AzTrials
AzTrials

ARDSPERVE-ARDSNCT02510105

Tomodensitometric Study of Pulmonary Effects of Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation in ARDS Patients

A study testing VDR4 ventilator (Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation), CT scan and Servo-i in people with ARDS, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is intended to elucidate the pulmonary effects of Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation (IPV) with VDR4 ventilator of patients with ARDS, using computed tomography (CT). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
ARDS
What is being tested?
VDR4 ventilator (Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation), CT scan and Servo-i
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jul 2015to Dec 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients ventilated more than 48 h
  • Sedated patients
  • ARDS moderate or severe (Berlin 2012)
  • Patients who have given their consent or his family
  • Patients aged between 18 and 85 years

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant ou lactating women
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Chronic respiratory insufficiency.
  • Pneumothorax
  • Fistulae bronchopleural

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003

    Patrick LACARIN, 04 73 75 11 95, placarin@chu-clermontferrand.fr

    Jean-Michel CONSTANTIN

Other trials in France

About this study

The study is intended to elucidate the pulmonary effects of Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation (IPV) with VDR4 ventilator of patients with ARDS, using computed tomography (CT).

Read the detailed description

Prospective clinical study in ICU of ventilated patients with ARDS. The morphologic pulmonary effects of IPV with VDR4 are not known to the investigators' knowledge.

The main aim is to quantify recruited, normally aerated and overinflated parts of the lungs after a 1 hour treatment with IPV.

Patients with ARDS (focal and non focal) consecutively admitted to the investigators' ICU are enrolled after informed consent.

Patients are intubated and ventilated with Servo-I (GE) and ventilation is optimized according to ARDS-network recommandations.

A first thoracic CT-scan is performed with ICU ventilator and then the patient is ventilated with VDR4 during 1 hour.

A second thoracic CT-scan is then performed and the patient re-ventilated with ICU ventilator.

Arterial blood gases and hemodynamic parameters are recorded during experiments.

CT-scan are analysed and compared for normally aerated, overinflated and recruited lung parenchyma. Regions are determined thanks to their Hounsfield units (HU).

Conditions
ARDS
Being tested
VDR4 ventilator (Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation), CT scan, Servo-i, - Intubation, Ventilation ( with an ICU conventional ventilator)
Keywords
Critical Care, ARDS, Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation, VDR4, Lung aeration, CT scan

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VDR4 ventilator (Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation)Device

  • CT scanDevice

  • Servo-iDevice

  • - IntubationDevice

  • Ventilation ( with an ICU conventional ventilator)Device

Study groups in NCT02510105
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ARDS patientsExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: VDR4 ventilator (Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation); Device: CT scan; Device: Servo-i; Device: - Intubation; Device: Ventilation ( with an ICU conventional ventilator)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline (H0) in volume of overinflated lung at H1

    Measured: at Hour 0(just before Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation) and Hour 1(just after Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Volume of normally aerated lung

    Measured: at Hour 0 (just before Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation ) and Hour 1 (just after Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation)

  2. Volume of recruited lung

    Measured: at day 1 (between H0 and H1)

  3. Heart rate

    Measured: at day 1 ((every 10 min between H0 and H1)

  4. Blood pressure

    Measured: at day 1 (every 10 min between H0 and H1)

  5. Arterial blood gaz

    Measured: at day 1 ((every 10 min between H0 and H1)

  6. Evolution of catecholamine doses (µg/Kg/min)

    Measured: at day 1 (every 10 min between H0 and H1)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02510105
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHU-0236
Acronym
PERVE-ARDS
Status last verified
Jul 2015
First submitted
1 Jun 2015
Last updated
28 Jul 2015
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Godet T, Jabaudon M, Blondonnet R, Tremblay A, Audard J, Rieu B, Pereira B, Garcier JM, Futier E, Constantin JM. High frequency percussive ventilation increases alveolar recruitment in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: an experimental, physiological and CT scan study. Crit Care. 2018 Jan 11;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1924-6.

    PubMed 29325586

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing VDR4 ventilator (Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation), CT scan and Servo-i in people with ARDS, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Patrick LACARIN (04 73 75 11 95, placarin@chu-clermontferrand.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline (H0) in volume of overinflated lung at H1 (time frame: at Hour 0(just before Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation) and Hour 1(just after Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02510105, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in