Chronic Hepatitis BPhase 4NCT02505009
Efficacy of HBV Vaccine in Consolidation of Nucleos(t)Ide Analogues Therapy
A Phase 4 study testing Engerix-B, Tenofovir and Entecavir in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Background and aims: Nucleos(t)ide analogues may suppress HBV DNA to undetectable level, but only about 30-40% remain sustained response 1-3 years after discontinued therapy. The investigators will try to improve the sustained response rate by given a course of HBV vaccination during the last 6 months on patients… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 31 to 76 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- What is being tested?
- Engerix-B, Tenofovir and Entecavir
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 116 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 May 2015to 21 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 31 to 76 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B
- Has been receiving a 3-year or more than 3 years entecavir or tenofovir therapy and intending to stop the treatment 6 months later.
- An inform consent will be obtained after well explanation.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant woman.
- Hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus or human immunodeficient virus co-infection.
- Alcoholism
- Present with malignant tumor, decompensated liver or renal diseases, present with other major medical illness.
- Liver cirrhosis, child B or C.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of HBV Therapeutic Vaccine in Consolidation of Nucleos(t)Ide Analogues Therapy: a Pilot Study
Background and aims: Nucleos(t)ide analogues may suppress HBV DNA to undetectable level, but only about 30-40% remain sustained response 1-3 years after discontinued therapy. The investigators will try to improve the sustained response rate by given a course of HBV vaccination during the last 6 months on patients receiving a 3-year entecavir or tenofovir therapy.
Rational: The host may response to HBV vaccine when HBV DNA and immune tolerance are suppressed during entecavir or tenofovir therapy.
Read more
Patients: Patients who have been receiving entecavir or tenofovir therapy for at least 30 months will be invited to this study. The case group will receive 5 Engerix-B injections during the last 6 months of entecavir or tenofovir therapy. Arm A-entecavir pretreated group: 75 cases will be enrolled to receive Engerix-B injection and compared with histological non-vaccine treated controls; Arm B-tenofovir pretreated group: 50 patients will be randomized into case (vaccine) and control group according to age, gender, pretreatment HBV DNA level.
Therapy: Both case and control groups will receive a 3 year or longer entecavir or tenofovir therapy. Patients will be screen at 24-30 months and enrolled at 30 months after entecavir or tenofovir therapy. They will receive 5 Engerix-B injections at 0,1st ,2nd,3rd and 6th month [30-36 +/-1 month post nucleos(t)ide therapy] post enrollment. Both drugs will be discontinued after completed therapy.
Follow-up: Both groups will be monitoring by biochemistry, alpha-fetoprotein, quantitative HBsAg, HBV DNA levels and immunological parameter periodically for 2 years after therapy.
Efficacy: Those patients with persistent normal ALT and HBV DNA lower than 1*100000 cps/mL after discontinued nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy will be considered to have sustained response. Patients with transient elevation of HBV DNA and ALT, but normalized spontaneously without further therapy will be defined as delayed response. Patients with persistent HBV DNA greater than 1*100000 cps/mL will be considered to have non-sustained response.
Study duration: The enrollment will be completed in one year and keep on observation for additional 2 years.
Expected goals of the study: HBV vaccine and nucleos(t)ide analogues combination therapy may decrease the HBV relapse rate at 1 and 2 year after completed therapy.
Read the detailed description
Introduction Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a widely prevalent global health problem with estimate 350-400 million chronic HBV carriers worldwide. In China, Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, as many as 10-15% of the population are chronically infected with HBV. In North America and North Europe, HBV chronic carrier rates are much lower, usually below 1%. Intermediate HBV carrier rates of 1-7% are found in parts of Southern and Eastern Europe, Central America, the Middle East and parts of Japan (1-4).
HBV is highly infectious; many chronic HBsAg carriers were infected in their family shortly after birth or in early childhood (5-7). Recent genome-wide association studies revealed antigen presenting molecules, Human leukocyte antigen-DP (HLA-DP) and HLA-DQ, are associated with persistence HBV infection (8-10). HBV is actively replicated in chronic carriers during the initial immune tolerance phase (11). Impaired innate and adaptive immune responses to HBV can be found during this stage (12-16). They are generally asymptomatic until the immune clearance phase developed. At this stage, innate immunity, HBV-specific and non-specific T cells and other immune cells may orchestra an immune response and hepatic necroinflammation to clear HBV (17-19). The immune clearance phase is critical to the outcome of chronic HBsAg carriers. Those patients with prolonged HBV replication and repeated hepatic inflammation will run into liver cirrhosis and /or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (20-23). How to terminate HBV replication is an important issue in management of chronic HBsAg carriers.
1.1 Therapy for chronic hepatitis B In the past 20 years, significant improvements in treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have been achieved by introducing regimen of interferon derivatives and nucleotide/nucleoside analogues (NA) (24-26). Interferon is a T helper cell type 1 cytokine that promotes immunity of host to clear HBV (27,28). NA inhibit HBV DNA synthesis by termination the nascent proviral DNA chain. About 30% patients may have complete response with normalization alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA lower than 10000 cps/mL one to three year after discontinued therapy (10,29-31). For the rest of patients a flare-up HBV replication occurred (10,29-31), a life-long therapy may be needed to eliminate covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) pool and achieved a sustained therapeutic response (32). Unfortunately, the prolonged use of NA need a lot of budgets and carried a substantial risk for emerging drug resistance mutants (33). The interferon derivatives regimens have similar efficacy with significant side effects (27,28). Therefore, Development of a safe and affordable anti-HBV agent/strategy is needed to further improve outcomes (34).
1.2 Rational for combine HBV vaccine with NA therapy NA therapy may suppress Serum HBV DNA to undetectable level (29-31). These drugs are acceptable to most of the patients because they are admitted orally, once daily and without significant side effect. The main problem is HBV DNA tends to relapse in approximately 70% of patients 1-3 years after discontinued therapy (10, 29-31).
When HBV was suppressed by NA therapy, the immune tolerance may also be suppressed. The post treatment relapse is an indirect evidence of losing immune tolerance in such patients (29-31). The post treatment clinical relapse is associated with enhanced Th1 response (35-37). T regulatory (Treg) cells, macrophages and other unidentified factors may play important roles on HBV tolerance (19, 38-41). One of an important phenomenon for patients receiving NA therapy is decrease of Treg cells level (42,43). The post treatment relapse of hepatic necroinflammation is an evidence of the restored HBV specific immune response (44,45).
In addition to the relief of immune tolerance, NA may suppress the HBsAg production from free virus, but no effect is expected for those HBsAg produced by integrated HBV genome. These two types of HBsAg may have some differences on protein conformation and behavior (46,47). The vaccine is produced according to free virus. Therefore, when the HBsAg produced by free virus is suppressed by NA to a low level, the vaccine may be recognized as a new antigen. The immune response elicited by the therapeutic vaccine may have a potential on suppression of free virus.
1.3 Combined HBV vaccine and NA therapy in animal study A Woodchuck animal study suggest entecavir therapy followed by Woodchuck surface (WHs) and core (WHc) DNA vaccination 7 weeks later may induce WHc and WHs specific T cell responses. Two of the 6 animals clear Woodchuck surface antigen (WHBsAg) and product anti-WHBs (48). Similar results can be found in HBV transgenic mice model. Hepatitis B surface (HBs) and hepatitis B core (HBc) specific cellular and humoral response was identified after HBc and HBs protein vaccine therapy (49). In a mouse model with sustained HBV viremia after infection with a recombinant adeno-associated virus carrying a replicable HBV genome. Immunization with the conventional HBV vaccine in the presence of aluminum adjuvant failed to elicit an immune response,but vaccination of mice with HBsAg/CpG induced strong antibody production and T-cell responses(50)
1.4 Combined HBV vaccine and NA therapy in liver transplantation Prevention of HBV reinfection is an important issue in chronic hepatitis B received liver transplantation. HBsAg immunoglobulin (HBIG) is the choice of therapy with evident of good protection (51). However, HBIG is quite expensive and long term therapy is needed. Combination of HBV vaccine and NA therapy had been done in patients received liver transplantation. The initial reports were not good (52-54), but recent studies suggest up to 50% patients response to lamivudine and HBV vaccination combination therapy (55,56) after adjusted dose of HBIG. All these studies did not report severe adverse event using lamivudine and HBV vaccine combination therapy.
1.5 Combined HBV vaccine and NA therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B To increase response rate many HBV vaccines has been developed by increase immune epitope or posttranslation modifications (57,58) Combination of Lamivudine with therapeutic HBsAg DNA vaccination led to the persistence of T-cell responses (59). An HBV therapeutic vaccine clinical trial studies showed a decrease of HBV replication in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive patients received HBV vaccine and lamivudine combination therapy (60).
- Study objectives To understand the efficacy of combining a 3-year NA and Engerix-B therapy in sustained viral suppression.
- Investigational plan 3.1 Overall study design This trials will examine the efficacy of NA and Engerix-B combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B.
3.2 Study design Arm A-entecavir pretreated group: Case vs. histological control study. Arm B-tenofovir pretreated group: randomized case and control study. 3.3. Therapy 3.3.1 Entecavir 0.5 mg daily for at least 3 years. 3.3.2 Tenofovir 300 mg daily for at least 3 years. 3.3.3 Five doses of Engerix-B 20 ug during the last 6 month of NA therapy in case group.
Both case and control groups will complete a 3-year NA therapy. The vaccination group will receive a course of Engerix-B vaccination. They will be enrolled at the last 6 months of the NA therapy. Engerix-B will be given at the 0,1st ,2nd 3rd and 6th month after the enrollment.
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- Being tested
- Engerix-B, Tenofovir, Entecavir
- Keywords
- Therapeutic Uses, Entecavir, Tenofovir, Engerix-B, DNA Virus Infections, Antiviral Agents, Vaccination
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B, Chronic, DNA Virus Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Engerix-BDrug
The case group will receive 5 Engerix-B injections during the last 6 months of a 3-year NA therapy.
TenofovirDrug
Both case and control will receive 300 mg Tenofovir for at least 3 years
EntecavirDrug
Both case and control will receive 0.5 mg entecavir therapy for at least 3 years
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| entecavir pretreated vaccine arm | Experimental | Arm A,case group: 75 cases will be enrolled to receive Engerix-B injection and compared with histological non-vaccine treated controls Receives: Drug: Engerix-B; Drug: Entecavir |
| tenofovir pretreated vaccine arm | Experimental | Arm B case group: A total of 50 patients will be randomized into case (vaccine) and control group according to age, gender, pretreatment HBV DNA level. Receives: Drug: Engerix-B; Drug: Tenofovir |
| Entecavir pretreated control arm | Active comparator | Arm A control group: Age, gender and pretreatment DNA matched histological controls Receives: Drug: Entecavir |
| tenofovir pretreated control arm | Active comparator | Arm B control group: A total of 50 patients will be randomized into case (vaccine) and control group according to age, gender, pretreatment HBV DNA level. Receives: Drug: Tenofovir |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
HBV DNA levels during followup period
- Non-responder: When HBV DNA levels were greater than 1*100000 cps/mL and persistence to 1 year after stopped combination therapy, or need other therapy before the end point.
- Delayed responder: Those patients with transient elevation of HBV DNA shortly after stopped NA therapy and then become normal ALT and HBV DNA lower than 1*100000 cps/mL without other therapy.
- Sustained responder:HBV DNA levels were lower than 1*100000 cps/mL and persistence to 1 year after stopped combination therapy
Measured: At 48th weeks of followup after completed combination therapy
HBV DNA levels during followup period
- Non-responder: When HBV DNA levels were greater than 1*100000 cps/mL and persistence to 2 years after stopped combination therapy, or need other therapy before the end point.
- Delayed responder: Those patients with transient elevation of HBV DNA shortly after stopped NA therapy and then become normal ALT and HBV DNA lower than 1*100000 cps/mL without other therapy.
- Sustained responder:HBV DNA levels were lower than 1*100000 cps/mL and persistence to 2 years after stopped combination therapy
Measured: At 96th weeks of followup after completed combination therapy
Secondary outcomes (4)
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level during followup period
ALT level after completed therapy will be grouped into normal serum ALT level, 1-2x upper limit normal (ULN), 2-5x ULN or >5x ULN. ALT relapse is defined as ALT level >2x ULN.
Measured: At 48 th week of followup after completed combination therapy
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level during followup period
ALT level after completed therapy will be grouped into normal serum ALT level, 1-2x upper limit normal (ULN), 2-5x ULN or >5x ULN. ALT relapse is defined as ALT level >2x ULN.
Measured: At 96th weeks of followup after completed combination therapy
Quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) level during followup period
Serum qHBsAg level after completed therapy will be grouped into lower than 150 international unit (IU)/mL, 500 IU/mL, 500-1000 IU/mL and >1000 IU/mL. Those qHBsAg lower than 150 IU/mL is defined as good serological response.
Measured: At 48th week of followup after completed combination therapy
Quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) level during followup period
Serum qHBsAg level after completed therapy will be grouped into lower than 150 international unit (IU)/mL, 500 IU/mL, 500-1000 IU/mL and >1000 IU/mL. Those qHBsAg lower than 150 IU/mL is defined as good serological response.
Measured: At 96th week of followup after completed combination therapy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study start1 May 2015
- Primary completion21 Dec 2018
- Study completion21 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (60)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Hepatitis BStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chang Gung Memorial HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 116 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dar-In Tai, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02505009
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 104-3167C
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chen CJ, Wang LY, Yu MW. Epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in the Asia-Pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 May;15 Suppl:E3-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02124.x.
PubMed 10921373El Khouri M, dos Santos VA. Hepatitis B: epidemiological, immunological, and serological considerations emphasizing mutation. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2004 Aug;59(4):216-24. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812004000400011. Epub 2004 Sep 9.
PubMed 15361988Tsay PK, Tai DI, Chen YM, Yu CP, Wan SY, Shen YJ, Lin DY. Impact of gender, viral transmission and aging in the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen. Chang Gung Med J. 2009 Mar-Apr;32(2):155-64.
PubMed 19403005Liaw YF, Brunetto MR, Hadziyannis S. The natural history of chronic HBV infection and geographical differences. Antivir Ther. 2010;15 Suppl 3:25-33. doi: 10.3851/IMP1621.
PubMed 21041901Burk RD, Hwang LY, Ho GY, Shafritz DA, Beasley RP. Outcome of perinatal hepatitis B virus exposure is dependent on maternal virus load. J Infect Dis. 1994 Dec;170(6):1418-23. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.6.1418.
PubMed 7995980Beasley RP, Hwang LY, Lin CC, Leu ML, Stevens CE, Szmuness W, Chen KP. Incidence of hepatitis B virus infections in preschool children in Taiwan. J Infect Dis. 1982 Aug;146(2):198-204. doi: 10.1093/infdis/146.2.198.
PubMed 7108271Beasley RP, Hwang LY, Lin CC, Ko YC, Twu SJ. Incidence of hepatitis among students at a university in Taiwan. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Feb;117(2):213-22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113532.
PubMed 6402925Kamatani Y, Wattanapokayakit S, Ochi H, Kawaguchi T, Takahashi A, Hosono N, Kubo M, Tsunoda T, Kamatani N, Kumada H, Puseenam A, Sura T, Daigo Y, Chayama K, Chantratita W, Nakamura Y, Matsuda K. A genome-wide association study identifies variants in the HLA-DP locus associated with chronic hepatitis B in Asians. Nat Genet. 2009 May;41(5):591-5. doi: 10.1038/ng.348. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
PubMed 19349983Mbarek H, Ochi H, Urabe Y, Kumar V, Kubo M, Hosono N, Takahashi A, Kamatani Y, Miki D, Abe H, Tsunoda T, Kamatani N, Chayama K, Nakamura Y, Matsuda K. A genome-wide association study of chronic hepatitis B identified novel risk locus in a Japanese population. Hum Mol Genet. 2011 Oct 1;20(19):3884-92. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr301. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
PubMed 21750111Chang SW, Fann CS, Su WH, Wang YC, Weng CC, Yu CJ, Hsu CL, Hsieh AR, Chien RN, Chu CM, Tai DI. A genome-wide association study on chronic HBV infection and its clinical progression in male Han-Taiwanese. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e99724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099724. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24940741Chu CM, Karayiannis P, Fowler MJ, Monjardino J, Liaw YF, Thomas HC. Natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Taiwan: studies of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum. Hepatology. 1985 May-Jun;5(3):431-4. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840050315.
PubMed 3997072Bertoletti A, Ferrari C. Innate and adaptive immune responses in chronic hepatitis B virus infections: towards restoration of immune control of viral infection. Gut. 2012 Dec;61(12):1754-64. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301073. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
PubMed 22157327Das A, Maini MK. Innate and adaptive immune responses in hepatitis B virus infection. Dig Dis. 2010;28(1):126-32. doi: 10.1159/000282075. Epub 2010 May 7.
PubMed 20460900Fisicaro P, Valdatta C, Boni C, Massari M, Mori C, Zerbini A, Orlandini A, Sacchelli L, Missale G, Ferrari C. Early kinetics of innate and adaptive immune responses during hepatitis B virus infection. Gut. 2009 Jul;58(7):974-82. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.163600. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
PubMed 19201769Tan AT, Koh S, Goh W, Zhe HY, Gehring AJ, Lim SG, Bertoletti A. A longitudinal analysis of innate and adaptive immune profile during hepatic flares in chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2010 Mar;52(3):330-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
PubMed 20137825
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of HBV Therapeutic Vaccine in Consolidation of Nucleos(t)Ide Analogues Therapy: a Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02505009
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 104-3167C
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- Keywords
- Therapeutic Uses, Entecavir, Tenofovir, Engerix-B, DNA Virus Infections, Antiviral Agents, Vaccination
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 116 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background and aims: Nucleos(t)ide analogues may suppress HBV DNA to undetectable level, but only about 30-40% remain sustained response 1-3 years after discontinued therapy. The investigators will try to improve the sustained response rate by given a course of HBV vaccination during the last 6 months on patients receiving a 3-year entecavir or tenofovir therapy.
Rational: The host may response to HBV vaccine when HBV DNA and immune tolerance are suppressed during entecavir or tenofovir therapy.
Patients: Patients who have been receiving entecavir or tenofovir therapy for at least 30 months will be invited to this study. The case group will receive 5 Engerix-B injections during the last 6 months of entecavir or tenofovir therapy. Arm A-entecavir pretreated group: 75 cases will be enrolled to receive Engerix-B injection and compared with histological non-vaccine treated controls; Arm B-tenofovir pretreated group: 50 patients will be randomized into case (vaccine) and control group according to age, gender, pretreatment HBV DNA level.
Therapy: Both case and control groups will receive a 3 year or longer entecavir or tenofovir therapy. Patients will be screen at 24-30 months and enrolled at 30 months after entecavir or tenofovir therapy. They will receive 5 Engerix-B injections at 0,1st ,2nd,3rd and 6th month [30-36 +/-1 month post nucleos(t)ide therapy] post enrollment. Both drugs will be discontinued after completed therapy.
Follow-up: Both groups will be monitoring by biochemistry, alpha-fetoprotein, quantitative HBsAg, HBV DNA levels and immunological parameter periodically for 2 years after therapy.
Efficacy: Those patients with persistent normal ALT and HBV DNA lower than 1*100000 cps/mL after discontinued nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy will be considered to have sustained response. Patients with transient elevation of HBV DNA and ALT, but normalized spontaneously without further therapy will be defined as delayed response. Patients with persistent HBV DNA greater than 1*100000 cps/mL will be considered to have non-sustained response.
Study duration: The enrollment will be completed in one year and keep on observation for additional 2 years.
Expected goals of the study: HBV vaccine and nucleos(t)ide analogues combination therapy may decrease the HBV relapse rate at 1 and 2 year after completed therapy.
Detailed description
Introduction Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a widely prevalent global health problem with estimate 350-400 million chronic HBV carriers worldwide. In China, Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, as many as 10-15% of the population are chronically infected with HBV. In North America and North Europe, HBV chronic carrier rates are much lower, usually below 1%. Intermediate HBV carrier rates of 1-7% are found in parts of Southern and Eastern Europe, Central America, the Middle East and parts of Japan (1-4).
HBV is highly infectious; many chronic HBsAg carriers were infected in their family shortly after birth or in early childhood (5-7). Recent genome-wide association studies revealed antigen presenting molecules, Human leukocyte antigen-DP (HLA-DP) and HLA-DQ, are associated with persistence HBV infection (8-10). HBV is actively replicated in chronic carriers during the initial immune tolerance phase (11). Impaired innate and adaptive immune responses to HBV can be found during this stage (12-16). They are generally asymptomatic until the immune clearance phase developed. At this stage, innate immunity, HBV-specific and non-specific T cells and other immune cells may orchestra an immune response and hepatic necroinflammation to clear HBV (17-19). The immune clearance phase is critical to the outcome of chronic HBsAg carriers. Those patients with prolonged HBV replication and repeated hepatic inflammation will run into liver cirrhosis and /or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (20-23). How to terminate HBV replication is an important issue in management of chronic HBsAg carriers.
1.1 Therapy for chronic hepatitis B In the past 20 years, significant improvements in treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have been achieved by introducing regimen of interferon derivatives and nucleotide/nucleoside analogues (NA) (24-26). Interferon is a T helper cell type 1 cytokine that promotes immunity of host to clear HBV (27,28). NA inhibit HBV DNA synthesis by termination the nascent proviral DNA chain. About 30% patients may have complete response with normalization alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA lower than 10000 cps/mL one to three year after discontinued therapy (10,29-31). For the rest of patients a flare-up HBV replication occurred (10,29-31), a life-long therapy may be needed to eliminate covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) pool and achieved a sustained therapeutic response (32). Unfortunately, the prolonged use of NA need a lot of budgets and carried a substantial risk for emerging drug resistance mutants (33). The interferon derivatives regimens have similar efficacy with significant side effects (27,28). Therefore, Development of a safe and affordable anti-HBV agent/strategy is needed to further improve outcomes (34).
1.2 Rational for combine HBV vaccine with NA therapy NA therapy may suppress Serum HBV DNA to undetectable level (29-31). These drugs are acceptable to most of the patients because they are admitted orally, once daily and without significant side effect. The main problem is HBV DNA tends to relapse in approximately 70% of patients 1-3 years after discontinued therapy (10, 29-31).
When HBV was suppressed by NA therapy, the immune tolerance may also be suppressed. The post treatment relapse is an indirect evidence of losing immune tolerance in such patients (29-31). The post treatment clinical relapse is associated with enhanced Th1 response (35-37). T regulatory (Treg) cells, macrophages and other unidentified factors may play important roles on HBV tolerance (19, 38-41). One of an important phenomenon for patients receiving NA therapy is decrease of Treg cells level (42,43). The post treatment relapse of hepatic necroinflammation is an evidence of the restored HBV specific immune response (44,45).
In addition to the relief of immune tolerance, NA may suppress the HBsAg production from free virus, but no effect is expected for those HBsAg produced by integrated HBV genome. These two types of HBsAg may have some differences on protein conformation and behavior (46,47). The vaccine is produced according to free virus. Therefore, when the HBsAg produced by free virus is suppressed by NA to a low level, the vaccine may be recognized as a new antigen. The immune response elicited by the therapeutic vaccine may have a potential on suppression of free virus.
1.3 Combined HBV vaccine and NA therapy in animal study A Woodchuck animal study suggest entecavir therapy followed by Woodchuck surface (WHs) and core (WHc) DNA vaccination 7 weeks later may induce WHc and WHs specific T cell responses. Two of the 6 animals clear Woodchuck surface antigen (WHBsAg) and product anti-WHBs (48). Similar results can be found in HBV transgenic mice model. Hepatitis B surface (HBs) and hepatitis B core (HBc) specific cellular and humoral response was identified after HBc and HBs protein vaccine therapy (49). In a mouse model with sustained HBV viremia after infection with a recombinant adeno-associated virus carrying a replicable HBV genome. Immunization with the conventional HBV vaccine in the presence of aluminum adjuvant failed to elicit an immune response,but vaccination of mice with HBsAg/CpG induced strong antibody production and T-cell responses(50)
1.4 Combined HBV vaccine and NA therapy in liver transplantation Prevention of HBV reinfection is an important issue in chronic hepatitis B received liver transplantation. HBsAg immunoglobulin (HBIG) is the choice of therapy with evident of good protection (51). However, HBIG is quite expensive and long term therapy is needed. Combination of HBV vaccine and NA therapy had been done in patients received liver transplantation. The initial reports were not good (52-54), but recent studies suggest up to 50% patients response to lamivudine and HBV vaccination combination therapy (55,56) after adjusted dose of HBIG. All these studies did not report severe adverse event using lamivudine and HBV vaccine combination therapy.
1.5 Combined HBV vaccine and NA therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B To increase response rate many HBV vaccines has been developed by increase immune epitope or posttranslation modifications (57,58) Combination of Lamivudine with therapeutic HBsAg DNA vaccination led to the persistence of T-cell responses (59). An HBV therapeutic vaccine clinical trial studies showed a decrease of HBV replication in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive patients received HBV vaccine and lamivudine combination therapy (60).
- Study objectives To understand the efficacy of combining a 3-year NA and Engerix-B therapy in sustained viral suppression.
- Investigational plan 3.1 Overall study design This trials will examine the efficacy of NA and Engerix-B combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B.
3.2 Study design Arm A-entecavir pretreated group: Case vs. histological control study. Arm B-tenofovir pretreated group: randomized case and control study. 3.3. Therapy 3.3.1 Entecavir 0.5 mg daily for at least 3 years. 3.3.2 Tenofovir 300 mg daily for at least 3 years. 3.3.3 Five doses of Engerix-B 20 ug during the last 6 month of NA therapy in case group.
Both case and control groups will complete a 3-year NA therapy. The vaccination group will receive a course of Engerix-B vaccination. They will be enrolled at the last 6 months of the NA therapy. Engerix-B will be given at the 0,1st ,2nd 3rd and 6th month after the enrollment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| entecavir pretreated vaccine arm | Experimental | Drug: Engerix-B, Drug: EntecavirArm A,case group: 75 cases will be enrolled to receive Engerix-B injection and compared with histological non-vaccine treated controls |
| tenofovir pretreated vaccine arm | Experimental | Drug: Engerix-B, Drug: TenofovirArm B case group: A total of 50 patients will be randomized into case (vaccine) and control group according to age, gender, pretreatment HBV DNA level. |
| Entecavir pretreated control arm | Active comparator | Drug: EntecavirArm A control group: Age, gender and pretreatment DNA matched histological controls |
| tenofovir pretreated control arm | Active comparator | Drug: TenofovirArm B control group: A total of 50 patients will be randomized into case (vaccine) and control group according to age, gender, pretreatment HBV DNA level. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 31 to 76 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B
- Has been receiving a 3-year or more than 3 years entecavir or tenofovir therapy and intending to stop the treatment 6 months later.
- An inform consent will be obtained after well explanation.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant woman.
- Hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus or human immunodeficient virus co-infection.
- Alcoholism
- Present with malignant tumor, decompensated liver or renal diseases, present with other major medical illness.
- Liver cirrhosis, child B or C.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Engerix-BThe case group will receive 5 Engerix-B injections during the last 6 months of a 3-year NA therapy. | Drug | entecavir pretreated vaccine arm, tenofovir pretreated vaccine arm |
| TenofovirBoth case and control will receive 300 mg Tenofovir for at least 3 years | Drug | tenofovir pretreated control arm, tenofovir pretreated vaccine arm |
| EntecavirBoth case and control will receive 0.5 mg entecavir therapy for at least 3 years | Drug | Entecavir pretreated control arm, entecavir pretreated vaccine arm |
Primary outcome
HBV DNA levels during followup period
Time frame: At 48th weeks of followup after completed combination therapy
1. Non-responder: When HBV DNA levels were greater than 1*100000 cps/mL and persistence to 1 year after stopped combination therapy, or need other therapy before the end point. 2. Delayed responder: Those patients with transient elevation of HBV DNA shortly after stopped NA therapy and then become normal ALT and HBV DNA lower than 1*100000 cps/mL without other therapy. 3. Sustained responder:HBV DNA levels were lower than 1*100000 cps/mL and persistence to 1 year after stopped combination therapy
HBV DNA levels during followup period
Time frame: At 96th weeks of followup after completed combination therapy
1. Non-responder: When HBV DNA levels were greater than 1*100000 cps/mL and persistence to 2 years after stopped combination therapy, or need other therapy before the end point. 2. Delayed responder: Those patients with transient elevation of HBV DNA shortly after stopped NA therapy and then become normal ALT and HBV DNA lower than 1*100000 cps/mL without other therapy. 3. Sustained responder:HBV DNA levels were lower than 1*100000 cps/mL and persistence to 2 years after stopped combination therapy
4 secondary outcomes
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level during followup period
Time frame: At 48 th week of followup after completed combination therapy
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level during followup period
Time frame: At 96th weeks of followup after completed combination therapy
Quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) level during followup period
Time frame: At 48th week of followup after completed combination therapy
Quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) level during followup period
Time frame: At 96th week of followup after completed combination therapy
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2019.
- Background: PubMed 10921373Chen CJ, Wang LY, Yu MW. Epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in the Asia-Pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 May;15 Suppl:E3-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02124.x.
- Background: PubMed 15361988El Khouri M, dos Santos VA. Hepatitis B: epidemiological, immunological, and serological considerations emphasizing mutation. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2004 Aug;59(4):216-24. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812004000400011. Epub 2004 Sep 9.
- Background: PubMed 19403005Tsay PK, Tai DI, Chen YM, Yu CP, Wan SY, Shen YJ, Lin DY. Impact of gender, viral transmission and aging in the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen. Chang Gung Med J. 2009 Mar-Apr;32(2):155-64.
- Background: PubMed 21041901Liaw YF, Brunetto MR, Hadziyannis S. The natural history of chronic HBV infection and geographical differences. Antivir Ther. 2010;15 Suppl 3:25-33. doi: 10.3851/IMP1621.
- Background: PubMed 7995980Burk RD, Hwang LY, Ho GY, Shafritz DA, Beasley RP. Outcome of perinatal hepatitis B virus exposure is dependent on maternal virus load. J Infect Dis. 1994 Dec;170(6):1418-23. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.6.1418.
- Background: PubMed 7108271Beasley RP, Hwang LY, Lin CC, Leu ML, Stevens CE, Szmuness W, Chen KP. Incidence of hepatitis B virus infections in preschool children in Taiwan. J Infect Dis. 1982 Aug;146(2):198-204. doi: 10.1093/infdis/146.2.198.
- Background: PubMed 6402925Beasley RP, Hwang LY, Lin CC, Ko YC, Twu SJ. Incidence of hepatitis among students at a university in Taiwan. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Feb;117(2):213-22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113532.
- Background: PubMed 19349983Kamatani Y, Wattanapokayakit S, Ochi H, Kawaguchi T, Takahashi A, Hosono N, Kubo M, Tsunoda T, Kamatani N, Kumada H, Puseenam A, Sura T, Daigo Y, Chayama K, Chantratita W, Nakamura Y, Matsuda K. A genome-wide association study identifies variants in the HLA-DP locus associated with chronic hepatitis B in Asians. Nat Genet. 2009 May;41(5):591-5. doi: 10.1038/ng.348. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
- Background: PubMed 21750111Mbarek H, Ochi H, Urabe Y, Kumar V, Kubo M, Hosono N, Takahashi A, Kamatani Y, Miki D, Abe H, Tsunoda T, Kamatani N, Chayama K, Nakamura Y, Matsuda K. A genome-wide association study of chronic hepatitis B identified novel risk locus in a Japanese population. Hum Mol Genet. 2011 Oct 1;20(19):3884-92. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr301. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
- Background: PubMed 24940741Chang SW, Fann CS, Su WH, Wang YC, Weng CC, Yu CJ, Hsu CL, Hsieh AR, Chien RN, Chu CM, Tai DI. A genome-wide association study on chronic HBV infection and its clinical progression in male Han-Taiwanese. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e99724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099724. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 3997072Chu CM, Karayiannis P, Fowler MJ, Monjardino J, Liaw YF, Thomas HC. Natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Taiwan: studies of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum. Hepatology. 1985 May-Jun;5(3):431-4. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840050315.
- Background: PubMed 22157327Bertoletti A, Ferrari C. Innate and adaptive immune responses in chronic hepatitis B virus infections: towards restoration of immune control of viral infection. Gut. 2012 Dec;61(12):1754-64. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301073. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Sequential Therapy With Daplusiran/Tomligisiran (DAP/TOM) Followed by Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Hepatitis B
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study of Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection (B-Focus)
Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Durability of Treatment Response in Previous Bepirovirsen Study Participants (B-Sure)
Hepatitis B
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of CPU-YL01 Injection in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dar-In Tai, MD, PhD principal investigator
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Engerix-B, Tenofovir and Entecavir in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
HBV DNA levels during followup period (time frame: At 48th weeks of followup after completed combination therapy). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02505009, which also lists 60 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2019.