TendinopathyNCT02498795
Comparative Research Among 3 Action Protocol in Other to Approach Chronic Patellar Tendinopathy
A study testing Group of Dry Needling and Group of Electrolysis in people with Tendinopathy, run by Universidad de Zaragoza at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The accomplishment of a treatment with Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis of additional form to the accomplishment of eccentric exercise's program in patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy is more effective than the accomplishment of an additional treatment with dry needling or eccentric exercise's program… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tendinopathy
- What is being tested?
- Group of Dry Needling and Group of Electrolysis
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 2 May 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age understood between 18 and 40 years.
- To practise any sport of habitual form.
- Patients diagnosed of chronic patellar tendinopathy with a minimum of 3 months of evolution and with stable symptomatology.
- Pain to the palpation of the tendon in the low pole of the knee and during the training or competition.
- Punctuation of the questionnaire VISA-P under 80.
Who cannot join
- Patient had an operation on the knee affected in the last 6 months.
- Infiltrations in the knee affected in the last 3 months.
- Patient who has received pharmacological treatment or physical therapy in the last 48 hours.
- Pathology with less than 3 months of evolution.
- To present bilateral chronic tendinopathy.
- Punctuation of the questionnaire major or equal Visa - p of 80.
- Inability to apply someone of the techniques of treatment or valuation for absolute or relative contraindication.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The accomplishment of a treatment with Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis of additional form to the accomplishment of eccentric exercise's program in patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy is more effective than the accomplishment of an additional treatment with dry needling or eccentric exercise's program realized of isolated form.
Read the detailed description
Experimental study randomized with double blind, whose purpose is to compare three protocols in those who apply different protocols of physical therapy to themselves in three groups of intervention with patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy.
There take part in this study young women of both sexes, of Zaragoza and of different sports clubs of entity 18 and 40 years, that they realize of habitual form (minimum 3 times a week) a sport. All of them present chronic patellar tendinopathy.
- Conditions
- Tendinopathy
- Being tested
- Group of Dry Needling, Group of Electrolysis, Control Group
- Keywords
- Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis, Dry needling, Eccentric exercise, Patella
- Medical subject headings
- Tendinopathy, Patella Fracture
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group of Dry NeedlingOther
Every group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day.
Group of ElectrolysisOther
Every group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day.
Control GroupOther
Every group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group of Dry Needling | Active comparator | They will receive a treatment of dry needling with ultrasound scan together with a treatment in which they will realize eccentric exercise's program that the patient will have to realize in his domicile.
The needle will get in the relevant zone of treatment. The punction will be realized using the technique of entry - Hong's rapid exit. Three punction will realize in the disabled zone of 3 seconds of duration. Receives: Other: Group of Dry Needling |
| Group of electrolysis | Active comparator | They will receive a treatment of Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis with ultrasound scan together with a treatment in which they will realize eccentric exercise's program that the patient will have to realize in his domicile.
The needle will get in the relevant zone of treatment. An intensity of 3 milliampere will be in use, during 3 seconds and one will repeat 3 times. Receives: Other: Group of Electrolysis |
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | They will receive a treatment of punction placebo with ultrasound scan together with a treatment in the one that will realize eccentric exercise's program that the patient will have to realize in his domicile. Receives: Other: Control Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in functionality at 8 weeks as measured by Visa-p
This scale consists of eight questions, the first six questions of which employ an analogical visual scale in order to assign a score of 0 to 10, where 10 represents the optimum state, for the purpose of quantifying pain and function in different activities, whereas the last two questions assess the level of functionality and ability to perform physical activity.
Measured: 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
Pain, as measured by Visual Analog Scale
Participants will be explained that a score of 0 indicates the absence of pain whereas a score of 10 represents the maximum tolerable pain
Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Quality of life by SF-36
Health Survey
Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Thickness of the tendon, as measured by ultrasound scan
Tendon structure
Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Height of the jump
Jump test with a force platform
Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Concentric force of the low members
Jump test with a force platform
Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Speed of the jump
Jump test with a force platform
Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Hypervascularity, as measured by ultrasound scan
Tendon structure
Measured: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Functionality, as measured by Visa-p
This scale consists of eight questions, the first six questions of which employ an analogical visual scale in order to assign a score of 0 to 10, where 10 represents the optimum state, for the purpose of quantifying pain and function in different activities, whereas the last two questions assess the level of functionality and ability to perform physical activity.
Measured: 0 and 20 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2019
- Study completion2 May 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TendinopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de Zaragoza
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidad San Jorge
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maria Pilar López Royo, Universidad de Zaragoza
- Investigators
- Eva Gómez-Trullén, PhD, Study director, Universidad de ZaragozaPablo Herrero, PhD, Study director, Universidad San Jorge
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02498795
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P115/0017
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Lopez-Royo MP, Rios-Diaz J, Galan-Diaz RM, Herrero P, Gomez-Trullen EM. A Comparative Study of Treatment Interventions for Patellar Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 May;102(5):967-975. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.073. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
PubMed 33556350Lopez-Royo MP, Gomez-Trullen EM, Ortiz-Lucas M, Galan-Diaz RM, Bataller-Cervero AV, Al-Boloushi Z, Hamam-Alcober Y, Herrero P. Comparative study of treatment interventions for patellar tendinopathy: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 16;10(2):e034304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034304.
PubMed 32066608
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Research Among 3 Action Protocol in Other to Approach Chronic Patellar Tendinopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02498795
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P115/0017
- Conditions
- Tendinopathy
- Keywords
- Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis, Dry needling, Eccentric exercise, Patella
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de ZaragozaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidad San Jorge
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The accomplishment of a treatment with Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis of additional form to the accomplishment of eccentric exercise's program in patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy is more effective than the accomplishment of an additional treatment with dry needling or eccentric exercise's program realized of isolated form.
Detailed description
Experimental study randomized with double blind, whose purpose is to compare three protocols in those who apply different protocols of physical therapy to themselves in three groups of intervention with patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy.
There take part in this study young women of both sexes, of Zaragoza and of different sports clubs of entity 18 and 40 years, that they realize of habitual form (minimum 3 times a week) a sport. All of them present chronic patellar tendinopathy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group of Dry Needling | Active comparator | Other: Group of Dry NeedlingThey will receive a treatment of dry needling with ultrasound scan together with a treatment in which they will realize eccentric exercise's program that the patient will have to realize in his domicile. The needle will get in the relevant zone of treatment. The punction will be realized using the technique of entry - Hong's rapid exit. Three punction will realize in the disabled zone of 3 seconds of duration. |
| Group of electrolysis | Active comparator | Other: Group of ElectrolysisThey will receive a treatment of Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis with ultrasound scan together with a treatment in which they will realize eccentric exercise's program that the patient will have to realize in his domicile. The needle will get in the relevant zone of treatment. An intensity of 3 milliampere will be in use, during 3 seconds and one will repeat 3 times. |
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | Other: Control GroupThey will receive a treatment of punction placebo with ultrasound scan together with a treatment in the one that will realize eccentric exercise's program that the patient will have to realize in his domicile. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age understood between 18 and 40 years.
- To practise any sport of habitual form.
- Patients diagnosed of chronic patellar tendinopathy with a minimum of 3 months of evolution and with stable symptomatology.
- Pain to the palpation of the tendon in the low pole of the knee and during the training or competition.
- Punctuation of the questionnaire VISA-P under 80.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient had an operation on the knee affected in the last 6 months.
- Infiltrations in the knee affected in the last 3 months.
- Patient who has received pharmacological treatment or physical therapy in the last 48 hours.
- Pathology with less than 3 months of evolution.
- To present bilateral chronic tendinopathy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group of Dry NeedlingEvery group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day. | Other | Group of Dry Needling |
| Group of ElectrolysisEvery group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day. | Other | Group of electrolysis |
| Control GroupEvery group will receive a total of 4 treatment distributed throughout 8 weeks of treatment. The program of eccentric exercises that will have to realize it in his domicile every day. | Other | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in functionality at 8 weeks as measured by Visa-p
Time frame: 8 weeks
This scale consists of eight questions, the first six questions of which employ an analogical visual scale in order to assign a score of 0 to 10, where 10 represents the optimum state, for the purpose of quantifying pain and function in different activities, whereas the last two questions assess the level of functionality and ability to perform physical activity.
8 secondary outcomes
Pain, as measured by Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Quality of life by SF-36
Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Thickness of the tendon, as measured by ultrasound scan
Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Height of the jump
Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Concentric force of the low members
Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Speed of the jump
Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Hypervascularity, as measured by ultrasound scan
Time frame: 0, 8 and 20 weeks
Functionality, as measured by Visa-p
Time frame: 0 and 20 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Dec 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33556350Lopez-Royo MP, Rios-Diaz J, Galan-Diaz RM, Herrero P, Gomez-Trullen EM. A Comparative Study of Treatment Interventions for Patellar Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 May;102(5):967-975. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.073. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32066608Lopez-Royo MP, Gomez-Trullen EM, Ortiz-Lucas M, Galan-Diaz RM, Bataller-Cervero AV, Al-Boloushi Z, Hamam-Alcober Y, Herrero P. Comparative study of treatment interventions for patellar tendinopathy: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 16;10(2):e034304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034304.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Tendinopathy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Investigation of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Patients With Elbow Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis, Medial Epicondylitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Natural History of Shoulder Pathology in Manual Wheelchair Users
Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of Cyriax Approach With and Without Mobilization With Movement in Shoulder Restriction With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Recruiting
A Comparison of the Effects of Combining ESWT With Blood Flow Restriction Therapy in Patients Diagnosed With Lateral Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eva Gómez-Trullén, PhD study director
Universidad de Zaragoza
Pablo Herrero, PhD study director
Universidad San Jorge
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Group of Dry Needling and Group of Electrolysis in people with Tendinopathy, run by Universidad de Zaragoza at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in functionality at 8 weeks as measured by Visa-p (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02498795, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2020.