AzTrials
AzTrials

Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain InjuryPhase 2/3HemenNCT02499393

Hypothermia Enhanced by Magnesium Sulphate

A Phase 2/3 study testing Magnesium Sulfate in people with Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain Injury, run by Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

New 2010 neonatal resuscitation guidelines state that offering therapeutic hypothermia (TH) should be a standard of care in managing neonates with perinatal hypoxic - ischemic insult and present with signs of moderate and/or severe hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 hour to 6 hours
Conditions the study is for
Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain Injury
What is being tested?
Magnesium Sulfate
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
75 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
Apr 2010to Dec 2014
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 hour to 6 hours
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Group A Infants > 36.0 weeks gestation with at least ONE of the following: for gestational age also use clinical assessment
  • Apgar score of less than or equal to ≤5 at 10 (ten) minutes after birth
  • continued need for resuscitation, including endotracheal or mask ventilation, at 10min after birth
  • acidosis defined as either umbilical cord pH or any arterial, venous or capillary pH within 60 min of birth less than (<) pH 7.00
  • base deficit greater than or equal to (≥) 16 mmol/L in umbilical cord blood sample or any blood sample within 60 minutes of birth (arterial or venous blood)
  • Group B Newborn with moderate or severe encephalopathy with varying states of consciousness: lethargy, stupor, or coma and
Show all 12Show fewer
  • One or more of below:
  • hypotonia
  • abnormal reflexes : oculomotor / pupillary
  • suck: weak / absent
  • clinical seizures - clinically confirmed
  • Group C integrated electroencephalogram (aEEG / CFM) (lasting at least 20 minutes), which indicates either a moderate / serious abnormalities in the background activity aEEG (a score of 2 or 3) or convulsions attacks.

Who cannot join

  • major congenital maformation
  • extremely poor prognosis : Apgar score 0 @ 15 minutes of life

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Polish Mother Memorial Hospital - Research Instutiute

    Lodz, 93-338

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Two Method of Therapeutic Hypothermia Enhanced by Magnesium Sulphate in Neonatal Encephalopathy

New 2010 neonatal resuscitation guidelines state that offering therapeutic hypothermia (TH) should be a standard of care in managing neonates with perinatal hypoxic - ischemic insult and present with signs of moderate and/or severe hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) . Despite the evidence from several randomized control trial (RCT) proving its effectiveness, its effect is perceived insufficient or only modest. Thus today's research efforts are directed toward finding the new possibilities of enhancing the effects of hypothermia. List of agents with potential neuroprotective properties includes: erythropoetin, melatonin, topiramate, morphine, xenon, MgSO4. Given investigators previous experiences with preterm neonates exposed to MgSO4 prenatally or administered this drug after birth because of perinatal asphyxia, the investigators designed the trial which would evaluate the possibility of increasing the TH effect by combining this method with MgSO4. Until now there are several published studies evaluating the effectiveness of MgSO4 in the group of asphyxiated neonates, including one RCT. However, all of these studies were conducted before the era of TH Furthermore, irrespective of the potential benefits, safety of using MgSO4 during TH in the group of term neonates was not studied. It is particularly important in the light of the results presented by Mittendorf et.al. They studied the effects of prenatal aggressive treatment with MgSO4 on the outcome of preterm neonates showed that patients exposed to high doses of MgSO4 were at higher risk of severe intracranial bleeding. Other side effects of high serum magnesium levels are: vasodilatation, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, coagulopathy, and gastrointestinal disturbances. MgSO4 is a very attractive neuroprotective option,also because of its easy availability. Drug can be administered in the birth hospital while neonate is being prepared for the transport to TH center. Timing of the intervention is very important for neonates suffering from perinatal asphyxia. Both TH and administration of potentially neuroprotective drug should be started during "therapeutic window". It is the initial potentially reversible phase of hypoxic insult lasting about 6 hours. If the long-term follow up shows that MgSO4 has an additive neuroprotective effect and no significant side effects in the group of asphyxiated neonates treated with TH this relatively simple and not expensive intervention may be introduced into clinical practice

Read the detailed description

First decade of the twenty first century is an era when the therapeutic hypothermia became a widely used procedure in managing neonates with hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy. New 2010 neonatal resuscitation guidelines state that offering therapeutic hypothermia should be a standard of care in managing neonates who sustained perinatal hypoxic - ischemic insult and present with signs of moderate and/or severe hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy. Despite the evidence coming from several randomized controlled trials proving its effectiveness, in certain situations its effect is perceived insufficient or only modest at best. For this reason today's research efforts are directed toward finding the new possibilities of enhancing the effects of hypothermia. Some these new modalities are: modification of the hypothermia protocol, hypothermia combined with drugs which have a potential to be neuro-protective, and finally stem cell therapy. List of medications/substances with potential neuro - protective properties includes: erythropoetin, melatonin, topiramate, morphine, xenon, magnesium sulfate. Given investigators previous experiences with group of preterm neonates who were either exposed to magnesium sulfate prenatally or administered this drug after birth because of perinatal asphyxia, it was only natural to design the trial which would evaluate the possibility of increasing the effect of therapeutic hypothermia by combining this modality with administration of magnesium sulfate. Before the era of inhaled NO magnesium sulfate was widely used in the management of neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of neonates (PPHN), but then the level in the serum was kept in the high range (3,5 - 5,5 mmol/L). Until now there are several published studies evaluating the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate in the group of asphyxiated neonates, including one randomized controlled trial. Results are promising. However, all of these studies were conducted before the era of therapeutic hypothermia. Furthermore, irrespective of the potential benefits, safety of using magnesium sulfate during therapeutic hypothermia in the group of term and late preterm neonates was not studied. It is particularly important in the light of the results presented by Mittendorf et.al. They studied the effects of prenatal aggressive treatment with magnesium sulfate on the outcome of the neonates born with very low birth weight and showed that patients exposed to high doses of magnesium were at higher risk for developing severe intracranial bleeding. Other known side effects of high serum magnesium levels are: vasodilatation, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, coagulopathy, and gastrointestinal disturbances. Magnesium sulfate is a very attractive option as a neuroprotective drug also because of its easy availability. Drug can be administered to the patient in the birth hospital while neonate is being prepared for the transport to the center with therapeutic hypothermia. Timing of the intervention is very important in the management of the neonates suffering from perinatal asphyxia. Both, therapeutic hypothermia, as well as administration of potentially neuroprotective drug should be started during so called "therapeutic window". It is the initial potentially reversible phase of hypoxic insult lasting about 6 hours followed by the irreversible phase of apoptosis and destruction of neurons. If the long terms follow up shows that magnesium sulfate has an additive neuroprotective effect and no significant side effects in the group of asphyxiated neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia this relatively simple and not expensive intervention may be introduced into clinical practice.

Being tested
Magnesium Sulfate
Keywords
newborn, therapeutic hypothermia, magnesium sulphate

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Magnesium SulfateDrug

    Also called Magnesii Sulfurici 20% Polpharma

    intravenous infusion of magnesium sulphate

Study groups in NCT02499393
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TH+MgSO4ExperimentalTherapeutic hypothermia plus magnesium sulphate intravenous infusion Neonates who were randomized to the study group (TH+MgSO4) received three 250 mg/kg doses of magnesium sulfate given as one - hour continuous infusion spaced 24 hours apart on three consecutive days. 20% Magnesium Sulfuricum (Polpharma), 2 g /10 ml were used.
Receives: Drug: Magnesium Sulfate
TH- therapeutic hypothermiaNo interventiontherapeutic hypothermia without magnesium sulphate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Death

    Measured: until discharge (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay @ hypothermia center, an expected up to 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Neurological status

    according to Thompson scale (Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy score)

    Measured: 1-7 DOL

  2. Neurological status

    the long-term evaluation of psychomotor development according to the scale BAYLEY III

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2010
  3. Primary completionApr 2013
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
75 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02499393
Sponsor's protocol ID
PolishMMHRI
Acronym
Hemen
Status last verified
Jul 2015
First submitted
1 Jul 2015
Last updated
16 Jul 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Merchant N, Azzopardi D. Early predictors of outcome in infants treated with hypothermia for hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Apr;57 Suppl 3:8-16. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12726.

    PubMed 25800487
  • Gulczynska EM, Gadzinowski J, Kesiak M, Sobolewska B, Caputa J, Maczko A, Walas W, Cedrowska-Adamus W, Talar T. Therapeutic hypothermia in asphyxiated newborns: selective head cooling vs. whole body cooling - comparison of short term outcomes. Ginekol Pol. 2019;90(7):403-410. doi: 10.5603/GP.2019.0069.

    PubMed 31392710

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Magnesium Sulfate in people with Perinatal Anoxic-ischemic Brain Injury, run by Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Death (time frame: until discharge (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay @ hypothermia center, an expected up to 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02499393, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in