AzTrials
AzTrials

TendinopathyNCT02498795

Comparative Research Among 3 Action Protocol in Other to Approach Chronic Patellar Tendinopathy

A study testing Group of Dry Needling and Group of Electrolysis in people with Tendinopathy, run by Universidad de Zaragoza at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The accomplishment of a treatment with Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis of additional form to the accomplishment of eccentric exercise's program in patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy is more effective than the accomplishment of an additional treatment with dry needling or eccentric exercise's program… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years
Conditions the study is for
Tendinopathy
What is being tested?
Group of Dry Needling and Group of Electrolysis
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 Jan 2019to 2 May 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age understood between 18 and 40 years.
  • To practise any sport of habitual form.
  • Patients diagnosed of chronic patellar tendinopathy with a minimum of 3 months of evolution and with stable symptomatology.
  • Pain to the palpation of the tendon in the low pole of the knee and during the training or competition.
  • Punctuation of the questionnaire VISA-P under 80.

Who cannot join

  • Patient had an operation on the knee affected in the last 6 months.
  • Infiltrations in the knee affected in the last 3 months.
  • Patient who has received pharmacological treatment or physical therapy in the last 48 hours.
  • Pathology with less than 3 months of evolution.
  • To present bilateral chronic tendinopathy.
  • Punctuation of the questionnaire major or equal Visa - p of 80.
  • Inability to apply someone of the techniques of treatment or valuation for absolute or relative contraindication.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Universidad San Jorge

    Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, 50830

Other trials in Spain

About this study

The accomplishment of a treatment with Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis of additional form to the accomplishment of eccentric exercise's program in patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy is more effective than the accomplishment of an additional treatment with dry needling or eccentric exercise's program realized of isolated form.

Read the detailed description

Experimental study randomized with double blind, whose purpose is to compare three protocols in those who apply different protocols of physical therapy to themselves in three groups of intervention with patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy.

There take part in this study young women of both sexes, of Zaragoza and of different sports clubs of entity 18 and 40 years, that they realize of habitual form (minimum 3 times a week) a sport. All of them present chronic patellar tendinopathy.

Conditions
Tendinopathy
Being tested
Group of Dry Needling, Group of Electrolysis, Control Group
Keywords
Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis, Dry needling, Eccentric exercise, Patella
Medical subject headings
Tendinopathy, Patella Fracture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Group of Dry NeedlingOther

    Every group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day.

  • Group of ElectrolysisOther

    Every group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day.

  • Control GroupOther

    Every group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day.

Study groups in NCT02498795
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group of Dry NeedlingActive comparatorThey will receive a treatment of dry needling with ultrasound scan together with a treatment in which they will realize eccentric exercise's program that the patient will have to realize in his domicile. The needle will get in the relevant zone of treatment. The punction will be realized using the technique of entry - Hong's rapid exit. Three punction will realize in the disabled zone of 3 seconds of duration.
Receives: Other: Group of Dry Needling
Group of electrolysisActive comparatorThey will receive a treatment of Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis with ultrasound scan together with a treatment in which they will realize eccentric exercise's program that the patient will have to realize in his domicile. The needle will get in the relevant zone of treatment. An intensity of 3 milliampere will be in use, during 3 seconds and one will repeat 3 times.
Receives: Other: Group of Electrolysis
Control GroupPlacebo comparatorThey will receive a treatment of punction placebo with ultrasound scan together with a treatment in the one that will realize eccentric exercise's program that the patient will have to realize in his domicile.
Receives: Other: Control Group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in functionality at 8 weeks as measured by Visa-p

    This scale consists of eight questions, the first six questions of which employ an analogical visual scale in order to assign a score of 0 to 10, where 10 represents the optimum state, for the purpose of quantifying pain and function in different activities, whereas the last two questions assess the level of functionality and ability to perform physical activity.

    Measured: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Pain, as measured by Visual Analog Scale

    Participants will be explained that a score of 0 indicates the absence of pain whereas a score of 10 represents the maximum tolerable pain

    Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

  2. Quality of life by SF-36

    Health Survey

    Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

  3. Thickness of the tendon, as measured by ultrasound scan

    Tendon structure

    Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

  4. Height of the jump

    Jump test with a force platform

    Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

  5. Concentric force of the low members

    Jump test with a force platform

    Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

  6. Speed of the jump

    Jump test with a force platform

    Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

  7. Hypervascularity, as measured by ultrasound scan

    Tendon structure

    Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks

  8. Functionality, as measured by Visa-p

    This scale consists of eight questions, the first six questions of which employ an analogical visual scale in order to assign a score of 0 to 10, where 10 represents the optimum state, for the purpose of quantifying pain and function in different activities, whereas the last two questions assess the level of functionality and ability to perform physical activity.

    Measured: 0 and 20 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion2 May 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02498795
Sponsor's protocol ID
P115/0017
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
6 Jun 2015
Last updated
4 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Lopez-Royo MP, Rios-Diaz J, Galan-Diaz RM, Herrero P, Gomez-Trullen EM. A Comparative Study of Treatment Interventions for Patellar Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 May;102(5):967-975. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.073. Epub 2021 Feb 6.

    PubMed 33556350
  • Lopez-Royo MP, Gomez-Trullen EM, Ortiz-Lucas M, Galan-Diaz RM, Bataller-Cervero AV, Al-Boloushi Z, Hamam-Alcober Y, Herrero P. Comparative study of treatment interventions for patellar tendinopathy: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 16;10(2):e034304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034304.

    PubMed 32066608

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Group of Dry Needling and Group of Electrolysis in people with Tendinopathy, run by Universidad de Zaragoza at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in functionality at 8 weeks as measured by Visa-p (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02498795, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in