UveitisPhase 1/2UVEREGNCT02494492
Treatment of the Bilateral Severe Uveitis by IVT of Regulator T-cells: Study of Tolerance of Dose
A Phase 1/2 study testing intravitreous administration of regulator T-cells in people with Uveitis, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Uveitis is a leading cause of blindness in the children and young adult's populations. One third of etiology are idiopathic. The reference treatments are corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. They have significant side effects, and patient's compliance is often poor. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Uveitis
- What is being tested?
- intravitreous administration of regulator T-cells
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects ≥ 18 years
- severe bilateral uveitis not infectious
- visual acuity between CLD and 1/10 for the eye the most affected and less than 5/10 for the fellow eye
- failed steroid ≤ 15 mg / day with or without an immunosuppressive agents
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
Department of ophthalmology Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles FOIX
Paris, 75013
About this study
Uveitis is a leading cause of blindness in the children and young adult's populations. One third of etiology are idiopathic. The reference treatments are corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. They have significant side effects, and patient's compliance is often poor. In addition, some uveitis are more resistant. Also, in these situations of deadlock therapeutic, investigators propose a cell therapy by administering regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the vitreous of patients.
Read the detailed description
Arsenal and limitations in the treatment of uveitis Uveitis is a major cause of severe visual loss or even blindness in children and young adults. In almost one third of cases, it is associated with an infectious agent, another third is integrated in the field of autoimmune diseases as systemic entities including (Behçet's disease, sarcoidosis, spondyloarthropathy ...) or limited to the eye (Birdshot type retinochoroidopathy, sympathetic ophthalmia, idiopathic retinal vasculitis). The last third remains idiopathic, where despite a careful etiological research, no cause is identified. The systemic corticosteroids are often effective but have significant side effects and patient compliance is often poor. That is why they are sometimes administered directly into the posterior segment of the eye (vitreous), but the effect is only temporary, often ineffective, and also associated with side effects. In addition, some are steroid-dependent, requiring treatment with immunosuppressive agents; which also may be responsible for many adverse effects and are not always effective. In these therapeutic impasse situations, investigators propose a cell therapy approach injection of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 regulators + (Tregs), directly into the vitreous of patients.
A new therapy approach uveitis by cell therapy It is now clearly established that Tregs play a critical role in the control of autoimmune diseases. In man or mouse, a deep deficit in Tregs is associated with a very severe autoimmune syndrome, leading to death .In uveitis, it is also shown that Tregs control this disease in deficient mice. Tregs have been reported in humans . In addition, our group and others have shown that various autoimmune diseases can be prevented by transfer of Tregs in mice .Thus, cell therapy by injection of Tregs raises hopes for the treatment of chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases . However, only specific and not polyclonal Tregs, have a strong therapeutic potential when administered systemically. The only Tregs that can be used in clinic are polyclonal Tregs purified by magnetic beads to which, are adsorbed anti- CD25 antibody . This technology provides a cell preparation enriched in Tregs for 50 to 70%, the balance consisting of effector T cells (Teffs ) , B lymphocytes and NK cells. A therapeutic alternative to the systemic injection of specific Tregs is to inject, preactivated polyclonal Tregs directly into the target site of autoimmune disease, in purified clinical grade condition.
Description of the study population. Patients with bilateral severe steroid-dependent non-infectious uveitis. Infectious or tumoral etiologies have been excluded after completion of a comprehensive review of systems. All patients had a negative Quantiferon test and a normal Mantoux test. Biological tests sent to specialized laboratories will eliminate an active infection. In some cases, aqueous humor obtained after AC tap and / or vitreous biopsy obtained after vitrectomy will be analyzed for diagnostic assay IL-10, immune load factor or PCR analysis (toxoplasmosis, herpes viruses).
Pathophysiology of uveitis in humans. Inflammatory chemokines and cytokines, such as IL-6, IFN-g, IL-8 and MCP-1 and sometimes IL-1ß, IL-2 and TNF-alpha were found in the aqueous humor and vitreous of patients with uveitis . Given the small volume available in these human samples (around 100 ml), data are obtained with multiple detection techniques using flow cytometry, for measuring the concentration of thirty different cytokines and chemokines in a 50 microl volume.
In order to expand the study to other cytokines and chemokines, investigators also used a semi-quantitative technique named ""antibody array"" which allows the analysis of a number of different molecules ranging from 30 to 170. These preliminary results, evaluated in some patients, confirm the presence of Th1 inflammatory profile in the eye of patients suffering from uveitis (not shown) and confirm our strategy
Risks associated with injected cells. No side effects of Tregs injection has been observed in preclinical mouse model. In our Biotherapies facilities, production of Tregs, as provided in this essay, will contain 50 to 70% of Tregs, defined by the phenotype CD4 + Foxp3 + CD25 +. Therefore investigators tested the effect of leukocyte contaminants on therapeutic effect in uveitis in mice. The presence of such contaminants effector T cells, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells or macrophages did not cause visible side effects at the clinical or histological levels. A second potential risk is that the injected of polyclonal Tregs have been differentiated into a different celltype. Anterior study showed that natural human Tregs can differentiate into Th17 type T lymphocytes in the presence of IL-2 or IL-15. This differentiation is accentuated by the addition of IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-21 or IL-23 . Although investigators can not formally exclude the possibility that Tregs injected IVT may differentiate into Th17 cells, since this event is not probably been detected in uveitis eye (data not shown).
Another potential risk of dissemination of the injected cells from the eye due to reflux at conjunctiva during the IVT. The last risk that can be considered is the development of non- Hodgkin lymphoma by creating a tolerogenic environment due to regulatory T cells. This risk is identical than the one associated with the current reference treatment of uveitis : immunosuppressives agent and corticosteroids. These risks have never been fully described in the literature in both animals and humans.
Dosage and number of patients. The 3 levels of Tregs doses will be respectively 0.4, 1.2 and 3.6 million. The lowest dose of 0.4 million Tregs corresponding to 2 times the effective dose in mice.
Two to 18 patients will be enrolled in this trial. Funding is provided for 12 patients.
Good clinical practice( GCP) The research will be conducted in accordance with GCP and the current legislative and regulation. Investigators certify that the research will be conducted in accordance with the protocol of GCP The Biotherapies facilities perform production activities, quality control according to current regulations for cell therapy and compliance with good practices of Cellular Therapy (BPTC) and also according to standard operating procedures (SOP). Specific authorization is required from ANSM for the realization of this essay To conclude, it is now clearly established that cell therapy approach of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 regulators (Tregs) play a critical role in the control of autoimmune diseases in human or mouse clinical test . Therefore this clinical trial assess the effect of Tolerance- dose of in patients treated by Tregs for bilateral severe steroid-dependent non-infectious uveitis.
- Conditions
- Uveitis
- Being tested
- intravitreous administration of regulator T-cells
- Keywords
- Uveitis, Lymphocyte cells, lymphocyte T regulator, vitreous haze, intravitreal injection
- Medical subject headings
- Uveitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
intravitreous administration of regulator T-cellsOther
Also called cell therapy
The 3 levels of Tregs doses will be respectively 0.4, 1.2 and 3.6 million.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IVT of regulator T-cells | Experimental | intravitreous administration of regulator T-cells Receives: Other: intravitreous administration of regulator T-cells |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Toxicity (occurrence of at least 2 ocular serious adverse events)
Toxicity (or intolerance) is defined as the occurrence of at least 2 ocular serious adverse events in 4 weeks following the injection of
Treg, defined as:
- an increase on OCT of the retinal thickness of <800mm from the initial review of the visit 1 of the eye injected,
- decrease in visual acuity compared to the initial review of the visit 1of the eye injected with 2 lines,
- occurence of ocular hypertension uncontrolled by ≥ 21 mmHg local treatment or hypotonia (5mmHg) compared to the initial review of the visit 1 of the eye injected,
- occurence of vitreous hemorrhage, retinal necrosis, except complications attributed to the technique of administration,
- onset of a hypopyon, except complication attributed to the technical Board
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
ETDRS scale
visual acuity measured by ETDRS scale
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for UveitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bahram BODAGHI, Professor, Principal investigator, Assitance publique - Hopitaux de Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02494492
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P081250
- Acronym
- UVEREG
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of the Bilateral Severe Uveitis by IVT of Regulator T-cells: Study of Tolerance of Dose
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02494492
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UVEREG / P081250
- Conditions
- Uveitis
- Keywords
- Uveitis, Lymphocyte cells, lymphocyte T regulator, vitreous haze, intravitreal injection
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Suspended
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Uveitis is a leading cause of blindness in the children and young adult's populations. One third of etiology are idiopathic. The reference treatments are corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. They have significant side effects, and patient's compliance is often poor. In addition, some uveitis are more resistant. Also, in these situations of deadlock therapeutic, investigators propose a cell therapy by administering regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the vitreous of patients.
Detailed description
Arsenal and limitations in the treatment of uveitis Uveitis is a major cause of severe visual loss or even blindness in children and young adults. In almost one third of cases, it is associated with an infectious agent, another third is integrated in the field of autoimmune diseases as systemic entities including (Behçet's disease, sarcoidosis, spondyloarthropathy ...) or limited to the eye (Birdshot type retinochoroidopathy, sympathetic ophthalmia, idiopathic retinal vasculitis). The last third remains idiopathic, where despite a careful etiological research, no cause is identified. The systemic corticosteroids are often effective but have significant side effects and patient compliance is often poor. That is why they are sometimes administered directly into the posterior segment of the eye (vitreous), but the effect is only temporary, often ineffective, and also associated with side effects. In addition, some are steroid-dependent, requiring treatment with immunosuppressive agents; which also may be responsible for many adverse effects and are not always effective. In these therapeutic impasse situations, investigators propose a cell therapy approach injection of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 regulators + (Tregs), directly into the vitreous of patients.
A new therapy approach uveitis by cell therapy It is now clearly established that Tregs play a critical role in the control of autoimmune diseases. In man or mouse, a deep deficit in Tregs is associated with a very severe autoimmune syndrome, leading to death .In uveitis, it is also shown that Tregs control this disease in deficient mice. Tregs have been reported in humans . In addition, our group and others have shown that various autoimmune diseases can be prevented by transfer of Tregs in mice .Thus, cell therapy by injection of Tregs raises hopes for the treatment of chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases . However, only specific and not polyclonal Tregs, have a strong therapeutic potential when administered systemically. The only Tregs that can be used in clinic are polyclonal Tregs purified by magnetic beads to which, are adsorbed anti- CD25 antibody . This technology provides a cell preparation enriched in Tregs for 50 to 70%, the balance consisting of effector T cells (Teffs ) , B lymphocytes and NK cells. A therapeutic alternative to the systemic injection of specific Tregs is to inject, preactivated polyclonal Tregs directly into the target site of autoimmune disease, in purified clinical grade condition.
Description of the study population. Patients with bilateral severe steroid-dependent non-infectious uveitis. Infectious or tumoral etiologies have been excluded after completion of a comprehensive review of systems. All patients had a negative Quantiferon test and a normal Mantoux test. Biological tests sent to specialized laboratories will eliminate an active infection. In some cases, aqueous humor obtained after AC tap and / or vitreous biopsy obtained after vitrectomy will be analyzed for diagnostic assay IL-10, immune load factor or PCR analysis (toxoplasmosis, herpes viruses).
Pathophysiology of uveitis in humans. Inflammatory chemokines and cytokines, such as IL-6, IFN-g, IL-8 and MCP-1 and sometimes IL-1ß, IL-2 and TNF-alpha were found in the aqueous humor and vitreous of patients with uveitis . Given the small volume available in these human samples (around 100 ml), data are obtained with multiple detection techniques using flow cytometry, for measuring the concentration of thirty different cytokines and chemokines in a 50 microl volume.
In order to expand the study to other cytokines and chemokines, investigators also used a semi-quantitative technique named ""antibody array"" which allows the analysis of a number of different molecules ranging from 30 to 170. These preliminary results, evaluated in some patients, confirm the presence of Th1 inflammatory profile in the eye of patients suffering from uveitis (not shown) and confirm our strategy
Risks associated with injected cells. No side effects of Tregs injection has been observed in preclinical mouse model. In our Biotherapies facilities, production of Tregs, as provided in this essay, will contain 50 to 70% of Tregs, defined by the phenotype CD4 + Foxp3 + CD25 +. Therefore investigators tested the effect of leukocyte contaminants on therapeutic effect in uveitis in mice. The presence of such contaminants effector T cells, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells or macrophages did not cause visible side effects at the clinical or histological levels. A second potential risk is that the injected of polyclonal Tregs have been differentiated into a different celltype. Anterior study showed that natural human Tregs can differentiate into Th17 type T lymphocytes in the presence of IL-2 or IL-15. This differentiation is accentuated by the addition of IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-21 or IL-23 . Although investigators can not formally exclude the possibility that Tregs injected IVT may differentiate into Th17 cells, since this event is not probably been detected in uveitis eye (data not shown).
Another potential risk of dissemination of the injected cells from the eye due to reflux at conjunctiva during the IVT. The last risk that can be considered is the development of non- Hodgkin lymphoma by creating a tolerogenic environment due to regulatory T cells. This risk is identical than the one associated with the current reference treatment of uveitis : immunosuppressives agent and corticosteroids. These risks have never been fully described in the literature in both animals and humans.
Dosage and number of patients. The 3 levels of Tregs doses will be respectively 0.4, 1.2 and 3.6 million. The lowest dose of 0.4 million Tregs corresponding to 2 times the effective dose in mice.
Two to 18 patients will be enrolled in this trial. Funding is provided for 12 patients.
Good clinical practice( GCP) The research will be conducted in accordance with GCP and the current legislative and regulation. Investigators certify that the research will be conducted in accordance with the protocol of GCP The Biotherapies facilities perform production activities, quality control according to current regulations for cell therapy and compliance with good practices of Cellular Therapy (BPTC) and also according to standard operating procedures (SOP). Specific authorization is required from ANSM for the realization of this essay To conclude, it is now clearly established that cell therapy approach of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 regulators (Tregs) play a critical role in the control of autoimmune diseases in human or mouse clinical test . Therefore this clinical trial assess the effect of Tolerance- dose of in patients treated by Tregs for bilateral severe steroid-dependent non-infectious uveitis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IVT of regulator T-cells | Experimental | Other: intravitreous administration of regulator T-cellsintravitreous administration of regulator T-cells |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subjects ≥ 18 years
- severe bilateral uveitis not infectious
- visual acuity between CLD and 1/10 for the eye the most affected and less than 5/10 for the fellow eye
- failed steroid ≤ 15 mg / day with or without an immunosuppressive agents
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| intravitreous administration of regulator T-cellsAlso: cell therapyThe 3 levels of Tregs doses will be respectively 0.4, 1.2 and 3.6 million. | Other | IVT of regulator T-cells |
Primary outcome
Toxicity (occurrence of at least 2 ocular serious adverse events)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Toxicity (or intolerance) is defined as the occurrence of at least 2 ocular serious adverse events in 4 weeks following the injection of Treg, defined as: * an increase on OCT of the retinal thickness of <800mm from the initial review of the visit 1 of the eye injected, * decrease in visual acuity compared to the initial review of the visit 1of the eye injected with 2 lines, * occurence of ocular hypertension uncontrolled by ≥ 21 mmHg local treatment or hypotonia (5mmHg) compared to the initial review of the visit 1 of the eye injected, * occurence of vitreous hemorrhage, retinal necrosis, except complications attributed to the technique of administration, * onset of a hypopyon, except complication attributed to the technical Board
1 secondary outcome
ETDRS scale
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2017.
Related trials for Uveitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Apremilast in Children With Oral Ulcers Associated With Behçet's Disease or Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis
Behçet's Disease, Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation
Non-infectious Anterior Uveitis, Non-infectious Intermediate Uveitis
RecruitingObservational study
A Study of Uveitis in Children <18 Years of Age
Uveitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Multicenter Study on the Efficacy and Safety of OCS-01 in Subjects With Uveitis Related and Post Surgical Macular Edema
Uveitis Related Cystoid Macular Edema, Cystoid Macular Edema, Postoperative
RecruitingPhase 1
A Proof-of-concept Trial to EvaluAte the efficaCy and Safety Of Cell Therapy TRX103 in Patients With Active, Non-infectious Uveitis
Non Infectious Uveitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bahram BODAGHI, Professor principal investigator
Assitance publique - Hopitaux de Paris
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing intravitreous administration of regulator T-cells in people with Uveitis, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Toxicity (occurrence of at least 2 ocular serious adverse events) (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2017.