AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 2NCT02504671

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 Plus Methotrexate in Subjects With Active Moderate-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 2 study testing GSK3196165, MTX and Folic acid in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 64 sites in 14 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomised, Phase IIb, dose-adaptive, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study with the primary objective to assess the efficacy of GSK3196165, in combination with methotrexate (MTX), in subjects with active moderate severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with MTX. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What is being tested?
GSK3196165, MTX and Folic acid
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
222 participants
Where
64 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
23 Jul 2015to 29 Dec 2017
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >=18 years at the time of signing informed consent.
  • Meets ACR/EULAR 2010 RA Classification Criteria, with disease duration of >=12 weeks.
  • Swollen joint count of >=4 (66-joint count) and tender joint count of >=4 (68-joint count).
  • DAS28(CRP) >=3.2.
  • CRP >=5.0 milligram per litre (mg/L) at screening.
  • Must have previously received MTX (15-25 mg weekly) for at least 12 weeks before screening, with no change in route of administration, with a stable and tolerated dose for >=4 weeks prior to Day 1. A stable dose of MTX >=7.5 mg/week is acceptable, if the MTX dose has been reduced for reasons of documented intolerance to MTX, e.g. hepatic or hematologic toxicity, or per local requirement.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Weight >=45 kilogram (kg).
  • Male or female subjects are eligible to participate so long as they meet and agree to abide by the contraceptive criteria.
  • Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >=60% predicted; forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) >=70% predicted
  • No evidence of active or latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB).

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • History of other inflammatory rheumatological or autoimmune disorders, other than Sjögren's syndrome secondary to RA.
  • History of any respiratory disease which (in the opinion of the investigator) would compromise subject safety or the ability of the subject to complete the study (e.g. significant interstitial lung disease, such as pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), moderate-severe asthma, bronchiectasis, previous pulmonary alveolar proteinosis [PAP]).
  • Clinically-significant or unstable (in the opinion of the investigator) persistent cough or dyspnea that is unexplained.
  • Significant unstable or uncontrolled acute or chronic disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could confound the results of the study or put the subject at undue risk.
  • A history of malignancy.
  • Hereditary or acquired immunodeficiency disorder, including immunoglobulin deficiency.
  • Current/previous Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 or 2 infection.

Trial locations and contacts

64 sites in 14 countries.

64 sites in 14 countries

Ukraine11 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ivano-Frankivsk, 76008

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kharkiv, 61029

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kharkiv, 61039

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kryvyi Rih, 50056

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lviv, 79013

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Odesa, 65026

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Poltava, 36011

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sumy, 40022

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Vinnytsia, 21018

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Vinnytsia, 21029

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Zhytomyr, 10002

Other trials in Ukraine

Poland9 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bialystok, 15-351

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bydgoszcz, 85-168

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bytom, 41-902

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Grodzisk Mazowiecki, 05-825

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lodz, 91-347

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lublin, 20-582

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Torun, 87-100

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 01-518

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 02-653

Other trials in Poland

Russia9 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 119049

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Novosibirsk, 630099

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Omsk, 644111

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ryazan, 390026

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg, 192177

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tver', 170036

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Vladimir, 600023

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Yaroslavl, 150003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Yaroslavl, 150023

Other trials in Russia

Czechia5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Brno, 602 00

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bruntál, 792 01

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prague, 130 00

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prague, 150 06

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Uherské Hradiště, 686 01

Other trials in Czechia

Mexico5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62170

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62290

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44650

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mérida, Yucatán, 97000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Luis Potosí City, 78213

Other trials in Mexico

Bulgaria4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Plovdiv, 4000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Plovdiv, 4002

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sofia, 1431

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sofia, 1606

Other trials in Bulgaria

Germany4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bad Doberan, 18209

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Berlin, 14059

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hamburg, D-20095

Other trials in Germany

Hungary3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Budapest, 1036

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kistarcsa, 2143

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Veszprém, 8200

Other trials in Hungary

Italy3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bologna, 40138

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Milan, Lombardy, 20132

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Naples, 80131

Other trials in Italy

South Africa3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Panorama / Cape Town, 7500

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pretoria, Gauteng, 1

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Stellenbosch, 7600

Other trials in South Africa

Canada2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Barrie, L4M 6L2

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Brampton, Ontario, L6T 0G1

Other trials in Canada

Estonia2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tallinn, 10117

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tallinn, 13419

Other trials in Estonia

Spain2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    A Coruña, 15006

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Madrid, 28041

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Birmingham, B15 2TH

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Leeds, LS7 4SA

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Phase IIb, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Adaptive, Study of the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 in Combination With Methotrexate Therapy, in Subjects With Active Moderate-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Treatment With Methotrexate

This is a randomised, Phase IIb, dose-adaptive, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study with the primary objective to assess the efficacy of GSK3196165, in combination with methotrexate (MTX), in subjects with active moderate severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with MTX. Approximately 210 subjects will be randomised into the study, following a screening period of up to four weeks. The total treatment period is up to 52 weeks, with a 12-week follow-up period after the last dose (Week 50). Subjects will be randomised (1:1:1:1:1:1) to placebo or one of five subcutaneous (SC) GSK3196165 doses, in combination with MTX (at a weekly dose between 15-25 milligram [mg]), previously received for at least 12 weeks, with a stable and tolerated dose and route of administration for >=4 weeks. Escape therapy is provided at specified timepoints in the protocol for subjects that do not achieve adequate disease improvement.

Being tested
GSK3196165, MTX, Folic acid, Placebo
Keywords
DMARD-IR, GSK3196165, Rheumatoid Arthritis
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GSK3196165Drug

    GSK3196165 is supplied as liquid and will be administered as SC injection.

  • MTXDrug

    MTX will be supplied as capsule, tablet or liquid and will be administered orally or as SC injection.

  • Folic acidDrug

    Folic acid will be supplied as capsule, tablet or liquid and will be administered orally.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo is supplied as liquid as sterile 0.9% weight by volume (w/v) sodium chloride solution and will be administered as SC injection

Study groups in NCT02504671
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GSK3196165, Dose 1 + MTX and Folic acidExperimentalSubject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 1 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Receives: Drug: GSK3196165; Drug: MTX; Drug: Folic acid
GSK3196165, Dose 2 + MTX and folic acidExperimentalSubject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 2 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Receives: Drug: GSK3196165; Drug: MTX; Drug: Folic acid
GSK3196165, Dose 3 + MTX and folic acidExperimentalSubject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 3 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Receives: Drug: GSK3196165; Drug: MTX; Drug: Folic acid
GSK3196165, Dose 4 + MTX and folic acidExperimentalSubject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 4 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Receives: Drug: GSK3196165; Drug: MTX; Drug: Folic acid
GSK3196165, Dose 5 + MTX and folic acidExperimentalSubject will receive GSK3196165 Dose 5 (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Receives: Drug: GSK3196165; Drug: MTX; Drug: Folic acid
Placebo + MTX and folic acidPlacebo comparatorSubjects will receive placebo (initially weekly, then every other week) in combination with MTX (at a dose between 15-25 mg/week) and folic acid >=5 mg/week.
Receives: Drug: MTX; Drug: Folic acid; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score for 28 Different Joints With C-reactive Protein Value (DAS28{CRP}) Remission (DAS28 <2.6) at Week 24

    DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 millimeter [mm] visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in [milligrams/liter] mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). ITT population comprised of all participants who were randomized to treatment and who received at least one dose of study treatment (GSK3196165 or placebo).

    Measured: Week 24

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at Week 12

    DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) Remission (DAS28 <2.6) at All Time Points

    DAS28(CRP) remission is defined as a DAS28 score of <2.6 points. The DAS index combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints. The DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome).

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)

  3. Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at All Assessment Time Points

    DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value from the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  4. Time to First DAS28(CRP) Remission

    The DAS index combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints. The DAS28 is a modification of the original DAS and is based on a count of 28 swollen and tender joints and is used to evaluate a participant's response to treatment. DAS 28 CRP utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) +0.28*√(SJC28)+0.014*GH+0.36*ln(CRP+1)+0.96. Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst) and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.96 and 8.61. High score (worse outcome) and low scores (better outcome). Median time, to remission has been presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 62

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving Categorical DAS28(CRP) Response (Moderate/Good [European League Against Rheumatism] EULAR Response) at All Assessment Time Points

    DAS28(CRP) scores were categorized using EULAR response criteria. Response at a given time point was defined based on the combination of current DAS28 score and the improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to Baseline. The definition of no response, moderate response and good response was as follows: Current DAS28 <=3.2 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2=good response), (>0.6 to <=1.2 = moderate response) and (<=0.6 =no response). Current DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2 =moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2 = moderate response) and (<=0.6 =no response). Current DAS28 >5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2=moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2 = no response) and (<=0.6 =no response). If the post-Baseline DAS28(CRP) score was missing, then the corresponding EULAR category was set to missing.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)

  6. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology's (ACR) 20/50/70 Response Rates at All Assessment Time Points

    The ACR definition for calculating improvement in rheumatoid arthritis is calculated as a 20% improvement (ACR20) in both tender and swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR-core set measures: participant and physician global assessments, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, disability, and an acute-phase reactant (i.e. CRP value). Similarly, ACR50 and ACR70 were calculated with the respective percent improvement. The specific components of the ACR assessments are as follows: Tender/Painful Joint count 68 (TJC68), Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66), Participant's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Participant's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, CRP (mg/L) and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI). For all visits, if any of the component scores were missing, then those scores were considered as not having met the criteria for improvement.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)

  7. Percentage of Participants With Index-based ACR/EULAR Remission Rates at All Assessment Time Points

    Index-based remission was achieved if the following requirement was met: SDAI <= 3.3. If the SDAI value was missing at an individual assessment point, Index-based remission for that assessment was set to missing.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)

  8. Percentage of Participants With Boolean-based ACR/EULAR Remission Rates at All Assessment Time Points

    Boolean-based remission was achieved if all of the following requirements were met at the same time: TJC68 <= 1,SJC66 <= 1,CRP <= 1mg/dL, PtGA <= 10. If one of the components was missing at an individual assessment point, Boolean-based remission for that assessment was set to missing.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)

  9. Percentage of Participants in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission

    CDAI combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints, in addition to a measure of general health from both the participants and the physician. CDAI utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: CDAI =TJC28 + SJC28 + GH + GP Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity and GP=physician assessment of disease activity using a 10 cm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst). It ranges between 0 and 76. High score indicates worse outcome, low score indicates better outcome. Remission was achieved for a non-missing CDAI value <=2.8.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Week 62 (follow-up)

  10. Change From Baseline in SDAI at All Assessment Time Points

    SDAI combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints, in addition to a measure of general health from both the participants and the physician and acute phase reactants. The SDAI utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal-phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees. It is calculated using the following formula: SDAI = TJC28 + SJC28 + GH + GP + CRP Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment, GP= physician assessment of disease activity using a 10 centimetre [cm] visual analogue scale [VAS] with 0 = best, 10 = worst), and CRP= C reactive Protein (in mg/L). It ranges between 0.1 and 86. High score indicates worse outcome, low score indicates better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  11. Change From Baseline in CDAI at All Assessment Time Points

    CDAI combines information relating to the number of swollen and tender joints, in addition to a measure of general health from both the participants and the physician. CDAI utilizing joint scores from the following 28 joints: elbows, shoulders, elbow, wrists, metacarpal- phalangeal I-V, proximal interphalangeal I-V and knees and is calculated using the following formula: CDAI =TJC28 + SJC28 + GH + GP Where TJC - Tender joint Count, SJC= Swollen Joint Count, (GH=participant assessment of disease activity and GP=physician assessment of disease activity using a 10 cm visual analogue scale with 0 = best, 100 = worst). It ranges between 0 and 76. High score indicates worse outcome, low score indicates better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  12. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at All Assessment Time Points

    HAQ-DI is 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas;dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities. Each functional area contains at least two questions. For each question, there is a four level response set that is scored from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). If aids or devices or physical assistance are used for a specific functional area and the maximum response of this functional area is 0 or 1 the according value is increased to a score of 2. HAQ-DI is only calculated if there are at least 6 functional area scores available. The average of these non-missing functional area scores defines the continuous HAQ-DI score ranging from 0 to 3. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  13. Change From Baseline in Pain Score at All Assessment Time Points

    Participants assessed the severity of their current arthritis pain using a 100 unit visual analog scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponds to the magnitude of their pain. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and Week 24

  14. Change From Baseline in Physical and Mental Component Scores (PCS, MCS) and in Domain Scores of Short Form 36 (SF-36) at All Assessment Time Points

    SF-36 is a generic health survey containing 36 questions covering 8 domains of health. SF-36 yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as PCS and MCS health summary scores. The version 2, 1-week recall questionnaire was used. Recoding, calculations and standardization were done as per the User's manual of SF-36. Domain scores were only calculated if less than half of the item scores were missing. All raw domain scores were transformed on a 0-100 scale (transformed domain scores) and then standardized into norm-based scores using Z-score. Following the transformation of the 8 domain scores into z-scores, the MCS and PCS were aggregated (AGG) using weights as PCS/MCS = 50 + (AGG_PHYS *10/AGG_MENT *10). High score (worse outcome) and low score (better outcome). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 24

  15. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue at All Assessment Time Points

    The FACIT-fatigue questionnaire is a participant reported measure developed to assess fatigue consisting of 13 statements regarding feeling fatigue using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 4. For only two of the items (i.e. Answer 5 [An5] and An7) a higher value represents a lower fatigue; 11 of the item scores (i.e. HI7, HI12, An1, An2, An3, An4, An8, An12, An14, An15, An16) have to be reversed by subtracting the captured value from 4 (0 is turned to a 4; 1 into 3; 3 into 1; 4 into 0). After performing the reversals the sum of the non-missing individual items were multiplied by 13 and divided by the number of the non-missing individual items. The final score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue (i.e. a better quality of life). Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 24

  16. Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Question 3 at All Assessment Time Points

    BFI is a self-reported instrument consisting of nine questions which correlate well with quality-of-life measures. For this study, Question 3 only was used which asked about fatigue severity at its worst in the last 24 hours. A discrete 11 unit numeric reporting scale was used where 0 =No fatigue, and 10=As bad as you can imagine. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, 24

  17. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other situations as per Medical or Scientific judgment. Overall AEs and SAEs for the entire study duration until follow-up have been presented.

    Measured: Up to 62 weeks

  18. Number of Participants With Serious Infections

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Serious infections were categorized as AE of special interest. The number of participants with overall serious infections have been presented.

    Measured: Up to 62 weeks

  19. Number of Participants With Opportunistic Infections

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participants, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Opportunistic infections were categorized as AE of special interest. The number of participants with overall opportunistic infections have been presented.

    Measured: Up to 62 weeks

  20. Number of Participants With Pulmonary Events

    Pulmonary assessments were performed to determine the number of participants with pulmonary events including persistent cough, persistent dyspnea, and persistent Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Persistent is defined as any event with duration >=15 days. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. The number of participants experiencing pulmonary events have been reported.

    Measured: Up to 62 weeks

  21. Number of Participants With Worst-case Post-Baseline Results for Pulse Oximetry

    Oxygen saturation measures the capacity of blood to transport oxygen to other parts of the body. Oxygen binds to hemoglobin in red blood cells when moving through the lungs. A pulse oximeter uses two frequencies of light (red and infrared) to determine the percentage of hemoglobin in the blood that is saturated with oxygen, that is called as blood oxygen saturation. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the start of study treatment. The number of participants with blood oxygen level < 80%, 80% to <90% and >=90% have been reported.

    Measured: Up to 62 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start23 Jul 2015
  3. Primary completion22 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion29 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
222 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02504671
Sponsor's protocol ID
201755
Other IDs
2014-003453-34, 2014
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
20 Jul 2015
Last updated
11 Jan 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD for this study is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Publications

  • Buckley CD, Simon-Campos JA, Zhdan V, Becker B, Davy K, Fisheleva E, Gupta A, Hawkes C, Inman D, Layton M, Mitchell N, Patel J, Saurigny D, Williamson R, Tak PP. Efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and safety of the anti-granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor antibody otilimab (GSK3196165) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, phase 2b, dose-ranging study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020 Nov;2(11):e677-e688. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30229-0. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

    PubMed 38279364

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing GSK3196165, MTX and Folic acid in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 64 sites in 14 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 64 sites in Ukraine, Poland, Russia, Czechia, Mexico and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score for 28 Different Joints With C-reactive Protein Value (DAS28{CRP}) Remission (DAS28 <2.6) at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02504671, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in