Rectal CancerPhase 3GRECCAR12NCT02514278
Optimisation of Response for Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer : Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy vs. Radiochemotherapy
A Phase 3 study testing Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Folfirinox, 4 cycles, 50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractions and Local excision in good responders in people with Rectal Cancer, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 29 sites in France.
Trial summary
Standard treatment of rectal cancer is rectal excision with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. A new concept suggests organ preservation as an alternative to rectal excision in good responders after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy to decrease surgical morbidity and increase quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Folfirinox, 4 cycles, 50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractions and Local excision in good responders
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 218 participants
- Where
- 29 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 28 Jan 2016to 30 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Rectal adenocarcinoma
- cT2T3
- cN0-1 (≤ 3 positive lymph nodes or size ≤8mm)
- Tumour size ≤4 cm
- Location ≤10 cm from the anal verge
- No distant metastasis
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patient ≥18 years
- ECOG ≤2
- Effective contraception during the study
- Patient and doctor have signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- T1 or T4
- Tumour size >4cm
- N2 (>3 positive lymph nodes or size >8mm)
- Tumour > 10 cm from the anal verge
- Distant metastasis
- Chronic intestinal inflammation and/or bowel obstruction
Show all 15Show fewer
- Contra indication for chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
- Previous pelvic radiotherapy or chemotherapy
- Severe renal, hepatic insufficiency (serum creatinine<30ml/min)
- Peripheral neuropathy > grade 1
- Complete or partial Dihydropyrimidine deshydrogenase (DPD) deficiency (uracilemia ≥ 16 ng/mL)
- Concomitant treatment with millepertuis, yellow fever vaccine, phenytoin or sorivudine (or chemically equivalent)
- Pregnant or breast-feeding woman.
- Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship
- Impossibility for compliance to follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
29 sites in 1 country.
29 sites in 1 country
France29 sites
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Amiens Picardie
Amiens
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU de Besançon
Besançon
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque - CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Estaing - CHRU Clermont Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Beaujon - APHP
Clichy
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre Georges François Leclerc - Dijon
Dijon
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Albert Michallon - CHU de Grenoble
La Tronche
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre Oscar Lambret - Lille
Lille
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre Léon Bérard - Lyon
Lyon
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Lyon Sud - CHU Lyon
Lyon
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU de la Timone - Marseille
Marseille
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Institut Paoli Calmette - Marseille
Marseille
Service de Chirurgie Digestives, Hôpital Européen de Marseille
Marseille
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier
Montpellier
Service d'Oncologie et Radiothérapie, Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie
Mougins
Service de Chirurgie Digestive,Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Nancy
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôtel Dieu - CHU de Nantes
Nantes
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Carémeau - Nîmes
Nîmes
GH Paris Saint Joseph
Paris
Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Oncologique, Hôpital Bicêtre - APHP
Paris
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital les Diaconnesses
Paris
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Saint-Antoine - APHP
Paris
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Saint-Louis - APHP Paris
Paris
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Pontchaillou - CHU Rennes
Rennes
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Charles Nicolle - CHU de Rouen
Rouen
Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Purpan - CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse
Service de chirurgie digestive, CHRU de Nancy -Hôpital de Brabois
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy
Département de chirurgie digestive, Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif
About this study
Standard treatment of rectal cancer is rectal excision with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. A new concept suggests organ preservation as an alternative to rectal excision in good responders after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy to decrease surgical morbidity and increase quality of life. The rational is the fact that 15% of patients have sterilized tumours after radiochemotherapy for T3T4 rectal cancer. The French GRECCAR 2 trial is the first phase III trial investigating this strategy: patients with T2T3 low rectal carcinomas (size ≤4 cm) received 50 Gy with capecitabine and good clinical responders (≤2 cm) were randomized between local and rectal excision. The main findings were: the rate of complete pathologic response was higher after radiochemotherapy for small T2T3 than for T3T4 tumours (40% vs 15% ypT0) and good pathologic responders (ypT0-1) were associated with zero positive mesorectal nodes.
The objective of the new trial is to increase the proportion of patients treated with organ preservation by optimizing tumour response. As compared to Folfiri, tritherapy Folfirinox has been shown to enhance the response rate. In patients with colorectal metastases, response rate and R0 resection were twice higher, resulting in improved survival. Folfirinox also increases response and chance of R0 resection rates in initially unresectable colorectal metastases, compared to standard or intensified bi-chemotherapy regimens. Adding two months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Folfirinox) before radiochemotherapy, the investigators expect to increase chance of organ preservation rate, as compared to radiochemotherapy alone.
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Folfirinox, 4 cycles, 50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractions, Local excision in good responders, Rectal excision in bad responders, Capecitabine
- Keywords
- Organ preservation, Local excision, Radiochemotherapy, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Folfirinox, Tumour response
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Folfirinox, 4 cyclesDrug
- oxaliplatin: 85 mg/m2
- irinotecan: 180 mg/m²
- folinic acid: 400 mg/m2 (DL form) or 200 mg/m2 (L form)
- 5FU: 2400 mg/m2
50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractionsRadiation
Radiochemotherapy 5 weeks
Local excision in good respondersProcedure or surgery
If local excision:
- Surveillance if ypT0-1 or ypT2Nx/cN0 (no lymph node at baseline imaging)
- Complementary rectal excision if ypT2Nx/cN1, ypT3 or R1.
Rectal excision in bad respondersProcedure or surgery
CapecitabineDrug
1600 mg/m2 daily 5 days/7
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy | Experimental | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Folfirinox, 4 cycles:
* oxaliplatin: 85 mg/m2
* irinotecan: 180 mg/m²
* folinic acid: 400 mg/m2 (DL form) or 200 mg/m2 (L form)
* 5FU: 2400 mg/m2
Radiochemotherapy : 2 to 4 weeks after chemotherapy, 5 weeks (50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractions) + capecitabine (1600 mg/m2 daily 5 days/7) Receives: Drug: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Folfirinox, 4 cycles; Radiation: 50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractions; Procedure: Local excision in good responders; Procedure: Rectal excision in bad responders; Drug: Capecitabine |
| Radiochemotherapy | Active comparator | Radiochemotherapy: 5 weeks (50 Gy, 2 Gy/session ; 25 fractions) + capecitabine (1600 mg/m2 daily 5 days/7, excluding weekends) Receives: Radiation: 50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractions; Procedure: Local excision in good responders; Procedure: Rectal excision in bad responders; Drug: Capecitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of organ preservation and absence of stoma
Number of patients with organ preservation and absence of stoma at 1 year after surgery
Measured: 1 year after surgery
Secondary outcomes (13)
Compliance to treatment
Number of patients receiving full neoadjuvent treatment and the allocated surgery
Measured: From beginning of neoadjuvant treatment until surgery, expected average 20 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Tolerance to treatment
Number of patients with adverse events
Measured: From beginning of neoadjuvant treatment until 1 year after surgery
Rate of clinical complete response
To determine the rate of grade 1 : no tumor at digital examination
Measured: At 8 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Rate of radiological response
To determine the rate of tumor ≤ 2 cm with TRG1-3 at MRI
Measured: At 8 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Rate of complete pathologic response
To determine the rate of ypT0
Measured: At surgery, expected average 10 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Correlation between radiological and clinical response
To analyse the correlation between radiological response ( tumor ≤ 2 cm with TRG1-3 at MRI) and clinical response (grade 1)
Measured: Between 8 to 10 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Correlation between radiological (radiomic analysis) and pathologic response
To analyse the correlation between radiological response ( tumor ≤ 2 cm with TRG1-3 at MRI) and pathological response (ypT0)
Measured: Between 8 to 10 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Rate of curative surgery
To determine the rate of R0 resection
Measured: At surgery, expected average 10 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Surgical morbidity
To analyse the cumulative Clavien-Dindo at 1 year
Measured: From surgery until 1 year of follow-up
Quality of life
To examine score of questionnaires : QLQ CR-30, QLQ CR-29
Measured: From randomization until 1 year after surgery
Local recurrence
To determine the rate of local recurrence at 3 years
Measured: From surgery until 3 years of follow-up
Overall survival
To determine the rate of overall survival at 3 years
Measured: From surgery until 3 years of follow-up
Disease-free survival
To determine the rate of disease-free survival at 3 years
Measured: From surgery until 3 years of follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study start28 Jan 2016
- Primary completion9 Jun 2022
- Study completion30 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, BordeauxThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 218 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christophe LAURENT, Prof., Principal investigator, University Hospital Bordeaux, France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02514278
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUBX 2014/33
- Other IDs
- 2015-001100-59, 2015
- Acronym
- GRECCAR12
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 14 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Vendrely V, Denost Q, Charleux T, Brouquet A, Huguet F, Rullier E. [Rectal cancer radiotherapy: Therapeutical strategy and perspective]. Cancer Radiother. 2018 Oct;22(6-7):558-563. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Aug 28. French.
PubMed 30170787
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimisation of Response for Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer : Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy vs. Radiochemotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02514278
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GRECCAR12 / CHUBX 2014/33
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Keywords
- Organ preservation, Local excision, Radiochemotherapy, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Folfirinox, Tumour response
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 218 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BordeauxUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Standard treatment of rectal cancer is rectal excision with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. A new concept suggests organ preservation as an alternative to rectal excision in good responders after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy to decrease surgical morbidity and increase quality of life. The rational is the fact that 15% of patients have sterilized tumours after radiochemotherapy for T3T4 rectal cancer. The French GRECCAR 2 trial is the first phase III trial investigating this strategy: patients with T2T3 low rectal carcinomas (size ≤4 cm) received 50 Gy with capecitabine and good clinical responders (≤2 cm) were randomized between local and rectal excision. The main findings were: the rate of complete pathologic response was higher after radiochemotherapy for small T2T3 than for T3T4 tumours (40% vs 15% ypT0) and good pathologic responders (ypT0-1) were associated with zero positive mesorectal nodes.
The objective of the new trial is to increase the proportion of patients treated with organ preservation by optimizing tumour response. As compared to Folfiri, tritherapy Folfirinox has been shown to enhance the response rate. In patients with colorectal metastases, response rate and R0 resection were twice higher, resulting in improved survival. Folfirinox also increases response and chance of R0 resection rates in initially unresectable colorectal metastases, compared to standard or intensified bi-chemotherapy regimens. Adding two months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Folfirinox) before radiochemotherapy, the investigators expect to increase chance of organ preservation rate, as compared to radiochemotherapy alone.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy | Experimental | Drug: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Folfirinox, 4 cycles, Radiation: 50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractions, Procedure: Local excision in good responders, Procedure: Rectal excision in bad responders, Drug: CapecitabineNeoadjuvant chemotherapy Folfirinox, 4 cycles: * oxaliplatin: 85 mg/m2 * irinotecan: 180 mg/m² * folinic acid: 400 mg/m2 (DL form) or 200 mg/m2 (L form) * 5FU: 2400 mg/m2 Radiochemotherapy : 2 to 4 weeks after chemotherapy, 5 weeks (50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractions) + capecitabine (1600 mg/m2 daily 5 days/7) |
| Radiochemotherapy | Active comparator | Radiation: 50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractions, Procedure: Local excision in good responders, Procedure: Rectal excision in bad responders, Drug: CapecitabineRadiochemotherapy: 5 weeks (50 Gy, 2 Gy/session ; 25 fractions) + capecitabine (1600 mg/m2 daily 5 days/7, excluding weekends) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Rectal adenocarcinoma
- cT2T3
- cN0-1 (≤ 3 positive lymph nodes or size ≤8mm)
- Tumour size ≤4 cm
- Location ≤10 cm from the anal verge
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- T1 or T4
- Tumour size >4cm
- N2 (>3 positive lymph nodes or size >8mm)
- Tumour > 10 cm from the anal verge
- Distant metastasis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Folfirinox, 4 cycles* oxaliplatin: 85 mg/m2 * irinotecan: 180 mg/m² * folinic acid: 400 mg/m2 (DL form) or 200 mg/m2 (L form) * 5FU: 2400 mg/m2 | Drug | Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy |
| 50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractionsRadiochemotherapy 5 weeks | Radiation | Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy, Radiochemotherapy |
| Local excision in good respondersIf local excision: * Surveillance if ypT0-1 or ypT2Nx/cN0 (no lymph node at baseline imaging) * Complementary rectal excision if ypT2Nx/cN1, ypT3 or R1. | Procedure or surgery | Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy, Radiochemotherapy |
| Rectal excision in bad responders | Procedure or surgery | Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy, Radiochemotherapy |
| Capecitabine1600 mg/m2 daily 5 days/7 | Drug | Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy, Radiochemotherapy |
Primary outcome
Rate of organ preservation and absence of stoma
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Number of patients with organ preservation and absence of stoma at 1 year after surgery
13 secondary outcomes
Compliance to treatment
Time frame: From beginning of neoadjuvant treatment until surgery, expected average 20 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Tolerance to treatment
Time frame: From beginning of neoadjuvant treatment until 1 year after surgery
Rate of clinical complete response
Time frame: At 8 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Rate of radiological response
Time frame: At 8 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Rate of complete pathologic response
Time frame: At surgery, expected average 10 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Correlation between radiological and clinical response
Time frame: Between 8 to 10 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Correlation between radiological (radiomic analysis) and pathologic response
Time frame: Between 8 to 10 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Rate of curative surgery
Time frame: At surgery, expected average 10 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment
Surgical morbidity
Time frame: From surgery until 1 year of follow-up
Quality of life
Time frame: From randomization until 1 year after surgery
Local recurrence
Time frame: From surgery until 3 years of follow-up
Overall survival
Time frame: From surgery until 3 years of follow-up
Disease-free survival
Time frame: From surgery until 3 years of follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 30170787Vendrely V, Denost Q, Charleux T, Brouquet A, Huguet F, Rullier E. [Rectal cancer radiotherapy: Therapeutical strategy and perspective]. Cancer Radiother. 2018 Oct;22(6-7):558-563. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Aug 28. French.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Rectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christophe LAURENT, Prof. principal investigator
University Hospital Bordeaux, France
29 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Folfirinox, 4 cycles, 50 Gy, 2 Gy/session; 25 fractions and Local excision in good responders in people with Rectal Cancer, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 29 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 29 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of organ preservation and absence of stoma (time frame: 1 year after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02514278, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2026.