AzTrials
AzTrials

UveitisPhase 1/2UVEREGNCT02494492

Treatment of the Bilateral Severe Uveitis by IVT of Regulator T-cells: Study of Tolerance of Dose

A Phase 1/2 study testing intravitreous administration of regulator T-cells in people with Uveitis, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Suspended

Paused. Enrolment is on hold for now and may resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Uveitis is a leading cause of blindness in the children and young adult's populations. One third of etiology are idiopathic. The reference treatments are corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. They have significant side effects, and patient's compliance is often poor. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Uveitis
What is being tested?
intravitreous administration of regulator T-cells
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Mar 2013to Dec 2017
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects ≥ 18 years
  • severe bilateral uveitis not infectious
  • visual acuity between CLD and 1/10 for the eye the most affected and less than 5/10 for the fellow eye
  • failed steroid ≤ 15 mg / day with or without an immunosuppressive agents

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Department of ophthalmology Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles FOIX

    Paris, 75013

Other trials in France

About this study

Uveitis is a leading cause of blindness in the children and young adult's populations. One third of etiology are idiopathic. The reference treatments are corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. They have significant side effects, and patient's compliance is often poor. In addition, some uveitis are more resistant. Also, in these situations of deadlock therapeutic, investigators propose a cell therapy by administering regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the vitreous of patients.

Read the detailed description

Arsenal and limitations in the treatment of uveitis Uveitis is a major cause of severe visual loss or even blindness in children and young adults. In almost one third of cases, it is associated with an infectious agent, another third is integrated in the field of autoimmune diseases as systemic entities including (Behçet's disease, sarcoidosis, spondyloarthropathy ...) or limited to the eye (Birdshot type retinochoroidopathy, sympathetic ophthalmia, idiopathic retinal vasculitis). The last third remains idiopathic, where despite a careful etiological research, no cause is identified. The systemic corticosteroids are often effective but have significant side effects and patient compliance is often poor. That is why they are sometimes administered directly into the posterior segment of the eye (vitreous), but the effect is only temporary, often ineffective, and also associated with side effects. In addition, some are steroid-dependent, requiring treatment with immunosuppressive agents; which also may be responsible for many adverse effects and are not always effective. In these therapeutic impasse situations, investigators propose a cell therapy approach injection of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 regulators + (Tregs), directly into the vitreous of patients.

A new therapy approach uveitis by cell therapy It is now clearly established that Tregs play a critical role in the control of autoimmune diseases. In man or mouse, a deep deficit in Tregs is associated with a very severe autoimmune syndrome, leading to death .In uveitis, it is also shown that Tregs control this disease in deficient mice. Tregs have been reported in humans . In addition, our group and others have shown that various autoimmune diseases can be prevented by transfer of Tregs in mice .Thus, cell therapy by injection of Tregs raises hopes for the treatment of chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases . However, only specific and not polyclonal Tregs, have a strong therapeutic potential when administered systemically. The only Tregs that can be used in clinic are polyclonal Tregs purified by magnetic beads to which, are adsorbed anti- CD25 antibody . This technology provides a cell preparation enriched in Tregs for 50 to 70%, the balance consisting of effector T cells (Teffs ) , B lymphocytes and NK cells. A therapeutic alternative to the systemic injection of specific Tregs is to inject, preactivated polyclonal Tregs directly into the target site of autoimmune disease, in purified clinical grade condition.

Description of the study population. Patients with bilateral severe steroid-dependent non-infectious uveitis. Infectious or tumoral etiologies have been excluded after completion of a comprehensive review of systems. All patients had a negative Quantiferon test and a normal Mantoux test. Biological tests sent to specialized laboratories will eliminate an active infection. In some cases, aqueous humor obtained after AC tap and / or vitreous biopsy obtained after vitrectomy will be analyzed for diagnostic assay IL-10, immune load factor or PCR analysis (toxoplasmosis, herpes viruses).

Pathophysiology of uveitis in humans. Inflammatory chemokines and cytokines, such as IL-6, IFN-g, IL-8 and MCP-1 and sometimes IL-1ß, IL-2 and TNF-alpha were found in the aqueous humor and vitreous of patients with uveitis . Given the small volume available in these human samples (around 100 ml), data are obtained with multiple detection techniques using flow cytometry, for measuring the concentration of thirty different cytokines and chemokines in a 50 microl volume.

In order to expand the study to other cytokines and chemokines, investigators also used a semi-quantitative technique named ""antibody array"" which allows the analysis of a number of different molecules ranging from 30 to 170. These preliminary results, evaluated in some patients, confirm the presence of Th1 inflammatory profile in the eye of patients suffering from uveitis (not shown) and confirm our strategy

Risks associated with injected cells. No side effects of Tregs injection has been observed in preclinical mouse model. In our Biotherapies facilities, production of Tregs, as provided in this essay, will contain 50 to 70% of Tregs, defined by the phenotype CD4 + Foxp3 + CD25 +. Therefore investigators tested the effect of leukocyte contaminants on therapeutic effect in uveitis in mice. The presence of such contaminants effector T cells, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells or macrophages did not cause visible side effects at the clinical or histological levels. A second potential risk is that the injected of polyclonal Tregs have been differentiated into a different celltype. Anterior study showed that natural human Tregs can differentiate into Th17 type T lymphocytes in the presence of IL-2 or IL-15. This differentiation is accentuated by the addition of IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-21 or IL-23 . Although investigators can not formally exclude the possibility that Tregs injected IVT may differentiate into Th17 cells, since this event is not probably been detected in uveitis eye (data not shown).

Another potential risk of dissemination of the injected cells from the eye due to reflux at conjunctiva during the IVT. The last risk that can be considered is the development of non- Hodgkin lymphoma by creating a tolerogenic environment due to regulatory T cells. This risk is identical than the one associated with the current reference treatment of uveitis : immunosuppressives agent and corticosteroids. These risks have never been fully described in the literature in both animals and humans.

Dosage and number of patients. The 3 levels of Tregs doses will be respectively 0.4, 1.2 and 3.6 million. The lowest dose of 0.4 million Tregs corresponding to 2 times the effective dose in mice.

Two to 18 patients will be enrolled in this trial. Funding is provided for 12 patients.

Good clinical practice( GCP) The research will be conducted in accordance with GCP and the current legislative and regulation. Investigators certify that the research will be conducted in accordance with the protocol of GCP The Biotherapies facilities perform production activities, quality control according to current regulations for cell therapy and compliance with good practices of Cellular Therapy (BPTC) and also according to standard operating procedures (SOP). Specific authorization is required from ANSM for the realization of this essay To conclude, it is now clearly established that cell therapy approach of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 regulators (Tregs) play a critical role in the control of autoimmune diseases in human or mouse clinical test . Therefore this clinical trial assess the effect of Tolerance- dose of in patients treated by Tregs for bilateral severe steroid-dependent non-infectious uveitis.

Conditions
Uveitis
Being tested
intravitreous administration of regulator T-cells
Keywords
Uveitis, Lymphocyte cells, lymphocyte T regulator, vitreous haze, intravitreal injection
Medical subject headings
Uveitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intravitreous administration of regulator T-cellsOther

    Also called cell therapy

    The 3 levels of Tregs doses will be respectively 0.4, 1.2 and 3.6 million.

Study groups in NCT02494492
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IVT of regulator T-cellsExperimentalintravitreous administration of regulator T-cells
Receives: Other: intravitreous administration of regulator T-cells

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Toxicity (occurrence of at least 2 ocular serious adverse events)

    Toxicity (or intolerance) is defined as the occurrence of at least 2 ocular serious adverse events in 4 weeks following the injection of

    Treg, defined as:

    • an increase on OCT of the retinal thickness of <800mm from the initial review of the visit 1 of the eye injected,
    • decrease in visual acuity compared to the initial review of the visit 1of the eye injected with 2 lines,
    • occurence of ocular hypertension uncontrolled by ≥ 21 mmHg local treatment or hypotonia (5mmHg) compared to the initial review of the visit 1 of the eye injected,
    • occurence of vitreous hemorrhage, retinal necrosis, except complications attributed to the technique of administration,
    • onset of a hypopyon, except complication attributed to the technical Board

    Measured: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. ETDRS scale

    visual acuity measured by ETDRS scale

    Measured: 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02494492
Sponsor's protocol ID
P081250
Acronym
UVEREG
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
10 Jun 2015
Last updated
16 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing intravitreous administration of regulator T-cells in people with Uveitis, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Toxicity (occurrence of at least 2 ocular serious adverse events) (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in