DiabetesPhase 3DUAL™ VIIINCT02501161
A 104 Week Clinical Trial Comparing Long Term Glycaemic Control of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira) Versus Insulin Glargine Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
A Phase 3 study testing insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 143 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
This trial is conducted in Africa, Asia, Europe, North America and South America. The purpose is to compare long-term glycaemic control of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) in insulin naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with oral anti diabetics. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,012 participants
- Where
- 143 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 31 Jan 2016to 3 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female, age greater than or equal to 18 years at the time of signing informed consent
- Subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
- HbA1c 7.0-11.0% (both inclusive) (53-97 mmol/mol) by central laboratory analysis
- Body mass index greater than or equal to 20 kg/m^2
- Insulin naïve subjects; however short term insulin treatment for a maximum of 14 days prior to the day of screening is allowed, as is prior insulin treatment for gestational diabetes
- Stable daily dose(s) including any of the following antidiabetic drug(s)/regimens within 90 days prior to the day of screening: a) Biguanides (metformin greater than or equal to 1500 mg or maximum tolerated dose documented in the subject medical record), b) Other OAD(s) allowed: sulphonylurea, glinides, pioglitazone, and DPP4-inhibitors (greater than or equal to half of the maximum approved dose according to local label or maximum tolerated dose as documented in subjects medical record)
Who cannot join
- Screening calcitonin greater than or equal to 50 ng/L
- Renal impairment estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 as per CKD-EPI value to be defined as listed in the classification CKD-EPI using IDMS for serum creatinine measurement on the day of screening
- Impaired liver function, defined as ALAT or ASAT greater than or equal to 2.5 times upper limit of normal
- Family or personal history of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 or Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma
- History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic)
- Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 90 days before the day of screening
- Anticipated initiation or change in concomitant medications for more than 14 consecutive days or on a frequent basis known to affect weight or glucose metabolism (e.g. orlistat, thyroid hormones, corticosteroids)
Trial locations and contacts
143 sites in 16 countries.
143 sites in 16 countries
United States44 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Avon, Indiana, 46123
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Beaver, Pennsylvania, 15009
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bermuda Dunes, California, 92203
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Billings, Montana, 59101
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Blackfoot, Idaho, 83221
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Buckley, Michigan, 49620
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80910
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75251
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Fresno, California, 93720
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Glendale, Arizona, 85306-4652
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Glendale, Arizona, 85308
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77040
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Humboldt, Tennessee, 38343
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hyattsville, Maryland, 20782
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46254
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Irving, Texas, 75061-2210
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Katy, Texas, 77450
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kenosha, Wisconsin, 53142
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kenosha, Wisconsin, 53144
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Lake Worth, Florida, 33461
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Lancaster, California, 93534
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mason, Ohio, 45040-6815
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Maumee, Ohio, 43537
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Metairie, Louisiana, 70002
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33135
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Midlothian, Virginia, 23114
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Monterey, California, 93940
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Muscle Shoals, Alabama, 35662
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Nashua, New Hampshire, 03063
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
New Windsor, New York, 12553
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85020
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85050
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rockville, Maryland, 20852
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sacramento, California, 95821
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Spring Valley, California, 91978
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tuscumbia, Alabama, 35674
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ventura, California, 93003
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Waltham, Massachusetts, 02453
India13 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560054
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641018
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Delhi, New Delhi, 110002
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302006
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kolkata, West Bengal, 700020
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kolkata, West Bengal, 700107
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400058
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440015
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pune, Maharashtra, 411001
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pune, Maharashtra, 411040
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rohtak, Haryana, 124001
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500003
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 530002
South Africa11 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Alberton, 1449
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Brits, North West, 0250
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7700
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cosmo City, Gauteng, 2188
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4001
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4170
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
eMkhomazi, KwaZulu-Natal, 4170
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 1818
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0002
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0083
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0183
United Kingdom9 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Angus, DD8 2AS
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Coventry, CV2 2DX
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dudley, DY1 2HQ
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dundee, DD4 6QY
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Fife, KY14 6AW
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hull, HU3 2RW
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rotherham, S60 2UD
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Torquay, TQ2 7AA
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
Israel8 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Haifa, 35152
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Haifa
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Nahariya, 22100
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rishon LeZiyyon, 75650
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tel Aviv, 62038
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tel Aviv, 6789714
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tel HaShomer, 52621
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tsrifin, 70300
Norway8 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bodø, 8005
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hamar, 2317
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hoenefoss, 3515
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kløfta, 2040
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Lierskogen, 3420
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Oslo, 0424
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Stavanger, 4005
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tananger, 4056
Russia8 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Moscow, 119121
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Moscow, 119435
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Novosibirsk, 630117
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Penza, 440026
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 194354
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 194358
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 195213
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Stavropol, 355035
Turkey (Türkiye)8 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ankara, 06100
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bursa
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Istanbul, 34096
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Istanbul, 34390
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Istanbul, 34718
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Istanbul, 34899
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rize, 53020
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Samsun, 55139
Italy7 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bologna, 40138
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Catanzaro, 88100
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cittadella (PD), 35013
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Negrar (VR), 37024
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Palermo, 90129
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pavia, 27100
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Verona, 37126
Hungary5 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Budapest, 1106
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Budapest, H-1134
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dunaújváros, 2400
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kaposvár, 7400
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pécs, H-7624
Slovakia5 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Prievidza, 97101
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sabinov, 08301
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Trebišov, 07501
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Trenčín, 911 01
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Trnava, 91701
Argentina4 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1425AGC
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
CABA, C1179AAB
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Capital Federal, C1056ABJ
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mendoza, 5500
Czechia4 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pilsen, 30100
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pilsen, 32600
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Prague, 11694
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Prague, 140 46
Mexico4 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ciudad Madero, Tamaulipas, 89440
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62250
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Durango, 34000
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44600
Poland3 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bialystok, 15-276
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Gdansk, 80-858
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Zabrze, 41-800
Brazil2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, 90035-170
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01228-000
About this study
Official title: A Clinical Trial Comparing Long Term Glycaemic Control of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira) Versus Insulin Glargine Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
This trial is conducted in Africa, Asia, Europe, North America and South America. The purpose is to compare long-term glycaemic control of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) in insulin naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with oral anti diabetics.
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- insulin degludec/liraglutide, insulin glargine
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
insulin degludec/liraglutideDrug
Injected subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily for 104 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.
insulin glargineDrug
Injected subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily for 104 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin degludec/liraglutide QD + OAD(s) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: insulin degludec/liraglutide |
| insulin glargine QD + OAD(s) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: insulin glargine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time From Randomisation to Inadequate Glycaemic Control and Need for Treatment Intensification
Inadequate glycaemic control and need for treatment intensification was defined as a glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.0% or greater at 2 consecutive visits from week 26, including week 26 if HbA1c was greater than or equal to 7% at week 12. Time from randomisation to inadequate glycaemic control and need for treatment intensification was analysed using a stratified log-rank test where treatment, baseline HbA1c group and previous OAD treatment were included as strata in the model. The variable "baseline HbA1c group" was a dichotomised baseline HbA1c variable with 2 categories: HbA1c < 8.5% or HbA1c ≥ 8.5% and the variable "previous OAD treatment" was a categorical variable with 2 categories: SU ± OAD(s) (SU users) or OAD(s) (Non-SU users). 25%, median (50%) and 75% percentiles for the cumulative distribution function were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier survival function.
Measured: Weeks 0-104 + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2
Secondary outcomes (53)
Time From Randomisation to HbA1c >6.5% at 2 Consecutive Visits
Time to HbA1c > 6.5% at 2 consecutive visits is defined as time from randomization to HbA1c > 6.5% at 2 consecutive planned scheduled visits from week 26 (including week 26 if HbA1c was > 6.5% at week 12). Time from randomisation to HbA1c >6.5% at 2 consecutive visits was analysed using a stratified log-rank test where treatment, baseline HbA1c group and previous OAD treatment were included as strata in the model. The variable "baseline HbA1c group" was a dichotomised baseline HbA1c variable with 2 categories: HbA1c < 8.5% or HbA1c ≥ 8.5% and the variable "previous OAD treatment" was a categorical variable with 2 categories: SU ± OAD(s) (SU users) or OAD(s) (Non-SU users). 25%, median (50%) and 75% percentiles for the cumulative distribution function were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier survival function.
Measured: Weeks 0-104 + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2
Change in HbA1c
Change in HbA1c from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26
Change in Body Weight
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Insulin Dose
Insulin dose after 26 and 104 weeks of treatment is presented.
Measured: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0%
Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c <7.0% at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% Without Weight Gain
Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c <7.0% without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode that was severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c <7.0% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c < 7.0% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes and Without Weight Gain
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode that was severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c <7.0% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes and without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5%
Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Weight Gain
Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes and Without Weight Gain
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes and without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 26, week 104
Change in FPG
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
SMPG-9-point Profile (Individual Points in the Profile)
Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG)-9-point profile (individual points in the profile) at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 26, week 104
Change in SMPG-mean 9-point Profile
Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Change in SMPG-mean 9-point profile from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in SMPG-mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals
Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Change in SMPG-mean postprandial increment over all meals from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic)
Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting C-peptide
Change in fasting C-peptide (measured in nanomoles per liter [nmol/L]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting Human Insulin
Change in fasting human insulin (measured in picomoles per liter [pmol/L]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol
Change in fasting total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting LDL-cholesterol
Change in fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting HDL-cholesterol
Change in fasting high density lipoprotein (HDL)- cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting VLDL-cholesterol
Change in fasting very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting Triglycerides
Change in fasting triglycerides (measured as mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting Free Fatty Acids
Change in fasting free fatty acids (measured as mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.
Measured: Weeks 0-26
Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.
Measured: Weeks 0-104
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment
Hypoglycaemic episodes (SMPG value ≤3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)) were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to ADA during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.
Measured: Weeks 0-26
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment
Hypoglycaemic episodes (SMPG value ≤3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)) were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to ADA during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.
Measured: Weeks 0-104
Number of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes occurring between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent nocturnal severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.
Measured: Weeks 0-26
Number of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes occurring between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent nocturnal severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.
Measured: Weeks 0-104
Number of TEAEs During 26 Weeks of Treatment
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product. If the event had onset date before the first day of exposure on trial product and increased in severity during the treatment period and until 7 days after the last drug date, then this event was also considered as a TEAE. Number of TEAEs during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.
Measured: Weeks 0-26
Number of TEAEs During 104 Weeks of Treatment
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as an adverse event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product. If the event had onset date before the first day of exposure on trial product and increased in severity during the treatment period and until 7 days after the last drug date, then this event was also considered as a TEAE. Number of TEAEs during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.
Measured: Week 0 to week 104
Eye Examination Category
Fundus photography or a dilated fundoscopy was performed at baseline (within 12 weeks prior to week 0) and week 104. The investigator interpreted each eye's (left and right) results and categorised them as: normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). Number of participants in each category at baseline and week 104 were presented.
Measured: Baseline (within 12 weeks prior to week 0), week 104
ECG Evaluation
The electrocardiogram (ECG) was assessed at baseline (within 2 weeks prior to week 0) and week 104. The investigator interpreted the results and categorised them as: normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each ECG category at baseline and week 104 are presented.
Measured: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to week 0), week 104
Change in Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio
Change in urine albumin/creatinine ratio from baseline (week 0) to week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 104
Change in Pulse Rate
Change in pulse rate from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Creatinine, Total Bilirubin
Change in biochemistry parameter- creatinine, total bilirubin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Albumin
Change in biochemistry parameter- albumin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Biochemistry Parameters- ALP, ALT, AST, Lipase and Amylase
Change in biochemistry parameters- alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lipase and amylase from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Sodium, Potassium and Calcium
Change in sodium, potassium and calcium from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Haematological Parameter- Haemoglobin
Change in haemoglobin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Haematological Parameter- Haematocrit
Change in haematocrit from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Haematological Parameter- Erythrocytes
Change in erythrocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Haematological Parameter- Thrombocytes and Leukocytes
Change in thrombocytes and leukocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Haematological Parameter- Eosinophils
Change in eosinophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Haematological Parameter- Neutrophils
Change in neutrophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Haematological Parameter- Basophils
Change in basophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Haematological Parameter- Monocytes
Change in monocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Haematological Parameter- Lymphocytes
Change in lymphocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Calcitonin
The number of participants who reported low, normal and high levels of calcitonin in relation to reference ranges at baseline (week 0), week 26 and week 104 are presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Short Form Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2™, Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains and Summaries of the Physical Component Score (PCS) and the Mental Component Score (MCS)
SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in the sub-domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores are presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in TRIM-D
Treatment related impact measures-diabetes (TRIM-D) was developed according to the FDA guidance from 2009 on development of new PRO measures. The questionnaire consists of 5 sub-domains, which are scored according to a 1-5 point scale with a higher score indicating a better health state (less negative impact). Sub-domain scores are calculated by summing across items in the same sub-domain, and the total score is calculated by summing scores from all the sub-domains. The highest possible summed score within a sub-domain ranges from 20 (compliance sub-domain) to 40 (psychological health sub-domain) points and the highest possible total score is 140 points. Change in TRIM-D total score from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study start31 Jan 2016
- Primary completion3 Oct 2018
- Study completion3 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novo Nordisk A/SThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,012 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novo Nordisk A/S
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Global Clinical Registry GCR, 1452, Study director, Novo Nordisk A/S
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02501161
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NN9068-4228
- Other IDs
- 2014-005639-15, U1111-1165-3914, 2014
- Acronym
- DUAL™ VIII
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 27 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Aroda VR, Gonzalez-Galvez G, Gron R, Halladin N, Haluzik M, Jermendy G, Kok A, Orsy P, Sabbah M, Sesti G, Silver R. Durability of insulin degludec plus liraglutide versus insulin glargine U100 as initial injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes (DUAL VIII): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3b, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Aug;7(8):596-605. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30184-6. Epub 2019 Jun 9.
PubMed 31189519Philis-Tsimikas A, Aroda VR, De Block C, Billings LK, Liebl A, Sivarathinasami R, D'Cruz JM, Lingvay I. Higher Derived Time in Range With IDegLira Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in People With Type 2 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May;18(3):653-659. doi: 10.1177/19322968221149041. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
PubMed 36710452
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Clinical Trial Comparing Long Term Glycaemic Control of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira) Versus Insulin Glargine Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02501161
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DUAL™ VIII / NN9068-4228
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,012 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novo Nordisk A/SIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Nov 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial is conducted in Africa, Asia, Europe, North America and South America. The purpose is to compare long-term glycaemic control of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) in insulin naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with oral anti diabetics.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin degludec/liraglutide QD + OAD(s) | Experimental | Drug: insulin degludec/liraglutide |
| insulin glargine QD + OAD(s) | Active comparator | Drug: insulin glargine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female, age greater than or equal to 18 years at the time of signing informed consent
- Subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
- HbA1c 7.0-11.0% (both inclusive) (53-97 mmol/mol) by central laboratory analysis
- Body mass index greater than or equal to 20 kg/m^2
- Insulin naïve subjects; however short term insulin treatment for a maximum of 14 days prior to the day of screening is allowed, as is prior insulin treatment for gestational diabetes
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Screening calcitonin greater than or equal to 50 ng/L
- Renal impairment estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 as per CKD-EPI value to be defined as listed in the classification CKD-EPI using IDMS for serum creatinine measurement on the day of screening
- Impaired liver function, defined as ALAT or ASAT greater than or equal to 2.5 times upper limit of normal
- Family or personal history of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 or Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma
- History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| insulin degludec/liraglutideInjected subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily for 104 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. | Drug | Insulin degludec/liraglutide QD + OAD(s) |
| insulin glargineInjected subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily for 104 weeks. Dose individually adjusted. | Drug | insulin glargine QD + OAD(s) |
Primary outcome
Time From Randomisation to Inadequate Glycaemic Control and Need for Treatment Intensification
Time frame: Weeks 0-104 + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2
Inadequate glycaemic control and need for treatment intensification was defined as a glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.0% or greater at 2 consecutive visits from week 26, including week 26 if HbA1c was greater than or equal to 7% at week 12. Time from randomisation to inadequate glycaemic control and need for treatment intensification was analysed using a stratified log-rank test where treatment, baseline HbA1c group and previous OAD treatment were included as strata in the model. The variable "baseline HbA1c group" was a dichotomised baseline HbA1c variable with 2 categories: HbA1c < 8.5% or HbA1c ≥ 8.5% and the variable "previous OAD treatment" was a categorical variable with 2 categories: SU ± OAD(s) (SU users) or OAD(s) (Non-SU users). 25%, median (50%) and 75% percentiles for the cumulative distribution function were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier survival function.
53 secondary outcomes
Time From Randomisation to HbA1c >6.5% at 2 Consecutive Visits
Time frame: Weeks 0-104 + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2
Change in HbA1c
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Change in Body Weight
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Insulin Dose
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0%
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% Without Weight Gain
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c < 7.0% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes and Without Weight Gain
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5%
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Weight Gain
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c ≤6.5% Without Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes and Without Weight Gain
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Change in FPG
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
SMPG-9-point Profile (Individual Points in the Profile)
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Change in SMPG-mean 9-point Profile
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in SMPG-mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic)
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting C-peptide
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting Human Insulin
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting LDL-cholesterol
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting HDL-cholesterol
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting VLDL-cholesterol
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting Triglycerides
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Fasting Free Fatty Acids
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 0-26
Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 0-104
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 0-26
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 0-104
Number of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 26 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 0-26
Number of Treatment-emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During 104 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 0-104
Number of TEAEs During 26 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 0-26
Number of TEAEs During 104 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Week 0 to week 104
Eye Examination Category
Time frame: Baseline (within 12 weeks prior to week 0), week 104
ECG Evaluation
Time frame: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to week 0), week 104
Change in Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio
Time frame: Week 0, week 104
Change in Pulse Rate
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Creatinine, Total Bilirubin
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Albumin
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in Biochemistry Parameters- ALP, ALT, AST, Lipase and Amylase
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Nov 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 31189519Aroda VR, Gonzalez-Galvez G, Gron R, Halladin N, Haluzik M, Jermendy G, Kok A, Orsy P, Sabbah M, Sesti G, Silver R. Durability of insulin degludec plus liraglutide versus insulin glargine U100 as initial injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes (DUAL VIII): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3b, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Aug;7(8):596-605. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30184-6. Epub 2019 Jun 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36710452Philis-Tsimikas A, Aroda VR, De Block C, Billings LK, Liebl A, Sivarathinasami R, D'Cruz JM, Lingvay I. Higher Derived Time in Range With IDegLira Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in People With Type 2 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May;18(3):653-659. doi: 10.1177/19322968221149041. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
- Clinical Trials at Novo NordiskLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Cadisegliatin as Adjunctive Therapy to Insulin in Participants With Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Not yet recruiting
SWitching to Appropriate Prescription in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome
Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic Syndrome, Diabete Type 2
Active, not recruiting
Pilot of Continuous Glucose Monitor-Augmented Food Is Medicine
Nutrition, Type 2 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Safety and Effect of Peripheral Nerve Decompression Combined With Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Diabetes Complication
Recruiting
Continuous Monitoring of Plantar Temperature Variations Using Connected Insoles and a Mobile Application for Diabetic Foot.
Diabetic Foot Disease, Diabetic Foot Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Global Clinical Registry GCR, 1452 study director
Novo Nordisk A/S
143 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 143 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 143 sites in United States, India, South Africa, United Kingdom, Israel and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time From Randomisation to Inadequate Glycaemic Control and Need for Treatment Intensification (time frame: Weeks 0-104 + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02501161, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.