AzTrials
AzTrials

Alveolar EchinococcosisNCT02509884

Long-term Results of Comprehensive AE Management

An observational study of Alveolar Echinococcosis, run by University of Ulm.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of Alveolar Echinococcosis : A single-center, long-term observational study of 312 Patients in Germany. Human alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is the most Iethal human helminthic infection and is one of the 17 neglected tropical diseases prioritized by the World Health Organization… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Alveolar Echinococcosis
How many people
312 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 1992to Dec 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients with AE seen at the specialized treatment unit in Ulm between January 1992 and December 2011 were included in the database. Follow-up ended on 31.12.2012. Cases were defined according to the likelihood of diagnosis as a "possible", "probable", or "confirmed case"

Who may be able to join

  • All patients with AE seen at the specialized treatment unit in Ulm between January 1992 and December 2011.

Who cannot join

None listed.

About this study

Official title: Comprehensive Diagnosis and Treatment of Alveolar Echinococcosis : A Single-center, Longterm Observational Study of 312 Patients in Germany

Comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of Alveolar Echinococcosis : A single-center, long-term observational study of 312 Patients in Germany. Human alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is the most Iethal human helminthic infection and is one of the 17 neglected tropical diseases prioritized by the World Health Organization (WHO). Its incidence is low in endemic regions of Central and Western Europe (0.03-0.05/100,000), but morbidity and treatment costs are high. In this observational study, the investigators assessed the severity of the disease using the PNM staging system and report on the long-term results of specific AE therapy in an interdisciplinary team of clinicians.

Read the detailed description

All patients with Alveolar Echinococcosis (AE) seen at the specialized treatment unit in Ulm between January 1992 and December 2011 were included in the database. Follow up ended on 31.12.2012. Cases were defined to the likelihood of diagnosis as a "possible", "probable" or "confirmed" case . Diagnosis of AE was based on clinical presentation, epidemiological history, pathognomonic imaging findings, specific laboratory results, such as immunodiagnosis or histopathological findings in resected/ biopsied specimens, and/or detection of nucleic acid sequences in such specimens. The location of the larval lesions and its spread at diagnosis was documented using the PNM classification. Treatment with benzimidazoles was followed the WHO-IWGE recommendations. Treatment efficacy was monitored by US examination and FDG-PET scan or MRI. To categorize each case at each visit the terms "cured", "stable" or "progressive" were used. Patients' data was assessed at each visit; missing information was obtained from hospital records or the family doctor. Names were anonymized and data was stored in a Microsoft Excel database. Statistics were done with SAS version 9.3.

The data were stratified into series A containing diagnoses until December 1999 and series B from January 2000 onwards. This separation was chosen as patient admissions to the clinic rose almost 3-fold in 2000 when notification of AE became mandatory in Germany. It can be assumed that series B better represents AE patient characteristics, disease manifestation and comprehensive management; series A includes case histories with favorable prognoses at the time of diagnosis while optimal treatment for AE was still unavailable.

Outcome parameters for this study population were: overall survival after diagnosis, relapse after surgery or progression of remaining liver lesions in size or new lesions in other organs, and time to relapse or progress. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan Meier method.

Parameters with an assumed influence on the time until relapse or progress of the parasitic lesions entered Kaplan Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis, respectively, and hazard ratios (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Logistic regression was used to identify factors which may predict a successful treatment interruption using the odds ratio (OR) as an appropriate outcome parameter.

Keywords
Alveolar Echinococcosis (AE), Echinococcus multilocularis, antiparasitic treatment, surgery, classification, staging, prospective cohort study
Medical subject headings
Alveolar echinococcosis, Echinococcosis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall survival after diagnosis,

    Survival was estimated by the Kaplan Meier method.

    Measured: inclusion January 1992-December 2011; end of follow-up December 2012 .Inclusion January 1992-December 1999 (series A).Inclusion January 2000- December 2011 (series B)

  2. Relapse after surgery or progression of remaining liver lesions in size or new lesions in other organs

    Parameters with an assumed influence on the time until relapse or progress of the parasitic lesions entered Kaplan Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis, respectively, and hazard ratios (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

    Measured: inclusion January 1992-December 2011; end of follow-up December 2012.Inclusion January 1992-December 1999 (series A).Inclusion January 2000- December 2011 (series B)

  3. Time to relapse or progress

    Measured: inclusion January 1992-December 2011; end of follow-up December 2012.Inclusion January 1992-December 1999 (series A).Inclusion January 2000- December 2011 (series B)

Secondary outcomes (4)

  1. Symptoms and comorbidities

    Specific and unspecific symptoms were less frequent in case series B (44.6%) than in series A (61.1%; Table 4). 90 out of 204 (44.1 %) patients in B did not report any symptoms. Jaundice was more frequent in series A (17.6% vs. 7.8%). The occurrence of any kind of symptoms was closely associated with the disease stage: rates of patients with symptoms increased from 24.2% (stage I), to 32.6% (stage II), 50.8% (stage IIIa), 54.4% (stage IIIb) and 68.0% at stage IV. More cases in series A (56.7%) had no concomitant health problems when first diagnosed with AE. Notably, 18 cases of series B and 1 case of series A suffered from chronic inflammatory or immunologic syndromes including rheumatic disorders. 22 cases (7.1%) suffered from malignant diseases prior to AE diagnosis

    Measured: inclusion January 1992-December 2011; end of follow-up December 2012. Inclusion January 1992-December 1999 (series A).Inclusion January 2000- December 2011 (series B)

  2. Medical treatment and side effects

    Side effects of medical therapy were monitored throughout follow-up, notably more closely during the first six months after start of ABZ. In cases of toxicity to the drug, postprandial ABZ sulfoxide plasma levels were used for guidance, and drug dose was reduced accordingly. For re-exposure ABZ was given at a lower dosage which was slowly raised over a period of one month. Patients with continuing toxicity were switched to MBZ. If toxicity remained, patients had prolonged medication pauses. Phases of non-adherence to the therapy regimen were noted if their duration was >3 months. Such phases due to drug intolerance, misunderstandings or non-compliance of the patients, were defined as "pauses".

    Measured: inclusion January 1992-December 2011; end of follow-up December 2012Inclusion January 1992-December 1999 (series A).Inclusion January 2000- December 2011 (series B)

  3. Treatment interruption ant potential cure

    Treatment efficacy was monitored by US examination and, every 24 months, by alternating FDG-PET/CT scans and MRI.Structured treatment interruption was a goal for patients with an PanyN0M0 status at diagnosis, either after ascertained R0 resection and a two-year BMZ prophylaxis, as well as for patients with non-resectable lesions under the following assumptions 1) marked regression/absence of lesion(s) by imaging, 2) vanished enrichment of FDG around the AE lesion(s) assessed by FDG-PET/CT scan, 3) continuous BMZ medication for at least 2 years, 4) no extrahepatic involvement, 5) absence of any clinical symptoms or signs of illness, 6) marked changes in serology. Such medication-free phases were noted as "interruptions".

    Measured: inclusion January 1992-December 2011; end of follow-up December 2012.Inclusion January 1992-December 1999 (series A).Inclusion January 2000- December 2011 (series B)

  4. Surgical and interventional treatment

    After liver resections, surgical specimen was reviewed by the pathologist and graded as R0, R1, or R2 resections. Patients with R0 resections received ABZ for at least two years as "secondary prophylaxis" as recommended by WHO-IWGE (Anonymous 1996, Brunetti et al 2010). Drug treatment was indefinitely prescribed to patients after incomplete or palliative resections (R1 or R2), to all patients with extrahepatic lesions, and all cases with inoperable liver lesions. Some cases received BMZ days or weeks prior to surgery. Time on drug was noted as well as time on inappropriate dosage or pauses.

    Measured: inclusion January 1992-December 2011; end of follow-up December 2012.Inclusion January 1992-December 1999 (series A).Inclusion January 2000- December 2011 (series B)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 1992
  3. Primary completionDec 2011
  4. Study completionDec 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
312 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02509884
Sponsor's protocol ID
166/13
Status last verified
Jul 2015
First submitted
12 Jul 2015
Last updated
28 Jul 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Kern P, Wen H, Sato N, Vuitton DA, Gruener B, Shao Y, Delabrousse E, Kratzer W, Bresson-Hadni S. WHO classification of alveolar echinococcosis: principles and application. Parasitol Int. 2006;55 Suppl:S283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2005.11.041. Epub 2005 Dec 15.

    PubMed 16343985

  • Brunetti E, Kern P, Vuitton DA; Writing Panel for the WHO-IWGE. Expert consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis in humans. Acta Trop. 2010 Apr;114(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 30.

    PubMed 19931502

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Alveolar Echinococcosis, run by University of Ulm.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall survival after diagnosis, (time frame: inclusion January 1992-December 2011; end of follow-up December 2012 .Inclusion January 1992-December 1999 (series A).Inclusion January 2000- December 2011 (series B)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02509884, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2015.

AzTrials uses cookies for analytics and advertising. You can accept or reject them; the site works either way. Privacy Policy.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in