AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney TransplantPhase 2NCT02495077

Effects of Inhibiting Early Inflammation in Kidney Transplant Patients

A Phase 2 study testing Infliximab, Methylprednisolone and Mycophenolate Mofetil in people with Kidney Transplant, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 15 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

During transplant surgery, there is a period of time when a donated kidney is removed from a donor's body and stored until the time of the transplant surgery. The storage procedure results in buildup of various proteins within the kidney that can injure the donated kidney after it is transplanted. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Transplant
What is being tested?
Infliximab, Methylprednisolone and Mycophenolate Mofetil
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
290 participants
Where
15 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
2 Nov 2015to 23 Jul 2021
Phase
Phase 2

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult (>18 years of age) male and female recipients (all races and ethnicities)
  • Subject must be able to understand and provide consent
  • Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants (including re-transplants)
  • Negative crossmatch, actual or virtual, or a PRA of 0% on historic and current sera as determined by each participating study center
  • Donor kidneys from deceased donors and donors after cardiac death (DCD) with Kidney Donor Profile Indices (KDPI) ranging from ≥20 to <95
  • Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test upon study entry
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Subjects must have a negative test result for latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (PPD, QuantiFERON, ELISPOT):
  • Subjects who have a negative test result for latent TB infection within 1 year of transplant date are eligible for enrollment and no further action is required
  • Subjects who have a negative test for latent TB infection that is greater than 1 year old are eligible for enrollment but are required to have a repeat test prior to transplantation.

Who cannot join

  • Inability or unwillingness of a participant to give written informed consent or comply with study protocol
  • Recipients of living donor transplants
  • Presence of other transplanted solid organ (heart, lung, liver, pancreas, small intestines) or co-transplanted organ
  • Human immunodeficiency virus positive (HIV+) recipients
  • Epstein-Barr virus Immunoglobulin G (EBV IgG) negative recipients
  • Hepatitis B surface antigen positive kidney transplant recipients
Show all 28Show fewer
  • Hepatitis B core antibody positive kidney transplant recipients
  • Hepatitis B negative kidney transplant recipients that receive transplants from Hepatitis B core antibody positive donor
  • Hepatitis C Virus positive (HCV+) patients who are either untreated or have failed to demonstrate sustained viral remission for more than 12 months after anti-viral treatment
  • Recipients with a previous history of active TB
  • Recipients with a positive test for latent TB infection (PPD, QuantiFERON, ELISPOT), regardless of previous therapy
  • Any severe infection at the time of transplantation.
  • --Note: Severe infection determination will be made by the local site investigator.
  • Severe congestive heart failure (NYHA functional class III or higher)
  • Subjects with a known hypersensitivity to any murine/ mouse proteins
  • Subjects with any history of receiving any anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti- TNF) products
  • Subjects in whom rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin®) or infliximab might not be tolerated
  • Subjects with a white blood cell count less than 3000/mm^3
  • Subjects with a platelet count less than 100,000/mm^3
  • Subjects with systolic blood pressure <100 mm/Hg
  • Subjects with symptomatic orthostatic hypotension or currently requiring Midodrine for blood pressure support
  • Subjects from, or who have traveled, to endemic areas with a history of active histoplasmosis or, with a chest x-ray consistent with previous active histoplasmosis (no serological testing required) :
  • --Endemic regions determined by site based on local standard of care.
  • Subjects currently or formerly residing in regions of the United States that are highly endemic for coccidioidomycosis, and who have a positive serologic test for coccidioidomycosis:
  • --Endemic regions determined by site based on local standard of care.
  • Recipients are excluded if the local site decides to treat the recipient with fluconazole because of diagnosis or suspicion of fungal infection the donor
  • Subjects that receive IVIG treatment within 3 months of transplant or planned intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment peri-transplant
  • Use of an investigational agent within 4-weeks prior to study entry.

Trial locations and contacts

15 sites in 2 countries.

15 sites in 2 countries

United States13 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • University of Maryland

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201

  • Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • University Hospitals of Cleveland

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • University of California, Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90024

  • University of Wisconsin

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • Yale University

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06511

  • Mount Sinai Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10029

  • University of California, San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

Canada2 sites
  • Toronto General Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4

  • University of Manitoba

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of Infliximab (Remicade®) Induction Therapy for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients (CTOT-19)

During transplant surgery, there is a period of time when a donated kidney is removed from a donor's body and stored until the time of the transplant surgery. The storage procedure results in buildup of various proteins within the kidney that can injure the donated kidney after it is transplanted. One of these proteins is tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether taking infliximab, which blocks tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), just prior to transplant surgery, along with usual transplant medicines will protect the donated kidney from damage caused by TNF-alpha and help keep the transplanted kidney healthy for a longer period of time.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double blind (masked), placebo-controlled, 2-arm clinical trial of 300 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. Participants will be randomized (1:1) to the experimental or control arm (150 subjects per arm).

Keywords
Kidney Transplantation, infliximab, Tissue Donors, Remicade, Induction Therapy, Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • InfliximabBiological

    Also called Remicade®

    A single dose, of 3mg/kg infusion

  • MethylprednisoloneDrug

    Also called Solu-Medrol

    500mg will be Initiated just prior to or at the initiation of transplant surgery and prior to Infliximab and thymoglobulin infusion

  • Mycophenolate MofetilDrug

    Also called MMF, CellCept®

    Administered at a target dose of 2000mg daily, as tolerated, until study closure

  • TacrolimusDrug

    Also called FK-506, FR-900506, Prograf®

    Administered at a target dose of 0.1mg/kg BID, post-op, then adjusted to target trough levels of 8-12ng/ml during 1st 3-months post-op and finally adjusted to target trough levels of 5-8ng/ml until study closure

  • Thymoglobulin®Biological

    Also called Antithymocyte Globulin [Rabbit], Rabbit ATG

    Administered daily for 5 days with the intention of achieving a total dose of 4.5 to 6.0 mg/kg, as tolerated

  • AcetaminophenDrug

    Also called Tylenol®

    30 to 60 minutes prior to the start of the infusion

    • Tylenol, 600 to 1000mg by mouth or
    • Suppository form
  • LoratadineDrug

    Also called Claritin®

    30 to 60 minutes prior to the start of the infusion

    • Claritin (Loratadine) 10mg by mouth or
    • Benadryl (Diphenhydramine) 25 or 50 mg by mouth
  • Placebo for InfliximabBiological

    A single dose is volume matched to Infliximab (250mL) infusion

  • PrednisoneDrug

    Prednisone will be administered peri-operatively according to center practice. Prednisone should be gradually tapered to no less than 5 mg/day or 10 mg every other day by 3 months post-transplant thereafter until study closure.

  • DiphenhydramineDrug

    Also called Benadryl

    30 to 60 minutes prior to the start of the infusion

    • Claritin (Loratadine) 10mg by mouth or
    • Benadryl (Diphenhydramine) 25 or 50 mg by mouth
Study groups in NCT02495077
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExperimentalExperimentalrATG is co-administered with anti-TNFa (infliximab/Remicade®) plus maintenance therapy with tacrolimus, a mycophenolic acid derivative (either MMF or enteric coated MPA) and prednisone.
Receives: Biological: Infliximab; Drug: Methylprednisolone; Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil; Drug: Tacrolimus; Biological: Thymoglobulin®; Drug: Acetaminophen; Drug: Loratadine; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Diphenhydramine
ControlActive comparatorRabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG/Thymoglobulin®) plus placebo (Sterile normal saline) induction followed by maintenance therapy with tacrolimus, a mycophenolic acid derivative (either MMF or enteric coated MPA) and prednisone.
Receives: Drug: Methylprednisolone; Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil; Drug: Tacrolimus; Biological: Thymoglobulin®; Drug: Acetaminophen; Drug: Loratadine; Biological: Placebo for Infliximab; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Diphenhydramine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Difference Between the Mean eGFR (Modified MDRD) in the Experimental vs. Control Groups.

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the month 24 eGFR for each treatment group.

    Measured: 24-Month post-transplantation

Secondary outcomes (45)
  1. Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR)

    Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection.Criteria include: IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation.

    Measured: 6 month post-transplantation

  2. Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR).

    Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Criteria include: IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  3. BANFF Grades of First Acute Cellular Rejections (ACR).

    Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection.Criteria include: IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation.

    Measured: 6 month post-transplantation

  4. Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection.

    Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of borderline or greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as Borderline, IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with borderline representing possible cellular rejection, IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection, and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection.Criteria include: Borderline-no intimal arteritis is present but foci of mild tubulitis; IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation.

    Measured: 6 months post-transplantation

  5. Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection

    Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of borderline or greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as Borderline, IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with borderline representing possible cellular rejection, IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection, and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Criteria include: Borderline-no intimal arteritis is present but foci of mild tubulitis; IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  6. Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR)

    Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive.Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes.

    Measured: 6 months post-transplantation

  7. Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR).

    Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  8. Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR

    Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR or suspicious for AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, C4d staining positive, or suspicious. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes; suspicious-when 2 of 3 factors for acute/active are present.

    Measured: 6 months post-transplantation

  9. Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR.

    Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR or suspicious for AMR within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, C4d staining positive, or suspicious. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes; suspicious-when 2 of 3 factors for acute/active are present

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  10. BANFF Grades of First AMR.

    Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes.

    Measured: 6 months post-transplantation

  11. Percent of Participants With BANFF Chronicity Scores > or Equal 2 on the 24 Month Biopsy.

    The Banff 2013 classification involves scoring numerous characteristics of renal biopsy specimens. The ci (interstitial fibrosis) and ct (tubular atrophy) scores are two such characteristics. The scores can take values of 0, 1, 2, or 3 for each characteristic (ci and ct), indicating increasing severity of disease as the scores increase. Participants are considered to have met this endpoint if their ci + ct score on the 24 month biopsy summed to be > or equal to 2.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  12. Change in BANFF Chronicity Scores Between Implantation and the 24 Month Biopsy.

    The Banff 2013 classification involves scoring numerous characteristics of renal biopsy specimens. The ci (interstitial fibrosis) and ct (tubular atrophy) scores are two such characteristics. The scores can take values of 0, 1, 2, or 3 for each characteristic (ci and ct), indicating increasing severity of disease as the scores increase. For this endpoint, the sum of ci+ct scores from the implantation biopsy was subtracted from the sum of the ci+ct scores from the month 24 biopsy and the difference between the two time points was classified as 0, 1, 2, or 3+. Higher values of this difference indicate more severe disease.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  13. Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.

    Biopsies were read by the local pathologist at the hospital where the participant was a patient. These local reads informed clinical care for the participant, which may or may not include prescribing/administering medication to the participant to help with clinical concerns or findings noted on a biopsy. Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they have a report of receiving treatment for clinical or biopsy-proven rejection during the first 6 months post-transplant.

    Measured: 6 months post-transplantation

  14. Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.

    Biopsies were read by the local pathologist at the hospital where the participant was a patient. These local reads informed clinical care for the participant, which may or may not include prescribing/administering medication to the participant to help with clinical concerns or findings noted on a biopsy. Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they have a report of receiving treatment for clinical or biopsy-proven rejection during the 24 month post-transplant follow-up.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  15. Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 3 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 3 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 14 days was used for month 3 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24.

    Measured: 3 months and 24 months post-transplantation

  16. Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 3 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 3 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 14 days was used for month 3 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24.

    Measured: 3 months and 24 months post-transplantation

  17. Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. Post-transplant nadir was defined as the lowest value of eGFR from the first 6 months post-transplant. The change in eGFR between nadir and month 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the nadir eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24.

    Measured: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

  18. Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. Post-transplant nadir was defined as the lowest value of eGFR from the first 6 months post-transplant. The change in eGFR between nadir and month 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the nadir eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24.

    Measured: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

  19. Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 6 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 6 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24.

    Measured: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

  20. Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 6 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 6 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24.

    Measured: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

  21. eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 7 post-transplantation

  22. eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group.

    Measured: Days 30, 60, and 180 post-transplantation

  23. eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group.

    Measured: Day 7 post-transplantation

  24. eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI

    Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group.

    Measured: Days 30, 90, and 180 post-transplantation

  25. Percent of Participants With Death or Graft Failure.

    Participants who died or experienced graft failure were considered to have met this endpoint. Graft failure was defined as the need for post-transplant dialysis for more than 56 days.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  26. Percent of Participants With Only Graft Failure.

    Participants who experienced graft failure were considered to have met this endpoint. Graft failure was defined as the need for post-transplant dialysis for more than 56 days.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  27. Percent of Participants That Required at Least One Dialysis Treatment.

    Dialysis within the first week post-transplant is used in the setting of delayed graft function (DGF). Participants are considered to have had DGF if they had at least one dialysis treatment in the first week post-transplant.

    Measured: 1 week post-transplantation

  28. Number of Dialysis Sessions.

    The number of dialysis sessions a person had during their first 8 weeks post-transplant was used for this endpoint.

    Measured: 8 weeks post-transplantation

  29. Duration of Delayed Graft Function (DGF), Defined as Time From Transplantation to the Last Required Dialysis Treatment.

    Participants are considered to have had DGF if they had at least one dialysis treatment in the first week post-transplant. For this endpoint, duration was calculated as the date of last post-transplant dialysis treatment minus the date of the first post-transplant dialysis treatment.

    Measured: First post-transplant dialysis treatment to last post-transplant dialysis treatment

  30. Percent of Participants With Primary Non-Function (PNF), Defined as Dialysis-dependency for More Than 3 Months.

    Post-transplant dialysis is sometimes required in the setting of kidney transplant. If such dialysis continues for more than 3 months, the participant is considered to have PNF and, as such, meets this endpoint definition.

    Measured: Transplantation through at least month 3 up to month 24

  31. Change From Baseline (Immediately After Surgery) in Serum Creatinine.

    Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. eGFR values from 24, 48, and 72 hours post-transplant (i.e., days 1, 2, and 3) were used to generate an estimate of the serum creatinine at each time point of interest for each treatment group.

    Measured: 24, 48 and 72 hours post-transplantation

  32. Days From Transplantation Until Event (ACR, AMR, or Hospitalization for Infection and/or Malignancy)

    Participants are considered to have met this endpoint if they experienced biopsy-proven T-cell mediated rejection (ACR) or antibody mediated rejection (AMR) based on central pathology reading or were hospitalized for infection and/or malignancy. For participants who met one or more of these three components, the earliest event date of the three components was used as the time of meeting the endpoint. Participants who did not meet any of the three components were censored at their last date of follow-up. Event (or censor) day was calculated as event (or censor) date minus transplant date.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  33. The Percent of Participants With a Serum Creatinine of More Than 3 mg/dL.

    Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. This endpoint is ascertaining slow graft function in the immediate days post-transplant. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 5 serum creatinine was greater than 3 mg/dL.

    Measured: Day 5 post-transplantation

  34. Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 2 Divided by he First Creatinine After Surgery

    Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 2 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function.

    Measured: Day 2 post-transplantation

  35. Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 5 Divided by the First Creatinine After Surgery.

    Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 5 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function.

    Measured: Day 5 post-transplantation

  36. The Percent of Participants Whose Day 5 Serum CRR Was Less Than 70%.

    Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 5 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 5 serum CRR was less than 70%.

    Measured: Day 5 post-transplantation

  37. The Percent of Participants Whose Day 2 Serum CRR Was Less Than 30%.

    Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 2 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 2 serum CRR was less than 30%.

    Measured: Day 2 post-transplantation

  38. The Percent of Participants Who Need Dialysis After Week 1.

    Participants who needed dialysis after the first week post-transplant were considered to have met this endpoint.

    Measured: 1 week to 24 months post-transplantation

  39. Percent of Participants With de Novo DSA.

    Donor specific antibody (DSA) can be formed post-transplant as part of the recipient's alloimmune response to the transplanted organ. DSA was determined by a central laboratory. Participants with newly developed DSA (i.e., de novo) following transplant were considered to have met this endpoint.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  40. Percent of Participants With Any Infection Requiring Hospitalization or Resulting in Death.

    Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had an infection that required hospitalization or resulted in death.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  41. Percent of Participants With Mycobacterial or Fungal Infections

    Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had at least one mycobacterial of fungal infection.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  42. Percent of Participants With CMV Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site

    Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of CMV viremia that required a change in their existing immunosuppression or the use of anti-viral therapy.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  43. Percent of Participants With BK Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site.

    Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of BK viremia that required a change in their existing immunosuppression or the use of anti-viral therapy.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  44. Percent of Participants With Malignancy.

    Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of malignancy.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

  45. Percent of Participants With Impaired Wound Healing Manifested by Wound Dehiscence, Wound Infection, or Hernia at the Site of the Transplant Incision

    Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of impaired wound healing at the site of the transplant incision manifested by one wound dehiscence, wound infection, or hernia.

    Measured: 24 months post-transplantation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Nov 2015
  3. Primary completion23 Jul 2021
  4. Study completion23 Jul 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
290 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02495077
Sponsor's protocol ID
DAIT CTOT-19
Other IDs
U01AI063594, NIAID CRMS ID#: 20678
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
6 Jul 2015
Last updated
24 Sep 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Wajih Z, Karpe KM, Walters GD. Interventions for BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 9;10(10):CD013344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013344.pub2.

    PubMed 39382091
  • Hricik DE, Armstrong B, Alhamad T, Brennan DC, Bromberg JS, Bunnapradist S, Chandran S, Fairchild RL, Foley DP, Formica R, Gibson IW, Kesler K, Kim SJ, Mannon RB, Menon MC, Newell KA, Nickerson P, Odim J, Poggio ED, Sung R, Shapiro R, Tinckam K, Vincenti F, Heeger PS. Infliximab Induction Lacks Efficacy and Increases BK Virus Infection in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results of the CTOT-19 Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Jan 1;34(1):145-159. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2022040454. Epub 2022 Oct 4.

    PubMed 36195441

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in