Intermittent ClaudicationYORVICNCT02505503
York Study of Unloading Shoes for Vascular Intermittent Claudication
A study testing Unloading shoes in people with Intermittent Claudication and Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Some people experience a cramp-like leg pain during walking that is relieved only by rest. This is called intermittent claudication (IC) and it is a common symptom of peripheral arterial disease. Patients with IC struggle to walk, which in turn lowers their quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Intermittent Claudication, Peripheral Arterial Disease
- What is being tested?
- Unloading shoes
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jul 2015to Sep 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged ≥16 years with intermittent claudication due to peripheral arterial disease
- Resting ankle-brachial index ≤0.9 and/or imaging evidence of peripheral arterial disease
- Stable symptoms for at least 3 months (assessed via self-report)
- Pain-free walking distance <250 m on 6-minute walk test
- Ambulation that is limited primarily by calf claudication on 6-minute walk test
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Able to read and speak English
Who cannot join
- Absolute contraindications to exercise testing as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine
- Critical limb ischemia
- Function is uniquely impaired, e.g. vascular amputees
- Co-morbidities that limit walking to a greater extent than intermittent claudication (e.g. severe arthritis)
- Ambulation limited by claudication in regions other than the calf
- Current or previous (within 6 months) use of shoe inserts, knee or ankle braces or customised shoes prescribed by a health professional
- Ankle/foot pathology/pain on either side
- "High-risk" foot (e.g. significant peripheral neuropathy, foot deformity, history of foot ulceration), assessed by a vascular specialist (Registrar or Consultant) or podiatrist
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
York St John University
York, North Yorkshire, YO31 7EX
York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
York, North Yorkshire, YO31 8HE
About this study
Official title: Randomised Crossover Study With Nested Qualitative Component Investigating the Clinical Efficacy and Acceptability of Unloading Shoes in Patients With Intermittent Claudication Due to Peripheral Arterial Disease
Some people experience a cramp-like leg pain during walking that is relieved only by rest. This is called intermittent claudication (IC) and it is a common symptom of peripheral arterial disease. Patients with IC struggle to walk, which in turn lowers their quality of life.
The intensity of IC pain experienced during walking depends on several factors, including the type of footwear worn. For example, non-supportive shoes may make the calf muscles work harder during walking, leading to earlier and more-severe symptoms of IC.
Read more
A member of the research team has developed a shoe that reduces the work done by the lower-leg muscles during walking. Preliminary data indicate that, when wearing these "unloading shoes", people with IC were able to walk further without pain as compared with when wearing a normal pair of shoes. The current project aims to provide further information on the usefulness and acceptability of these shoes.
Forty people with IC will complete a set of three walking tests on two separate occasions; once whilst wearing the unloading shoes, and once whilst wearing some normal shoes. The participants will then be given a pair of unloading or normal shoes to wear for two weeks, after which we will collect information on how acceptable the shoes were to wear via a survey of all participants and one-to-one interviews with a subset of participants.
Read the detailed description
Study design This is a single-centre, randomised crossover study with a qualitative component. Forty patients will be recruited from York Hospital. Participants will be asked to perform walking assessments on two week days within a maximum period of two weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned to complete walking assessments whilst wearing unloading shoes on day 1, followed by walking assessments whilst wearing control shoes on day 2, or vice versa. All participants will then be given the unloading or control shoes to wear for two weeks, after which they will complete a survey about how acceptable the shoes were to wear. A sub-sample of participants will also be interviewed about the acceptability of the shoes.
Study setting Recruitment for this study will take place at York Hospital, York, United Kingdom. Study assessments will take place at York St John University.
Unloading shoe The design of the "unloading" shoe to be used in this research will be a modern style of trainer-type shoe with a cosmetically-shaped rocker sole incorporated. The rocker sole will comprise of three circular curves whose arc centres are positioned at the anatomical ankle, hip and knee respectively; assuming a vertical lower limb. This is designed to influence the line of action of the ground reaction force to pass close to the anatomical joint centres and so reduce the moments needed to be generated for ambulation by the muscles acting across those joints in the lower limb. Additionally it is designed to place the ankle into a relatively plantarflexed position where the ankle plantarflexors use less energy than for instance when placed in dorsiflexion. This is in order to unload the calf muscles by providing a simultaneous reduction in ankle range of motion in relative plantarflexion but still moving with a near-normal trajectory. This also optimises the lever arm between the Achilles tendon and the ankle joint so making propulsion, and therefore calf muscle power generation, more efficient. Participants will be provided with a pair of appropriately-sized shoes, which will be produced for this study by an established shoe manufacturer - Chaneco (www.chaneco.co.uk). To allow participants to habituate to wearing the shoes before assessment, they will be allowed to walk around in the shoes at a self-selected pace for at least 5 minutes.
Control shoe During the control condition assessments, participants will wear a pair of appropriately-sized shoes, which are similar in appearance to the unloading shoes, but do not contain the altered sole. Again, these will be provided by Chaneco, and a minimum of 5 minutes walking will be allowed for habituation.
Outcome measures Primary outcome measure
- Maximum walking distance during forced-pace walking: Following a rest period of at least 20 minutes, participants will complete a 6-minute walk test in which they will be instructed to walk as far as possible within 6 minutes. This test simulates community walking better than treadmill testing, has been recommended as a primary outcome in claudication trials, and has good inter-day reproducibility (coefficient of variation 10.4%). A straight 30-m course will be used and the distance walked recorded. A testing checklist and standardised instructions will be used. The outcome assessor will have no role in the sizing and fitting of the shoes, in an attempt to keep them blinded, and the verbal test instructions will be audio-recorded so that we can check the consistency of which the instructions have been delivered.
Secondary outcome measures
- Pain-free walking distance during usual-pace walking: Following a rest period of at least 20 minutes, participants will be invited to walk at their usual walking speed along a straight 30-m course. Their walking speed will be recorded using electronic timing gates (SMARTSPEED, Fusion Sport). Participants will be instructed to indicate the point where they first experience claudication pain. The distance walked up until this point will be recorded.
- Gait biomechanical parameters: Reflective markers will be positioned on anatomical landmarks of the lower extremities using double-sided sticky tape to allow 3D motion analysis. Wireless surface electromyography units (Trigno EMG, Delsys, Italy) will also be attached to the skin overlying the medial and lateral Gastrocnemius and Tibialis Anterior using double-sided sticky tape to allow the assessment of lower-leg muscle recruitment patterns during the gait cycle. Participants will walk at their usual pace along a figure-of-8 circuit. A force plate (9281EA, Kistler) positioned in the central straight portion of the figure-of-8 will capture kinetic data. The participants will be naïve to the force plate, to help ensure a natural walking gait. Infra-red 3D optical motion analysis cameras (Oqus, Qualisys) will capture kinematic data each time a participant approaches and passes over the force plate. Participants will indicate when they experience the onset of claudication pain and continue until pain prevents them walking further. Outcomes include step length, stride length, cadence, velocity and joint angles, and joint moments and powers of the lower extremities during the three stages of pain development during walking; pain-free walking, after the onset of pain and immediately before stopping walking due to pain.
Participant timeline Participants will be required to attend the biomechanics laboratory at York St John University on 3 occasions: a first "screening" visit for obtaining written informed consent, confirming eligibility and recording baseline characteristics of the participant, and two subsequent visits on which the study assessments will be conducted. The study assessment sessions (i.e. visits 2 and 3) will be identical in composition apart from that the participants will wear different shoes (unloading or control) during the walking tests. The first assessment visit must be completed within 4 weeks of the screening visit, and there will be a maximum of 2 weeks and a minimum of 1 day between assessment visits 1 and 2. After completing the crossover study, half of the participants (n=20) will be given the unloading shoes and the other half (n=20) the control shoes to wear for 2 weeks. After this 2-week period, all participants will complete and return a survey about the shoes and be questioned via telephone about any adverse device effects. A sub-sample (minimum n=12; control n=6, unloading n=6) will undertake a telephone-based semi-structured interview with a qualitative researcher. This interview will be conducted within 2 weeks of the end of the 2 week shoe-wearing period. Therefore, the maximum duration that a participant will be involved in the study from the point of consenting is 10 weeks, and the minimum is 17 days; however, most participants will most likely be undertaking the study visits across a period of 4-8 weeks.
- Being tested
- Unloading shoes, Unadapted control shoe
- Keywords
- Claudication, Footwear, Shoes, Walking capacity, Walking distance
- Medical subject headings
- Intermittent Claudication, Peripheral Arterial Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Unloading shoesDevice
The unloading shoe will be a trainer-type shoe with a rocker sole incorporated. The sole is designed to influence the line of action of the ground reaction force to pass close to the anatomical joint centres and so reduce the moments needed to be generated for ambulation by the muscles acting across those joints in the lower limb. Additionally it is designed to place the ankle into a relatively plantarflexed position where the ankle plantarflexors use less energy than for instance when placed in dorsiflexion.
Unadapted control shoeDevice
During the control condition assessments, participants wear a pair of appropriately-sized shoes, which are similar in appearance to the unloading shoes, but do not contain the altered sole.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Unloading shoes | Active comparator | The unloading shoe will be a trainer-type shoe with a cosmetically-shaped rocker sole. The sole will have three circular curves whose arc centres are positioned at the anatomical ankle, hip and knee respectively; assuming a vertical lower limb. This is designed to influence the line of action of the ground reaction force to pass close to the anatomical joint centres and so reduce the moments needed to be generated for ambulation by the muscles acting across those joints in the lower limb. Additionally it is designed to place the ankle into a relatively plantarflexed position where the ankle plantarflexors use less energy than for instance when placed in dorsiflexion. Receives: Device: Unloading shoes; Device: Unadapted control shoe |
| Unadapted control shoes | Placebo comparator | The control shoes will be similar in appearance to the unloading shoes, but they will not contain the altered sole. Receives: Device: Unloading shoes; Device: Unadapted control shoe |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total distance walked during 6-minute walk test
Following a rest period of at least 20 minutes, participants will complete a 6-minute walk test in which they will be instructed to walk as far as possible within 6 minutes. A straight 30-m course will be used and the distance walked recorded.
Measured: Measured 40 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Secondary outcomes (6)
Pain-free walking distance during usual-pace walking
Following a rest period of at least 20 minutes, participants will be invited to walk at their usual walking speed along a straight 30-m course. Participants will be instructed to indicate the point where they first experience claudication pain. The distance walked up until this point will be recorded.
Measured: Measured 20 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Walking speed
This variable will be assessed during self-paced walking.
Measured: Measured 60 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Step length
This variable will be assessed during self-paced walking.
Measured: Measured 60 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Step cadence
This variable will be assessed during self-paced walking.
Measured: Measured 60 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Muscle activation
Electromyography will be used to observe when during the gait cycle of self-paced walking the calf muscles are activated. This will allow the investigators to determine the effectiveness of the unloading shoes in altering calf muscle activity.
Measured: Measured 60 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Joint moments
An infrared camera system and force platform will be used to assess external moments at the ankle, knee and hip.
Measured: Measured 60 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2015
- Primary completionAug 2016
- Study completionSep 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Intermittent ClaudicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of York, York St John University, University of Salford
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Garry Tew, PhD, Principal investigator, University of York
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02505503
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- YOR - A02382
- Acronym
- YORVIC
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 14 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Jordan AR, Tew GA, Hutchins SW, Shalan A, Cook L, Thompson A. Three-curve rocker-soled shoes and gait adaptations to intermittent claudication pain: A randomised crossover trial. Gait Posture. 2019 Jan;67:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
PubMed 30265963Tew GA, Shalan A, Jordan AR, Cook L, Coleman ES, Fairhurst C, Hewitt C, Hutchins SW, Thompson A. Unloading shoes for intermittent claudication: a randomised crossover trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0716-x.
PubMed 29179693
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomised Crossover Study With Nested Qualitative Component Investigating the Clinical Efficacy and Acceptability of Unloading Shoes in Patients With Intermittent Claudication Due to Peripheral Arterial Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02505503
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- YORVIC / YOR - A02382
- Keywords
- Claudication, Footwear, Shoes, Walking capacity, Walking distance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of York, York St John University, University of Salford
- Study start
- Jul 2015
- Primary completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Some people experience a cramp-like leg pain during walking that is relieved only by rest. This is called intermittent claudication (IC) and it is a common symptom of peripheral arterial disease. Patients with IC struggle to walk, which in turn lowers their quality of life.
The intensity of IC pain experienced during walking depends on several factors, including the type of footwear worn. For example, non-supportive shoes may make the calf muscles work harder during walking, leading to earlier and more-severe symptoms of IC.
A member of the research team has developed a shoe that reduces the work done by the lower-leg muscles during walking. Preliminary data indicate that, when wearing these "unloading shoes", people with IC were able to walk further without pain as compared with when wearing a normal pair of shoes. The current project aims to provide further information on the usefulness and acceptability of these shoes.
Forty people with IC will complete a set of three walking tests on two separate occasions; once whilst wearing the unloading shoes, and once whilst wearing some normal shoes. The participants will then be given a pair of unloading or normal shoes to wear for two weeks, after which we will collect information on how acceptable the shoes were to wear via a survey of all participants and one-to-one interviews with a subset of participants.
Detailed description
Study design This is a single-centre, randomised crossover study with a qualitative component. Forty patients will be recruited from York Hospital. Participants will be asked to perform walking assessments on two week days within a maximum period of two weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned to complete walking assessments whilst wearing unloading shoes on day 1, followed by walking assessments whilst wearing control shoes on day 2, or vice versa. All participants will then be given the unloading or control shoes to wear for two weeks, after which they will complete a survey about how acceptable the shoes were to wear. A sub-sample of participants will also be interviewed about the acceptability of the shoes.
Study setting Recruitment for this study will take place at York Hospital, York, United Kingdom. Study assessments will take place at York St John University.
Unloading shoe The design of the "unloading" shoe to be used in this research will be a modern style of trainer-type shoe with a cosmetically-shaped rocker sole incorporated. The rocker sole will comprise of three circular curves whose arc centres are positioned at the anatomical ankle, hip and knee respectively; assuming a vertical lower limb. This is designed to influence the line of action of the ground reaction force to pass close to the anatomical joint centres and so reduce the moments needed to be generated for ambulation by the muscles acting across those joints in the lower limb. Additionally it is designed to place the ankle into a relatively plantarflexed position where the ankle plantarflexors use less energy than for instance when placed in dorsiflexion. This is in order to unload the calf muscles by providing a simultaneous reduction in ankle range of motion in relative plantarflexion but still moving with a near-normal trajectory. This also optimises the lever arm between the Achilles tendon and the ankle joint so making propulsion, and therefore calf muscle power generation, more efficient. Participants will be provided with a pair of appropriately-sized shoes, which will be produced for this study by an established shoe manufacturer - Chaneco (www.chaneco.co.uk). To allow participants to habituate to wearing the shoes before assessment, they will be allowed to walk around in the shoes at a self-selected pace for at least 5 minutes.
Control shoe During the control condition assessments, participants will wear a pair of appropriately-sized shoes, which are similar in appearance to the unloading shoes, but do not contain the altered sole. Again, these will be provided by Chaneco, and a minimum of 5 minutes walking will be allowed for habituation.
Outcome measures Primary outcome measure
- Maximum walking distance during forced-pace walking: Following a rest period of at least 20 minutes, participants will complete a 6-minute walk test in which they will be instructed to walk as far as possible within 6 minutes. This test simulates community walking better than treadmill testing, has been recommended as a primary outcome in claudication trials, and has good inter-day reproducibility (coefficient of variation 10.4%). A straight 30-m course will be used and the distance walked recorded. A testing checklist and standardised instructions will be used. The outcome assessor will have no role in the sizing and fitting of the shoes, in an attempt to keep them blinded, and the verbal test instructions will be audio-recorded so that we can check the consistency of which the instructions have been delivered.
Secondary outcome measures
- Pain-free walking distance during usual-pace walking: Following a rest period of at least 20 minutes, participants will be invited to walk at their usual walking speed along a straight 30-m course. Their walking speed will be recorded using electronic timing gates (SMARTSPEED, Fusion Sport). Participants will be instructed to indicate the point where they first experience claudication pain. The distance walked up until this point will be recorded.
- Gait biomechanical parameters: Reflective markers will be positioned on anatomical landmarks of the lower extremities using double-sided sticky tape to allow 3D motion analysis. Wireless surface electromyography units (Trigno EMG, Delsys, Italy) will also be attached to the skin overlying the medial and lateral Gastrocnemius and Tibialis Anterior using double-sided sticky tape to allow the assessment of lower-leg muscle recruitment patterns during the gait cycle. Participants will walk at their usual pace along a figure-of-8 circuit. A force plate (9281EA, Kistler) positioned in the central straight portion of the figure-of-8 will capture kinetic data. The participants will be naïve to the force plate, to help ensure a natural walking gait. Infra-red 3D optical motion analysis cameras (Oqus, Qualisys) will capture kinematic data each time a participant approaches and passes over the force plate. Participants will indicate when they experience the onset of claudication pain and continue until pain prevents them walking further. Outcomes include step length, stride length, cadence, velocity and joint angles, and joint moments and powers of the lower extremities during the three stages of pain development during walking; pain-free walking, after the onset of pain and immediately before stopping walking due to pain.
Participant timeline Participants will be required to attend the biomechanics laboratory at York St John University on 3 occasions: a first "screening" visit for obtaining written informed consent, confirming eligibility and recording baseline characteristics of the participant, and two subsequent visits on which the study assessments will be conducted. The study assessment sessions (i.e. visits 2 and 3) will be identical in composition apart from that the participants will wear different shoes (unloading or control) during the walking tests. The first assessment visit must be completed within 4 weeks of the screening visit, and there will be a maximum of 2 weeks and a minimum of 1 day between assessment visits 1 and 2. After completing the crossover study, half of the participants (n=20) will be given the unloading shoes and the other half (n=20) the control shoes to wear for 2 weeks. After this 2-week period, all participants will complete and return a survey about the shoes and be questioned via telephone about any adverse device effects. A sub-sample (minimum n=12; control n=6, unloading n=6) will undertake a telephone-based semi-structured interview with a qualitative researcher. This interview will be conducted within 2 weeks of the end of the 2 week shoe-wearing period. Therefore, the maximum duration that a participant will be involved in the study from the point of consenting is 10 weeks, and the minimum is 17 days; however, most participants will most likely be undertaking the study visits across a period of 4-8 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Unloading shoes | Active comparator | Device: Unloading shoes, Device: Unadapted control shoeThe unloading shoe will be a trainer-type shoe with a cosmetically-shaped rocker sole. The sole will have three circular curves whose arc centres are positioned at the anatomical ankle, hip and knee respectively; assuming a vertical lower limb. This is designed to influence the line of action of the ground reaction force to pass close to the anatomical joint centres and so reduce the moments needed to be generated for ambulation by the muscles acting across those joints in the lower limb. Additionally it is designed to place the ankle into a relatively plantarflexed position where the ankle plantarflexors use less energy than for instance when placed in dorsiflexion. |
| Unadapted control shoes | Placebo comparator | Device: Unloading shoes, Device: Unadapted control shoeThe control shoes will be similar in appearance to the unloading shoes, but they will not contain the altered sole. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Aged ≥16 years with intermittent claudication due to peripheral arterial disease
- Resting ankle-brachial index ≤0.9 and/or imaging evidence of peripheral arterial disease
- Stable symptoms for at least 3 months (assessed via self-report)
- Pain-free walking distance <250 m on 6-minute walk test
- Ambulation that is limited primarily by calf claudication on 6-minute walk test
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Absolute contraindications to exercise testing as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine
- Critical limb ischemia
- Function is uniquely impaired, e.g. vascular amputees
- Co-morbidities that limit walking to a greater extent than intermittent claudication (e.g. severe arthritis)
- Ambulation limited by claudication in regions other than the calf
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Unloading shoesThe unloading shoe will be a trainer-type shoe with a rocker sole incorporated. The sole is designed to influence the line of action of the ground reaction force to pass close to the anatomical joint centres and so reduce the moments needed to be generated for ambulation by the muscles acting across those joints in the lower limb. Additionally it is designed to place the ankle into a relatively plantarflexed position where the ankle plantarflexors use less energy than for instance when placed in dorsiflexion. | Device | Unadapted control shoes, Unloading shoes |
| Unadapted control shoeDuring the control condition assessments, participants wear a pair of appropriately-sized shoes, which are similar in appearance to the unloading shoes, but do not contain the altered sole. | Device | Unadapted control shoes, Unloading shoes |
Primary outcome
Total distance walked during 6-minute walk test
Time frame: Measured 40 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Following a rest period of at least 20 minutes, participants will complete a 6-minute walk test in which they will be instructed to walk as far as possible within 6 minutes. A straight 30-m course will be used and the distance walked recorded.
6 secondary outcomes
Pain-free walking distance during usual-pace walking
Time frame: Measured 20 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Walking speed
Time frame: Measured 60 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Step length
Time frame: Measured 60 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Step cadence
Time frame: Measured 60 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Muscle activation
Time frame: Measured 60 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Joint moments
Time frame: Measured 60 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Sep 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30265963Jordan AR, Tew GA, Hutchins SW, Shalan A, Cook L, Thompson A. Three-curve rocker-soled shoes and gait adaptations to intermittent claudication pain: A randomised crossover trial. Gait Posture. 2019 Jan;67:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29179693Tew GA, Shalan A, Jordan AR, Cook L, Coleman ES, Fairhurst C, Hewitt C, Hutchins SW, Thompson A. Unloading shoes for intermittent claudication: a randomised crossover trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0716-x.
Related trials for Intermittent Claudication
Not yet recruiting
Daily Stretching to Improve Walking in Older Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: The STRETCH PAD Study
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD), Intermittent Claudication
Recruiting
EVERO Drug-coated Balloon (DCB) Randomized Trial
Peripheral Vascular Disease, Peripheral Arterial Disease
Recruiting
Personalised Multicomponent Exercise Programme in Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral Arterial Disease, Intermittent Claudication
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Ramipril Treatment of Claudication: Oxidative Damage and Muscle Fibrosis
Peripheral Arterial Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Improving Mobility After Revascularization in Peripheral Artery Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease, Intermittent Claudication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Garry Tew, PhD principal investigator
University of York
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Unloading shoes in people with Intermittent Claudication and Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total distance walked during 6-minute walk test (time frame: Measured 40 minutes after putting on the intervention or control shoes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02505503, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2016.