Infertility FemaleNCT02498210
IVM for Patients With Low Ovarian Response. Does it Improve IVFoutcomes and Does it Improve the Following IVF Cycle?
A study testing In Vitro Maturation Procedure in people with Infertility Female, run by Sheba Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
Poor ovarian response (POR) is one of the major therapeutic challenges in in vitro fertilization. Several therapeutic approaches for POR have been explored; yet, a single effective strategy has not yet been established. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Infertility Female
- What is being tested?
- In Vitro Maturation Procedure
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- Oct 2016to Jul 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Poor ovarian response IVF cycle
Who cannot join
- Normal ovarian response
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Sheba Medical Center
Kiryat Ono, 5229910
ettie maman, MD, 97235302882, ettiemaman@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: IVM Treatment in Patients With Low Ovarian Response. Does it Improve IVF Outcome or May it Cause Activation of Ovarian Follicles and Increase the Chances of Success in the Following IVF Cycle?
Poor ovarian response (POR) is one of the major therapeutic challenges in in vitro fertilization. Several therapeutic approaches for POR have been explored; yet, a single effective strategy has not yet been established. Recently, a live birth was reported after ovarian cortex fragmentation and in vitro disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway and activation of Akt signaling. During IVM procedure increased mechanical stimulation of the ovarian cortex takes place. , with the consequent disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway. Our aim is to investigate whether the mechanical manipulation and triggering of ovarian cortex caused by IVM can cause ovarian follicular activation and recruitment by the mechanisms mentioned above. Thus stimulation in the following regular IVF cycle will result in improved ovarian response and increased oocytes yield
Read the detailed description
IVM treatment in patients with low ovarian response. Does it improve IVF outcome or may it cause activation of ovarian follicles and increase the chances of success in the following IVF cycle?
Scientific background:
Poor ovarian response (POR) is one of the major therapeutic challenges in in vitro fertilization. The prevalence of poor responders patients varies in the literature between 9 and 24%, however due to the increase in childbearing age it is expected to be one of the main infertility cause. Failure to respond adequately to standard protocols and to recruit adequate follicles results in decreased oocyte production, cycle cancellation and, overall, it is associated with a significantly diminished probability of pregnancy Several therapeutic approaches for POR have been explored; yet, a single effective strategy has not yet been established. Previously it was shown that mechanical manipulation on ovarian cortex such as ovarian wedge resection or ovarian "drilling" by diathermy or laser, induced follicle growth in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patient.
Recently, a live birth was reported after ovarian cortex fragmentation and in vitro disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway and activation of Akt signaling. The treated ovarian fragments were grafted back to the patient and after follicle growth, retrieval of mature eggs, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer; a healthy baby was delivered. The Hippo signaling pathway is essential to maintain optimal organ size and is conserved in all metazoan animals [6-8]. In this study it was shown that ovarian fragmentation increased actin polymerization and disrupted Hippo signaling by decreasing phosphorylated Yes-associated protein (pYAP) levels together with increased nuclear localization of YAP, leading to increased expression of CCN growth factors genes and BIRC apoptosis inhibitors. Secreted CCN2 and related factors promoted follicle growth
Genes involved in ovarian fragmentation, Hippo signaling, and follicle growth is important for ovarian physiology and pathophysiology. Ovarian fragmentation led to changes in intercellular tension and facilitated the conversion of G-actin to F-actin. Subsequent disruption of Hippo signaling decreased pYAP to total YAP ratios, leading to increased expression of downstream CCN growth factors and BIRC apoptosis inhibitors
In vitro maturation (IVM) has been practiced in a clinical setting for over a decade. It has been suggested as an alternative to conventional IVF for minimizing the risk of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients with the PCOS. Recently, IVM has been proposed as the method for patients undergoing anticancer treatment, particularly for women who require rapid fertility preservation [9] or face the risk of estrogen-sensitive cancer recurrence involve. Although IVM has been applied to IVF poor responders with equivocal results, several researchers have shown benefits in IVM in women who have low ovarian response.
For the purpose of IVM, oocytes are retrieved from ovarian follicles as small as 4-5mm in diameter, under ultrasound guidance with a single-lumen thinner aspiration needle. The aspiration pressure is reduced compared to regular IVF. Therefore, multiple needle punctures are needed because lower aspiration pressures are used and bloody aspirates may block the thin needle lumen. Because immature oocytes are enclosed in tightly packed cumulus cells, curettage of the follicle wall is needed to dislodge the cumulus oocyte complex. All leads to the fact that during IVM procedure increased mechanical stimulation of the ovarian cortex takes place, with the consequent disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway.
Hypothesis and aims Our aim is to investigate whether the mechanical manipulation and triggering of ovarian cortex caused by IVM can cause ovarian follicular activation and recruitment by the mechanisms mentioned above. Thus stimulation in the following regular IVF cycle will result in improved ovarian response and increased oocytes yield.
Materials and Methods Patients Prospective cohort study on POR patients. Twenty five POR patients will be selected based on the bologna criteria and all patients will have at least one documented POR cycle.
IVM protocol POR patients will be treated in IVM cycle according to our IVF unit protocol, using FSH-priming . Briefly, a baseline evaluation that included a hormonal profile and an ultrasound scan was performed on day 3 of the menstrual cycle. On day 3, 150 IU/day recombinant FSH was added for 3 days. A second evaluation was performed on day 6 of the menstrual cycle. An injection of 10,000 IU hCG (Pregnyl; Organon, Oss, Holland) was administered subcutaneously when the endometrial thickness will be ≥6 mm and the leading follicle will be at least 12 mm. Oocyte retrieval will be performed under ultrasound guidance with a 19G single-lumen aspiration needle (Cook; Queensland, Australia) with a reduced aspiration pressure of 7.5 kPa. The follicular fluid will be collected in culture tubes containing follicle flush buffer (Cook) with 2 IU/ml heparin. Because of the difficulty in identifying compacted oocyte complexes, all aspirates were filtered to identify the additional oocytes.
In-Vitro Oocyte Maturation Germinal vesicles and M1 oocytes will be cultured in IVM medium (Sage; CT, USA) supplemented with 75 IU FSH and 75IU luteinizing hormone (LH; Ferring, Keil, Germany) and checked for maturity between 24-48 hours after culture. Mature oocytes were will be denuded of the granulosa cells and fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). After ICSI, the oocytes will be transferred into IVF medium. Fertilization will be assessed 18 hours after ICSI by examining the oocytes for the appearance of two distinct pronuclei (2PN) and the extrusion of two polar bodies.
IVF protocol Following the IVM treatment, if the patient failed to conceive, she will be offered a conventional IVF treatment, using the same controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol, as in her previous IVF treatment (prior to the IVM cycle). Each patient will serve as her own control.
Outcome measurements Outcome measurements will include controlled ovarian hyperstimulation variables, number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes on the day of the aspiration, fertilization rate, embryos quality and number of embryos transferred.
- Conditions
- Infertility Female
- Being tested
- In Vitro Maturation Procedure
- Keywords
- IVM, HIPPO signaling
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility, Female
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
In Vitro Maturation ProcedureOther
POR patients will be treated in IVM cycle. After baseline evaluation on day 3, 150 IU/day recombinant FSH or HMG will be added for 3 days. A second evaluation will be performed on day 6 of the menstrual cycle. An injection of 10,000 IU hCG (Pregnyl; Organon, Oss, Holland) or Ovitrelle 250mcg (Merck Serono ) will be administered subcutaneously when the endometrial thickness will be ≥6 mm and the leading follicle will be at least 12 mm. Oocyte retrieval will be performed under ultrasound guidance with a 19G single-lumen aspiration needle (Cook; Queensland, Australia). The follicular fluid will be collected in culture tubes containing follicle flush buffer (Cook) with 2 IU/ml heparin. All aspirates were filtered to identify additional oocytes
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IVF after IVM | Experimental | If the patients will not concive during the IVM cycle . results of this following IVF cycle will be compared to the initial IVF preformance
Intervention : In Vitro Maturation Procedure Receives: Other: In Vitro Maturation Procedure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of oocytes
IVF cycle after IVM results will be compared to the IVF cycle with poor ovarian response
Measured: 3 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2016
- Primary completionJul 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Infertility FemaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ettie Maman, MD, Principal investigator, Sheba Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02498210
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHEBA-14-1604-EM-CTIL
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 31 May 2015
- Last updated
- 27 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Tarlatzi TB, Tarlatzis BC. Evidence-based management of poor ovarian response. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Sep;1205:199-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05665.x.
PubMed 20840273Shanbhag S, Aucott L, Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MA, McTavish AR. Interventions for 'poor responders' to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD004379. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004379.pub2.
PubMed 17253503STEIN IF Sr. The management of bilateral polycystic ovaries. Fertil Steril. 1955 May-Jun;6(3):189-205. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)31980-x. No abstract available.
PubMed 14380378Farquhar C, Brown J, Marjoribanks J. Laparoscopic drilling by diathermy or laser for ovulation induction in anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD001122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001122.pub4.
PubMed 22696324Kawamura K, Cheng Y, Suzuki N, Deguchi M, Sato Y, Takae S, Ho CH, Kawamura N, Tamura M, Hashimoto S, Sugishita Y, Morimoto Y, Hosoi Y, Yoshioka N, Ishizuka B, Hsueh AJ. Hippo signaling disruption and Akt stimulation of ovarian follicles for infertility treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 22;110(43):17474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312830110. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
PubMed 24082083Dong J, Feldmann G, Huang J, Wu S, Zhang N, Comerford SA, Gayyed MF, Anders RA, Maitra A, Pan D. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell. 2007 Sep 21;130(6):1120-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.019.
PubMed 17889654Hergovich A. Mammalian Hippo signalling: a kinase network regulated by protein-protein interactions. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012 Feb;40(1):124-8. doi: 10.1042/BST20110619.
PubMed 22260677Maman E, Meirow D, Brengauz M, Raanani H, Dor J, Hourvitz A. Luteal phase oocyte retrieval and in vitro maturation is an optional procedure for urgent fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jan;95(1):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.064. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
PubMed 20688325Li J, Xu Y, Zhou G, Guo J, Xin N. Natural cycle IVF/IVM may be more desirable for poor responder patients after failure of stimulated cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Sep;28(9):791-5. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9597-6. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
PubMed 21695516Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
PubMed 21505041
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- IVM Treatment in Patients With Low Ovarian Response. Does it Improve IVF Outcome or May it Cause Activation of Ovarian Follicles and Increase the Chances of Success in the Following IVF Cycle?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02498210
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHEBA-14-1604-EM-CTIL
- Conditions
- Infertility Female
- Keywords
- IVM, HIPPO signaling
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Poor ovarian response (POR) is one of the major therapeutic challenges in in vitro fertilization. Several therapeutic approaches for POR have been explored; yet, a single effective strategy has not yet been established. Recently, a live birth was reported after ovarian cortex fragmentation and in vitro disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway and activation of Akt signaling. During IVM procedure increased mechanical stimulation of the ovarian cortex takes place. , with the consequent disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway. Our aim is to investigate whether the mechanical manipulation and triggering of ovarian cortex caused by IVM can cause ovarian follicular activation and recruitment by the mechanisms mentioned above. Thus stimulation in the following regular IVF cycle will result in improved ovarian response and increased oocytes yield
Detailed description
IVM treatment in patients with low ovarian response. Does it improve IVF outcome or may it cause activation of ovarian follicles and increase the chances of success in the following IVF cycle?
Scientific background:
Poor ovarian response (POR) is one of the major therapeutic challenges in in vitro fertilization. The prevalence of poor responders patients varies in the literature between 9 and 24%, however due to the increase in childbearing age it is expected to be one of the main infertility cause. Failure to respond adequately to standard protocols and to recruit adequate follicles results in decreased oocyte production, cycle cancellation and, overall, it is associated with a significantly diminished probability of pregnancy Several therapeutic approaches for POR have been explored; yet, a single effective strategy has not yet been established. Previously it was shown that mechanical manipulation on ovarian cortex such as ovarian wedge resection or ovarian "drilling" by diathermy or laser, induced follicle growth in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patient.
Recently, a live birth was reported after ovarian cortex fragmentation and in vitro disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway and activation of Akt signaling. The treated ovarian fragments were grafted back to the patient and after follicle growth, retrieval of mature eggs, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer; a healthy baby was delivered. The Hippo signaling pathway is essential to maintain optimal organ size and is conserved in all metazoan animals [6-8]. In this study it was shown that ovarian fragmentation increased actin polymerization and disrupted Hippo signaling by decreasing phosphorylated Yes-associated protein (pYAP) levels together with increased nuclear localization of YAP, leading to increased expression of CCN growth factors genes and BIRC apoptosis inhibitors. Secreted CCN2 and related factors promoted follicle growth
Genes involved in ovarian fragmentation, Hippo signaling, and follicle growth is important for ovarian physiology and pathophysiology. Ovarian fragmentation led to changes in intercellular tension and facilitated the conversion of G-actin to F-actin. Subsequent disruption of Hippo signaling decreased pYAP to total YAP ratios, leading to increased expression of downstream CCN growth factors and BIRC apoptosis inhibitors
In vitro maturation (IVM) has been practiced in a clinical setting for over a decade. It has been suggested as an alternative to conventional IVF for minimizing the risk of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients with the PCOS. Recently, IVM has been proposed as the method for patients undergoing anticancer treatment, particularly for women who require rapid fertility preservation [9] or face the risk of estrogen-sensitive cancer recurrence involve. Although IVM has been applied to IVF poor responders with equivocal results, several researchers have shown benefits in IVM in women who have low ovarian response.
For the purpose of IVM, oocytes are retrieved from ovarian follicles as small as 4-5mm in diameter, under ultrasound guidance with a single-lumen thinner aspiration needle. The aspiration pressure is reduced compared to regular IVF. Therefore, multiple needle punctures are needed because lower aspiration pressures are used and bloody aspirates may block the thin needle lumen. Because immature oocytes are enclosed in tightly packed cumulus cells, curettage of the follicle wall is needed to dislodge the cumulus oocyte complex. All leads to the fact that during IVM procedure increased mechanical stimulation of the ovarian cortex takes place, with the consequent disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway.
Hypothesis and aims Our aim is to investigate whether the mechanical manipulation and triggering of ovarian cortex caused by IVM can cause ovarian follicular activation and recruitment by the mechanisms mentioned above. Thus stimulation in the following regular IVF cycle will result in improved ovarian response and increased oocytes yield.
Materials and Methods Patients Prospective cohort study on POR patients. Twenty five POR patients will be selected based on the bologna criteria and all patients will have at least one documented POR cycle.
IVM protocol POR patients will be treated in IVM cycle according to our IVF unit protocol, using FSH-priming . Briefly, a baseline evaluation that included a hormonal profile and an ultrasound scan was performed on day 3 of the menstrual cycle. On day 3, 150 IU/day recombinant FSH was added for 3 days. A second evaluation was performed on day 6 of the menstrual cycle. An injection of 10,000 IU hCG (Pregnyl; Organon, Oss, Holland) was administered subcutaneously when the endometrial thickness will be ≥6 mm and the leading follicle will be at least 12 mm. Oocyte retrieval will be performed under ultrasound guidance with a 19G single-lumen aspiration needle (Cook; Queensland, Australia) with a reduced aspiration pressure of 7.5 kPa. The follicular fluid will be collected in culture tubes containing follicle flush buffer (Cook) with 2 IU/ml heparin. Because of the difficulty in identifying compacted oocyte complexes, all aspirates were filtered to identify the additional oocytes.
In-Vitro Oocyte Maturation Germinal vesicles and M1 oocytes will be cultured in IVM medium (Sage; CT, USA) supplemented with 75 IU FSH and 75IU luteinizing hormone (LH; Ferring, Keil, Germany) and checked for maturity between 24-48 hours after culture. Mature oocytes were will be denuded of the granulosa cells and fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). After ICSI, the oocytes will be transferred into IVF medium. Fertilization will be assessed 18 hours after ICSI by examining the oocytes for the appearance of two distinct pronuclei (2PN) and the extrusion of two polar bodies.
IVF protocol Following the IVM treatment, if the patient failed to conceive, she will be offered a conventional IVF treatment, using the same controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol, as in her previous IVF treatment (prior to the IVM cycle). Each patient will serve as her own control.
Outcome measurements Outcome measurements will include controlled ovarian hyperstimulation variables, number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes on the day of the aspiration, fertilization rate, embryos quality and number of embryos transferred.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IVF after IVM | Experimental | Other: In Vitro Maturation ProcedureIf the patients will not concive during the IVM cycle . results of this following IVF cycle will be compared to the initial IVF preformance Intervention : In Vitro Maturation Procedure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Poor ovarian response IVF cycle
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Normal ovarian response
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| In Vitro Maturation ProcedurePOR patients will be treated in IVM cycle. After baseline evaluation on day 3, 150 IU/day recombinant FSH or HMG will be added for 3 days. A second evaluation will be performed on day 6 of the menstrual cycle. An injection of 10,000 IU hCG (Pregnyl; Organon, Oss, Holland) or Ovitrelle 250mcg (Merck Serono ) will be administered subcutaneously when the endometrial thickness will be ≥6 mm and the leading follicle will be at least 12 mm. Oocyte retrieval will be performed under ultrasound guidance with a 19G single-lumen aspiration needle (Cook; Queensland, Australia). The follicular fluid will be collected in culture tubes containing follicle flush buffer (Cook) with 2 IU/ml heparin. All aspirates were filtered to identify additional oocytes | Other | IVF after IVM |
Primary outcome
Number of oocytes
Time frame: 3 month
IVF cycle after IVM results will be compared to the IVF cycle with poor ovarian response
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Nov 2019.
- Background: PubMed 20840273Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Tarlatzi TB, Tarlatzis BC. Evidence-based management of poor ovarian response. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Sep;1205:199-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05665.x.
- Background: PubMed 17253503Shanbhag S, Aucott L, Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MA, McTavish AR. Interventions for 'poor responders' to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD004379. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004379.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 14380378STEIN IF Sr. The management of bilateral polycystic ovaries. Fertil Steril. 1955 May-Jun;6(3):189-205. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)31980-x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22696324Farquhar C, Brown J, Marjoribanks J. Laparoscopic drilling by diathermy or laser for ovulation induction in anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD001122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001122.pub4.
- Background: PubMed 24082083Kawamura K, Cheng Y, Suzuki N, Deguchi M, Sato Y, Takae S, Ho CH, Kawamura N, Tamura M, Hashimoto S, Sugishita Y, Morimoto Y, Hosoi Y, Yoshioka N, Ishizuka B, Hsueh AJ. Hippo signaling disruption and Akt stimulation of ovarian follicles for infertility treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 22;110(43):17474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312830110. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 17889654Dong J, Feldmann G, Huang J, Wu S, Zhang N, Comerford SA, Gayyed MF, Anders RA, Maitra A, Pan D. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell. 2007 Sep 21;130(6):1120-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.019.
- Background: PubMed 22260677Hergovich A. Mammalian Hippo signalling: a kinase network regulated by protein-protein interactions. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012 Feb;40(1):124-8. doi: 10.1042/BST20110619.
- Background: PubMed 20688325Maman E, Meirow D, Brengauz M, Raanani H, Dor J, Hourvitz A. Luteal phase oocyte retrieval and in vitro maturation is an optional procedure for urgent fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jan;95(1):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.064. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
- Background: PubMed 21695516Li J, Xu Y, Zhou G, Guo J, Xin N. Natural cycle IVF/IVM may be more desirable for poor responder patients after failure of stimulated cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Sep;28(9):791-5. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9597-6. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
- Background: PubMed 21505041Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
Related trials for Infertility Female
RecruitingObservational study
Safety and Efficacy of Corifollitropin Alfa N02 Injection in Elderly Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)
Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Inherited Reproductive Disorders
Genetic Disorder, Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Biorepository in Participants Who Undergo OTC for Gonadotoxic Therapy
Acute Ovarian Failure, Infertility
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Linzagolix in Adenomyosis and Recurrent Implantation Failure
Adenomyosis of Uterus, Implantation Failure
Recruiting
225 IU Versus 300 IU Starting FSH Dose in PPOS for Good-Prognosis Women
Infertility (IVF Patients), Infertility Assisted Reproductive Technology
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ettie Maman, MD principal investigator
Sheba Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing In Vitro Maturation Procedure in people with Infertility Female, run by Sheba Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ettie Maman, MD (972526666451, ettiemaman@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of oocytes (time frame: 3 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02498210, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2019.