Critical Limb IschemiaNCT02498080
Drug Eluting Balloons PTA in Infra-popliteal Arteries in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia
A study testing DEB PTA and Standard PTA in people with Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Neuromed IRCCS.
Trial summary
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of infra-popliteal arteries in patients suffering peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) provides good results in terms of limb salvage. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- What is being tested?
- DEB PTA and Standard PTA
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2015to Sep 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients with CLI (Rutherford classes 4, 5, 6);
- stenosis and/or complete occlusion of P3 popliteal artery segment;
- stenosis and/or complete occlusion of at least 1 leg vessel >40 mm in length;
- life-expectancy >12 months;
- possibility to perform angiogram at 12-months follow-up.
Who cannot join
- life-expectancy <12 months;
- iodinated contrast media or paclitaxel allergy;
- impossibility to undergo dual antiplatelet therapy.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Drug Eluting Balloons Versus Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in Infra-popliteal Arteries in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of infra-popliteal arteries in patients suffering peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) provides good results in terms of limb salvage. During the last decade, drug eluting balloons (DEB) were found to be an effective tool for the treatment of atherosclerotic disease in several arterial districts. Aim of this study is to compare results of DEB PTA versus standard PTA of infra-popliteal district in patients with CLI, from a single-centre prospective randomized trial.
Read the detailed description
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of infra-popliteal arteries in patients suffering peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) provides good results in terms of limb salvage. Nevertheless, this treatment is still burdened by consistent restenosis and reintervention rates up to 68% and 50%, respectively.
During the last decade, drug eluting balloons (DEB) were found to be an effective tool for the treatment of atherosclerotic disease in several arterial districts. DEBs are coated by antimitotic drug (usually paclitaxel) in order to inhibit endothelial cells proliferation. Paclitaxel effectiveness is due to the drug lipophilicity.
A short (1 to 3 minutes) balloon inflation at the target vessel level is sufficient to deliver a therapeutic dose of paclitaxel, lasting in situ thereafter for months.
The effectiveness of DEBs has been already proven in coronary as well as in femoro-popliteal district: DEBs have improved primary patency rates both in de novo lesions and in femoro-popliteal intrastent restenosis.
A role for DEBs in the treatment of infra-popliteal lesions district in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) has been also described, however results in that specific anatomical site are still controversial.
The DEBATE-BTK Trial showed that DEBs reduce 1-year restenosis, target lesions revascularization (TLR) and target vessel occlusions rates in the treatment of infra-popliteal lesions in diabetic patients with CLI, compared with standard PTA. On the other hand, the IN.PACT DEEP Trial showed a higher major amputation rate and lower amputation-free survival for DEB compared to standard PTA.
It has been hypothesized that DEBs failure could be related to different materials and drug coating process for older DEBs, resulting in an insufficient dose delivered to the target vessel wall.
Aim of this study is to compare results of DEB PTA versus standard PTA of infra-popliteal district in patients with CLI, from a single-centre prospective randomized trial.
Patients and Methods
Study Design: single-centre, parallel-arms, PROBE (Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-Point) trial.
The study will be submitted to the Ethical Committee of IRCCS NEUROMED and performed according to the Helsinki Declaration. All patients will sign an informed consent before inclusion into the study.
Inclusion criteria: patients with CLI (Rutherford classes 4, 5, 6), stenosis and/or complete occlusion of P3 popliteal artery segment, stenosis and/or complete occlusion of at least 1 leg vessel >40 mm in length, life-expectancy >12 months, possibility to perform angiogram at 12-months follow-up.
Exclusion criteria: life-expectancy <12 months, iodinated contrast media or paclitaxel allergy, impossibility to undergo dual antiplatelet therapy.
Randomization: Lesions will be randomly assigned to DEB PTA or standard PTA after successful passage of the guidewire. Randomization will be performed in blocks of 10 with the use of computer-generated random digits, and the assignments will be placed in sealed envelopes.
Intraoperative details:
PTA procedures are usually performed by an antegrade approach through a 5 Fr sheath, after systemic anticoagulation (Heparin Sodium 70 IU/kg). In patients randomised to DEB PTA, a predilatation with standard balloon is always performed. When more than 1 DEB is needed, a 5 mm overlapping zone between balloons is always considered. In all cases, regardless of type of balloon, inflation length is 3 minutes. At completion angiogram, in case of flow-limiting dissection or >30% residual stenosis, a further 3 minutes PTA is performed. Coronary stents are used as bailout.
Technical success is defined as the successful recanalization of target vessel with direct flow to the foot, with residual stenosis <30%. Inflow lesions of above-the-knee (ATK) segment are treated during the same session. Patients with bilateral lesions are treated in different procedures. After intervention, patients are usually treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg/day and Clopidogrel 75 mg/day) for at least 4 weeks, followed by lifelong single antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg/day).
All DEB PTAs are performed by Ranger Balloon (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). This balloon is provided by Sterling platform associated with a loading tool aimed to protect the balloon surface during insertion inside the sheath, in order to avoid drug loss during intra-arterial navigation. Paclitaxel is coated to balloon surface by citrate ester in a peculiar form, allowing providing an optimal drug dose release at target vessel wall.
Follow-up: Duplex Ultrasound Scans (DUS) are scheduled at 1, 3 and 6 months from intervention. At 1 year follow-up, all patients undergo digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The latter DSA is compared with intraoperative diagnostic imaging using the same projections. Trophic lesions care is performed by weekly visits for the first 2 months, followed by bimonthly visits for the next 2 months. Visits are then scheduled monthly until ulcer healing. Planned minor amputations in non-infected patients are performed within 1 month from the index procedure.
Primary outcomes: 12-months binary restenosis rate, defined as lumen loss >50% at DSA.
Secondary outcomes: clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rate, major amputations rate, wound healing rate, 12-months target vessel occlusion rate at DSA.
Acquired angiograms and DUS scans will be reviewed by 2 blinded investigators who will not actively participate in recruitment and will have no knowledge of randomization group.
Study power: Assuming a binary restenosis rate after conventional PTA of 75% and a reduction of at least 50% after DEB 4, a minimum of 41 lesions for group should be evaluated to have a statistical power of 90% and a significance level alpha=0.05 (two-sided).
Assuming a occlusion rate of target lesion after conventional PTA of 55% and a reduction of at least 60% after DEB 4, a minimum of 44 lesions for group should be evaluated to have a statistical power of 90% and a significance level alpha=0.05 (two-sided).
The number of lesions could be increased up to 50 for randomization group to maximise the power of the study.
Assuming a rate of eligible lesions per patient of 1.3, a minimum of 78 patients should be enrolled in the study.
Statistical analysis. Continuous variables will be expressed as means±standard deviation or medians with interquartile ranges and as percentage for categorical variables. Variables with positive skewness will be analysed after a logarithmic transformation.
To compare the characteristics of two randomization group, Student's t test will be used for continuous variables and X2 test for categorical variables (Exact Fisher's test will be used for cell with frequency <6).
Concordance data between ecodoppler and angiography will be tested by Bland-Altman method.
The "intention to treat" principle will be adopted for the analysis of the primary endpoints: the evaluation of efficacy takes into account the initial randomization independently from the compliance to the treatment of the subject.
The rate of primary outcomes between the two randomization group will be compared by Kaplan-Meier method, followed by long-rank test, e by multivariate logistic analysis, adjusted for possible confounding.
The data analysis will be generated using SAS/STAT software, Version 9.1.3 of the SAS System for Windows©2009. SAS Institute Inc. and SAS are registered trademarks of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Timeline:
Taking into account a recruitment capacity of our centre on 60 eligible patients per year, the recruitment phase will last 15 months for a total duration of the study of 36 months.
Month 0-3: protocol preparation, ethical committee approval, patient identification Month 4-19: enrolment of patients Month 12: ad interim analysis of results. Required because of the high rate of success of DEB reported by other studies.
Month 16-31: follow-up. Month 32-36: Data analysis and publication of results
- Conditions
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- Being tested
- DEB PTA, Standard PTA
- Keywords
- Drug eluting balloons, Critical limb ischemia, Infra-popliteal arteries, Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DEB PTAProcedure or surgery
paclitaxel drug eluting balloon PTA
Standard PTAProcedure or surgery
Standard PTA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DEB PTA | Experimental | Devices: paclitaxel drug eluting balloon PTA Receives: Procedure: DEB PTA |
| standard PTA | Active comparator | devices: standard balloon PTA Receives: Procedure: Standard PTA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
binary restenosis rate
binary restenosis rate has been defined as lumen loss >50% at DSA
Measured: 12-months
Secondary outcomes (4)
clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rate
Measured: 12-months
major amputations rate
Measured: 12-months
wound healing rate
Measured: 12-months
target vessel occlusion rate
vessel occlusion rate at DSA
Measured: 12-months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2015
- Primary completionSep 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Critical Limb IschemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Neuromed IRCCS
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Francesco Pompeo, Neuromed IRCCS
- Investigators
- Antonella Biello, MD, Principal investigator, Neuromed IRCCS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02498080
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pmp01
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 15 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Forbes JF, Adam DJ, Bell J, Fowkes FG, Gillespie I, Raab GM, Ruckley CV, Bradbury AW; BASIL trial Participants. Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: Health-related quality of life outcomes, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2010 May;51(5 Suppl):43S-51S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.076.
PubMed 20435261Scheinert D, Duda S, Zeller T, Krankenberg H, Ricke J, Bosiers M, Tepe G, Naisbitt S, Rosenfield K. The LEVANT I (Lutonix paclitaxel-coated balloon for the prevention of femoropopliteal restenosis) trial for femoropopliteal revascularization: first-in-human randomized trial of low-dose drug-coated balloon versus uncoated balloon angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.022.
PubMed 24456716Liistro F, Porto I, Angioli P, Grotti S, Ricci L, Ducci K, Falsini G, Ventoruzzo G, Turini F, Bellandi G, Bolognese L. Drug-eluting balloon in peripheral intervention for below the knee angioplasty evaluation (DEBATE-BTK): a randomized trial in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia. Circulation. 2013 Aug 6;128(6):615-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001811.
PubMed 23797811Zeller T, Baumgartner I, Scheinert D, Brodmann M, Bosiers M, Micari A, Peeters P, Vermassen F, Landini M, Snead DB, Kent KC, Rocha-Singh KJ; IN.PACT DEEP Trial Investigators. Drug-eluting balloon versus standard balloon angioplasty for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in critical limb ischemia: 12-month results from the IN.PACT DEEP randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 14;64(15):1568-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1198.
PubMed 25301459
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Drug Eluting Balloons Versus Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in Infra-popliteal Arteries in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02498080
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pmp01
- Conditions
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- Keywords
- Drug eluting balloons, Critical limb ischemia, Infra-popliteal arteries, Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Neuromed IRCCSUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2015
- Primary completion
- Sep 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of infra-popliteal arteries in patients suffering peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) provides good results in terms of limb salvage. During the last decade, drug eluting balloons (DEB) were found to be an effective tool for the treatment of atherosclerotic disease in several arterial districts. Aim of this study is to compare results of DEB PTA versus standard PTA of infra-popliteal district in patients with CLI, from a single-centre prospective randomized trial.
Detailed description
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of infra-popliteal arteries in patients suffering peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) provides good results in terms of limb salvage. Nevertheless, this treatment is still burdened by consistent restenosis and reintervention rates up to 68% and 50%, respectively.
During the last decade, drug eluting balloons (DEB) were found to be an effective tool for the treatment of atherosclerotic disease in several arterial districts. DEBs are coated by antimitotic drug (usually paclitaxel) in order to inhibit endothelial cells proliferation. Paclitaxel effectiveness is due to the drug lipophilicity.
A short (1 to 3 minutes) balloon inflation at the target vessel level is sufficient to deliver a therapeutic dose of paclitaxel, lasting in situ thereafter for months.
The effectiveness of DEBs has been already proven in coronary as well as in femoro-popliteal district: DEBs have improved primary patency rates both in de novo lesions and in femoro-popliteal intrastent restenosis.
A role for DEBs in the treatment of infra-popliteal lesions district in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) has been also described, however results in that specific anatomical site are still controversial.
The DEBATE-BTK Trial showed that DEBs reduce 1-year restenosis, target lesions revascularization (TLR) and target vessel occlusions rates in the treatment of infra-popliteal lesions in diabetic patients with CLI, compared with standard PTA. On the other hand, the IN.PACT DEEP Trial showed a higher major amputation rate and lower amputation-free survival for DEB compared to standard PTA.
It has been hypothesized that DEBs failure could be related to different materials and drug coating process for older DEBs, resulting in an insufficient dose delivered to the target vessel wall.
Aim of this study is to compare results of DEB PTA versus standard PTA of infra-popliteal district in patients with CLI, from a single-centre prospective randomized trial.
Patients and Methods
Study Design: single-centre, parallel-arms, PROBE (Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-Point) trial.
The study will be submitted to the Ethical Committee of IRCCS NEUROMED and performed according to the Helsinki Declaration. All patients will sign an informed consent before inclusion into the study.
Inclusion criteria: patients with CLI (Rutherford classes 4, 5, 6), stenosis and/or complete occlusion of P3 popliteal artery segment, stenosis and/or complete occlusion of at least 1 leg vessel >40 mm in length, life-expectancy >12 months, possibility to perform angiogram at 12-months follow-up.
Exclusion criteria: life-expectancy <12 months, iodinated contrast media or paclitaxel allergy, impossibility to undergo dual antiplatelet therapy.
Randomization: Lesions will be randomly assigned to DEB PTA or standard PTA after successful passage of the guidewire. Randomization will be performed in blocks of 10 with the use of computer-generated random digits, and the assignments will be placed in sealed envelopes.
Intraoperative details:
PTA procedures are usually performed by an antegrade approach through a 5 Fr sheath, after systemic anticoagulation (Heparin Sodium 70 IU/kg). In patients randomised to DEB PTA, a predilatation with standard balloon is always performed. When more than 1 DEB is needed, a 5 mm overlapping zone between balloons is always considered. In all cases, regardless of type of balloon, inflation length is 3 minutes. At completion angiogram, in case of flow-limiting dissection or >30% residual stenosis, a further 3 minutes PTA is performed. Coronary stents are used as bailout.
Technical success is defined as the successful recanalization of target vessel with direct flow to the foot, with residual stenosis <30%. Inflow lesions of above-the-knee (ATK) segment are treated during the same session. Patients with bilateral lesions are treated in different procedures. After intervention, patients are usually treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg/day and Clopidogrel 75 mg/day) for at least 4 weeks, followed by lifelong single antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg/day).
All DEB PTAs are performed by Ranger Balloon (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). This balloon is provided by Sterling platform associated with a loading tool aimed to protect the balloon surface during insertion inside the sheath, in order to avoid drug loss during intra-arterial navigation. Paclitaxel is coated to balloon surface by citrate ester in a peculiar form, allowing providing an optimal drug dose release at target vessel wall.
Follow-up: Duplex Ultrasound Scans (DUS) are scheduled at 1, 3 and 6 months from intervention. At 1 year follow-up, all patients undergo digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The latter DSA is compared with intraoperative diagnostic imaging using the same projections. Trophic lesions care is performed by weekly visits for the first 2 months, followed by bimonthly visits for the next 2 months. Visits are then scheduled monthly until ulcer healing. Planned minor amputations in non-infected patients are performed within 1 month from the index procedure.
Primary outcomes: 12-months binary restenosis rate, defined as lumen loss >50% at DSA.
Secondary outcomes: clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rate, major amputations rate, wound healing rate, 12-months target vessel occlusion rate at DSA.
Acquired angiograms and DUS scans will be reviewed by 2 blinded investigators who will not actively participate in recruitment and will have no knowledge of randomization group.
Study power: Assuming a binary restenosis rate after conventional PTA of 75% and a reduction of at least 50% after DEB 4, a minimum of 41 lesions for group should be evaluated to have a statistical power of 90% and a significance level alpha=0.05 (two-sided).
Assuming a occlusion rate of target lesion after conventional PTA of 55% and a reduction of at least 60% after DEB 4, a minimum of 44 lesions for group should be evaluated to have a statistical power of 90% and a significance level alpha=0.05 (two-sided).
The number of lesions could be increased up to 50 for randomization group to maximise the power of the study.
Assuming a rate of eligible lesions per patient of 1.3, a minimum of 78 patients should be enrolled in the study.
Statistical analysis. Continuous variables will be expressed as means±standard deviation or medians with interquartile ranges and as percentage for categorical variables. Variables with positive skewness will be analysed after a logarithmic transformation.
To compare the characteristics of two randomization group, Student's t test will be used for continuous variables and X2 test for categorical variables (Exact Fisher's test will be used for cell with frequency <6).
Concordance data between ecodoppler and angiography will be tested by Bland-Altman method.
The "intention to treat" principle will be adopted for the analysis of the primary endpoints: the evaluation of efficacy takes into account the initial randomization independently from the compliance to the treatment of the subject.
The rate of primary outcomes between the two randomization group will be compared by Kaplan-Meier method, followed by long-rank test, e by multivariate logistic analysis, adjusted for possible confounding.
The data analysis will be generated using SAS/STAT software, Version 9.1.3 of the SAS System for Windows©2009. SAS Institute Inc. and SAS are registered trademarks of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Timeline:
Taking into account a recruitment capacity of our centre on 60 eligible patients per year, the recruitment phase will last 15 months for a total duration of the study of 36 months.
Month 0-3: protocol preparation, ethical committee approval, patient identification Month 4-19: enrolment of patients Month 12: ad interim analysis of results. Required because of the high rate of success of DEB reported by other studies.
Month 16-31: follow-up. Month 32-36: Data analysis and publication of results
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DEB PTA | Experimental | Procedure: DEB PTADevices: paclitaxel drug eluting balloon PTA |
| standard PTA | Active comparator | Procedure: Standard PTAdevices: standard balloon PTA |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- patients with CLI (Rutherford classes 4, 5, 6);
- stenosis and/or complete occlusion of P3 popliteal artery segment;
- stenosis and/or complete occlusion of at least 1 leg vessel >40 mm in length;
- life-expectancy >12 months;
- possibility to perform angiogram at 12-months follow-up.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- life-expectancy <12 months;
- iodinated contrast media or paclitaxel allergy;
- impossibility to undergo dual antiplatelet therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DEB PTApaclitaxel drug eluting balloon PTA | Procedure or surgery | DEB PTA |
| Standard PTAStandard PTA | Procedure or surgery | standard PTA |
Primary outcome
binary restenosis rate
Time frame: 12-months
binary restenosis rate has been defined as lumen loss >50% at DSA
4 secondary outcomes
clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rate
Time frame: 12-months
major amputations rate
Time frame: 12-months
wound healing rate
Time frame: 12-months
target vessel occlusion rate
Time frame: 12-months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jul 2015.
- Background: PubMed 20435261Forbes JF, Adam DJ, Bell J, Fowkes FG, Gillespie I, Raab GM, Ruckley CV, Bradbury AW; BASIL trial Participants. Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: Health-related quality of life outcomes, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2010 May;51(5 Suppl):43S-51S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.076.
- Background: PubMed 24456716Scheinert D, Duda S, Zeller T, Krankenberg H, Ricke J, Bosiers M, Tepe G, Naisbitt S, Rosenfield K. The LEVANT I (Lutonix paclitaxel-coated balloon for the prevention of femoropopliteal restenosis) trial for femoropopliteal revascularization: first-in-human randomized trial of low-dose drug-coated balloon versus uncoated balloon angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.022.
- Background: PubMed 23797811Liistro F, Porto I, Angioli P, Grotti S, Ricci L, Ducci K, Falsini G, Ventoruzzo G, Turini F, Bellandi G, Bolognese L. Drug-eluting balloon in peripheral intervention for below the knee angioplasty evaluation (DEBATE-BTK): a randomized trial in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia. Circulation. 2013 Aug 6;128(6):615-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001811.
- Background: PubMed 25301459Zeller T, Baumgartner I, Scheinert D, Brodmann M, Bosiers M, Micari A, Peeters P, Vermassen F, Landini M, Snead DB, Kent KC, Rocha-Singh KJ; IN.PACT DEEP Trial Investigators. Drug-eluting balloon versus standard balloon angioplasty for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in critical limb ischemia: 12-month results from the IN.PACT DEEP randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 14;64(15):1568-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1198.
Related trials for Critical Limb Ischemia
RecruitingObservational study
miRNAs in Critical Limb Ischemia (miRNACLI)
Critical Limb Ischemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Laser Atherectomy and Sirolimus-eluting Balloon Angioplasty for CLTI
Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Recruiting
Radiotracer-Based Perfusion Imaging of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus
RecruitingObservational study
Vessel Recoil in Specific CLTI Populations
Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Not yet recruiting
DCB Outcomes After Non-Compliant Balloon Vessel Preparation With or Without Scoring in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease
Femoropopliteal Disease, Drug Coated Balloon
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Antonella Biello, MD principal investigator
Neuromed IRCCS
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing DEB PTA and Standard PTA in people with Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Neuromed IRCCS.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Antonella Biello, MD (+393287359230, bielloantonella@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
binary restenosis rate (time frame: 12-months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02498080, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2015.