Postoperative ComplicationsNCT02507557
Effects of Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on the Incidence of Postoperative Complications
An observational study of Postoperative Complications, run by First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Excessive fluid loss is often reported in gastrointestinal surgical patients due to preoperative fasting and bowel preparations. Insufficient fluid infusion may cause hypovolemia and tissue hypoperfusion, which may delayed postoperative recovery and even induce postoperative acute renal failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Complications
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- May 2016to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: patients undergone gastrointestinal surgery
Who may be able to join
- Elective laparotomy or laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.
- Age ≥ 18 years old.
- ASA grade II - IV.
- General anesthesia.
Who cannot join
- Patients with aortic regurgitation.
- Patients with major artery stenosis disease, peripheral vascular disease and arterial catheterization contraindication.
- Patients with cognitive dysfunction and uncooperative subjects.
- Failure to obtain informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, 400016
Juying Jin, M.D., 086-023-89011069, juyingjin@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Effects of Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on the Incidence of Postoperative Complications Following Gastrointestinal Surgery
Excessive fluid loss is often reported in gastrointestinal surgical patients due to preoperative fasting and bowel preparations. Insufficient fluid infusion may cause hypovolemia and tissue hypoperfusion, which may delayed postoperative recovery and even induce postoperative acute renal failure. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) strategy with that of the conventional fluid management on the morbidity and mortality of postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, and medical expense, so as to provide clinical evidences for optimized intraoperative fluid management for patients undergone gastrointestinal surgery.
Read the detailed description
- Background Excessive fluid loss is often reported in gastrointestinal surgical patients due to preoperative fasting and bowel preparations. Many factors may further exacerbate the lack of fluid volume, including intraoperative blood loss and fluid loss, anesthetic drug-induced peripheral vasodilatation, as well as systemic inflammatory response syndrome, systemic capillary leak syndrome, endothelial barrier dysfunction and transfer of intravascular fluid to the third space caused by surgical trauma.
Insufficient fluid infusion may cause hypovolemia and tissue hypoperfusion, which may delayed postoperative recovery and even induce postoperative acute renal failure. On the other hand, fluid overload can lead to edema, increased oxygen diffusion distance between lung mesenchyme and cells, then causing tissue ischemia, hypoxia, and acidosis and even affecting the recovery of gastrointestinal function and the healing of incision. It has been proved that improper fluid therapy in the perioperative period is associated with poor outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal surgery. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) regimen emphasizes the personalized fluid infusion to optimize the intraoperative hemodynamics and tissue perfusion, including rising stroke volume, increasing arterial oxygen saturation, which may result in improving postoperative outcomes.
Flo-Trac/Vigileo system is developed by Edwards Technology, and monitors the continuous cardiac output via peripheral arteries. The monitoring approaches of this system prove to be convenient, safe and minimally invasive. As an important indicator of the system, stroke volume variation (SVV) can accurately reflect the volume status of patients. The principle of SVV is the preload change, which is caused by the intrathoracic pressure changes between inspiratory and expiratory phases, will lead to arterial pulse pressure fluctuations, thus affecting stroke volume (SV). SV may vary under different volume loads. Through measuring and analyzing these differences and then assessing the circulation status, SVV provides guidance for fluid therapy. The continuous and real-time SVV monitoring can provide data of patients' circulation status, thereby optimizing clinical fluid treatment options and avoiding excessive or insufficient volume. For patients with gastrointestinal surgery, SVV guidance during the surgery can accurately regulate fluid infusion, which will contribute to the early postoperative recovery and improve patient prognosis.
In the present study, SVV-directed fluid therapy will be performed in patients with gastrointestinal surgery and then will be compared with conventional fluid treatment regimen in the mobility and mortality of postoperative complications, postoperative recovery, and length of hospital stay. The investigators are aiming to provide clinical evidences for reasonable intraoperative fluid management of such patients.
II. Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the effects of GDFT strategy with that of the conventional fluid management on the morbidity and mortality of postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, and medical expense, so as to provide clinical evidences for optimized intraoperative fluid management for patients undergone gastrointestinal surgery.
III. Research Plan 1. Design: quantitative observational comparative effectiveness research. 2. Sample Volume: 200 cases of subjects in the experimental group and control group, respectively.
- Research phases The research is divided into three phases
- Retrospective analysis of perioperative data from patients undergone gastrointestinal surgery according to traditional practices from January to June 2015. Data about postoperative length of hospital stay, the morbidity and mortality of complications is collected from electronic database. The fluid was administrated according to the traditional method. Total intake volume = compensatory volume of expansion (CVE) + physically required volume+ cumulative loss volume + continued loss volume + the loss volume of the third space. Both physically required volume and cumulative loss volume were replaced according to 4-2-1 rule. Crystalloid and colloid were given with the ratio of 2/1. According to the bleeding, RBC and plasma were given if necessary. HR50 /min~100/min and MAP60~100mmHg were maintained during the surgery in both groups. When SBP<90 mmHg or MAP < 60 mmHg, the patients were given the vasoactive drug of bitartrate noradrenaline.
- Training phase: the GDFT protocol training will be implemented after receiving ethic approval estimated from July to September 2015. A 3-month training period allowed all research staff to become familiar with the protocol.
- Implementation phase: After 3 months training, estimated from October 2015 till March in 2016, the fluid management is conducted to patients with the gastrointestinal surgery on the basis of GDFT protocol. Then perioperative data of the included patients in this phase will be collected retrospectively from electronic database.
- GDFT protocol
- Anesthesia management The radial artery line is placed before anesthesia. The invasively arterial blood pressure, ECG, HR and SPO2 are monitored. The Flo-Trac/Vigileo monitoring system is connected with the radial artery line of the GDFT group, CO, SV, SVV and other hemodynamic parameters are monitored. In addition, the bispectral index (BIS) is continuously monitored to assess the depth of sedation. Induction: 0.01~0.03 mg/kg of midazolam, 0.2~0.4μg/kg of sufentanil, 1~2 mg/kg of propofol and 0.6~0.9 mg/kg of rocuronium are injected intravenously for anesthesia induction. After the completion of endotracheal intubation, the internal jugular puncture catheterization is undergone at the right side to monitor the central vein pressure. Maintenance: After endotracheal intubation, the mechanical ventilation is initiated. The tidal volume is set as 6~8 mL/kg, respiratory rate as 10 to 14 times/min and inhalation to exhalation ratio as 1:2. In the surgery, the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in end expiratory gas is kept at the level of 35 - 45 mmHg. And the remifentanil (target concentration of effect compartment is 4 - 8 ng / mL) and propofol (target concentration of plasma is 3 - 5μg / mL) of intravenous target-controlled infusion are given to maintain the anesthesia effect. BIS value is maintained at 40 - 50. Besides, 0.1~0.3μg/kg sufentanil and 0.1~0.2 mg/kg rocuronium are injected intermittently. About 30 minutes before the end of the surgery, a bolus of 0.1~0.3μg/kg sufentanil is administered. Recovery: The depth of anesthesia is reduced gradually at the end of the surgery. In the recovery period, the atropine and neostigmine are given as muscle relaxant antagonists. Extubation is performed according to the awareness, breathing, muscle strength and reflex recovery of the patient. All patients are delivered to ICU after surgery.
- Fluid Treatment Compensatory volume of expansion (CVE) is replaced with 5mL/kg of Ringer's lactate solution before induction. The maintained dose of infusion of crystalloid during surgery is: 2~4 ml/kg/h for open procedure (maximum dose of 400ml/h), and 1~2 ml/kg/h for laparoscopic procedure (maximum dose of 200ml/h) respectively. Fluid replacement is directed by SV value. After incision (after pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cases) give a 200 mL Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 and Sodium Chloride bolus over <10 min. If SV increases by >10%, repeat bolus until SV increases by <10%. Record peak value achieved. Give a further colloid bolus when SV drops 10% from peak value and repeat cycle. According to the bleeding, RBC and plasma are given if necessary. SaO2≥95%, Hb > 70g/L, core body temperature> 37 ℃, HR50 /min~100/min and MAP60~100mmHg are maintained during the surgery in both groups. When SBP<90 mmHg or MAP < 60 mmHg, the two groups are given the vasoactive drug of bitartrate noradrenaline.
- Monitoring variables
- Intraoperative intake and output volume: volume of intraoperative crystalloid, volume of colloid, blood transfusion volume, urine output, blood loss and use of vasoactive agents.
- Hemodynamic variables: MAP, HR, SaO2, CVP, CO, CI, SV, SVV, stroke volume index (SVI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) at the following time points: baseline, immediately after induction and intubation, at beginning of the surgery and every five minutes following that, at the end of surgery, etc.
- Conditions
- Postoperative Complications
- Keywords
- Therapy, Fluid, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Postoperative Complications
- Medical subject headings
- Postoperative Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Before GDFM Training | About 200 patients' medical record information will be extracted from the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University electronic medical record prior to the start of the training curriculum. | |
| After GDFM Training | About 200 patients' medical record information will be extracted from the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University electronic medical record after the training program took place |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The difference in postoperative morbidity rate between pre-training and post-training cohorts
Measured: within postoperative 30 days
The difference in postoperative mortality rate between pre-training and post-training cohorts
Measured: within postoperative 30 days
Secondary outcomes (6)
Occurrence of postoperative complications
Measured: within postoperative 30 days
Postoperative length of hospital stay
Measured: within postoperative 30 days
Readmission rate
Measured: within post-discharge 30 days
Time of flatus
Measured: within postoperative 30 days
Time of defecation
Measured: within postoperative 30 days
Time of urine catheter removal
Measured: within postoperative 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2016
- Primary completionNov 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postoperative ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Edwards Lifesciences
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Min Su, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
- Investigators
- Su Min, MD, Study chair, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02507557
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GDFTCQ2015
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Jin J, Min S, Liu D, Liu L, Lv B. Clinical and economic impact of goal-directed fluid therapy during elective gastrointestinal surgery. Perioper Med (Lond). 2018 Oct 4;7:22. doi: 10.1186/s13741-018-0102-y. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30305890
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on the Incidence of Postoperative Complications Following Gastrointestinal Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02507557
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GDFTCQ2015
- Conditions
- Postoperative Complications
- Keywords
- Therapy, Fluid, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Postoperative Complications
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Edwards Lifesciences
- Study start
- May 2016
- Primary completion
- Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Excessive fluid loss is often reported in gastrointestinal surgical patients due to preoperative fasting and bowel preparations. Insufficient fluid infusion may cause hypovolemia and tissue hypoperfusion, which may delayed postoperative recovery and even induce postoperative acute renal failure. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) strategy with that of the conventional fluid management on the morbidity and mortality of postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, and medical expense, so as to provide clinical evidences for optimized intraoperative fluid management for patients undergone gastrointestinal surgery.
Detailed description
- Background Excessive fluid loss is often reported in gastrointestinal surgical patients due to preoperative fasting and bowel preparations. Many factors may further exacerbate the lack of fluid volume, including intraoperative blood loss and fluid loss, anesthetic drug-induced peripheral vasodilatation, as well as systemic inflammatory response syndrome, systemic capillary leak syndrome, endothelial barrier dysfunction and transfer of intravascular fluid to the third space caused by surgical trauma.
Insufficient fluid infusion may cause hypovolemia and tissue hypoperfusion, which may delayed postoperative recovery and even induce postoperative acute renal failure. On the other hand, fluid overload can lead to edema, increased oxygen diffusion distance between lung mesenchyme and cells, then causing tissue ischemia, hypoxia, and acidosis and even affecting the recovery of gastrointestinal function and the healing of incision. It has been proved that improper fluid therapy in the perioperative period is associated with poor outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal surgery. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) regimen emphasizes the personalized fluid infusion to optimize the intraoperative hemodynamics and tissue perfusion, including rising stroke volume, increasing arterial oxygen saturation, which may result in improving postoperative outcomes.
Flo-Trac/Vigileo system is developed by Edwards Technology, and monitors the continuous cardiac output via peripheral arteries. The monitoring approaches of this system prove to be convenient, safe and minimally invasive. As an important indicator of the system, stroke volume variation (SVV) can accurately reflect the volume status of patients. The principle of SVV is the preload change, which is caused by the intrathoracic pressure changes between inspiratory and expiratory phases, will lead to arterial pulse pressure fluctuations, thus affecting stroke volume (SV). SV may vary under different volume loads. Through measuring and analyzing these differences and then assessing the circulation status, SVV provides guidance for fluid therapy. The continuous and real-time SVV monitoring can provide data of patients' circulation status, thereby optimizing clinical fluid treatment options and avoiding excessive or insufficient volume. For patients with gastrointestinal surgery, SVV guidance during the surgery can accurately regulate fluid infusion, which will contribute to the early postoperative recovery and improve patient prognosis.
In the present study, SVV-directed fluid therapy will be performed in patients with gastrointestinal surgery and then will be compared with conventional fluid treatment regimen in the mobility and mortality of postoperative complications, postoperative recovery, and length of hospital stay. The investigators are aiming to provide clinical evidences for reasonable intraoperative fluid management of such patients.
II. Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the effects of GDFT strategy with that of the conventional fluid management on the morbidity and mortality of postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, and medical expense, so as to provide clinical evidences for optimized intraoperative fluid management for patients undergone gastrointestinal surgery.
III. Research Plan 1. Design: quantitative observational comparative effectiveness research. 2. Sample Volume: 200 cases of subjects in the experimental group and control group, respectively.
- Research phases The research is divided into three phases
- Retrospective analysis of perioperative data from patients undergone gastrointestinal surgery according to traditional practices from January to June 2015. Data about postoperative length of hospital stay, the morbidity and mortality of complications is collected from electronic database. The fluid was administrated according to the traditional method. Total intake volume = compensatory volume of expansion (CVE) + physically required volume+ cumulative loss volume + continued loss volume + the loss volume of the third space. Both physically required volume and cumulative loss volume were replaced according to 4-2-1 rule. Crystalloid and colloid were given with the ratio of 2/1. According to the bleeding, RBC and plasma were given if necessary. HR50 /min~100/min and MAP60~100mmHg were maintained during the surgery in both groups. When SBP<90 mmHg or MAP < 60 mmHg, the patients were given the vasoactive drug of bitartrate noradrenaline.
- Training phase: the GDFT protocol training will be implemented after receiving ethic approval estimated from July to September 2015. A 3-month training period allowed all research staff to become familiar with the protocol.
- Implementation phase: After 3 months training, estimated from October 2015 till March in 2016, the fluid management is conducted to patients with the gastrointestinal surgery on the basis of GDFT protocol. Then perioperative data of the included patients in this phase will be collected retrospectively from electronic database.
- GDFT protocol
- Anesthesia management The radial artery line is placed before anesthesia. The invasively arterial blood pressure, ECG, HR and SPO2 are monitored. The Flo-Trac/Vigileo monitoring system is connected with the radial artery line of the GDFT group, CO, SV, SVV and other hemodynamic parameters are monitored. In addition, the bispectral index (BIS) is continuously monitored to assess the depth of sedation. Induction: 0.01~0.03 mg/kg of midazolam, 0.2~0.4μg/kg of sufentanil, 1~2 mg/kg of propofol and 0.6~0.9 mg/kg of rocuronium are injected intravenously for anesthesia induction. After the completion of endotracheal intubation, the internal jugular puncture catheterization is undergone at the right side to monitor the central vein pressure. Maintenance: After endotracheal intubation, the mechanical ventilation is initiated. The tidal volume is set as 6~8 mL/kg, respiratory rate as 10 to 14 times/min and inhalation to exhalation ratio as 1:2. In the surgery, the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in end expiratory gas is kept at the level of 35 - 45 mmHg. And the remifentanil (target concentration of effect compartment is 4 - 8 ng / mL) and propofol (target concentration of plasma is 3 - 5μg / mL) of intravenous target-controlled infusion are given to maintain the anesthesia effect. BIS value is maintained at 40 - 50. Besides, 0.1~0.3μg/kg sufentanil and 0.1~0.2 mg/kg rocuronium are injected intermittently. About 30 minutes before the end of the surgery, a bolus of 0.1~0.3μg/kg sufentanil is administered. Recovery: The depth of anesthesia is reduced gradually at the end of the surgery. In the recovery period, the atropine and neostigmine are given as muscle relaxant antagonists. Extubation is performed according to the awareness, breathing, muscle strength and reflex recovery of the patient. All patients are delivered to ICU after surgery.
- Fluid Treatment Compensatory volume of expansion (CVE) is replaced with 5mL/kg of Ringer's lactate solution before induction. The maintained dose of infusion of crystalloid during surgery is: 2~4 ml/kg/h for open procedure (maximum dose of 400ml/h), and 1~2 ml/kg/h for laparoscopic procedure (maximum dose of 200ml/h) respectively. Fluid replacement is directed by SV value. After incision (after pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cases) give a 200 mL Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 and Sodium Chloride bolus over <10 min. If SV increases by >10%, repeat bolus until SV increases by <10%. Record peak value achieved. Give a further colloid bolus when SV drops 10% from peak value and repeat cycle. According to the bleeding, RBC and plasma are given if necessary. SaO2≥95%, Hb > 70g/L, core body temperature> 37 ℃, HR50 /min~100/min and MAP60~100mmHg are maintained during the surgery in both groups. When SBP<90 mmHg or MAP < 60 mmHg, the two groups are given the vasoactive drug of bitartrate noradrenaline.
- Monitoring variables
- Intraoperative intake and output volume: volume of intraoperative crystalloid, volume of colloid, blood transfusion volume, urine output, blood loss and use of vasoactive agents.
- Hemodynamic variables: MAP, HR, SaO2, CVP, CO, CI, SV, SVV, stroke volume index (SVI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) at the following time points: baseline, immediately after induction and intubation, at beginning of the surgery and every five minutes following that, at the end of surgery, etc.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Before GDFM Training | – | –About 200 patients' medical record information will be extracted from the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University electronic medical record prior to the start of the training curriculum. |
| After GDFM Training | – | –About 200 patients' medical record information will be extracted from the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University electronic medical record after the training program took place |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- patients undergone gastrointestinal surgery
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Elective laparotomy or laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.
- Age ≥ 18 years old.
- ASA grade II - IV.
- General anesthesia.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with aortic regurgitation.
- Patients with major artery stenosis disease, peripheral vascular disease and arterial catheterization contraindication.
- Patients with cognitive dysfunction and uncooperative subjects.
- Failure to obtain informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
The difference in postoperative morbidity rate between pre-training and post-training cohorts
Time frame: within postoperative 30 days
The difference in postoperative mortality rate between pre-training and post-training cohorts
Time frame: within postoperative 30 days
6 secondary outcomes
Occurrence of postoperative complications
Time frame: within postoperative 30 days
Postoperative length of hospital stay
Time frame: within postoperative 30 days
Readmission rate
Time frame: within post-discharge 30 days
Time of flatus
Time frame: within postoperative 30 days
Time of defecation
Time frame: within postoperative 30 days
Time of urine catheter removal
Time frame: within postoperative 30 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30305890Jin J, Min S, Liu D, Liu L, Lv B. Clinical and economic impact of goal-directed fluid therapy during elective gastrointestinal surgery. Perioper Med (Lond). 2018 Oct 4;7:22. doi: 10.1186/s13741-018-0102-y. eCollection 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Postoperative Complications
Recruiting
Endo-SPONGE for Treatment of Anastomotic or Hartmann's Stump Leakages in Lower Pelvic Area
Anastomotic Leaks, Hartmanns Stump Leakage
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Su Min, MD study chair
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Postoperative Complications, run by First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Juying Jin, Doctor (+86-13527486171, juyingjin@Hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The difference in postoperative morbidity rate between pre-training and post-training cohorts (time frame: within postoperative 30 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02507557, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2016.