Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain InjuryPhase 2/3HemenNCT02499393
Hypothermia Enhanced by Magnesium Sulphate
A Phase 2/3 study testing Magnesium Sulfate in people with Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain Injury, run by Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
New 2010 neonatal resuscitation guidelines state that offering therapeutic hypothermia (TH) should be a standard of care in managing neonates with perinatal hypoxic - ischemic insult and present with signs of moderate and/or severe hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) . Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 hour to 6 hours
- Conditions the study is for
- Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain Injury
- What is being tested?
- Magnesium Sulfate
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- Apr 2010to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 hour to 6 hours
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Group A Infants > 36.0 weeks gestation with at least ONE of the following: for gestational age also use clinical assessment
- Apgar score of less than or equal to ≤5 at 10 (ten) minutes after birth
- continued need for resuscitation, including endotracheal or mask ventilation, at 10min after birth
- acidosis defined as either umbilical cord pH or any arterial, venous or capillary pH within 60 min of birth less than (<) pH 7.00
- base deficit greater than or equal to (≥) 16 mmol/L in umbilical cord blood sample or any blood sample within 60 minutes of birth (arterial or venous blood)
- Group B Newborn with moderate or severe encephalopathy with varying states of consciousness: lethargy, stupor, or coma and
Show all 12Show fewer
- One or more of below:
- hypotonia
- abnormal reflexes : oculomotor / pupillary
- suck: weak / absent
- clinical seizures - clinically confirmed
- Group C integrated electroencephalogram (aEEG / CFM) (lasting at least 20 minutes), which indicates either a moderate / serious abnormalities in the background activity aEEG (a score of 2 or 3) or convulsions attacks.
Who cannot join
- major congenital maformation
- extremely poor prognosis : Apgar score 0 @ 15 minutes of life
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Poland1 site
Polish Mother Memorial Hospital - Research Instutiute
Lodz, 93-338
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Two Method of Therapeutic Hypothermia Enhanced by Magnesium Sulphate in Neonatal Encephalopathy
New 2010 neonatal resuscitation guidelines state that offering therapeutic hypothermia (TH) should be a standard of care in managing neonates with perinatal hypoxic - ischemic insult and present with signs of moderate and/or severe hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) . Despite the evidence from several randomized control trial (RCT) proving its effectiveness, its effect is perceived insufficient or only modest. Thus today's research efforts are directed toward finding the new possibilities of enhancing the effects of hypothermia. List of agents with potential neuroprotective properties includes: erythropoetin, melatonin, topiramate, morphine, xenon, MgSO4. Given investigators previous experiences with preterm neonates exposed to MgSO4 prenatally or administered this drug after birth because of perinatal asphyxia, the investigators designed the trial which would evaluate the possibility of increasing the TH effect by combining this method with MgSO4. Until now there are several published studies evaluating the effectiveness of MgSO4 in the group of asphyxiated neonates, including one RCT. However, all of these studies were conducted before the era of TH Furthermore, irrespective of the potential benefits, safety of using MgSO4 during TH in the group of term neonates was not studied. It is particularly important in the light of the results presented by Mittendorf et.al. They studied the effects of prenatal aggressive treatment with MgSO4 on the outcome of preterm neonates showed that patients exposed to high doses of MgSO4 were at higher risk of severe intracranial bleeding. Other side effects of high serum magnesium levels are: vasodilatation, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, coagulopathy, and gastrointestinal disturbances. MgSO4 is a very attractive neuroprotective option,also because of its easy availability. Drug can be administered in the birth hospital while neonate is being prepared for the transport to TH center. Timing of the intervention is very important for neonates suffering from perinatal asphyxia. Both TH and administration of potentially neuroprotective drug should be started during "therapeutic window". It is the initial potentially reversible phase of hypoxic insult lasting about 6 hours. If the long-term follow up shows that MgSO4 has an additive neuroprotective effect and no significant side effects in the group of asphyxiated neonates treated with TH this relatively simple and not expensive intervention may be introduced into clinical practice
Read the detailed description
First decade of the twenty first century is an era when the therapeutic hypothermia became a widely used procedure in managing neonates with hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy. New 2010 neonatal resuscitation guidelines state that offering therapeutic hypothermia should be a standard of care in managing neonates who sustained perinatal hypoxic - ischemic insult and present with signs of moderate and/or severe hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy. Despite the evidence coming from several randomized controlled trials proving its effectiveness, in certain situations its effect is perceived insufficient or only modest at best. For this reason today's research efforts are directed toward finding the new possibilities of enhancing the effects of hypothermia. Some these new modalities are: modification of the hypothermia protocol, hypothermia combined with drugs which have a potential to be neuro-protective, and finally stem cell therapy. List of medications/substances with potential neuro - protective properties includes: erythropoetin, melatonin, topiramate, morphine, xenon, magnesium sulfate. Given investigators previous experiences with group of preterm neonates who were either exposed to magnesium sulfate prenatally or administered this drug after birth because of perinatal asphyxia, it was only natural to design the trial which would evaluate the possibility of increasing the effect of therapeutic hypothermia by combining this modality with administration of magnesium sulfate. Before the era of inhaled NO magnesium sulfate was widely used in the management of neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of neonates (PPHN), but then the level in the serum was kept in the high range (3,5 - 5,5 mmol/L). Until now there are several published studies evaluating the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate in the group of asphyxiated neonates, including one randomized controlled trial. Results are promising. However, all of these studies were conducted before the era of therapeutic hypothermia. Furthermore, irrespective of the potential benefits, safety of using magnesium sulfate during therapeutic hypothermia in the group of term and late preterm neonates was not studied. It is particularly important in the light of the results presented by Mittendorf et.al. They studied the effects of prenatal aggressive treatment with magnesium sulfate on the outcome of the neonates born with very low birth weight and showed that patients exposed to high doses of magnesium were at higher risk for developing severe intracranial bleeding. Other known side effects of high serum magnesium levels are: vasodilatation, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, coagulopathy, and gastrointestinal disturbances. Magnesium sulfate is a very attractive option as a neuroprotective drug also because of its easy availability. Drug can be administered to the patient in the birth hospital while neonate is being prepared for the transport to the center with therapeutic hypothermia. Timing of the intervention is very important in the management of the neonates suffering from perinatal asphyxia. Both, therapeutic hypothermia, as well as administration of potentially neuroprotective drug should be started during so called "therapeutic window". It is the initial potentially reversible phase of hypoxic insult lasting about 6 hours followed by the irreversible phase of apoptosis and destruction of neurons. If the long terms follow up shows that magnesium sulfate has an additive neuroprotective effect and no significant side effects in the group of asphyxiated neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia this relatively simple and not expensive intervention may be introduced into clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain Injury
- Being tested
- Magnesium Sulfate
- Keywords
- newborn, therapeutic hypothermia, magnesium sulphate
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Magnesium SulfateDrug
Also called Magnesii Sulfurici 20% Polpharma
intravenous infusion of magnesium sulphate
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TH+MgSO4 | Experimental | Therapeutic hypothermia plus magnesium sulphate intravenous infusion Neonates who were randomized to the study group (TH+MgSO4) received three 250 mg/kg doses of magnesium sulfate given as one - hour continuous infusion spaced 24 hours apart on three consecutive days. 20% Magnesium Sulfuricum (Polpharma), 2 g /10 ml were used. Receives: Drug: Magnesium Sulfate |
| TH- therapeutic hypothermia | No intervention | therapeutic hypothermia without magnesium sulphate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Death
Measured: until discharge (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay @ hypothermia center, an expected up to 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Neurological status
according to Thompson scale (Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy score)
Measured: 1-7 DOL
Neurological status
the long-term evaluation of psychomotor development according to the scale BAYLEY III
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2010
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionDec 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Poznan University of Medical Sciences
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ewa Gulczynska, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Instutute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02499393
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PolishMMHRI
- Acronym
- Hemen
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 1 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Merchant N, Azzopardi D. Early predictors of outcome in infants treated with hypothermia for hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Apr;57 Suppl 3:8-16. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12726.
PubMed 25800487Gulczynska EM, Gadzinowski J, Kesiak M, Sobolewska B, Caputa J, Maczko A, Walas W, Cedrowska-Adamus W, Talar T. Therapeutic hypothermia in asphyxiated newborns: selective head cooling vs. whole body cooling - comparison of short term outcomes. Ginekol Pol. 2019;90(7):403-410. doi: 10.5603/GP.2019.0069.
PubMed 31392710
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Two Method of Therapeutic Hypothermia Enhanced by Magnesium Sulphate in Neonatal Encephalopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02499393
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Hemen / PolishMMHRI
- Conditions
- Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain Injury
- Keywords
- newborn, therapeutic hypothermia, magnesium sulphate
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Poznan University of Medical Sciences
- Study start
- Apr 2010
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
New 2010 neonatal resuscitation guidelines state that offering therapeutic hypothermia (TH) should be a standard of care in managing neonates with perinatal hypoxic - ischemic insult and present with signs of moderate and/or severe hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) . Despite the evidence from several randomized control trial (RCT) proving its effectiveness, its effect is perceived insufficient or only modest. Thus today's research efforts are directed toward finding the new possibilities of enhancing the effects of hypothermia. List of agents with potential neuroprotective properties includes: erythropoetin, melatonin, topiramate, morphine, xenon, MgSO4. Given investigators previous experiences with preterm neonates exposed to MgSO4 prenatally or administered this drug after birth because of perinatal asphyxia, the investigators designed the trial which would evaluate the possibility of increasing the TH effect by combining this method with MgSO4. Until now there are several published studies evaluating the effectiveness of MgSO4 in the group of asphyxiated neonates, including one RCT. However, all of these studies were conducted before the era of TH Furthermore, irrespective of the potential benefits, safety of using MgSO4 during TH in the group of term neonates was not studied. It is particularly important in the light of the results presented by Mittendorf et.al. They studied the effects of prenatal aggressive treatment with MgSO4 on the outcome of preterm neonates showed that patients exposed to high doses of MgSO4 were at higher risk of severe intracranial bleeding. Other side effects of high serum magnesium levels are: vasodilatation, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, coagulopathy, and gastrointestinal disturbances. MgSO4 is a very attractive neuroprotective option,also because of its easy availability. Drug can be administered in the birth hospital while neonate is being prepared for the transport to TH center. Timing of the intervention is very important for neonates suffering from perinatal asphyxia. Both TH and administration of potentially neuroprotective drug should be started during "therapeutic window". It is the initial potentially reversible phase of hypoxic insult lasting about 6 hours. If the long-term follow up shows that MgSO4 has an additive neuroprotective effect and no significant side effects in the group of asphyxiated neonates treated with TH this relatively simple and not expensive intervention may be introduced into clinical practice
Detailed description
First decade of the twenty first century is an era when the therapeutic hypothermia became a widely used procedure in managing neonates with hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy. New 2010 neonatal resuscitation guidelines state that offering therapeutic hypothermia should be a standard of care in managing neonates who sustained perinatal hypoxic - ischemic insult and present with signs of moderate and/or severe hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy. Despite the evidence coming from several randomized controlled trials proving its effectiveness, in certain situations its effect is perceived insufficient or only modest at best. For this reason today's research efforts are directed toward finding the new possibilities of enhancing the effects of hypothermia. Some these new modalities are: modification of the hypothermia protocol, hypothermia combined with drugs which have a potential to be neuro-protective, and finally stem cell therapy. List of medications/substances with potential neuro - protective properties includes: erythropoetin, melatonin, topiramate, morphine, xenon, magnesium sulfate. Given investigators previous experiences with group of preterm neonates who were either exposed to magnesium sulfate prenatally or administered this drug after birth because of perinatal asphyxia, it was only natural to design the trial which would evaluate the possibility of increasing the effect of therapeutic hypothermia by combining this modality with administration of magnesium sulfate. Before the era of inhaled NO magnesium sulfate was widely used in the management of neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of neonates (PPHN), but then the level in the serum was kept in the high range (3,5 - 5,5 mmol/L). Until now there are several published studies evaluating the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate in the group of asphyxiated neonates, including one randomized controlled trial. Results are promising. However, all of these studies were conducted before the era of therapeutic hypothermia. Furthermore, irrespective of the potential benefits, safety of using magnesium sulfate during therapeutic hypothermia in the group of term and late preterm neonates was not studied. It is particularly important in the light of the results presented by Mittendorf et.al. They studied the effects of prenatal aggressive treatment with magnesium sulfate on the outcome of the neonates born with very low birth weight and showed that patients exposed to high doses of magnesium were at higher risk for developing severe intracranial bleeding. Other known side effects of high serum magnesium levels are: vasodilatation, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, coagulopathy, and gastrointestinal disturbances. Magnesium sulfate is a very attractive option as a neuroprotective drug also because of its easy availability. Drug can be administered to the patient in the birth hospital while neonate is being prepared for the transport to the center with therapeutic hypothermia. Timing of the intervention is very important in the management of the neonates suffering from perinatal asphyxia. Both, therapeutic hypothermia, as well as administration of potentially neuroprotective drug should be started during so called "therapeutic window". It is the initial potentially reversible phase of hypoxic insult lasting about 6 hours followed by the irreversible phase of apoptosis and destruction of neurons. If the long terms follow up shows that magnesium sulfate has an additive neuroprotective effect and no significant side effects in the group of asphyxiated neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia this relatively simple and not expensive intervention may be introduced into clinical practice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TH+MgSO4 | Experimental | Drug: Magnesium SulfateTherapeutic hypothermia plus magnesium sulphate intravenous infusion Neonates who were randomized to the study group (TH+MgSO4) received three 250 mg/kg doses of magnesium sulfate given as one - hour continuous infusion spaced 24 hours apart on three consecutive days. 20% Magnesium Sulfuricum (Polpharma), 2 g /10 ml were used. |
| TH- therapeutic hypothermia | No intervention | –therapeutic hypothermia without magnesium sulphate |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 hour to 6 hours
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Group A Infants > 36.0 weeks gestation with at least ONE of the following: for gestational age also use clinical assessment
- Apgar score of less than or equal to ≤5 at 10 (ten) minutes after birth
- continued need for resuscitation, including endotracheal or mask ventilation, at 10min after birth
- acidosis defined as either umbilical cord pH or any arterial, venous or capillary pH within 60 min of birth less than (<) pH 7.00
- base deficit greater than or equal to (≥) 16 mmol/L in umbilical cord blood sample or any blood sample within 60 minutes of birth (arterial or venous blood)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- major congenital maformation
- extremely poor prognosis : Apgar score 0 @ 15 minutes of life
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Magnesium SulfateAlso: Magnesii Sulfurici 20% Polpharmaintravenous infusion of magnesium sulphate | Drug | TH+MgSO4 |
Primary outcome
Death
Time frame: until discharge (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay @ hypothermia center, an expected up to 4 weeks
2 secondary outcomes
Neurological status
Time frame: 1-7 DOL
Neurological status
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2015.
- Background: PubMed 25800487Merchant N, Azzopardi D. Early predictors of outcome in infants treated with hypothermia for hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Apr;57 Suppl 3:8-16. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12726.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31392710Gulczynska EM, Gadzinowski J, Kesiak M, Sobolewska B, Caputa J, Maczko A, Walas W, Cedrowska-Adamus W, Talar T. Therapeutic hypothermia in asphyxiated newborns: selective head cooling vs. whole body cooling - comparison of short term outcomes. Ginekol Pol. 2019;90(7):403-410. doi: 10.5603/GP.2019.0069.
Related trials for Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Mesenchymal Stem Cells With Cooling Therapy for Infants With Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy
Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy, Neonatal, Brain Injuries, Hypoxic-Ischemic
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Intranasal AAV9-PHP.eB Gene Therapy in Cerebral Palsy (CP) & Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE)
Hypoxic Brain Damage, Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy (HIE)
RecruitingObservational study
Biomarkers Study in Infants With Prior Neonatal Brain Injury
HIE - Hypoxic - Ischemic Encephalopathy, Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Dexmedetomidine Versus Morphine During Cooling Therapy in Neonates
Hypoxic Ischemic Brain Injury, Neonatal Encephalopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ewa Gulczynska, MD PhD principal investigator
Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Instutute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Magnesium Sulfate in people with Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain Injury, run by Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Death (time frame: until discharge (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay @ hypothermia center, an expected up to 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02499393, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2015.