AzTrials
AzTrials

Premature Birth of NewbornNCT02508571

Direct Swallowing Training and Oral Sensorimotor Stimulation in Preterm Infants

A study testing Direct swallowing training (DST) and Oral sensorimotor stimulation (OSMS) in people with Premature Birth of Newborn and Intervention Studies, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of direct swallowing training and oral sensorimotor stimulation in preterm infants on oral feeding performance. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 to 31 weeks
What is being tested?
Direct swallowing training (DST) and Oral sensorimotor stimulation (OSMS)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
189 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Jul 2015to Sep 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 to 31 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Preterm infants : before 32+0 weeks gestation
  • Infants who are receiving full tube feeding (more than 120 ml/kg/day)
  • Infants who discontinue of nasal continuous positive airway pressure before postmenstrual age 33+0 weeks
  • 'Feeders and growers'
  • The parents of the subject voluntarily sign the informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Major congenital anomalies : face, central nervous system, gastrointestine, heart, etc
  • Gastrointestinal complications
  • Chronic medical complications : Intraventricular hemorrhage ≥ Grade III, periventricular leukomalacia, surgical necrotizing enterocolitis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: The Effects of Direct Swallowing Training and Oral Sensorimotor Stimulation in Preterm Infants

This is randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of direct swallowing training and oral sensorimotor stimulation in preterm infants on oral feeding performance.

Being tested
Direct swallowing training (DST), Oral sensorimotor stimulation (OSMS), Sham intervention
Keywords
Infant, Premature, Intervention Studies, Bottle feeding
Medical subject headings
Premature Birth, Bottle Feeding

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Direct swallowing training (DST)Other

    The DST consists of placing a bolus of 0.05-0.2 mL of formula milk (if the parents refuse, distilled water) via a 1-mL syringe directly on the medial-posterior part of the tongue approximately at the level of the hard and soft palate junction. The volume is started with 0.05 mL, and increased in increments of 0.05 mL to a maximum of 0.2 mL until the swallowing reflex is observed. Once the minimal volume necessary to initiate the swallow reflex is identified, it is used for the duration of the training. The bolus is provided every 30 sec over the 15-minute program or as tolerated. It is continued until infants are able to complete independent oral feeding, 2 days in a row with no adverse events that do not self-resolve.

  • Oral sensorimotor stimulation (OSMS)Other

    The OSMS consists of a 15-minute stimulation program, whereby the first 12 minutes involve stroking the cheeks, lips, gums, and tongue, and the final 3 minutes consist of sucking on a pacifier. It is continued until infants are able to complete independent oral feeding, 2 days in a row with no adverse events that do not self-resolve.

  • Sham interventionOther

    The sham intervention consisted of the therapists placing his/her hands into the incubator or bassinet for 15 minutes without touching the infants. It is continued until infants are able to complete independent oral feeding, 2 days in a row with no adverse events that do not self-resolve.

Study groups in NCT02508571
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlSham comparatorTwo 15-minute sessions of sham intervention/day, five days a week
Receives: Other: Sham intervention
DST groupExperimentalOne session of DST and the other of sham intervention/day, five days a week
Receives: Other: Direct swallowing training (DST); Other: Sham intervention
DST+OSMS groupExperimentalOne session of DST and the other of OSMS/day, five days a week
Receives: Other: Direct swallowing training (DST); Other: Oral sensorimotor stimulation (OSMS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Days From Start to Independent Oral Feeding

    Days from start to independent oral feeding (independent oral feeding, 2 days in a row with no adverse events that do not self-resolve - The first successful day)

    Measured: From date of starting oral feeding until the date of independent, full oral feeding, an expected average of 3 weeks

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Days From Start to First Full Oral Feeding

    first full oral feeding : The first day that attain the full oral feeding regardless of feeding side effects

    Measured: From date of starting oral feeding until the date of first full oral feeding, an expected average of 2 weeks

  2. Days From Start to Complete Full Oral Feeding

    complete full oral feeding : 2 days in a row without any adverse events The first successful day)

    Measured: From date of starting oral feeding until the date of complete oral full feeding, an expected average of 3-4weeks

  3. Overall Transfer

    % volume taken/volume prescribed

    Measured: Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%

  4. Proficiency

    % volume taken at 5 min/volume prescribed

    Measured: Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%

  5. Rate of Transfer

    mL/min volume of milk consumed relative to the duration of the oral Feeding session

    Measured: Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%

  6. Volume Loss

    % volume of milk spilled from the lips as a percentage of the total milk transferred

    Measured: Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%

  7. Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS)

    • comprehensive description of the infant's feeding patterns
    • identify normal oral-motor patterns and to differentiate disorganized from dysfunctional patterns

    Measured: Total number of assessment : 2 times ( 1. 3-5 days after starting oral feeding, 2. within 3 days after stopping intervention)

  8. Length of Hospital Stay

    Length of hospital stay

    Measured: From date of admission until the date of discharge, through study completion, expected average days of 3 month

  9. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition

    • an individually administered instrument designed to assess the developmental functioning of infants, toddlers, and young children.
    • cognitive scale, motor scale (gross motor, fine motor), language scale (receptive communication, expressive communication)
    • subtest total raw scores \& scaled scores / composite scores /percentile ranks/ confidence intervals
    • Total raw score range (min~max) : cognitive (0~91), receptive communication (0~49), expressive communication (0~48), fine motor (0~66), gross motor (0~72)
    • Higher scores mean better outcomes

    Measured: Corrected age 18-24 months

  10. Korean Version of MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (K M-B CDI)

    -a simple screening test for language development

    Measured: postnatal age 36±2 months

  11. Korean-Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (K-WPPSI)-Fourth Edition.

    • An innovative measure of cognitive development and an intelligence test for preschoolers and young children
    • Primary index scales> verbal comprehension, visual spatial, fluid reasoning, working memory, processing speed ==> Full scale IQ
    • Ancillary index scales > vocabulary acquisition
    • scaled score, composite score, percentile rank, CI
    • Range of Full scale IQ : min (40) ~ max (160)
    • Higher scores mean better outcomes.

    Measured: aged 4:00~4:11 years

  12. Korean Developmental Screening Test

    • A fill-up questionnaire to be answered by parents so as to determine who experience developmental problems
    • Domains: gross motor, fine motor, language, cognition, sociality, self-care
    • Score range of each domain : min (0) ~ max (24)
    • Higher scores mean better outcomes.

    Measured: postnatal age 48±3 months

  13. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

    • a brief behavioural screening questionnaire
    • 5 subscales: Emotional problems scale, Conduct problems scale, Hyperactivity scale, Peer problems scale, Prosocial scale (score range of each scale : 0-10)
    • total difficulties score : summing scores from all the scales except the prosocial scale (score range : 0-40)
    • Lower scores mean better outcomes for the all scales except the prosocial scale

    Measured: postnatal age 48±3 months

  14. Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS)

    • A comprehensive and widely used measure of behavioral and skill-based feeding problems
    • It consists of 35 questions: 25 related to child eating, and 10 related to parent feeding behaviors.
    • Parents answer each question on a five-point Likert scale, then indicate whether they perceive that behavior to be problematic or not.
    • Child an parent frequency scores : from the Likert scales (score range : min 35 ~ max 175)
    • Child and parent problem scores : from the yes/no questions

    Measured: postnatal age 48±3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2015
  3. Primary completionSep 2020
  4. Study completionSep 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
189 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02508571
Sponsor's protocol ID
1401139552
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
23 Jul 2015
Last updated
3 Apr 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Lau C, Smith EO. Interventions to improve the oral feeding performance of preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2012 Jul;101(7):e269-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02662.x. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

    PubMed 22404221
  • Fucile S, Gisel E, Lau C. Oral stimulation accelerates the transition from tube to oral feeding in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2002 Aug;141(2):230-6. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.125731.

    PubMed 12183719
  • Heo JS, Kim EK, Kim SY, Song IG, Yoon YM, Cho H, Lee ES, Shin SH, Oh BM, Shin HI, Kim HS. Direct swallowing training and oral sensorimotor stimulation in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Mar;107(2):166-173. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-321945. Epub 2021 Jul 19.

    PubMed 34281934

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Direct swallowing training (DST) and Oral sensorimotor stimulation (OSMS) in people with Premature Birth of Newborn and Intervention Studies, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Days From Start to Independent Oral Feeding (time frame: From date of starting oral feeding until the date of independent, full oral feeding, an expected average of 3 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02508571, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in