal anesthesia
- Able to consent to the study and participate in the follow-up.
Who cannot join
- Weight under 50 kgs
- Allergy to acetaminophen
- General anesthesia
- Urgent or emergent cases
- Bleeding diathesis or other coagulopathy
- G6PD deficiency
Show all 17Show fewer
- Liver disease
- Substance abuse or dependence
- HELLP syndrome
- Thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction
- History or active gastrointestinal bleeding
- Acute kidney injury or chronic renal insufficiency
- Contraindication/refusal to spinal anesthesia
- Chronic pain
- Chronic narcotic use
- Illicit drug use
- Allergy to any study related medications.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
About this study
This study will compare IV (intravenous) versus oral (PO) acetaminophen for postoperative pain after scheduled, elective Cesarean delivery. All patients will receive a standardized spinal anesthetic for operative anesthesia and will be randomized into one of three groups: (group 1) 1 gram IV acetaminophen every 8 hours for three doses, (group 2) 1 gram oral acetaminophen every 8 hours for three doses, or (group 3) no acetaminophen. This will be a randomized, open label study.
Read the detailed description
This study will compare IV versus PO acetaminophen for postoperative pain in parturients after scheduled, elective Cesarean delivery. It is designed as a randomized, open label, controlled trial. All patients will receive a standardized spinal anesthetic for operative anesthesia and will be randomized into one of three groups: (group 1) 1 gram IV acetaminophen every 8 hours for three by a computer generated list.
- Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative
- Being tested
- Acetaminophen Intravenous, Acetaminophen Oral
- Keywords
- Acetaminophen, Pain, Postoperative, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Cesarean Section
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Acetaminophen IntravenousDrug
Also called Tylenol
IV 1 gram f3 doses over 24 hours
Acetaminophen OralDrug
Also called Tylenol
Oral 1 gram 3 doses over 24 hours
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Acetaminophen Intravenous | Active comparator | (group 1) 1 gram IV acetaminophen every 8 hours for three doses Receives: Drug: Acetaminophen Intravenous |
| Acetaminophen Oral | Active comparator | (group 2) 1 gram oral acetaminophen every 8 hours for three doses Receives: Drug: Acetaminophen Oral |
| No acetaminophen | No intervention | (group 3) no acetaminophen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cumulative Postoperative Opiate Consumption
Cumulative opiate consumption (IV morphine equivalents)
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (3)
Time to First Opiate Rescue
Time to first opiate pain medicine requested by patient
Measured: 48 hours
VAS (Visual Analog Scale)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain assessment with ambulation. The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain." For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 [100-mm scale]) .
Measured: 24 hours
Time Discharge
Time patient meets discharge criteria will be recorded
Measured: 24 hours postoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study start17 Mar 2015
- Primary completion27 Jul 2017
- Study completion27 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain, PostoperativeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of South CarolinaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of South Carolina
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sylvia Wilson, MD, Principal investigator, Medical University of South Carolina
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02487303
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00041193
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 25 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 5 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Macario A, Royal MA. A literature review of randomized clinical trials of intravenous acetaminophen (paracetamol) for acute postoperative pain. Pain Pract. 2011 May-Jun;11(3):290-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00426.x. Epub 2010 Nov 28.
PubMed 21114616Smith HS. Perioperative intravenous acetaminophen and NSAIDs. Pain Med. 2011 Jun;12(6):961-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01141.x. Epub 2011 May 31.
PubMed 21627768Wininger SJ, Miller H, Minkowitz HS, Royal MA, Ang RY, Breitmeyer JB, Singla NK. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, repeat-dose study of two intravenous acetaminophen dosing regimens for the treatment of pain after abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Clin Ther. 2010 Dec;32(14):2348-69. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.12.011.
PubMed 21353105Singla NK, Parulan C, Samson R, Hutchinson J, Bushnell R, Beja EG, Ang R, Royal MA. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetic parameters after single-dose administration of intravenous, oral, or rectal acetaminophen. Pain Pract. 2012 Sep;12(7):523-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00556.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
PubMed 22524979Fenlon S, Collyer J, Giles J, Bidd H, Lees M, Nicholson J, Dulai R, Hankins M, Edelman N. Oral vs intravenous paracetamol for lower third molar extractions under general anaesthesia: is oral administration inferior? Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):432-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes387. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
PubMed 23220855Alhashemi JA, Alotaibi QA, Mashaat MS, Kaid TM, Mujallid RH, Kaki AM. Intravenous acetaminophen vs oral ibuprofen in combination with morphine PCIA after Cesarean delivery. Can J Anaesth. 2006 Dec;53(12):1200-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03021581.
PubMed 17142654Wong JY, Carvalho B, Riley ET. Intrathecal morphine 100 and 200 mug for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: a trade-off between analgesic efficacy and side effects. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013 Jan;22(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
PubMed 23159009Singh SI, Rehou S, Marmai KL, Jones APM. The efficacy of 2 doses of epidural morphine for postcesarean delivery analgesia: a randomized noninferiority trial. Anesth Analg. 2013 Sep;117(3):677-685. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829cfd21. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
PubMed 23921652Beatty NC, Arendt KW, Niesen AD, Wittwer ED, Jacob AK. Analgesia after Cesarean delivery: a retrospective comparison of intrathecal hydromorphone and morphine. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Aug;25(5):379-383. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
PubMed 23965210Wilson SH, Wolf BJ, Robinson SM, Nelson C, Hebbar L. Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial. Pain Med. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):1584-1591. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny253.
PubMed 30561704
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intravenous Versus Oral Acetaminophen for Postoperative Pain Control After Cesarean Delivery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02487303
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00041193
- Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative
- Keywords
- Acetaminophen, Pain, Postoperative, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Cesarean Section
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of South CarolinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Mar 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Dec 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare IV (intravenous) versus oral (PO) acetaminophen for postoperative pain after scheduled, elective Cesarean delivery. All patients will receive a standardized spinal anesthetic for operative anesthesia and will be randomized into one of three groups: (group 1) 1 gram IV acetaminophen every 8 hours for three doses, (group 2) 1 gram oral acetaminophen every 8 hours for three doses, or (group 3) no acetaminophen. This will be a randomized, open label study.
Detailed description
This study will compare IV versus PO acetaminophen for postoperative pain in parturients after scheduled, elective Cesarean delivery. It is designed as a randomized, open label, controlled trial. All patients will receive a standardized spinal anesthetic for operative anesthesia and will be randomized into one of three groups: (group 1) 1 gram IV acetaminophen every 8 hours for three by a computer generated list.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Acetaminophen Intravenous | Active comparator | Drug: Acetaminophen Intravenous(group 1) 1 gram IV acetaminophen every 8 hours for three doses |
| Acetaminophen Oral | Active comparator | Drug: Acetaminophen Oral(group 2) 1 gram oral acetaminophen every 8 hours for three doses |
| No acetaminophen | No intervention | –(group 3) no acetaminophen |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Parturients 18 years
- Elective Cesarean delivery
- Spinal anesthesia
- Able to consent to the study and participate in the follow-up.
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Weight under 50 kgs
- Allergy to acetaminophen
- General anesthesia
- Urgent or emergent cases
- Bleeding diathesis or other coagulopathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Acetaminophen IntravenousAlso: TylenolIV 1 gram f3 doses over 24 hours | Drug | Acetaminophen Intravenous |
| Acetaminophen OralAlso: TylenolOral 1 gram 3 doses over 24 hours | Drug | Acetaminophen Oral |
Primary outcome
Cumulative Postoperative Opiate Consumption
Time frame: 24 hours
Cumulative opiate consumption (IV morphine equivalents)
3 secondary outcomes
Time to First Opiate Rescue
Time frame: 48 hours
VAS (Visual Analog Scale)
Time frame: 24 hours
Time Discharge
Time frame: 24 hours postoperative
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Dec 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 21114616Macario A, Royal MA. A literature review of randomized clinical trials of intravenous acetaminophen (paracetamol) for acute postoperative pain. Pain Pract. 2011 May-Jun;11(3):290-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00426.x. Epub 2010 Nov 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 21627768Smith HS. Perioperative intravenous acetaminophen and NSAIDs. Pain Med. 2011 Jun;12(6):961-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01141.x. Epub 2011 May 31.
- Results publication: PubMed 21353105Wininger SJ, Miller H, Minkowitz HS, Royal MA, Ang RY, Breitmeyer JB, Singla NK. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, repeat-dose study of two intravenous acetaminophen dosing regimens for the treatment of pain after abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Clin Ther. 2010 Dec;32(14):2348-69. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.12.011.
- Results publication: PubMed 22524979Singla NK, Parulan C, Samson R, Hutchinson J, Bushnell R, Beja EG, Ang R, Royal MA. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetic parameters after single-dose administration of intravenous, oral, or rectal acetaminophen. Pain Pract. 2012 Sep;12(7):523-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00556.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 23220855Fenlon S, Collyer J, Giles J, Bidd H, Lees M, Nicholson J, Dulai R, Hankins M, Edelman N. Oral vs intravenous paracetamol for lower third molar extractions under general anaesthesia: is oral administration inferior? Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):432-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes387. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 17142654Alhashemi JA, Alotaibi QA, Mashaat MS, Kaid TM, Mujallid RH, Kaki AM. Intravenous acetaminophen vs oral ibuprofen in combination with morphine PCIA after Cesarean delivery. Can J Anaesth. 2006 Dec;53(12):1200-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03021581.
- Results publication: PubMed 23159009Wong JY, Carvalho B, Riley ET. Intrathecal morphine 100 and 200 mug for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: a trade-off between analgesic efficacy and side effects. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013 Jan;22(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 23921652Singh SI, Rehou S, Marmai KL, Jones APM. The efficacy of 2 doses of epidural morphine for postcesarean delivery analgesia: a randomized noninferiority trial. Anesth Analg. 2013 Sep;117(3):677-685. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829cfd21. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 23965210Beatty NC, Arendt KW, Niesen AD, Wittwer ED, Jacob AK. Analgesia after Cesarean delivery: a retrospective comparison of intrathecal hydromorphone and morphine. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Aug;25(5):379-383. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30561704Wilson SH, Wolf BJ, Robinson SM, Nelson C, Hebbar L. Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial. Pain Med. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):1584-1591. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny253.
Related trials for Pain, Postoperative
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section at Assuit University Hospital
Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sylvia Wilson, MD principal investigator
Medical University of South Carolina
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Acetaminophen Intravenous and Acetaminophen Oral in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Dec 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cumulative Postoperative Opiate Consumption (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02487303, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2018.