AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic StenosisNCT02491255

Safety and Efficacy Study of Lotus Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (REPRISE Japan)

A study testing Lotus Valve System in people with Aortic Stenosis, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 5 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to confirm the safety and effectiveness of the Lotus™ Valve System in the Japanese medical environment for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in symptomatic subjects with calcific, severe native aortic stenosis who are considered at high or extreme risk for surgical valve… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aortic Stenosis
What is being tested?
Lotus Valve System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
5 sitesJapan
Study dates
22 Jun 2015to 13 Sep 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

IC1. Subject has documented calcific, severe native aortic stenosis with an initial AVA of ≤1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2) and a mean pressure gradient ≥40 mm Hg or jet velocity ≥4.0 m/s, as measured by echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamics.

IC2. Subject has a documented aortic annulus size of ≥18 mm and ≤27 mm based on the Center's assessment of pre-procedure diagnostic imaging (and confirmed by the Case Review Committee [CRC]) and is deemed treatable with an available size of the test device

IC3. Subject has symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with NYHA Functional Class ≥ II

IC4. There is agreement by the heart team (which must include a site investigator interventionalist and a site investigator cardiac surgeon) that subject is at high or extreme operative risk for surgical valve replacement (see note below for definitions of extreme and high risk, the required level of surgical assessment, and CRC confirmation) and that TAVR is appropriate. Additionally, subject has at least one of the following.

  • Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score ≥8% -OR-
  • If STS <8, subject has at least one of the following conditions:
  • Hostile chest
  • Porcelain aorta
  • Severe pulmonary hypertension (>60 mmHg)
  • Prior chest radiation therapy
  • Coronary artery bypass graft(s) at risk with re-operation
  • Severe lung disease (need for supplemental oxygen, FEV1 <50% of predicted, DLCO <60%, or other evidence of severe pulmonary dysfunction)
  • Neuromuscular disease that creates risk for mechanical ventilation or rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement
  • Orthopedic disease that creates risk for rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement
  • Childs Class A or B liver disease (subjects with Childs Class C disease are not eligible for inclusion in this trial)
  • Frailty as indicated by at least one of the following: 5-meter walk >6 seconds, Katz ADL score of 3/6 or less, body mass index <21, wheelchair bound, unable to live independently
  • Age ≥90 years
  • Other evidence that subject is at high or extreme risk for surgical valve replacement (CRC must confirm agreement with site heart team that subject meets high or extreme risk definition)

IC5. Heart team (which must include a cardiac interventionalist and an experienced cardiac surgeon) assessment that the subject is likely to benefit from valve replacement.

IC6. Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent.

IC7. Subject, family member, and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits.

IC8. Subject must be at least 20 years old.

IC9. For subjects not suitable for iliofemoral access (because of caliber of the iliofemoral vessels, severe tortuosity or other factors preventing safe iliofemoral access), trans-aortic access is deemed appropriate by the heart team and confirmed by the CRC. This inclusion criterion is only applicable to the TAo substudy and the 21mm substudy if the transaortic approach is used.

Note: Extreme operative risk and high operative risk are defined as follows:

Extreme Operative Risk: Predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk ≥50% at 30 days.

High Operative Risk: Predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk ≥15% at 30 days.

EC1. Subject has a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve.

EC2. Subject has had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin elevation).

EC3. Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months prior to study enrollment.

EC4. Subject has end-stage renal disease or has eGFR <20. Note: eGFR(ml/min/1.73m2)=194×Cr-1.094×Age-0.287×(If female×0.739)

EC5. Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic aortic or mitral valve.

EC6. Subject has severe aortic, tricuspid, or mitral regurgitation.

EC7. Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason.

EC8. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 6 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis.

EC9. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of new intra-cardiac vegetation or intraventricular or paravalvular thrombus requiring intervention.

EC10. Subject has Hgb <9 g/dL, platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, or white blood cell count <1,000 cells/mm3.

EC11. Subject requires chronic anticoagulation therapy after the implant procedure and cannot be treated with warfarin (other anticoagulants are not permitted in the first month) for at least 1 month concomitant with either aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel or ticlopidine, but prasugrel is not allowed).

EC12. Subject had a gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 3 months, or has other clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that would preclude treatment with required antiplatelet regimen, or will refuse transfusions.

EC13. Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all P2Y12 inhibitors, heparin, nickel, tantalum, titanium, or polyurethanes.

EC14. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, comorbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment.

EC15. Subject has hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

EC16. Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac or vascular procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty or pacemaker implantation, which are allowed).

EC17. Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires revascularization.

EC18. Subject has severe left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction <20%.

EC19. Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices.

EC20. Subject has severe vascular disease that would preclude safe access (e.g., aneurysm with thrombus that cannot be crossed safely, marked tortuosity, significant narrowing of the abdominal aorta, severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta, or symptomatic carotid or vertebral disease). This exclusion criterion is only applicable to the TF study and the 21mm substudy if the transfemoral or transiliac approach is used.

EC21. Subject has thick (>5 mm) protruding or ulcerated atheroma in the aortic arch. This exclusion criterion is only applicable to the TF study and the 21mm substudy if the transfemoral or transiliac approach is used.

EC22. Subject has arterial access that is not acceptable for the test device delivery systems as defined in the device Instructions For Use.

EC23. Subject has current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.).

EC24. Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint.

EC25. Subject has untreated conduction system disorder (e.g., Type II second degree atrioventricular block) that in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires a pacemaker implantation. Enrollment is permissible after permanent pacemaker implantation.

EC26. Subject has severe incapacitating dementia.

EC27. Subject is a woman who is pregnant, nursing (a pregnancy test must be performed in women of potential child-bearing) or wishes to be pregnant

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

Japan5 sites
  • Sakakibara Heart Institute

    Fuchū, Tokyo, 183-0003

  • Shonankamakura General Hospital

    Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533

  • Kurashiki Central Hospital

    Kurashiki, Okayama-ken, 710-8602

  • Keio University Hospital

    Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-8582

  • Osaka University Hospital

    Suita, Osaka, 565-0871

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: REPRISE Japan: Repositionable Percutaneous Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of Lotus™ Valve System - Clinical Evaluation in Japan

The objective of this study is to confirm the safety and effectiveness of the Lotus™ Valve System in the Japanese medical environment for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in symptomatic subjects with calcific, severe native aortic stenosis who are considered at high or extreme risk for surgical valve replacement.

Read the detailed description

A prospective, multicenter trial designed to confirm that the safety and effectiveness of the Lotus Valve System in the Japanese medical environment are consistent with the REPRISE III results for TAVR in symptomatic subjects who have calcific, severe native aortic stenosis and who are at extreme or high risk for surgical valve replacement.

Conditions
Aortic Stenosis
Being tested
Lotus Valve System
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lotus Valve SystemDevice

    Device: Lotus Valve System

Study groups in NCT02491255
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lotus Valve SystemExperimentalTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System
Receives: Device: Lotus Valve System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary Safety Endpoint: Composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, life-threatening and major bleeding events, stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury, or major vascular complications

    Measured: 30 days following procedure

  2. Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Composite of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke(adjudicated by an independent CEC), or moderate or greater paravalvular aortic regurgitation(based on independent core laboratory assessment)

    Measured: 6 month following procedure

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Moderate or greater paravalvular aortic regurgitation (based on core lab assessment)

    Measured: 6 month following procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start22 Jun 2015
  3. Primary completion30 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion13 Sep 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02491255
Sponsor's protocol ID
S6002
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
18 Jun 2015
Last updated
28 Sep 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lotus Valve System in people with Aortic Stenosis, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 5 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary Safety Endpoint: Composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, life-threatening and major bleeding events, stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury, or major vascular complications (time frame: 30 days following procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in