AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthy SubjectsSAPONCT02495870

The Acute Effects of Low Temperature for Long Time Heat Treatment of Pork Semitendinosus on Satiety

A study testing Pork in people with Healthy Subjects, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cooking meat at low temperatures for prolonged times is widely used among chefs and in food service due to the possibility to obtain a consistent and appealing eating quality. The method is generally termed low-temperature long-time (LTLT) cooking. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy Subjects
What is being tested?
Pork
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Nov 2014to Dec 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants who have provided written informed consent
  • Healthy men
  • Ages between 18 and 60 years
  • BMI between 18.5 and 30 kg/m2
  • Pork eaters

Who cannot join

  • Any food allergy, dislike or special diet of relevance to the study (e.g. vegetarian)
  • Daily use of prescription medicine or over-the-counter drugs affecting appetite, energy expenditure or protein metabolism
  • Use of dietary supplements (including protein supplement, powders, shakes) up to 1 month before the first meal test
  • Irregular eating schedule (e.g. skipping breakfast)
  • Self-reporting currently dieting or having lost/gained significant amount of weight (±3 kg) in the previous 3 months
  • Any known chronic diseases (e.g. cancer, heart disease, diabetes, neurological disorders)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Vigorous physical activity more than 10 hours/week
  • Smoking, smoking cessation within the past 3 months or nicotine use (electronic cigarettes) (>10 cigarettes per day)
  • Participants who work in appetite or feeding related areas
  • Participation in other intervention studies
  • Participants not able to comply with the study protocol as judged by study personnel

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Danish Meat Research Institute

    Taastrup, 2630

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Cooking meat at low temperatures for prolonged times is widely used among chefs and in food service due to the possibility to obtain a consistent and appealing eating quality. The method is generally termed low-temperature long-time (LTLT) cooking. In LTLT cooking, meat is vacuum-packed and heated at temperatures between 50°C and 65°C in a water bath for several hours. LTLT has several benefits - improved tenderness and juiciness, less cooking loss, better vitamin retention and uncompromised food safety.

A recent PhD thesis concluded that one of the mechanisms behind the changes in eating quality during LTLT cooking was due to the proteolytic degradation in the muscle tissue. The activity of proteolytic enzymes has shown to be dependent on heating temperature and time where the cathepsins were found to remain active during heat treatment. At 58°C the cathepsin B+L activity is increased compared to 48°C and 53°C and at 55°C compared to 25°C, 40°C and 70°C. A prolonged heating time of 17 hours at 58°C has also shown to increase cathepsin B+L activity. The proteolytic degradation results in the occurrence of peptides and amino acids such as tryptophan, tyrosine, leucine and histidine which could lead to a faster degree of satiety when consumed.

Read more

According to the aminostatic hypothesis by Mellinkoff, a rise in plasma amino acids elicited by protein ingestion could assist in the suppression of food intake and the onset of satiety.

The investigators therefore hypothesize that the ingestion of LTLT cooked pork would induce a faster satiety response due to the higher availability of peptides and amino acids prior to digestion. An acute meal study will elucidate this. LTLT cooking will be performed by the "cook-chill" method to mimic real life where meat is rapidly chilled after heat treatment, stored at 0-2°C and reheated and browned prior to serving.

Being tested
Pork

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PorkOther

Study groups in NCT02495870
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pork, 58°C, 72 minutesExperimentalPork muscle (semitendinosus) sous-vide cooked at 58°C for 72 minutes
Receives: Other: Pork
Pork, 58°C, 17 hoursExperimentalPork muscle (semitendinosus) sous-vide cooked at 58°C for 17 hours
Receives: Other: Pork
Meat balls, 58°C, 17 hoursExperimentalMeat balls made from pork Semitendinosus. Sous-vide cooked at 58°C for 17 hours
Receives: Other: Pork
Pork, 160°C (until 58°C in core)Active comparatorPork muscle (semitendinosus) oven cooked at 160°C until 58° in core.
Receives: Other: Pork

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ad libitum energy intake

    the primary outcome is measured 180 min after test meal is consumed

    Measured: 180 min

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. VAS scores for appetite (hunger, satiety, fullness, prospective consumption)

    The secondary endpoints are measured every 30 minute after the test meal is consumed

    Measured: every 30 min at time points 15, 45, 75, 105, 135, 165, 195 min from termination of the test meal.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2014
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02495870
Sponsor's protocol ID
SAPO 2A
Acronym
SAPO
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
10 Nov 2014
Last updated
8 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pork in people with Healthy Subjects, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ad libitum energy intake (time frame: 180 min). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in