Infant Social WithdrawalCIMHPNCT02497677
Copenhagen Infant Mental Health Project: Enhancing Parental Sensitivity and Attachment (CIMHP)
A study testing Circle of Security -Parenting and Care as Usual in people with Infant Social Withdrawal and Maternal Postnatal Depression, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Infant mental health is a significant public health issue as early adversity and expose to childhood stress has life-long consequences for the affected children. Helping families at risk correct their adverse effects on the infant has the potential to halt a negative spiral effect where vulnerable parents fail to cope… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Infant Social Withdrawal, Maternal Postnatal Depression
- What is being tested?
- Circle of Security -Parenting and Care as Usual
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 314 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Jul 2015to Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Mother lives in one of the participating three districts of Copenhagen
- Mother is > 18 years old
- Mother has an infant in the age of 2-12 months born at term (Gestational age (GA) 37-42) or born preterm (GA 30-36).
- Mother speaks and understands Danish.
- Mother is screened positive for symptoms of postnatal depression (EPDS >10) and fulfill criteria for diagnosis of depression assessed in a clinical interview (SCID-5/RV) conducted by a psychologist 10-20 days after EPDS screening AND/OR
- Infant is scored to be socially withdrawn in two ADBB assessments (ADBB >5) conducted within a range of 10-20 days when the infant is 2, 4 or 8 months.
- If there is a father/partner this person speaks and understands Danish or English.
Who cannot join
- Infant autism and/or early retardation
- Maternal bipolar disorder and/or psychotic disorder, known severe intellectual impairment, suicidal ideation and/or recent suicide attempt and/or present alcohol/substance abuse.
- Family intends to move away from the Copenhagen area within the period of the intervention.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Copenhagen Infant Mental Health Project: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Circle of Security-Parenting and Care as Usual as Interventions Targeting Infant Mental Healths Risks
Infant mental health is a significant public health issue as early adversity and expose to childhood stress has life-long consequences for the affected children. Helping families at risk correct their adverse effects on the infant has the potential to halt a negative spiral effect where vulnerable parents fail to cope with an at-risk child - which in turn, adds to the child's vulnerability, negatively affects the parents, and so forth. Over a four year period, an estimated 17.600 dyads will be screened in the City of Copenhagen using standardized screening instruments in detecting infant social withdrawal (ADBB) and maternal postnatal depression (EPDS). A sample of 314 eligible parent(s) will enter into a clinical, randomized control trial to test the efficacy of an 8 week group counseling program, Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P) compared to Care as Usual(CAU) in enhancing maternal sensitivity, child attachment and cognitive development. CIMHP is the first large-scale randomized controlled study to test the efficacy of COS-P in promoting parental sensitivity, child attachment and cognitive development in Denmark. Results will provide evidence regarding the efficacy of an American short term indicated parenting group program when implemented in a Scandinavian country.
Read the detailed description
Background and rationale Infant mental health is a significant public health issue as early adversity and exposure to early childhood stress has life-long consequences for these affected children on outcomes such physical and mental health, educational attainment, labor market success and family formation. Infants are - as a result of their dependency, vulnerability and relative social invisibility - more exposed to mental health risks than older children. Infants may be at risk due to a particular biological risk (e.g. infantile autism, retardation, prematurity, physical disabilities etc) or to psycho-social risks in the family (e.g. mentally ill parents, poverty, drug/alcohol abuse etc). Recent Danish estimates suggest that one in five families is at risk of inadequate parenting resources and child neglect.
There is by now solid evidence that the establishment of attachment relationships, i.e. a stable emotional bond with a caregiver - mostly the parent - is one of the most important developmental milestones in infancy. Early parent-child attachment relationships function as a blueprint for future social relationships and serve as a framework within which children learn how to deal with stressful situations and to regulate the accompanying negative emotions. Insecure and disorganized attachment is a significant risk for longitudinal child development and psychopathology, as the ability to regulate ones feelings of stress and negative emotions is important for a wide range of socio-emotional outcomes ranging from social competence, moral development and empathy, to academic achievement. Recent meta-analyses show that insecure and disorganized children have a higher risk of developing mental problems later in life. Insecurely attached children are also more likely than securely attached children to develop internalizing problems, such as anxiety and depressive symptoms, as well as externalizing problems such as aggressive behavior. For externalizing problems, the risk was even higher for disorganized children. Furthermore, research into early brain development indicates that brain development can be physiologically altered by severe stress imposed by neglect and inadequate parenting during a child's early years.
Evidence from attachment research shows that sensitive parenting, where the parent is alert and able to understand the infant's expression of emotional states and able to manage and meet the infant's needs contingently, adequately and in a comforting way will lead to the establishment of a pattern of secure attachment in the child. Lack of availability, inconsistent availability, misunderstanding of the infant's emotional expression and parental behavior that frightens the infant may all lead to an insure attachment and in the most severe cases a disorganized attachment. This is indicative of a breakdown of an organized (secure or insecure) attachment behavioral strategy. Disorganized attachment is considered to be the result of parental behavior that is frightening for the child. An extreme example of such behavior is child maltreatment, but all sorts of parental behavior that are not comprehensible for the child, such as dissociation, which is common in depressed parents, is potentially frightening for the child. This sort of behavior results in the paradoxical situation that the parent is a source of comfort and a source of fear at the same time. Thus, in stress situations the child does not know what to do, and the behavioral strategy collapses .
Infant social withdrawal indicates infant distress and early attachment disturbances and is a known risk factor for infant mental health. Infant social withdrawal is indicated by a lack of either positive (e.g. smiling, eye contact) or negative vocal protestations. Sustained withdrawal behavior in infants can be seen as a chronic diminution of the attachment system, which is gradually generalized into a diminished engagement and lowered reactivity to the environment at large. In more European countries the use of the validated systematic screening method, Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB) for identifying infant delayed socio-emotional development in infant mental health clinics and in home visiting programs have shown promising results.
Postnatal depression (PND) is another known risk for infant mental health. A meta-analysis shows that up to 19% of new mothers may experience minor or major depression during the first months postpartum. If only including major depression, the prevalence was found to be 7.1 %. In a more recent European study, 1,066 women were followed from pregnancy to 12 months postpartum. The results indicated that 9.6% of new mothers may experience a major depressive episode during the first year after delivery. No estimates were given for minor depression. Most cases develop within the first three months with a peak incidence of about 4-6 weeks.
PND has a substantial impact on the mother, her partner, her family, mother-baby interactions and attachment insecurity and the longer term socio-emotional and cognitive development of the baby, especially when depression occurs in the first year of life. Often, mothers suffering from postnatal depression are emotionally, cognitively and/or behaviorally inhibited or impaired in their ability to recognize and react with appropriate "sensitivity" and "responsiveness" to their children's needs. With regard to the infants of these mothers, higher incidences of negative behaviors, such as social withdrawal, persistent crying, averted gaze or head position, physical neediness and a lack of expression of delight in the presence of their mothers, have been observed. These behaviors increase the mother's experience of stress, which further contributes to the maintenance of maladaptive interactional behavioral patterns. Without improvement in these negative interaction cycles, for example, through early interventions, there is a greater likelihood for infants to develop an insecure-avoidant, an insecure ambivalent or disorganized attachment pattern.
Research on the treatment of women with postnatal depression has shown that treatment that only focuses on the mother (i.e., medication, psychotherapy) is insufficient to buffer against the negative impact of maternal psychopathology on the child's cognitive and psychosocial development, as well as infant-mother attachment quality. Even when depression is effectively treated, this does not seem to "spill over" and improve the mother-infant relationship and long-term infant social-emotional outcomes. Instead, it is necessary to support the depressed mothers in their specific needs in caring and relating to their infants,
Interventions targeting PND delivered in groups have been found to achieve change through the dual process of emotional experience and reflection in an interpersonal context. Group sessions provide a support network, reduce isolation and stigma, provide an environment in which to practice interpersonal and communication skills, shape coping strategies and learn from each other, and enable a number of families to be treated at once. Recently, building on evidence from attachment research, a special focus is given to preventive group programs that enhance parental sensitivity and secure attachment such as the intervention program "Circle of Security (COS)". Based on findings from more studies, COS has proved efficient in enhancing secure attachment as well as reducing maternal depressive symptomatology in high-risk samples, including mothers in prison and mentally ill mothers. The original COS program consists of 20 weekly sessions of 2 hour durations and includes an initial video assessment of parent -child attachment. In the COS intervention graphical illustrations of "the Circle of Security" are used. This Circle is a roadmap that encompasses the three basic control systems; the attachment system, the exploration system and the caregiving system. The parent is illustrated through the pair of hands that hold together the child's world. In COS concepts, "holding" means to serve as a secure base and safe haven. "The top half" of the Circle depicts the child's exploration system and needs. I order to explore, the child needs the parent to serve as a secure base by "watching over," "delighting in," "helping," and "enjoying with" the child. Having a parent that supports exploration helps the child develop his or her own sense of interest, leading to mastery and competency in later years. Along "the bottom half" is the child's attachment needs: "protect me," "comfort me," "delight in me," and "organize my feelings." By delighting in the child, the parent helps the child constructing an internal representation of him- of herself as a loved person and thereby establish self-worth, and by organizing the child's feelings by accepting, sharing and naming them, the parent co-regulates the child's emotions and lays the groundwork of later self-regulation of emotions. The child's needs for comfort and exploration encouragement shift rapidly and the caregiver must continuously adjust to those needs, whenever possible.
Meta-analytic evidence identifies short term group approaches (< 16 sessions), targeting maternal sensitivity as being the most effective, and sensitivity focused interventions conducted with referred at-risk samples (e.g. DSM-III-R depressed mothers), as being more effective than interventions with other groups. Attachment security, in particular, has been found to be readily influenced by sensitivity-focused interventions. The program "Circle of Security Parenting" (COS-P) is a recent and shorter version of COS that consists of eight weekly sessions of two hours durations without the individual video assessment of attachment. In COS-P standard video materials of child attachment behaviors as well as the graphic materials to illustrate the Circle of Security are used. Themes that are covered during the program are: "The Circle of Security", "Exploration of the child's needs in the circle", "Being with your child in the circle", "Exploration of own challenges in meeting child's needs", and "Disruption and repair of the relationship".
To the best of the investigator's knowledge, the effectiveness of COS-P in relation to enhancing maternal sensitivity and the mother-infant relationship has not been fully tested in an RCT design in a general population, making this study the first. Results will provide evidence regarding the efficacy of an American short term indicated parenting group program when implemented in a Scandinavian country. Further, COS-P is a promising approach as health nurses can be trained COS-P therapists in future up-scaling.
- Being tested
- Circle of Security -Parenting, Care as Usual
- Keywords
- parental sensitivity, child attachment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Circle of Security -ParentingBehavioural
Also called COS-P
The COS-P manual and video material has been translated to Danish (Tryghedscirklen - Forældreprogrammet, manual, Lier, 2013). Based on standard video material of parent-infant interactions, parents are trained to see and understand infant attachment behavior and especially to learn about infant miscuing attachment signals. In the current study parents will attend 10 sessions of 1.5 hour duration
Care as UsualBehavioural
Also called CAU
CAU are different in the three participating districts and vary in content and duration. All three districts offer (a) group interventions for mothers who experience postnatal depressive symptoms and/or (b) extra counselling home-visits by a health nurse. Number and content of extra home-visits vary in accordance with the families' specific needs, and will rarely exceed 12 extra visits per year.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Circle of Security-Parenting | Experimental | Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) is a brief educative group program for parents Receives: Behavioral: Circle of Security -Parenting |
| Care as Usual (CAU) | Active comparator | Care as usual (CAU) i.e. the active control condition will be standard practices for infants and families at risk in Copenhagen. Receives: Behavioral: Care as Usual |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maternal sensitivity
Maternal sensitivity is observed during five minutes mother-infant interaction (free play), and will be assessed using Coding Interactive behavior (CIB, Feldman, 1998).
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Secondary outcomes (12)
Infant-mother attachment quality
Infant-mother attachment will be assessed by the Strange Situation Procedure( Ainswotrth, 1978) is one of the most well-established indicators of how well or poorly toddlers are functioning in their primary attachment relationship (to mother) with long-term consequences for children's social and emotional adaptation throughout childhood and adolescence.
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is12-16 months)
Infant Social withdrawal
Infant Social Withdrawal will be assessed by the Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB, Guedeney \& Fermanian, 2001).
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Infants socio-emotional development - maternal and partner's report
A self-report measure administered to both mother and her partner.
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Infant cognitive and language development
A standardized test situation by a psychologist using the Bayley III Screener (Pearson, 2008)
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Maternal Depressive Symptoms
A self-report measure (EPDS, Cox, Holden \& Sagovsky, 1987).
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Maternal overall psychological distress
A self-report measure (SCL-92, Danish version Olsen, Moretnsen \& bech, 2004)
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Maternal depression diagnosis
Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders, Research version (First, Williams, Karg \& Spitzer, 2015)
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Maternal Attachment
A self-report measure (Experince in Close relationships, ECR, Fraley et al, 2000)
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Family Functioning, reported by mother and partner
A self-report measure (The McMaster Family Functioning Device, FAD, Epstein, Baldwin \& Bishop, 1983, Danish version, Thaustum et al, 2009)
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Parental Reflective Functioning, reported by mother and partner
self-report measure (The parental reflective Functioning Questionare, PRFQ-1, Luyten et al, 2009)
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Parental Stress, reported by mother and partner
A self-report measure (The Parenting Stress Index, third edition, PSI, Abidin, 1990, Danish version, Hogrefe Forlag)
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Number of extra homes visits by the health nurse
Reported by the health nurse
Measured: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2015
- Primary completionJul 2020
- Study completionDec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Infant Social WithdrawalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of CopenhagenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 314 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Copenhagen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Aarhus
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mette Væver, University of Copenhagen
- Investigators
- Mette Væver, Phd, Principal investigator, University of Copenhagen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02497677
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UCPH 2015-10
- Acronym
- CIMHP
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 26 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Smith-Nielsen J, Stove LL, Stuart AC, Jakel J, Egmose I, Rohder K, Wendelboe KI, Vaever MS. Differential effects of the circle of security-parenting programme on infant-mother attachment: The role of infant temperament. Br J Clin Psychol. 2026 Jun;65(2):289-297. doi: 10.1111/bjc.70031. Epub 2025 Dec 18.
PubMed 41414735Vaever MS, Smith-Nielsen J, Lange T. Copenhagen infant mental health project: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing circle of security -parenting and care as usual as interventions targeting infant mental health risks. BMC Psychol. 2016 Nov 22;4(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0166-8.
PubMed 27876079
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Copenhagen Infant Mental Health Project: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Circle of Security-Parenting and Care as Usual as Interventions Targeting Infant Mental Healths Risks
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02497677
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIMHP / UCPH 2015-10
- Keywords
- parental sensitivity, child attachment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 314 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CopenhagenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Aarhus
- Study start
- Jul 2015
- Primary completion
- Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Infant mental health is a significant public health issue as early adversity and expose to childhood stress has life-long consequences for the affected children. Helping families at risk correct their adverse effects on the infant has the potential to halt a negative spiral effect where vulnerable parents fail to cope with an at-risk child - which in turn, adds to the child's vulnerability, negatively affects the parents, and so forth. Over a four year period, an estimated 17.600 dyads will be screened in the City of Copenhagen using standardized screening instruments in detecting infant social withdrawal (ADBB) and maternal postnatal depression (EPDS). A sample of 314 eligible parent(s) will enter into a clinical, randomized control trial to test the efficacy of an 8 week group counseling program, Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P) compared to Care as Usual(CAU) in enhancing maternal sensitivity, child attachment and cognitive development. CIMHP is the first large-scale randomized controlled study to test the efficacy of COS-P in promoting parental sensitivity, child attachment and cognitive development in Denmark. Results will provide evidence regarding the efficacy of an American short term indicated parenting group program when implemented in a Scandinavian country.
Detailed description
Background and rationale Infant mental health is a significant public health issue as early adversity and exposure to early childhood stress has life-long consequences for these affected children on outcomes such physical and mental health, educational attainment, labor market success and family formation. Infants are - as a result of their dependency, vulnerability and relative social invisibility - more exposed to mental health risks than older children. Infants may be at risk due to a particular biological risk (e.g. infantile autism, retardation, prematurity, physical disabilities etc) or to psycho-social risks in the family (e.g. mentally ill parents, poverty, drug/alcohol abuse etc). Recent Danish estimates suggest that one in five families is at risk of inadequate parenting resources and child neglect.
There is by now solid evidence that the establishment of attachment relationships, i.e. a stable emotional bond with a caregiver - mostly the parent - is one of the most important developmental milestones in infancy. Early parent-child attachment relationships function as a blueprint for future social relationships and serve as a framework within which children learn how to deal with stressful situations and to regulate the accompanying negative emotions. Insecure and disorganized attachment is a significant risk for longitudinal child development and psychopathology, as the ability to regulate ones feelings of stress and negative emotions is important for a wide range of socio-emotional outcomes ranging from social competence, moral development and empathy, to academic achievement. Recent meta-analyses show that insecure and disorganized children have a higher risk of developing mental problems later in life. Insecurely attached children are also more likely than securely attached children to develop internalizing problems, such as anxiety and depressive symptoms, as well as externalizing problems such as aggressive behavior. For externalizing problems, the risk was even higher for disorganized children. Furthermore, research into early brain development indicates that brain development can be physiologically altered by severe stress imposed by neglect and inadequate parenting during a child's early years.
Evidence from attachment research shows that sensitive parenting, where the parent is alert and able to understand the infant's expression of emotional states and able to manage and meet the infant's needs contingently, adequately and in a comforting way will lead to the establishment of a pattern of secure attachment in the child. Lack of availability, inconsistent availability, misunderstanding of the infant's emotional expression and parental behavior that frightens the infant may all lead to an insure attachment and in the most severe cases a disorganized attachment. This is indicative of a breakdown of an organized (secure or insecure) attachment behavioral strategy. Disorganized attachment is considered to be the result of parental behavior that is frightening for the child. An extreme example of such behavior is child maltreatment, but all sorts of parental behavior that are not comprehensible for the child, such as dissociation, which is common in depressed parents, is potentially frightening for the child. This sort of behavior results in the paradoxical situation that the parent is a source of comfort and a source of fear at the same time. Thus, in stress situations the child does not know what to do, and the behavioral strategy collapses .
Infant social withdrawal indicates infant distress and early attachment disturbances and is a known risk factor for infant mental health. Infant social withdrawal is indicated by a lack of either positive (e.g. smiling, eye contact) or negative vocal protestations. Sustained withdrawal behavior in infants can be seen as a chronic diminution of the attachment system, which is gradually generalized into a diminished engagement and lowered reactivity to the environment at large. In more European countries the use of the validated systematic screening method, Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB) for identifying infant delayed socio-emotional development in infant mental health clinics and in home visiting programs have shown promising results.
Postnatal depression (PND) is another known risk for infant mental health. A meta-analysis shows that up to 19% of new mothers may experience minor or major depression during the first months postpartum. If only including major depression, the prevalence was found to be 7.1 %. In a more recent European study, 1,066 women were followed from pregnancy to 12 months postpartum. The results indicated that 9.6% of new mothers may experience a major depressive episode during the first year after delivery. No estimates were given for minor depression. Most cases develop within the first three months with a peak incidence of about 4-6 weeks.
PND has a substantial impact on the mother, her partner, her family, mother-baby interactions and attachment insecurity and the longer term socio-emotional and cognitive development of the baby, especially when depression occurs in the first year of life. Often, mothers suffering from postnatal depression are emotionally, cognitively and/or behaviorally inhibited or impaired in their ability to recognize and react with appropriate "sensitivity" and "responsiveness" to their children's needs. With regard to the infants of these mothers, higher incidences of negative behaviors, such as social withdrawal, persistent crying, averted gaze or head position, physical neediness and a lack of expression of delight in the presence of their mothers, have been observed. These behaviors increase the mother's experience of stress, which further contributes to the maintenance of maladaptive interactional behavioral patterns. Without improvement in these negative interaction cycles, for example, through early interventions, there is a greater likelihood for infants to develop an insecure-avoidant, an insecure ambivalent or disorganized attachment pattern.
Research on the treatment of women with postnatal depression has shown that treatment that only focuses on the mother (i.e., medication, psychotherapy) is insufficient to buffer against the negative impact of maternal psychopathology on the child's cognitive and psychosocial development, as well as infant-mother attachment quality. Even when depression is effectively treated, this does not seem to "spill over" and improve the mother-infant relationship and long-term infant social-emotional outcomes. Instead, it is necessary to support the depressed mothers in their specific needs in caring and relating to their infants,
Interventions targeting PND delivered in groups have been found to achieve change through the dual process of emotional experience and reflection in an interpersonal context. Group sessions provide a support network, reduce isolation and stigma, provide an environment in which to practice interpersonal and communication skills, shape coping strategies and learn from each other, and enable a number of families to be treated at once. Recently, building on evidence from attachment research, a special focus is given to preventive group programs that enhance parental sensitivity and secure attachment such as the intervention program "Circle of Security (COS)". Based on findings from more studies, COS has proved efficient in enhancing secure attachment as well as reducing maternal depressive symptomatology in high-risk samples, including mothers in prison and mentally ill mothers. The original COS program consists of 20 weekly sessions of 2 hour durations and includes an initial video assessment of parent -child attachment. In the COS intervention graphical illustrations of "the Circle of Security" are used. This Circle is a roadmap that encompasses the three basic control systems; the attachment system, the exploration system and the caregiving system. The parent is illustrated through the pair of hands that hold together the child's world. In COS concepts, "holding" means to serve as a secure base and safe haven. "The top half" of the Circle depicts the child's exploration system and needs. I order to explore, the child needs the parent to serve as a secure base by "watching over," "delighting in," "helping," and "enjoying with" the child. Having a parent that supports exploration helps the child develop his or her own sense of interest, leading to mastery and competency in later years. Along "the bottom half" is the child's attachment needs: "protect me," "comfort me," "delight in me," and "organize my feelings." By delighting in the child, the parent helps the child constructing an internal representation of him- of herself as a loved person and thereby establish self-worth, and by organizing the child's feelings by accepting, sharing and naming them, the parent co-regulates the child's emotions and lays the groundwork of later self-regulation of emotions. The child's needs for comfort and exploration encouragement shift rapidly and the caregiver must continuously adjust to those needs, whenever possible.
Meta-analytic evidence identifies short term group approaches (< 16 sessions), targeting maternal sensitivity as being the most effective, and sensitivity focused interventions conducted with referred at-risk samples (e.g. DSM-III-R depressed mothers), as being more effective than interventions with other groups. Attachment security, in particular, has been found to be readily influenced by sensitivity-focused interventions. The program "Circle of Security Parenting" (COS-P) is a recent and shorter version of COS that consists of eight weekly sessions of two hours durations without the individual video assessment of attachment. In COS-P standard video materials of child attachment behaviors as well as the graphic materials to illustrate the Circle of Security are used. Themes that are covered during the program are: "The Circle of Security", "Exploration of the child's needs in the circle", "Being with your child in the circle", "Exploration of own challenges in meeting child's needs", and "Disruption and repair of the relationship".
To the best of the investigator's knowledge, the effectiveness of COS-P in relation to enhancing maternal sensitivity and the mother-infant relationship has not been fully tested in an RCT design in a general population, making this study the first. Results will provide evidence regarding the efficacy of an American short term indicated parenting group program when implemented in a Scandinavian country. Further, COS-P is a promising approach as health nurses can be trained COS-P therapists in future up-scaling.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Circle of Security-Parenting | Experimental | Behavioral: Circle of Security -ParentingCircle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) is a brief educative group program for parents |
| Care as Usual (CAU) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Care as UsualCare as usual (CAU) i.e. the active control condition will be standard practices for infants and families at risk in Copenhagen. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Mother lives in one of the participating three districts of Copenhagen
- Mother is > 18 years old
- Mother has an infant in the age of 2-12 months born at term (Gestational age (GA) 37-42) or born preterm (GA 30-36).
- Mother speaks and understands Danish.
- Mother is screened positive for symptoms of postnatal depression (EPDS >10) and fulfill criteria for diagnosis of depression assessed in a clinical interview (SCID-5/RV) conducted by a psychologist 10-20 days after EPDS screening AND/OR
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Infant autism and/or early retardation
- Maternal bipolar disorder and/or psychotic disorder, known severe intellectual impairment, suicidal ideation and/or recent suicide attempt and/or present alcohol/substance abuse.
- Family intends to move away from the Copenhagen area within the period of the intervention.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Circle of Security -ParentingAlso: COS-PThe COS-P manual and video material has been translated to Danish (Tryghedscirklen - Forældreprogrammet, manual, Lier, 2013). Based on standard video material of parent-infant interactions, parents are trained to see and understand infant attachment behavior and especially to learn about infant miscuing attachment signals. In the current study parents will attend 10 sessions of 1.5 hour duration | Behavioural | Circle of Security-Parenting |
| Care as UsualAlso: CAUCAU are different in the three participating districts and vary in content and duration. All three districts offer (a) group interventions for mothers who experience postnatal depressive symptoms and/or (b) extra counselling home-visits by a health nurse. Number and content of extra home-visits vary in accordance with the families' specific needs, and will rarely exceed 12 extra visits per year. | Behavioural | Care as Usual (CAU) |
Primary outcome
Maternal sensitivity
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Maternal sensitivity is observed during five minutes mother-infant interaction (free play), and will be assessed using Coding Interactive behavior (CIB, Feldman, 1998).
12 secondary outcomes
Infant-mother attachment quality
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is12-16 months)
Infant Social withdrawal
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Infants socio-emotional development - maternal and partner's report
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Infant cognitive and language development
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Maternal Depressive Symptoms
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Maternal overall psychological distress
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Maternal depression diagnosis
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Maternal Attachment
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Family Functioning, reported by mother and partner
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Parental Reflective Functioning, reported by mother and partner
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Parental Stress, reported by mother and partner
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Number of extra homes visits by the health nurse
Time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 May 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41414735Smith-Nielsen J, Stove LL, Stuart AC, Jakel J, Egmose I, Rohder K, Wendelboe KI, Vaever MS. Differential effects of the circle of security-parenting programme on infant-mother attachment: The role of infant temperament. Br J Clin Psychol. 2026 Jun;65(2):289-297. doi: 10.1111/bjc.70031. Epub 2025 Dec 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27876079Vaever MS, Smith-Nielsen J, Lange T. Copenhagen infant mental health project: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing circle of security -parenting and care as usual as interventions targeting infant mental health risks. BMC Psychol. 2016 Nov 22;4(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0166-8.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mette Væver, Phd principal investigator
University of Copenhagen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Circle of Security -Parenting and Care as Usual in people with Infant Social Withdrawal and Maternal Postnatal Depression, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maternal sensitivity (time frame: Assessed at follow-up (infant is 12-16 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02497677, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 May 2026.