StrokeNCT02491203
Post-stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation Using Telerehabilitation Interactive Virtual Reality System in the Patient's Home
A study testing Telerehabilitation system in people with Stroke, run by Université de Montréal at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Stroke is a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide and its incidence is on the rise. Importantly, loss of arm function occurs in up to 85% of stroke survivors, with a significant long-term impact on activities of daily living, leisure activities and work. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Telerehabilitation system
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Jan 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (does not have to be a first time stroke);
- Mild to moderate upper limb impairment (score 3-6 Chedoke-McMaster arm component or ability to perform VR tasks at least at the lowest setting according to clinician);
- At least 6 months post stroke;
- No longer receiving rehabilitation services; and (5) living in an area where high speed Internet access is available.
Who cannot join
- Being medically unstable;
- Severe cognitive or communication deficits;
- Visual impairments;
- Severe balance deficits limiting sitting safely independently;
- Shoulder pain;
- Previous upper limb impairment limiting potential recovery.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Maximizing Post-stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation Using a Novel Telerehabilitation Interactive Virtual Reality System in the Patient's Home
Stroke is a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide and its incidence is on the rise. Importantly, loss of arm function occurs in up to 85% of stroke survivors, with a significant long-term impact on activities of daily living, leisure activities and work. The capacity for recovery following a stroke depends on several factors, including the extent of the initial neurological damage, spontaneous recovery and rehabilitation, with possible recovery even years after the stroke. Unfortunately, accessibility of much needed rehabilitation services poststroke often remains limited, both in terms of intensity and duration, as reported in a recent report on post-stroke rehabilitation services in Quebec (Richard, 2013) Recent evidence suggests that homebased telerehabilitation (TR) is a viable approach for upper limb training post-stroke when rehabilitation services are not available. Similarly, the Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care update for 2013 recommends home-based patient monitoring be used when frequent monitoring is needed and face-to-face visits are not available. Hence, The investigators have developed and propose to examine the use of a TR system that allows upper limb rehabilitation with ongoing off-line monitoring, to be used after usual poststroke rehabilitation is completed and services are no longer offered.
Read the detailed description
More specifically, the objective of the proposed study is to assess the impact, in terms of motor recovery, function,quality of life, compliance, safety and cost, of a novel, patient-centered home-based tailored TR program using an affordable virtual reality system for upper-limb rehabilitation post-stroke. Such a system, combined with remote off-line monitoring could allow patients to take charge and pursue their rehabilitation beyond current services, maximizing their potential for recovery.
A single-blind two-arm randomized clinical trial (RCT) is proposed for this study with participants who have had a stroke randomly allocated to: (1) 4-week training with home-based tele-rehabilitation (TR) system (see intervention below).i.e. treatment group or (2) 4-week written home exercise program provided by a clinician, i.e. exercise control group.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Telerehabilitation system
- Keywords
- Virtual reality, telerehabilitation, Stroke rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Telerehabilitation systemOther
Usual care plus home-based virtual reality telerehabilitation system.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual care | No intervention | All study participants in the control group will receive a 4-week written home exercise program (e.g. GRASP) , i.e. the usual care discharge home program. |
| Telerehabilitation system | Experimental | Participants in the experimental group will receive four weeks written home exercise program provided by a clinician, i.e. usual care discharge home program plus virtual reality (VR) and telerehabilitation system. The intensity and choice of game for the home program will be determined by the therapist based on the patient's abilities, interests, motivation and fatigue. The patient's performance for the VR home program will be monitored asynchronously and the program adapted to ensure it remains at an appropriate level for the patient. Receives: Other: Telerehabilitation system |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline in Upper limb motor control at 4 weeks
as measured using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-UE (FMA-UE).
Measured: baseline and four weeks after intervention
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline in quality of life at 4 weeks
measured using the Stroke Impact Scale-16, a stroke-specific, self-report, health status measure featuring 16 items capturing daily activities
Measured: At intake into the study ( post-stroke; chronic phase) and four weeks after intervention
Change from Baseline in Upper limb motor control at 4 weeks
Box and Block test.
Measured: At intake into the study ( post-stroke; chronic phase) and four weeks after intervention
Change from Baseline in Upper limb function at 4 weeks
Impact on upper extremity use in daily activities will be using the Motor Activity Log, a self-reported measure of upper limb use
Measured: At intake into the study ( post-stroke; chronic phase) and four weeks after intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionJan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Université de Montréal
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dahlia Kairy, Université de Montréal
- Investigators
- Dahlia Kairy, PhD, Principal investigator, Université de Montréal
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02491203
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRIR-937-0214
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 28 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Apr;8(4):355-69. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70025-0. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
PubMed 19233729Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Soliman EZ, Sorlie PD, Sotoodehnia N, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):e2-e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. Epub 2011 Dec 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 22179539Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S. Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2005 Jul;36(7):1480-4. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000170706.13595.4f. Epub 2005 Jun 9.
PubMed 15947263Richards C. Trajectoires de services de réadaptation post-AVC. Un continuum centré sur la personne: Comité d'experts sur l'offre de services de réadaptation post-AVC;2013
Langan J, Delave K, Phillips L, Pangilinan P, Brown SH. Home-based telerehabilitation shows improved upper limb function in adults with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Feb;45(2):217-20. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1115.
PubMed 23319181Dawson AS KJ MA, Foley N, Teasell R. Chapter 5: Stroke Rehabilitation. In: Lindsay MP GG BM, Phillips S, ed. Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care: Canadian Stroke Best Practices and Standards Working Group; 2013.
Hernandez A, Bubyr L, Archambault PS, Higgins J, Levin MF, Kairy D. Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation as a Feasible and Engaging Tool for the Management of Chronic Poststroke Upper-Extremity Function Recovery: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2022 Sep 27;10(3):e37506. doi: 10.2196/37506.
PubMed 36166289
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Maximizing Post-stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation Using a Novel Telerehabilitation Interactive Virtual Reality System in the Patient's Home
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02491203
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRIR-937-0214
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Virtual reality, telerehabilitation, Stroke rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Université de MontréalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2014
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stroke is a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide and its incidence is on the rise. Importantly, loss of arm function occurs in up to 85% of stroke survivors, with a significant long-term impact on activities of daily living, leisure activities and work. The capacity for recovery following a stroke depends on several factors, including the extent of the initial neurological damage, spontaneous recovery and rehabilitation, with possible recovery even years after the stroke. Unfortunately, accessibility of much needed rehabilitation services poststroke often remains limited, both in terms of intensity and duration, as reported in a recent report on post-stroke rehabilitation services in Quebec (Richard, 2013) Recent evidence suggests that homebased telerehabilitation (TR) is a viable approach for upper limb training post-stroke when rehabilitation services are not available. Similarly, the Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care update for 2013 recommends home-based patient monitoring be used when frequent monitoring is needed and face-to-face visits are not available. Hence, The investigators have developed and propose to examine the use of a TR system that allows upper limb rehabilitation with ongoing off-line monitoring, to be used after usual poststroke rehabilitation is completed and services are no longer offered.
Detailed description
More specifically, the objective of the proposed study is to assess the impact, in terms of motor recovery, function,quality of life, compliance, safety and cost, of a novel, patient-centered home-based tailored TR program using an affordable virtual reality system for upper-limb rehabilitation post-stroke. Such a system, combined with remote off-line monitoring could allow patients to take charge and pursue their rehabilitation beyond current services, maximizing their potential for recovery.
A single-blind two-arm randomized clinical trial (RCT) is proposed for this study with participants who have had a stroke randomly allocated to: (1) 4-week training with home-based tele-rehabilitation (TR) system (see intervention below).i.e. treatment group or (2) 4-week written home exercise program provided by a clinician, i.e. exercise control group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual care | No intervention | –All study participants in the control group will receive a 4-week written home exercise program (e.g. GRASP) , i.e. the usual care discharge home program. |
| Telerehabilitation system | Experimental | Other: Telerehabilitation systemParticipants in the experimental group will receive four weeks written home exercise program provided by a clinician, i.e. usual care discharge home program plus virtual reality (VR) and telerehabilitation system. The intensity and choice of game for the home program will be determined by the therapist based on the patient's abilities, interests, motivation and fatigue. The patient's performance for the VR home program will be monitored asynchronously and the program adapted to ensure it remains at an appropriate level for the patient. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (does not have to be a first time stroke);
- Mild to moderate upper limb impairment (score 3-6 Chedoke-McMaster arm component or ability to perform VR tasks at least at the lowest setting according to clinician);
- At least 6 months post stroke;
- No longer receiving rehabilitation services; and (5) living in an area where high speed Internet access is available.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Being medically unstable;
- Severe cognitive or communication deficits;
- Visual impairments;
- Severe balance deficits limiting sitting safely independently;
- Shoulder pain;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Telerehabilitation systemUsual care plus home-based virtual reality telerehabilitation system. | Other | Telerehabilitation system |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline in Upper limb motor control at 4 weeks
Time frame: baseline and four weeks after intervention
as measured using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-UE (FMA-UE).
3 secondary outcomes
Change from Baseline in quality of life at 4 weeks
Time frame: At intake into the study ( post-stroke; chronic phase) and four weeks after intervention
Change from Baseline in Upper limb motor control at 4 weeks
Time frame: At intake into the study ( post-stroke; chronic phase) and four weeks after intervention
Change from Baseline in Upper limb function at 4 weeks
Time frame: At intake into the study ( post-stroke; chronic phase) and four weeks after intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Nov 2018.
- Background: PubMed 19233729Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Apr;8(4):355-69. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70025-0. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
- Background: PubMed 22179539Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Soliman EZ, Sorlie PD, Sotoodehnia N, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):e2-e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. Epub 2011 Dec 15. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 15947263Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S. Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2005 Jul;36(7):1480-4. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000170706.13595.4f. Epub 2005 Jun 9.
- BackgroundRichards C. Trajectoires de services de réadaptation post-AVC. Un continuum centré sur la personne: Comité d'experts sur l'offre de services de réadaptation post-AVC;2013
- Background: PubMed 23319181Langan J, Delave K, Phillips L, Pangilinan P, Brown SH. Home-based telerehabilitation shows improved upper limb function in adults with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Feb;45(2):217-20. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1115.
- BackgroundDawson AS KJ MA, Foley N, Teasell R. Chapter 5: Stroke Rehabilitation. In: Lindsay MP GG BM, Phillips S, ed. Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care: Canadian Stroke Best Practices and Standards Working Group; 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36166289Hernandez A, Bubyr L, Archambault PS, Higgins J, Levin MF, Kairy D. Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation as a Feasible and Engaging Tool for the Management of Chronic Poststroke Upper-Extremity Function Recovery: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2022 Sep 27;10(3):e37506. doi: 10.2196/37506.
Related trials for Stroke
Recruiting
MindEx: A Novel, Multifocal, Cognitive Brain-Machine Interface System
Paralysis; Quadriplegic, Quadraplegia
RecruitingPhase 3
Probucol for Symptomatic Intracranial and Extracranial Artery Stenosis
Ischemic Stroke, TIA
RecruitingObservational study
CoMind Early Feasibility Study
Intracranial Pressure, Intracranial Pressure Changes
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Anti-inflammatory and Anti-thrombotic Therapy With colcHicine and Low Dose Rivaroxaban for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Reduction in Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Clevidipine for the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dahlia Kairy, PhD principal investigator
Université de Montréal
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Telerehabilitation system in people with Stroke, run by Université de Montréal at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline in Upper limb motor control at 4 weeks (time frame: baseline and four weeks after intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02491203, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.