Musculoskeletal DiseasesNCT02504710
Kinematic Real Time Feedback Used to Learn Manual Therapy on Peripherical Joints
A study testing Kinematic Real Time Feedback and Traditional systems of manual therapy teaching in people with Musculoskeletal Diseases and Complication of Manipulation Procedure, run by University of Malaga at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
This study will try to analyze the effect of the real-time kinematic feedback (KRTF) to learn manual therapy on peripherical joints comparing the results with the traditional teaching method. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Musculoskeletal Diseases, Complication of Manipulation Procedure, Defective; Learning (Specific)
- What is being tested?
- Kinematic Real Time Feedback and Traditional systems of manual therapy teaching
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Feb 2015to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- undergraduate students with no experience in manual therapy
Who cannot join
- To have some experience in manual therapy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Kinematic Real-Time Feedback, Obtained by Inertial Sensors, Used to Learn Manual Therapy on Peripherical Joints
This study will try to analyze the effect of the real-time kinematic feedback (KRTF) to learn manual therapy on peripherical joints comparing the results with the traditional teaching method.
- Conditions
- Musculoskeletal Diseases, Complication of Manipulation Procedure, Defective; Learning (Specific)
- Being tested
- Kinematic Real Time Feedback, Traditional systems of manual therapy teaching
- Keywords
- Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Learning, Feedback, Kinematics, Inertial Sensor
- Medical subject headings
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Kinematic Real Time FeedbackDevice
Traditional systems of manual therapy teachingOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Learning System | Active comparator | Traditional systems of manual therapy teaching Receives: Other: Traditional systems of manual therapy teaching |
| Kinematic Real-Time Feedback | Experimental | Kinematic real time feedback to learn Manual therapy Receives: Device: Kinematic Real Time Feedback |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Manipulation time Score
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Measured: Baseline
Manipulation time Score
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Measured: One Lesson
Manipulation time Score
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Measured: One week
Manipulation time Score
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Measured: Four weeks
Manipulation time Score
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Measured: Three months
Manipulation time Score
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Measured: Six Months
Manipulation Displacement Score
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Measured: Baseline
Manipulation Displacement Score
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Measured: One Lesson
Manipulation Displacement Score
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Measured: One week
Manipulation Displacement Score
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Measured: Four weeks
Manipulation Displacement Score
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Measured: Three months
Manipulation Displacement Score
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Measured: Six Months.
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: Baseline
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: One Lesson
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: One week
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: Four weeks
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: Three months
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: Six months.
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: Baseline
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: One Lesson
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: One week
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: Four weeks
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: Three months
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Measured: Six months.
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: Baseline
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: One Lesson
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: One week
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: Four weeks
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: Three months
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: Six months.
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: Baseline
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: One Lesson
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: One week
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: Four weeks
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: Three months
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Measured: Six months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2015
- Primary completionApr 2016
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Musculoskeletal DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Malaga
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas, University of Malaga
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02504710
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSF_ISLPerip_Man
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 12 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 13 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Trinidad-Fernandez M, Gonzalez-Molina F, Roldan-Jimenez C, Vaes P, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. New learning technique based on real-time kinematic feedback from an inertial sensor for manual therapy in shoulder joint: a randomised trial. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):992. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05649-y.
PubMed 39261790Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Ruiz-Munoz M, Avila-Bolivar AB, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Kinematic real-time feedback is more effective than traditional teaching method in learning ankle joint mobilisation: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0789-8.
PubMed 27716215
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Kinematic Real-Time Feedback, Obtained by Inertial Sensors, Used to Learn Manual Therapy on Peripherical Joints
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02504710
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSF_ISLPerip_Man
- Conditions
- Musculoskeletal Diseases, Complication of Manipulation Procedure, Defective; Learning (Specific)
- Keywords
- Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Learning, Feedback, Kinematics, Inertial Sensor
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MalagaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2015
- Primary completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will try to analyze the effect of the real-time kinematic feedback (KRTF) to learn manual therapy on peripherical joints comparing the results with the traditional teaching method.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Learning System | Active comparator | Other: Traditional systems of manual therapy teachingTraditional systems of manual therapy teaching |
| Kinematic Real-Time Feedback | Experimental | Device: Kinematic Real Time FeedbackKinematic real time feedback to learn Manual therapy |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- undergraduate students with no experience in manual therapy
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- To have some experience in manual therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Kinematic Real Time Feedback | Device | Kinematic Real-Time Feedback |
| Traditional systems of manual therapy teaching | Other | Traditional Learning System |
Primary outcome
Manipulation time Score
Time frame: Baseline
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Manipulation time Score
Time frame: One Lesson
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Manipulation time Score
Time frame: One week
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Manipulation time Score
Time frame: Four weeks
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Manipulation time Score
Time frame: Three months
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Manipulation time Score
Time frame: Six Months
Manipulation time Score: Seconds
Manipulation Displacement Score
Time frame: Baseline
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Manipulation Displacement Score
Time frame: One Lesson
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Manipulation Displacement Score
Time frame: One week
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Manipulation Displacement Score
Time frame: Four weeks
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Manipulation Displacement Score
Time frame: Three months
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Manipulation Displacement Score
Time frame: Six Months.
Joint Displacement Score: Degrees and centimeter
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Time frame: Baseline
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Time frame: One Lesson
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Time frame: One week
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Time frame: Four weeks
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Time frame: Three months
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Mean Velocity Score
Time frame: Six months.
Mean Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Time frame: Baseline
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Time frame: One Lesson
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Time frame: One week
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Time frame: Four weeks
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Time frame: Three months
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Maximal Velocity Score
Time frame: Six months.
Maximal Velocity Score: Degrees / seconds and centimeters / seconds
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Time frame: Baseline
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Time frame: One Lesson
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Time frame: One week
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Time frame: Four weeks
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Time frame: Three months
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Manipulation Mean Acceleration Score
Time frame: Six months.
Mean Acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Time frame: Baseline
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Time frame: One Lesson
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Time frame: One week
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Time frame: Four weeks
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Time frame: Three months
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Manipulation Maximal Acceleration Score
Time frame: Six months.
Maximal acceleration Score: (Degrees / seconds)2 and (centimeters / seconds)2
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39261790Trinidad-Fernandez M, Gonzalez-Molina F, Roldan-Jimenez C, Vaes P, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. New learning technique based on real-time kinematic feedback from an inertial sensor for manual therapy in shoulder joint: a randomised trial. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):992. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05649-y.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27716215Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Ruiz-Munoz M, Avila-Bolivar AB, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Kinematic real-time feedback is more effective than traditional teaching method in learning ankle joint mobilisation: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0789-8.
Related trials for Musculoskeletal Diseases
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A First-in-human Study of KK8123 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia
X-linked Hypophosphatemia
Recruiting
Effects of Cervicothoracic Mobilization in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Rotator Cuff Tendonitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Kinematic Real Time Feedback and Traditional systems of manual therapy teaching in people with Musculoskeletal Diseases and Complication of Manipulation Procedure, run by University of Malaga at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Manipulation time Score (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 36 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02504710, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2016.