Arteriovenous FistulaPhase 4NCT02493504
Effects of Heparin on Arteriovenous Fistula Patency
A Phase 4 study testing Heparin in people with Arteriovenous Fistula, run by Fatemeh Hoseinzadegan.
Trial summary
Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is now the optimal method of obtaining vascular access for dialysis. Measures such as systemic anticoagulation have been proposed as means of increasing patency rates but enough evidence does not exist to support their use. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Arteriovenous Fistula
- What is being tested?
- Heparin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2011to Jan 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic Kidney Disease, In need of AVF placement
Who cannot join
- Contraindications for anticoagulant therapy
About this study
Official title: Effects of Heparin on Early Patency of Arteriovenous Fistula in Angioaccess Surgery of Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease
Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is now the optimal method of obtaining vascular access for dialysis. Measures such as systemic anticoagulation have been proposed as means of increasing patency rates but enough evidence does not exist to support their use. The investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative heparin injection on patency of AVF during the first 24 hours after surgery and to determine whether such measure can be used to prevent early thrombosis of the vascular access.
Read the detailed description
The study was carried out on patients admitted to Shohada-e-Tajrish hospital for permanent vascular access placement since April 2011 through September 2012. The exclusion criteria consisted of having a contraindication of administration of anticuagulant agent. 150 patients were enrolled in the study.
All patients were operated on by a single surgeon (Dr Mozafar. The non dominant upper extremity (mostly the left arm) was generally used unless unfavorable vasculature or previous fistula placement changed the preference. The anastomosis technique was either end-to-side or side-to-side using a number 6.0 prolene suture. 75 patients were randomly assigned to receive 100units/kg of heparin after dissection prior to anastomosis while the other 75 received no intraoperative heparin injection. Auscultation of bruit and palpation of thrill was used to assess arteriovenous fistula patency in the first 24 hours after AVF placement.
Data analysis was performed using SPSS v.20. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Bivariate analysis in the form of Chi-square tests, T-test and Fischer's exact test were calculated.
Patient enrollment was voluntary and no costs were imposed on the patients. The study protocol was in accordance with 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.
- Conditions
- Arteriovenous Fistula
- Being tested
- Heparin
- Keywords
- Heparin
- Medical subject headings
- Arteriovenous Fistula
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HeparinDrug
Also called Case
100units/kg of heparin were administered for the case group after dissection prior to anastomosis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Heparin | Experimental | 75 patients were randomly assigned to receive 100units/kg of heparin after dissection prior to anastomosis. Receives: Drug: Heparin |
| Control | No intervention | 75 received no intraoperative heparin injection. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The number of patients with a bruit auscultated over AVF
Hearing a bruit through auscultation over the AVF is regarded as a positive measure or in other words a patent AVF. The frequency of positive measures are compared between the two groups.
Measured: The first 24 hours after anostomosis
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2011
- Primary completionApr 2012
- Study completionJan 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arteriovenous FistulaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fatemeh Hoseinzadegan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Fatemeh Hoseinzadegan, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
- Investigators
- Mohammad Mozafar, M.D., Study director, Associate Professor of General and Vascular Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02493504
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHBMU-001124
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 1 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 9 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Zhang QL, Rothenbacher D. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in population-based studies: systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2008 Apr 11;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-117.
PubMed 18405348Allon M, Robbin ML. Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: problems and solutions. Kidney Int. 2002 Oct;62(4):1109-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2002.kid551.x.
PubMed 12234281Haimov M, Baez A, Neff M, Slifkin R. Complications of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Arch Surg. 1975 Jun;110(6):708-12. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360120026004. No abstract available.
PubMed 1147768Perera GB, Mueller MP, Kubaska SM, Wilson SE, Lawrence PF, Fujitani RM. Superiority of autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis access: maintenance of function with fewer secondary interventions. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004 Jan;18(1):66-73. doi: 10.1007/s10016-003-0094-y. Epub 2004 Jan 20.
PubMed 14727162Abularrage CJ, Sidawy AN, Weiswasser JM, White PW, Arora S. Medical factors affecting patency of arteriovenous access. Semin Vasc Surg. 2004 Mar;17(1):25-31. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2003.11.006.
PubMed 15011176Green LD, Lee DS, Kucey DS. A metaanalysis comparing surgical thrombectomy, mechanical thrombectomy, and pharmacomechanical thrombolysis for thrombosed dialysis grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Nov;36(5):939-45. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.127524.
PubMed 12422093Smith GE, Gohil R, Chetter IC. Factors affecting the patency of arteriovenous fistulas for dialysis access. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Mar;55(3):849-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.095. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
PubMed 22070937Erkut B, Unlu Y, Ceviz M, Becit N, Ates A, Colak A, Kocak H. Primary arteriovenous fistulas in the forearm for hemodialysis: effect of miscellaneous factors in fistula patency. Ren Fail. 2006;28(4):275-81. doi: 10.1080/08860220600583617.
PubMed 16771241Dember LM, Beck GJ, Allon M, Delmez JA, Dixon BS, Greenberg A, Himmelfarb J, Vazquez MA, Gassman JJ, Greene T, Radeva MK, Braden GL, Ikizler TA, Rocco MV, Davidson IJ, Kaufman JS, Meyers CM, Kusek JW, Feldman HI; Dialysis Access Consortium Study Group. Effect of clopidogrel on early failure of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2164-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2164.
PubMed 18477783Ghorbani A, Aalamshah M, Shahbazian H, Ehsanpour A, Aref A. Randomized controlled trial of clopidogrel to prevent primary arteriovenous fistula failure in hemodialysis patients. Indian J Nephrol. 2009 Apr;19(2):57-61. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.53323.
PubMed 20368925Akin EB, Topcu O, Ozcan H, Ersoz S, Aytac S, Anadol E. Hemodynamic effect of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate on newly constructed arteriovenous fistula. World J Surg. 2002 Oct;26(10):1256-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-002-6515-1. Epub 2002 Sep 4.
PubMed 12205547Tessitore N, Bedogna V, Poli A, Mantovani W, Lipari G, Baggio E, Mansueto G, Lupo A. Adding access blood flow surveillance to clinical monitoring reduces thrombosis rates and costs, and improves fistula patency in the short term: a controlled cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Nov;23(11):3578-84. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn275. Epub 2008 May 29.
PubMed 18511608Sharathkumar A, Hirschl R, Pipe S, Crandell C, Adams B, Lin JJ. Primary thromboprophylaxis with heparins for arteriovenous fistula failure in pediatric patients. J Vasc Access. 2007 Oct-Dec;8(4):235-44.
PubMed 18161668Bhomi KK, Shrestha S, Bhattachan CL. Role of systemic anticoagulation in patients undergoing vascular access surgery. Nepal Med Coll J. 2008 Dec;10(4):222-4.
PubMed 19558057D'Ayala M, Smith RM, Martone C, Briggs W, Deitch JS, Wise L. The effect of systemic anticoagulation in patients undergoing angioaccess surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;22(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
PubMed 18055171
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Heparin on Early Patency of Arteriovenous Fistula in Angioaccess Surgery of Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02493504
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHBMU-001124
- Conditions
- Arteriovenous Fistula
- Keywords
- Heparin
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fatemeh HoseinzadeganUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2011
- Primary completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is now the optimal method of obtaining vascular access for dialysis. Measures such as systemic anticoagulation have been proposed as means of increasing patency rates but enough evidence does not exist to support their use. The investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative heparin injection on patency of AVF during the first 24 hours after surgery and to determine whether such measure can be used to prevent early thrombosis of the vascular access.
Detailed description
The study was carried out on patients admitted to Shohada-e-Tajrish hospital for permanent vascular access placement since April 2011 through September 2012. The exclusion criteria consisted of having a contraindication of administration of anticuagulant agent. 150 patients were enrolled in the study.
All patients were operated on by a single surgeon (Dr Mozafar. The non dominant upper extremity (mostly the left arm) was generally used unless unfavorable vasculature or previous fistula placement changed the preference. The anastomosis technique was either end-to-side or side-to-side using a number 6.0 prolene suture. 75 patients were randomly assigned to receive 100units/kg of heparin after dissection prior to anastomosis while the other 75 received no intraoperative heparin injection. Auscultation of bruit and palpation of thrill was used to assess arteriovenous fistula patency in the first 24 hours after AVF placement.
Data analysis was performed using SPSS v.20. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Bivariate analysis in the form of Chi-square tests, T-test and Fischer's exact test were calculated.
Patient enrollment was voluntary and no costs were imposed on the patients. The study protocol was in accordance with 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Heparin | Experimental | Drug: Heparin75 patients were randomly assigned to receive 100units/kg of heparin after dissection prior to anastomosis. |
| Control | No intervention | –75 received no intraoperative heparin injection. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Chronic Kidney Disease, In need of AVF placement
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Contraindications for anticoagulant therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HeparinAlso: Case100units/kg of heparin were administered for the case group after dissection prior to anastomosis. | Drug | Heparin |
Primary outcome
The number of patients with a bruit auscultated over AVF
Time frame: The first 24 hours after anostomosis
Hearing a bruit through auscultation over the AVF is regarded as a positive measure or in other words a patent AVF. The frequency of positive measures are compared between the two groups.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jul 2015.
- Background: PubMed 18405348Zhang QL, Rothenbacher D. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in population-based studies: systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2008 Apr 11;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-117.
- Background: PubMed 12234281Allon M, Robbin ML. Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: problems and solutions. Kidney Int. 2002 Oct;62(4):1109-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2002.kid551.x.
- Background: PubMed 1147768Haimov M, Baez A, Neff M, Slifkin R. Complications of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Arch Surg. 1975 Jun;110(6):708-12. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360120026004. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 14727162Perera GB, Mueller MP, Kubaska SM, Wilson SE, Lawrence PF, Fujitani RM. Superiority of autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis access: maintenance of function with fewer secondary interventions. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004 Jan;18(1):66-73. doi: 10.1007/s10016-003-0094-y. Epub 2004 Jan 20.
- Background: PubMed 15011176Abularrage CJ, Sidawy AN, Weiswasser JM, White PW, Arora S. Medical factors affecting patency of arteriovenous access. Semin Vasc Surg. 2004 Mar;17(1):25-31. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2003.11.006.
- Background: PubMed 12422093Green LD, Lee DS, Kucey DS. A metaanalysis comparing surgical thrombectomy, mechanical thrombectomy, and pharmacomechanical thrombolysis for thrombosed dialysis grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Nov;36(5):939-45. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.127524.
- Background: PubMed 22070937Smith GE, Gohil R, Chetter IC. Factors affecting the patency of arteriovenous fistulas for dialysis access. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Mar;55(3):849-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.095. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
- Background: PubMed 16771241Erkut B, Unlu Y, Ceviz M, Becit N, Ates A, Colak A, Kocak H. Primary arteriovenous fistulas in the forearm for hemodialysis: effect of miscellaneous factors in fistula patency. Ren Fail. 2006;28(4):275-81. doi: 10.1080/08860220600583617.
- Background: PubMed 18477783Dember LM, Beck GJ, Allon M, Delmez JA, Dixon BS, Greenberg A, Himmelfarb J, Vazquez MA, Gassman JJ, Greene T, Radeva MK, Braden GL, Ikizler TA, Rocco MV, Davidson IJ, Kaufman JS, Meyers CM, Kusek JW, Feldman HI; Dialysis Access Consortium Study Group. Effect of clopidogrel on early failure of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2164-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2164.
- Background: PubMed 20368925Ghorbani A, Aalamshah M, Shahbazian H, Ehsanpour A, Aref A. Randomized controlled trial of clopidogrel to prevent primary arteriovenous fistula failure in hemodialysis patients. Indian J Nephrol. 2009 Apr;19(2):57-61. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.53323.
- Background: PubMed 12205547Akin EB, Topcu O, Ozcan H, Ersoz S, Aytac S, Anadol E. Hemodynamic effect of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate on newly constructed arteriovenous fistula. World J Surg. 2002 Oct;26(10):1256-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-002-6515-1. Epub 2002 Sep 4.
- Background: PubMed 18511608Tessitore N, Bedogna V, Poli A, Mantovani W, Lipari G, Baggio E, Mansueto G, Lupo A. Adding access blood flow surveillance to clinical monitoring reduces thrombosis rates and costs, and improves fistula patency in the short term: a controlled cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Nov;23(11):3578-84. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn275. Epub 2008 May 29.
Related trials for Arteriovenous Fistula
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Okami Medical ALPHA Registry
Arterial Bleed, Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation
Not yet recruiting
A First-In-Man Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Ultra High Pressure PTA Balloon ULTRAVIOLET in Treating A-V Fistula Stenosis
Arterio-venous Fistula, Stenosis of Arteriovenous Dialysis Fistula
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Merit WRAPSODY™ Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Stenosis or Occlusion (WRAP)
Venous Stenosis, Venous Occlusion
Not yet recruiting
DialysisBot: AI Chatbot for Hemodialysis Self-Management
Chatbot-Based Training, Hemodialysis
RecruitingObservational study
NAIF 2.0 - COGNIFY
Dural Arteriovenous Fistula, Glymphatic System
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohammad Mozafar, M.D. study director
Associate Professor of General and Vascular Surgery
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Heparin in people with Arteriovenous Fistula, run by Fatemeh Hoseinzadegan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The number of patients with a bruit auscultated over AVF (time frame: The first 24 hours after anostomosis). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02493504, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.