Chronic Otitis MediaCRCNCT02495038
Optimal Dose of Combination of Rocuronium and Cisatracurium
A study testing 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex® and 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex® in people with Chronic Otitis Media and Anesthesia, run by Yonsei University.
Trial summary
BACKGROUND: The combinations of rocuronium and cisatracurium have a synergic effect. The investigators studied whether the prediction is possible to have a sufficient effect of reducing the dose when combining the two neuromuscular blocking agents through monitoring neuromuscular relaxation during surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Otitis Media, Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex® and 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 81 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
- BMI 20-30 kg/m2
- Patients scheduled for mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty.
Who cannot join
- a history of allergy to the study drugs,
- neuromuscular disease,
- pregnancy
- breast-feeding,
- preoperative medication of antipsychotics or neuroleptics known to interact with NMBAs
- serum creatinine level>1.2 mg/dL,
- liver transaminase>40 U/L.
About this study
Official title: Optimal Dose of Combination of Rocuronium and Cisatracurium: A Randomized Double-blinded Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: The combinations of rocuronium and cisatracurium have a synergic effect. The investigators studied whether the prediction is possible to have a sufficient effect of reducing the dose when combining the two neuromuscular blocking agents through monitoring neuromuscular relaxation during surgery.
METHODS: Each group were intubating dose group (Group I, n=27) combined Effective Dose (ED)95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium, small amount reducing group (Group S, n=27) reduced 10% of each ED95 and large amount reducing group (Group L, n=27) reduced 20% of each ED95. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. Each study drug was administrated to the patient and timer was started with TOF-Watch® monitoring. Train-of-four (TOF) of the ulnar nerve was used as setting of 2 Hz per 12 sec. The investigators checked time to TOF ratio=0 (Onset), time to 1st TOF ratio>25% (Duration 25%) and TOF 25-75% (recovery index) under total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA). One way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (α=0.05, β=0.2).
Read the detailed description
Introduction:
Rocuronium and cisatracurium are representative neuromuscular blocking agents used widely because the former have features of fast onset of peak effect and short duration of muscle relaxation relatively while the latter have comparatively long duration relaxation time and break down by Hofmann elimination and ester hydrolysis. A combination of the two have a synergic effect may be also used with either the priming method for rapid sequence intubation. It would contribute both to determine the effective combination rate clinically and to predict the pharmacokinetic characteristics that determine how much the synergistic effect of this combination. The investigators studied whether the prediction is possible to have a sufficient effect of reducing the dose when combining the two muscle relaxants through monitoring muscle relaxation during surgery.
Materials and methods:
This study was conducted to 81 patients scheduled for elective mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty after obtaining written informed consent. All patients included the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, aged 20-60, BMI 20-30 kg/m2. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a history of allergy to the study drugs, neuromuscular disease, pregnancy or breast-feeding, preoperative medication of antipsychotics or neuroleptics known to interact with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), serum creatinine level>1.2 mg/dL, liver transaminase>40 U/L. Anthropometric variables such as height, weight were measured in ward before surgery. BMI calculated as total body weight divided by the squared height. Ideal body weight (IBW) was calculated by the formula of Devine {50 kg + 2.3 × (height [inch]-60) for man and 45.5 kg + 2.3 × (height [inch]-60) for woman} and used to administrate NMBAs of initial dose. Lean body weight (LBW) was calculated by the formula of James {LBW (men) = (1.10 × Weight(kg)) - 128 × ( Weight2 / (100 × Height(m))2), (women) = (1.07 × Weight(kg)) - 148 × ( Weight2 / (100 × Height(m))2)}. Additive dose of NMBAs was administrated by LBW. Patients were randomly assigned to each group by opening of sealed allocation envelope. Each group were intubating dose group (Group I, n=27) combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium, small amount reducing group (Group S, n=27) reduced 10% of each ED95 and large amount reducing group (Group L, n=27) reduced 20% of each ED95.
Monitoring and Medication:
In the operating room, monitoring was accomplished to patients with a noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, thermometer, Bispectral Index (BIS VISTA Monitoring System; Aspect Medical Systems Inc, Norwood, MA, USA), and T1/T4 ratio used TOF-Watch® (Organon, Teknica B.V., Boxtel, the Netherlands). Every 5 min, measured things are recorded.
Premedications with midazolam 2 mg and glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg were administrated to patients intramuscularly 1 h before surgery. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. The syringe containing each study drug was conveyed to the performer of this study as the status of shielding the scale. The syringes of rocuronium and cisatracurium used each other syringe. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg, remifentanil 0.4-0.6 mcg/kg, afterward maintained with target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol 5-10 mg/kg/hr and remifentanil 0.05-2 mcg/kg/min. The infusion pump (Orchestra Module DPS, Fresenius-Vial, Brezins, France) was operated with Minto's and Marshall's pharmacokinetic model for effect site TCI of remifentanil and propofol.
The opposite arm against operation side was used for neuromuscular monitoring and attached to armboard of TOF-Watch®. Each study drug was administrated to the patient and timer was started with T1/T4 ratio monitoring. The surface electrodes of ulnar nerve placed at the wrist and Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation was used as setting of supramaximal square wave impulses with 200μs duration, 2 Hz per 12sec. The investigators checked times to TOF ratio=0 (Onset), 1st TOF ratio>25% (Duration 25%) and TOF 25-75% (Recovery Index), recovery time of 90% (TOF 25-90%) under total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA). Also the investigators checked the rate of additional rescue dose administrated with 10% of initial NMBAs dose, operation time from incision to surgical wound dressing, anesthesia time from entering to going out the operation room. Body temperature was maintained above 35°C using warm air blanket. The arterial pressure cuff was placed on the opposite arm against TOF monitoring.
Adverse Events and Management:
In all patients, anesthesia level was assessed based on a BIS score of 40-60. Moderate hypertension (>120% of baseline) or hypotension (<80% of baseline) was treated by increasing or decreasing rate of propofol infusion with fluid supplement. Severe hemodynamic change (systolic pressure < 90 mmHg or > 200 mmHg) was controlled by intravenous (IV) administration of phenylephrine 50 mcg or nicardipine 250 mcg repeatedly until being hemodynamic stable status. Unexpectedly, when hiccup or self-contained respiration was showed, additional rescue dose of NMBAs was administrated to the patient even though T1/T4 ratio was lower than 25%.
Statistical Analysis:
All data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SDs), numbers (percentages), or medians (upper and lower quartiles), as appropriate. Data between the groups were compared using the χ2 test, Fisher exact test, independent t test, or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. To assess data normality, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed on the data set. According to a preliminary study, 24 patients would be required in each group with a power of 0.9 and a type I error of 0.05. Factoring in a drop-out rate of 10%, the investigators calculated that 27 patients would be required for each group. All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) program. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Chronic Otitis Media, Anesthesia
- Being tested
- 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®
- Keywords
- combination, rocuronium, cisatracurium, neuromuscular blockade monitoring, drug synergism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®Drug
Also called Esmeron®, 74119419, ATC code:M03AC09, Nimbex®, 74500213, ATC code:M03AC11
Patients were randomly assigned to each group by opening of sealed allocation envelope. After collection of data, allocation number was matched with each group. The participants matched at Group S were administered with NMBAs reduced 10% of each ED95. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. Each drug dosage was determined by allocation number. The syringe containing each study drug was conveyed to the performer of this study as the status of shielding the scale. The syringes of rocuronium and cisatracurium used each other syringe.
20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®Drug
Also called Esmeron®, 74119419, ATC code:M03AC09, Nimbex®, 74500213, ATC code:M03AC11
The participants matched at Group L were administered with NMBAs reduced 20% of each ED95.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intubating dose, Group I | No intervention | combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium ED95, dose causing on average 95% suppression of neuromuscular response. |
| 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group S | Experimental | This arm reduced 10% of combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium Receives: Drug: 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex® |
| 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group L | Experimental | This arm reduced 20% of combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium Receives: Drug: 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex® |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Onset of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)
Time from administration of initial NMBAs to Train-of-four (TOF) ratio=0, assessed up to 15 minutes during general anesthesia.
Measured: Intraoperative, an average of 5 minutes
Duration 25% of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)
Time from administration of initial NMBAs to Train-of-four (TOF) ratio >25%, assessed up to 2 hours during general anesthesia.
Measured: Intraoperative, an average of 1 hours
Recovery Index of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)
Time from TOF ratio 25% to 75%, assessed up to 1 hour during general anesthesia.
Measured: Intraoperative, an average of 20 minutes
Secondary outcomes (3)
Operation Time
Time from skin incision to wound dressing assessed up to 8 hours.
Measured: Intraoperative, an average of 3 hours.
Anesthetic Time
Time from induction to recovery of anesthesia, asessed up to 3 hours.
Measured: Intraoperative, an average 4 hours.
Additional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio.
Additional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio is the number per hour of addition of rescue dose administrated with 10% of initial NMBAs dose. The formula is {(Addition number + 1 / Anesthetic time) x 60}.
Measured: Intraoperative, an average of 3 hours.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completionFeb 2015
- Study completionFeb 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Otitis MediaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yonsei UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Wooyoung Park, Yonsei University
- Investigators
- Young Gwan Cheon, Study director, Institutional Review Board of Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02495038
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- combination P-1
- Acronym
- CRC
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 4 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 2 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Naguib M, Samarkandi AH, Ammar A, Elfaqih SR, Al-Zahrani S, Turkistani A. Comparative clinical pharmacology of rocuronium, cisatracurium, and their combination. Anesthesiology. 1998 Nov;89(5):1116-24. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199811000-00011.
PubMed 9821999Donati F, Plaud B. Rocuronium-cisatracurium combinations. Anesthesiology. 1999 Aug;91(2):587-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199908000-00054. No abstract available.
PubMed 10443637Miller DR, Wherrett C, Hull K, Watson J, Legault S. Cumulation characteristics of cisatracurium and rocuronium during continuous infusion. Can J Anaesth. 2000 Oct;47(10):943-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03024863.
PubMed 11032267Cammu G, de Baerdemaeker L, den Blauwen N, de Mey JC, Struys M, Mortier E. Postoperative residual curarization with cisatracurium and rocuronium infusions. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Feb;19(2):129-34. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502000236.
PubMed 11999596Hans P, Welter P, Dewandre PY, Brichant JF, Bonhomme V. Recovery from neuromuscular block after an intubation dose of cisatracurium and rocuronium in lumbar disc surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2004;55(2):129-33.
PubMed 15264506Mak PH, Irwin MG. The effect of cisatracurium and rocuronium on cisatracurium precurarization and the priming principle. J Clin Anesth. 2004 Mar;16(2):83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.05.004.
PubMed 15110367Kopman AF, Zank LM, Ng J, Neuman GG. Antagonism of cisatracurium and rocuronium block at a tactile train-of-four count of 2: should quantitative assessment of neuromuscular function be mandatory? Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):102-106. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000094985.19305.E9.
PubMed 14693596de Morais BS, de Castro CH, Teixeira VC, Pinto AS. Residual neuromuscular block after rocuronium or cisatracurium. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2005 Dec;55(6):622-30. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942005000600005. English, Portuguese.
PubMed 19468536Kopman AF, Kopman DJ, Ng J, Zank LM. Antagonism of profound cisatracurium and rocuronium block: the role of objective assessment of neuromuscular function. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Feb;17(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.03.009.
PubMed 15721727Flockton EA, Mastronardi P, Hunter JM, Gomar C, Mirakhur RK, Aguilera L, Giunta FG, Meistelman C, Prins ME. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):622-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen037. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
PubMed 18385265Adamus M, Gabrhelik T, Marek O. Influence of gender on the course of neuromuscular block following a single bolus dose of cisatracurium or rocuronium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Jul;25(7):589-95. doi: 10.1017/S026502150800402X. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
PubMed 18405411Lin SP, Chang KY, Chen YJ, Lin SM, Chang WK, Chan KH, Ting CK. Priming with rocuronium to accelerate the onset time of cisatracurium during intubation. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009 Jan;72(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70014-0.
PubMed 19181592Amin AM, Mohammad MY, Ibrahim MF. Comparative study of neuromuscular blocking and hemodynamic effects of rocuronium and cisatracurium under sevoflurane or total intravenous anesthesia. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Feb;20(1):39-51.
PubMed 19266825Fassbender P, Geldner G, Blobner M, Hofmockel R, Rex C, Gautam S, Malhotra A, Eikermann M. Clinical predictors of duration of action of cisatracurium and rocuronium administered long-term. Am J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;18(5):439-45. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009883.
PubMed 19723864Lee H, Jeong S, Choi C, Jeong H, Lee S, Jeong S. Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Jan;64(1):34-9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.34. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
PubMed 23372884
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimal Dose of Combination of Rocuronium and Cisatracurium: A Randomized Double-blinded Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02495038
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRC / combination P-1
- Conditions
- Chronic Otitis Media, Anesthesia
- Keywords
- combination, rocuronium, cisatracurium, neuromuscular blockade monitoring, drug synergism
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2014
- Primary completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Dec 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
BACKGROUND: The combinations of rocuronium and cisatracurium have a synergic effect. The investigators studied whether the prediction is possible to have a sufficient effect of reducing the dose when combining the two neuromuscular blocking agents through monitoring neuromuscular relaxation during surgery.
METHODS: Each group were intubating dose group (Group I, n=27) combined Effective Dose (ED)95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium, small amount reducing group (Group S, n=27) reduced 10% of each ED95 and large amount reducing group (Group L, n=27) reduced 20% of each ED95. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. Each study drug was administrated to the patient and timer was started with TOF-Watch® monitoring. Train-of-four (TOF) of the ulnar nerve was used as setting of 2 Hz per 12 sec. The investigators checked time to TOF ratio=0 (Onset), time to 1st TOF ratio>25% (Duration 25%) and TOF 25-75% (recovery index) under total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA). One way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (α=0.05, β=0.2).
Detailed description
Introduction:
Rocuronium and cisatracurium are representative neuromuscular blocking agents used widely because the former have features of fast onset of peak effect and short duration of muscle relaxation relatively while the latter have comparatively long duration relaxation time and break down by Hofmann elimination and ester hydrolysis. A combination of the two have a synergic effect may be also used with either the priming method for rapid sequence intubation. It would contribute both to determine the effective combination rate clinically and to predict the pharmacokinetic characteristics that determine how much the synergistic effect of this combination. The investigators studied whether the prediction is possible to have a sufficient effect of reducing the dose when combining the two muscle relaxants through monitoring muscle relaxation during surgery.
Materials and methods:
This study was conducted to 81 patients scheduled for elective mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty after obtaining written informed consent. All patients included the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, aged 20-60, BMI 20-30 kg/m2. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a history of allergy to the study drugs, neuromuscular disease, pregnancy or breast-feeding, preoperative medication of antipsychotics or neuroleptics known to interact with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), serum creatinine level>1.2 mg/dL, liver transaminase>40 U/L. Anthropometric variables such as height, weight were measured in ward before surgery. BMI calculated as total body weight divided by the squared height. Ideal body weight (IBW) was calculated by the formula of Devine {50 kg + 2.3 × (height [inch]-60) for man and 45.5 kg + 2.3 × (height [inch]-60) for woman} and used to administrate NMBAs of initial dose. Lean body weight (LBW) was calculated by the formula of James {LBW (men) = (1.10 × Weight(kg)) - 128 × ( Weight2 / (100 × Height(m))2), (women) = (1.07 × Weight(kg)) - 148 × ( Weight2 / (100 × Height(m))2)}. Additive dose of NMBAs was administrated by LBW. Patients were randomly assigned to each group by opening of sealed allocation envelope. Each group were intubating dose group (Group I, n=27) combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium, small amount reducing group (Group S, n=27) reduced 10% of each ED95 and large amount reducing group (Group L, n=27) reduced 20% of each ED95.
Monitoring and Medication:
In the operating room, monitoring was accomplished to patients with a noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, thermometer, Bispectral Index (BIS VISTA Monitoring System; Aspect Medical Systems Inc, Norwood, MA, USA), and T1/T4 ratio used TOF-Watch® (Organon, Teknica B.V., Boxtel, the Netherlands). Every 5 min, measured things are recorded.
Premedications with midazolam 2 mg and glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg were administrated to patients intramuscularly 1 h before surgery. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. The syringe containing each study drug was conveyed to the performer of this study as the status of shielding the scale. The syringes of rocuronium and cisatracurium used each other syringe. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg, remifentanil 0.4-0.6 mcg/kg, afterward maintained with target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol 5-10 mg/kg/hr and remifentanil 0.05-2 mcg/kg/min. The infusion pump (Orchestra Module DPS, Fresenius-Vial, Brezins, France) was operated with Minto's and Marshall's pharmacokinetic model for effect site TCI of remifentanil and propofol.
The opposite arm against operation side was used for neuromuscular monitoring and attached to armboard of TOF-Watch®. Each study drug was administrated to the patient and timer was started with T1/T4 ratio monitoring. The surface electrodes of ulnar nerve placed at the wrist and Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation was used as setting of supramaximal square wave impulses with 200μs duration, 2 Hz per 12sec. The investigators checked times to TOF ratio=0 (Onset), 1st TOF ratio>25% (Duration 25%) and TOF 25-75% (Recovery Index), recovery time of 90% (TOF 25-90%) under total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA). Also the investigators checked the rate of additional rescue dose administrated with 10% of initial NMBAs dose, operation time from incision to surgical wound dressing, anesthesia time from entering to going out the operation room. Body temperature was maintained above 35°C using warm air blanket. The arterial pressure cuff was placed on the opposite arm against TOF monitoring.
Adverse Events and Management:
In all patients, anesthesia level was assessed based on a BIS score of 40-60. Moderate hypertension (>120% of baseline) or hypotension (<80% of baseline) was treated by increasing or decreasing rate of propofol infusion with fluid supplement. Severe hemodynamic change (systolic pressure < 90 mmHg or > 200 mmHg) was controlled by intravenous (IV) administration of phenylephrine 50 mcg or nicardipine 250 mcg repeatedly until being hemodynamic stable status. Unexpectedly, when hiccup or self-contained respiration was showed, additional rescue dose of NMBAs was administrated to the patient even though T1/T4 ratio was lower than 25%.
Statistical Analysis:
All data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SDs), numbers (percentages), or medians (upper and lower quartiles), as appropriate. Data between the groups were compared using the χ2 test, Fisher exact test, independent t test, or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. To assess data normality, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed on the data set. According to a preliminary study, 24 patients would be required in each group with a power of 0.9 and a type I error of 0.05. Factoring in a drop-out rate of 10%, the investigators calculated that 27 patients would be required for each group. All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) program. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intubating dose, Group I | No intervention | –combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium ED95, dose causing on average 95% suppression of neuromuscular response. |
| 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group S | Experimental | Drug: 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®This arm reduced 10% of combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium |
| 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group L | Experimental | Drug: 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®This arm reduced 20% of combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
- BMI 20-30 kg/m2
- Patients scheduled for mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- a history of allergy to the study drugs,
- neuromuscular disease,
- pregnancy
- breast-feeding,
- preoperative medication of antipsychotics or neuroleptics known to interact with NMBAs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®Also: Esmeron®, 74119419, ATC code:M03AC09, Nimbex®, 74500213, ATC code:M03AC11Patients were randomly assigned to each group by opening of sealed allocation envelope. After collection of data, allocation number was matched with each group. The participants matched at Group S were administered with NMBAs reduced 10% of each ED95. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. Each drug dosage was determined by allocation number. The syringe containing each study drug was conveyed to the performer of this study as the status of shielding the scale. The syringes of rocuronium and cisatracurium used each other syringe. | Drug | 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group S |
| 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®Also: Esmeron®, 74119419, ATC code:M03AC09, Nimbex®, 74500213, ATC code:M03AC11The participants matched at Group L were administered with NMBAs reduced 20% of each ED95. | Drug | 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group L |
Primary outcome
Onset of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)
Time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 5 minutes
Time from administration of initial NMBAs to Train-of-four (TOF) ratio=0, assessed up to 15 minutes during general anesthesia.
Duration 25% of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)
Time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 1 hours
Time from administration of initial NMBAs to Train-of-four (TOF) ratio >25%, assessed up to 2 hours during general anesthesia.
Recovery Index of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)
Time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 20 minutes
Time from TOF ratio 25% to 75%, assessed up to 1 hour during general anesthesia.
3 secondary outcomes
Operation Time
Time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 3 hours.
Anesthetic Time
Time frame: Intraoperative, an average 4 hours.
Additional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio.
Time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 3 hours.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Mar 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 9821999Naguib M, Samarkandi AH, Ammar A, Elfaqih SR, Al-Zahrani S, Turkistani A. Comparative clinical pharmacology of rocuronium, cisatracurium, and their combination. Anesthesiology. 1998 Nov;89(5):1116-24. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199811000-00011.
- Background: PubMed 10443637Donati F, Plaud B. Rocuronium-cisatracurium combinations. Anesthesiology. 1999 Aug;91(2):587-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199908000-00054. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11032267Miller DR, Wherrett C, Hull K, Watson J, Legault S. Cumulation characteristics of cisatracurium and rocuronium during continuous infusion. Can J Anaesth. 2000 Oct;47(10):943-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03024863.
- Background: PubMed 11999596Cammu G, de Baerdemaeker L, den Blauwen N, de Mey JC, Struys M, Mortier E. Postoperative residual curarization with cisatracurium and rocuronium infusions. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Feb;19(2):129-34. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502000236.
- Background: PubMed 15264506Hans P, Welter P, Dewandre PY, Brichant JF, Bonhomme V. Recovery from neuromuscular block after an intubation dose of cisatracurium and rocuronium in lumbar disc surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2004;55(2):129-33.
- Background: PubMed 15110367Mak PH, Irwin MG. The effect of cisatracurium and rocuronium on cisatracurium precurarization and the priming principle. J Clin Anesth. 2004 Mar;16(2):83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.05.004.
- Background: PubMed 14693596Kopman AF, Zank LM, Ng J, Neuman GG. Antagonism of cisatracurium and rocuronium block at a tactile train-of-four count of 2: should quantitative assessment of neuromuscular function be mandatory? Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):102-106. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000094985.19305.E9.
- Background: PubMed 19468536de Morais BS, de Castro CH, Teixeira VC, Pinto AS. Residual neuromuscular block after rocuronium or cisatracurium. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2005 Dec;55(6):622-30. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942005000600005. English, Portuguese.
- Background: PubMed 15721727Kopman AF, Kopman DJ, Ng J, Zank LM. Antagonism of profound cisatracurium and rocuronium block: the role of objective assessment of neuromuscular function. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Feb;17(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.03.009.
- Background: PubMed 18385265Flockton EA, Mastronardi P, Hunter JM, Gomar C, Mirakhur RK, Aguilera L, Giunta FG, Meistelman C, Prins ME. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):622-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen037. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
- Background: PubMed 18405411Adamus M, Gabrhelik T, Marek O. Influence of gender on the course of neuromuscular block following a single bolus dose of cisatracurium or rocuronium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Jul;25(7):589-95. doi: 10.1017/S026502150800402X. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
- Background: PubMed 19181592Lin SP, Chang KY, Chen YJ, Lin SM, Chang WK, Chan KH, Ting CK. Priming with rocuronium to accelerate the onset time of cisatracurium during intubation. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009 Jan;72(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70014-0.
Related trials for Chronic Otitis Media
Recruiting
CLIKX® Tympanostomy Tube Delivery System for the Placement of Tympanostomy Tubes
Otitis Media, Otitis Media Chronic
Recruiting
Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Revision Cartilage Tympanoplasty
Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Chronic Otitis Media
Not yet recruiting
Outcomes of Cartilage Tympanoplasty in Children
Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Conductive Hearing Loss
Not yet recruiting
Acetic Acid Ear Drops Versus 0.3 % Ciprofloxacin for Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media.
Otitis Media Chronic
Not yet recruiting
Does Adding a Fascial Layer to the Cartilage in Tympanoplasty for Large Tympanic Membrane Perforation Affect the Overall Results?
Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Otitis Media
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Young Gwan Cheon study director
Institutional Review Board of Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex® and 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex® in people with Chronic Otitis Media and Anesthesia, run by Yonsei University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Dec 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Onset of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs) (time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 5 minutes). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02495038, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2018.