Cervical PregnancyPhase 4INPerNCT02488642
Medical Management of Late Intrauterine Death.
A Phase 4 study testing Isosorbide Dinitrate, Misoprostol and Oxytocin in people with Cervical Pregnancy and Maternal Care for Late Fetal Death, run by National Institute of Perinatology.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin in combination in the management of late intrauterine foetal death. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Pregnancy, Maternal Care for Late Fetal Death
- What is being tested?
- Isosorbide Dinitrate, Misoprostol and Oxytocin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2008to May 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Closed cervix without evidence of cervical dilation or baseline uterine activity.
- A Bishop score of <5, having intact membranes.
- Gestation greater than or equal to 20 weeks established by the date of menstruation or by fetometry and ultrasound-confirmed late IUFD.
Who cannot join
- Multiple pregnancies.
- IUFD after late foeticide or the management of specific medical conditions associated with an increase in the risk of IUFD.
- Patients with a history of hypertension.
- Women with a history of unexplained antepartum haemorrhage, pelvic dystocia or any another counter-indications where medications were used.
About this study
Official title: Medical Management of Late Intrauterine Death Using a Therapeutic Combination of Isosorbide Dinitrate and Oxytocin.
The purpose of this study is to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin in combination in the management of late intrauterine foetal death.
Read the detailed description
A prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial (RCT) was conducted to compare the efficacy and clinical safety of the induction of labour using the combination of isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin (experimental arm, X = 1) compared to misoprostol-oxytocin (standard arm, X = 0). The main result of the study was the success rate of foetal expulsion within 15 hours, while the average administration induction interval defined the secondary result. A total of 60 women with pregnancies greater than 20 weeks gestation were referred for foetal evacuation. We defined late intrauterine foetal death (IUFD) as babies without signs of life in the uterus after 20 complete weeks of pregnancy. The approval to conduct the study was obtained from the institutional board ethical committees of both hospitals. All participants were informed about the objectives of the study, and informed consent was required. Patients with the following characteristics were included: closed cervix without evidence of cervical dilation or baseline uterine activity, A Bishop score of <5, having intact membranes, gestation greater than or equal to 20 weeks established by the date of menstruation or by fetometry and ultrasound-confirmed late IUFD. This study did not include the medical management of multiple pregnancies, IUFD after late foeticide or the management of specific medical conditions associated with an increase in the risk of IUFD or patients with a history of hypertension, along with women with a history of unexplained antepartum haemorrhage, pelvic dystocia or any another counter-indications where medications were used. Patients were assigned through a computational random number generator to receive isosorbide dinitrate or misoprostol. Allocation to groups was predetermined and arranged in numerical order. All participants were given a vaginal exam by the same person, who was blinded to the treatment allocation. The medications were administered in the posterior fornix, and cervical activity was evaluated at baseline and every 3 hours to monitor any change based on the Bishop score.
If the cervical conditions did not change after the treatment application, participants received a new dose, without exceeding 4 doses, to facilitate cervical ripening. Once a Bishop score of over 7 was reached, oxytocin was infused in a balanced electrolyte solution beginning with an infusion rate of 2 milli-International Units per minute (mIU/min) and doubling the dose every 15 minutes. The labour induction time from the first application of medication to the expulsion of the foetus was determined with a digital stopwatch. Each woman's vital signs were verified to determine that she was in stable condition and demonstrated haemodynamic stability as a requirement for the application of a new dose. During this time, the data and medical information were collected on paper and were later entered into a computational database. The participants remained at rest during the evaluation of adverse effects, such as headache, abdominal pain, pelvic pain, lower back pain, nausea, dizziness, and vomiting. The lack of cervical activity after 4 doses of medication was considered treatment failure.
A base solution of isosorbide dinitrate and misoprostol was prepared to obtain a concentration of 20 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) in 10% lactose solution. Serial dilutions were performed using known concentrations in mobile phase buffer solution (150 g ammonium acetate and 11.5 mL glacial acetic acid to 1 L water), methanol and water in a proportion of 350:100:550, respectively. The concentration of both drugs was determined using a ultraviolet (UV) light spectrophotometer reading at lambda 220 nm and a reference filter of lambda 278 nm. The mean absorbance for each set of standards, controls and samples was calculated by a standard plot curve. Computer-based curve-fitting statistical software was employed. Peak absorption and area under the curve were taken into account to determine stability of the pharmacological integration. Known samples of isosorbide dinitrate and misoprostol were added to 100% glycerin to prepare the gel solution. The reagents had final concentrations of either 80 mg of isosorbide dinitrate in 1.5 ml of gel solution or 100 micrograms of misoprostol in the same presentation.
Both solutions were packed in syringes that had the same appearance for the purpose of keeping the physician, patient and researcher blinded. The pharmacist was the only participant who knew the contents of the syringes. Four syringes were placed in an opaque and sealed envelope consecutively numbered with a unique study number. The envelopes were opened by the physician who applied the contents of the syringe, repeating the administration every 3 hours according to the prior selection and random allocation of patients. The entire "stock" of reagents remained stable for a period of 20 days and was maintained at room temperature (18-25° C) before using.
The calculation of the sample size was based on the Cox regression model using the risk quotient (log Hazard Ratio) and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).17 To reach a power (superiority of the clinical trial) of 80% and an α value of 0.05, with a standard deviation of 0.5 and under the assumption that 25% of all women will fail to induce labour, the estimated sample size required for the trial was 60 patients (30 in each arm).
All continuous variables were summarised using histograms and the measures of central tendency before conducting the statistical analyses. The statistical analyses were performed using the Chi-Square test, Fisher's exact test and the Mantel-Haenszel test, and Student's t test when appropriate. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify the normality of the data. To model the time-event of labour induction after IUFD, Cox regression was utilised, controlling for the covariates maternal age, foetal size and weight, and weeks of gestation. The proportional hazards assumption was evaluated using the two graphed lines, which corresponded to the survival curves (absence of crossing) and the log-log plots in the figure. Respiratory and cardiac rate, temperature (measured orally) and systolic and diastolic blood pressures (recorded using sphygmomanometry) were determined at baseline and every 3 hours until the trial ended. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated utilising bivariate analysis, including non-serious adverse events among the treatment groups. Attributable risk was calculated to determine the probability of total risk of each adverse effect observed with the use of isosorbide dinitrate or misoprostol. All of the tests were two-tailed, and results that had values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
- Being tested
- Isosorbide Dinitrate, Misoprostol, Oxytocin
- Keywords
- Isosorbide dinitrate gel solution, late intrauterine death, nitric oxide donors
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Isosorbide DinitrateDrug
Also called Isordil, Dilatrate-SR, Sorbitrate
MisoprostolDrug
Also called Cytotec
OxytocinDrug
Oxytocin was infused in a balanced electrolyte solution beginning with an infusion rate of 2 milli-International Units per minute (mIU/min) and doubling the dose every 15 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin | Experimental | Preinduction with isosorbide dinitrate gel solution (80 mg/1.5 mL) were administered in the posterior fornix every 3 hours. Once a Bishop score of over 7 was reached, oxytocin was infused in a balanced electrolyte solution beginning with an infusion rate of 2 milli-International Units per minute (mIU/min) and doubling the dose every 15 minutes.
If the cervical conditions (<7 Bishop Score) did not change after the treatment application, a new dose, without exceeding 4 doses, to facilitate cervical ripening. Receives: Drug: Isosorbide Dinitrate; Drug: Oxytocin |
| misoprostol-oxytocin | Placebo comparator | Preinduction with misoprostol gel solution (100 mcg/1.5 mL) were administered in the posterior fornix every 3 hours. Once a Bishop score of over 7 was reached, oxytocin was infused in a balanced electrolyte solution beginning with an infusion rate of 2 milli-International Units per minute (mIU/min) and doubling the dose every 15 minutes.
If the cervical conditions (<7 Bishop score) did not change after the treatment application, participants received a new dose, without exceeding 4 doses, to facilitate cervical ripening. Receives: Drug: Misoprostol; Drug: Oxytocin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rates of uterine expulsion in the women who received the isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin regimen
Measured: within 15 hours of administration
Secondary outcomes (1)
A Bishop score of >7 of administration of the first dose of isosorbide dinitrate
Measured: within 12 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2008
- Primary completionSep 2013
- Study completionMay 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (30)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical PregnancyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Perinatology
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gabriel Arteaga Troncoso, National Institute of Perinatology
- Investigators
- Gabriel Arteaga-Troncoso, PhD., Principal investigator, National Institute of Perinatology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02488642
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 212250-29021
- Acronym
- INPer
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 24 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
World Health Organization. Induction and augmentation of labour. In: WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, World Bank, editor. Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors. Geneva: WHO; 2000. pp. 17-25.
Koopmans L, Wilson T, Cacciatore J, Flenady V. Support for mothers, fathers and families after perinatal death. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 19;2013(6):CD000452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000452.pub3.
PubMed 23784865Radestad I, Steineck G, Nordin C, Sjogren B. Psychological complications after stillbirth--influence of memories and immediate management: population based study. BMJ. 1996 Jun 15;312(7045):1505-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7045.1505.
PubMed 8646141Silver RM, Heuser CC. Stillbirth workup and delivery management. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;53(3):681-90. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181eb3297.
PubMed 20661052Hughes EG, Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J. Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;97(5 Pt 2):847-55. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01216-3.
PubMed 11336776Neiger R, Greaves PC. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Tenn Med. 2001 Jan;94(1):25-7.
PubMed 11194687Bolnick JM, Velazquez MD, Gonzalez JL, Rappaport VJ, McIlwain-Dunivan G, Rayburn WF. Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;190(1):124-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00952-9.
PubMed 14749647Khan RU, El-Refaey H, Sharma S, Sooranna D, Stafford M. Oral, rectal, and vaginal pharmacokinetics of misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):866-70. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124783.38974.53.
PubMed 15121558Arteaga-Troncoso G, Villegas-Alvarado A, Belmont-Gomez A, Martinez-Herrera FJ, Villagrana-Zesati R, Guerra-Infante F. Intracervical application of the nitric oxide donor isosorbide dinitrate for induction of cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial to determine clinical efficacy and safety prior to first trimester surgical evacuation of retained products of conception. BJOG. 2005 Dec;112(12):1615-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00760.x.
PubMed 16305563Ignarro LJ, Lippton H, Edwards JC, Baricos WH, Hyman AL, Kadowitz PJ, Gruetter CA. Mechanism of vascular smooth muscle relaxation by organic nitrates, nitrites, nitroprusside and nitric oxide: evidence for the involvement of S-nitrosothiols as active intermediates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981 Sep;218(3):739-49. No abstract available.
PubMed 6115052Ignarro LJ. Heme-dependent activation of soluble guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide: regulation of enzyme activity by porphyrins and metalloporphyrins. Semin Hematol. 1989 Jan;26(1):63-76. No abstract available.
PubMed 2564216Schmidt HH, Lohmann SM, Walter U. The nitric oxide and cGMP signal transduction system: regulation and mechanism of action. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Aug 18;1178(2):153-75. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(93)90006-b. No abstract available.
PubMed 7688574Murad F. Regulation of cytosolic guanylyl cyclase by nitric oxide: the NO-cyclic GMP signal transduction system. Adv Pharmacol. 1994;26:19-33. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(08)60049-6.
PubMed 7913616Chung SJ, Fung HL. Identification of the subcellular site for nitroglycerin metabolism to nitric oxide in bovine coronary smooth muscle cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990 May;253(2):614-9.
PubMed 2110975Feelisch M, Kelm M. Biotransformation of organic nitrates to nitric oxide by vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991 Oct 15;180(1):286-93. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(05)81290-2.
PubMed 1656970
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Medical Management of Late Intrauterine Death Using a Therapeutic Combination of Isosorbide Dinitrate and Oxytocin.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02488642
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INPer / 212250-29021
- Keywords
- Isosorbide dinitrate gel solution, late intrauterine death, nitric oxide donors
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of PerinatologyOther government
- Collaborators
- National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico
- Study start
- May 2008
- Primary completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin in combination in the management of late intrauterine foetal death.
Detailed description
A prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial (RCT) was conducted to compare the efficacy and clinical safety of the induction of labour using the combination of isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin (experimental arm, X = 1) compared to misoprostol-oxytocin (standard arm, X = 0). The main result of the study was the success rate of foetal expulsion within 15 hours, while the average administration induction interval defined the secondary result. A total of 60 women with pregnancies greater than 20 weeks gestation were referred for foetal evacuation. We defined late intrauterine foetal death (IUFD) as babies without signs of life in the uterus after 20 complete weeks of pregnancy. The approval to conduct the study was obtained from the institutional board ethical committees of both hospitals. All participants were informed about the objectives of the study, and informed consent was required. Patients with the following characteristics were included: closed cervix without evidence of cervical dilation or baseline uterine activity, A Bishop score of <5, having intact membranes, gestation greater than or equal to 20 weeks established by the date of menstruation or by fetometry and ultrasound-confirmed late IUFD. This study did not include the medical management of multiple pregnancies, IUFD after late foeticide or the management of specific medical conditions associated with an increase in the risk of IUFD or patients with a history of hypertension, along with women with a history of unexplained antepartum haemorrhage, pelvic dystocia or any another counter-indications where medications were used. Patients were assigned through a computational random number generator to receive isosorbide dinitrate or misoprostol. Allocation to groups was predetermined and arranged in numerical order. All participants were given a vaginal exam by the same person, who was blinded to the treatment allocation. The medications were administered in the posterior fornix, and cervical activity was evaluated at baseline and every 3 hours to monitor any change based on the Bishop score.
If the cervical conditions did not change after the treatment application, participants received a new dose, without exceeding 4 doses, to facilitate cervical ripening. Once a Bishop score of over 7 was reached, oxytocin was infused in a balanced electrolyte solution beginning with an infusion rate of 2 milli-International Units per minute (mIU/min) and doubling the dose every 15 minutes. The labour induction time from the first application of medication to the expulsion of the foetus was determined with a digital stopwatch. Each woman's vital signs were verified to determine that she was in stable condition and demonstrated haemodynamic stability as a requirement for the application of a new dose. During this time, the data and medical information were collected on paper and were later entered into a computational database. The participants remained at rest during the evaluation of adverse effects, such as headache, abdominal pain, pelvic pain, lower back pain, nausea, dizziness, and vomiting. The lack of cervical activity after 4 doses of medication was considered treatment failure.
A base solution of isosorbide dinitrate and misoprostol was prepared to obtain a concentration of 20 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) in 10% lactose solution. Serial dilutions were performed using known concentrations in mobile phase buffer solution (150 g ammonium acetate and 11.5 mL glacial acetic acid to 1 L water), methanol and water in a proportion of 350:100:550, respectively. The concentration of both drugs was determined using a ultraviolet (UV) light spectrophotometer reading at lambda 220 nm and a reference filter of lambda 278 nm. The mean absorbance for each set of standards, controls and samples was calculated by a standard plot curve. Computer-based curve-fitting statistical software was employed. Peak absorption and area under the curve were taken into account to determine stability of the pharmacological integration. Known samples of isosorbide dinitrate and misoprostol were added to 100% glycerin to prepare the gel solution. The reagents had final concentrations of either 80 mg of isosorbide dinitrate in 1.5 ml of gel solution or 100 micrograms of misoprostol in the same presentation.
Both solutions were packed in syringes that had the same appearance for the purpose of keeping the physician, patient and researcher blinded. The pharmacist was the only participant who knew the contents of the syringes. Four syringes were placed in an opaque and sealed envelope consecutively numbered with a unique study number. The envelopes were opened by the physician who applied the contents of the syringe, repeating the administration every 3 hours according to the prior selection and random allocation of patients. The entire "stock" of reagents remained stable for a period of 20 days and was maintained at room temperature (18-25° C) before using.
The calculation of the sample size was based on the Cox regression model using the risk quotient (log Hazard Ratio) and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).17 To reach a power (superiority of the clinical trial) of 80% and an α value of 0.05, with a standard deviation of 0.5 and under the assumption that 25% of all women will fail to induce labour, the estimated sample size required for the trial was 60 patients (30 in each arm).
All continuous variables were summarised using histograms and the measures of central tendency before conducting the statistical analyses. The statistical analyses were performed using the Chi-Square test, Fisher's exact test and the Mantel-Haenszel test, and Student's t test when appropriate. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify the normality of the data. To model the time-event of labour induction after IUFD, Cox regression was utilised, controlling for the covariates maternal age, foetal size and weight, and weeks of gestation. The proportional hazards assumption was evaluated using the two graphed lines, which corresponded to the survival curves (absence of crossing) and the log-log plots in the figure. Respiratory and cardiac rate, temperature (measured orally) and systolic and diastolic blood pressures (recorded using sphygmomanometry) were determined at baseline and every 3 hours until the trial ended. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated utilising bivariate analysis, including non-serious adverse events among the treatment groups. Attributable risk was calculated to determine the probability of total risk of each adverse effect observed with the use of isosorbide dinitrate or misoprostol. All of the tests were two-tailed, and results that had values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin | Experimental | Drug: Isosorbide Dinitrate, Drug: OxytocinPreinduction with isosorbide dinitrate gel solution (80 mg/1.5 mL) were administered in the posterior fornix every 3 hours. Once a Bishop score of over 7 was reached, oxytocin was infused in a balanced electrolyte solution beginning with an infusion rate of 2 milli-International Units per minute (mIU/min) and doubling the dose every 15 minutes. If the cervical conditions (<7 Bishop Score) did not change after the treatment application, a new dose, without exceeding 4 doses, to facilitate cervical ripening. |
| misoprostol-oxytocin | Placebo comparator | Drug: Misoprostol, Drug: OxytocinPreinduction with misoprostol gel solution (100 mcg/1.5 mL) were administered in the posterior fornix every 3 hours. Once a Bishop score of over 7 was reached, oxytocin was infused in a balanced electrolyte solution beginning with an infusion rate of 2 milli-International Units per minute (mIU/min) and doubling the dose every 15 minutes. If the cervical conditions (<7 Bishop score) did not change after the treatment application, participants received a new dose, without exceeding 4 doses, to facilitate cervical ripening. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Closed cervix without evidence of cervical dilation or baseline uterine activity.
- A Bishop score of <5, having intact membranes.
- Gestation greater than or equal to 20 weeks established by the date of menstruation or by fetometry and ultrasound-confirmed late IUFD.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Multiple pregnancies.
- IUFD after late foeticide or the management of specific medical conditions associated with an increase in the risk of IUFD.
- Patients with a history of hypertension.
- Women with a history of unexplained antepartum haemorrhage, pelvic dystocia or any another counter-indications where medications were used.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Isosorbide DinitrateAlso: Isordil, Dilatrate-SR, Sorbitrate | Drug | isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin |
| MisoprostolAlso: Cytotec | Drug | misoprostol-oxytocin |
| OxytocinOxytocin was infused in a balanced electrolyte solution beginning with an infusion rate of 2 milli-International Units per minute (mIU/min) and doubling the dose every 15 minutes. | Drug | isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin, misoprostol-oxytocin |
Primary outcome
Rates of uterine expulsion in the women who received the isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin regimen
Time frame: within 15 hours of administration
1 secondary outcome
A Bishop score of >7 of administration of the first dose of isosorbide dinitrate
Time frame: within 12 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jul 2015.
- BackgroundWorld Health Organization. Induction and augmentation of labour. In: WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, World Bank, editor. Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors. Geneva: WHO; 2000. pp. 17-25.
- Results publication: PubMed 23784865Koopmans L, Wilson T, Cacciatore J, Flenady V. Support for mothers, fathers and families after perinatal death. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 19;2013(6):CD000452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000452.pub3.
- Results publication: PubMed 8646141Radestad I, Steineck G, Nordin C, Sjogren B. Psychological complications after stillbirth--influence of memories and immediate management: population based study. BMJ. 1996 Jun 15;312(7045):1505-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7045.1505.
- Results publication: PubMed 20661052Silver RM, Heuser CC. Stillbirth workup and delivery management. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;53(3):681-90. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181eb3297.
- Results publication: PubMed 11336776Hughes EG, Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J. Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;97(5 Pt 2):847-55. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01216-3.
- Results publication: PubMed 11194687Neiger R, Greaves PC. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Tenn Med. 2001 Jan;94(1):25-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 14749647Bolnick JM, Velazquez MD, Gonzalez JL, Rappaport VJ, McIlwain-Dunivan G, Rayburn WF. Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;190(1):124-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00952-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 15121558Khan RU, El-Refaey H, Sharma S, Sooranna D, Stafford M. Oral, rectal, and vaginal pharmacokinetics of misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):866-70. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124783.38974.53.
- Results publication: PubMed 16305563Arteaga-Troncoso G, Villegas-Alvarado A, Belmont-Gomez A, Martinez-Herrera FJ, Villagrana-Zesati R, Guerra-Infante F. Intracervical application of the nitric oxide donor isosorbide dinitrate for induction of cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial to determine clinical efficacy and safety prior to first trimester surgical evacuation of retained products of conception. BJOG. 2005 Dec;112(12):1615-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00760.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 6115052Ignarro LJ, Lippton H, Edwards JC, Baricos WH, Hyman AL, Kadowitz PJ, Gruetter CA. Mechanism of vascular smooth muscle relaxation by organic nitrates, nitrites, nitroprusside and nitric oxide: evidence for the involvement of S-nitrosothiols as active intermediates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981 Sep;218(3):739-49. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 2564216Ignarro LJ. Heme-dependent activation of soluble guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide: regulation of enzyme activity by porphyrins and metalloporphyrins. Semin Hematol. 1989 Jan;26(1):63-76. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 7688574Schmidt HH, Lohmann SM, Walter U. The nitric oxide and cGMP signal transduction system: regulation and mechanism of action. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Aug 18;1178(2):153-75. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(93)90006-b. No abstract available.
Related trials for Cervical Pregnancy
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gabriel Arteaga-Troncoso, PhD. principal investigator
National Institute of Perinatology
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Isosorbide Dinitrate, Misoprostol and Oxytocin in people with Cervical Pregnancy and Maternal Care for Late Fetal Death, run by National Institute of Perinatology.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rates of uterine expulsion in the women who received the isosorbide dinitrate-oxytocin regimen (time frame: within 15 hours of administration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02488642, which also lists 30 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2015.