HealthyBALvalNCT02515591
Validating the Use of Disposable Bronchoscopes for Research Bronchoalveolar Lavage
An observational study of Healthy, run by Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Validation study to use the disposable bronchoscopes in healthy volunteer research bronchoscopies to ensure adequate sample and cell yield. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Bronchoalveolar Lavage validation study
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jul 2015to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: Healthy Volunteers, male and Non pregnant female, aged between 18-55 years old.
Who may be able to join
- Capacity to provide written consent before any study procedures are performed and can understand and comply with the requirements of the study.
- Males and non-pregnant females, between 18 and 55 years of age, inclusive.
- Body mass index (BMI) 18.0 to 30.0 kg/m2, inclusive.
- Fluent in English, ability to understand the procedures and convey any adverse events effectively to the research team.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with hepatic, pulmonary, metabolic, neurologic, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, haematological, or psychiatric system, or any significant condition that may preclude nasal or oral intubation with a bronchoscope ,in the opinion of the investigator.
- Subjects with any report of acute illness or febrile event that has not resolved 72 hours before bronchoscopy.
- Subjects with any use of, or intent to use, medications, including prescription, over the counter, herbal preparations, or vitamin/mineral supplementation, for 3 days before the bronchoscopy with the exception of contraception medication.
- Subjects who have had previous adverse reactions to benzodiazepines or anaesthetic agents (lidocaine) including reversal agents such as flumazenil.
- Subjects who have participated (taken investigative drug and/or device) in another clinical trial within 30 days or within drug's 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, before the study procedure.
- Subjects with any elevation of liver test results above 2 times the upper limit of normal; isolated elevation of bilirubin levels without elevation of direct bilirubin level is acceptable.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Subjects with a haemoglobin level <12.0 g/dL and prothrombin time < 13 seconds.
- Subjects with very poor venous access.
- Subjects who have used cigarettes (including vapour / e-cigarettes), cigars, and nicotine-containing products within 3 months before bronchoscopy and have a smoking history of >10 pack years.
- Subjects who have not abstained from alcoholic beverages or alcohol-containing products for at least 72 hours before bronchoscopy.
- Female subjects with a positive urine pregnancy test at screen and/or prior to bronchoscopy.
- Subjects who are employees of the study unit or their close family members, students who are working in the study unit, or close family members of the investigator or sponsor.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Royal Liverpool Hospital Clinical Research Facility
Liverpool, L7 8XP
About this study
Official title: Validating the Use of Disposable Flexible Intubation Bronchoscopes for Research Bronchoalveolar Lavage
Validation study to use the disposable bronchoscopes in healthy volunteer research bronchoscopies to ensure adequate sample and cell yield.
Read the detailed description
Research bronchoscopies are traditionally performed using conventional flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopes. The technique for obtaining bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) from healthy volunteers for research purposes has been developed by our group since 1999 and has been performed in > 1,000 subjects in the UK and Malawi including healthy volunteers.
Fibreoptic bronchoscopy with BAL using manual hand held suction enables the removal of non-adherent cells and lung lining fluid from the mucosal surface. In research environments, BAL allows sampling of innate (lung macrophage), cellular (B- and T- cells), and humoral (immunoglobulin) responses within the lung. Further applications include determining protein and drug levels, with the latter being a key parameter in early phase 'lung tissue active' drug development.
The BAL technique uses gentle hand-held suction of instilled fluid; this is designed to maximize BAL volume returned, and to apply minimum shear force on ciliated epithelia in order to preserve the structure and function of cells within the BAL fluid. This technique is also intended to preserve viability to facilitate the growth of cells in ex vivo culture. The research technique therefore uses a larger volume of warmed normal saline instillate (typically in the order of 200 ml) and employs manual suction to reduce cell damage.
At the Royal Liverpool Hospital (RLBUHT) ≥120 healthy volunteer BALs have been performed. Available data suggest that from 200 ml of instillate the following volume yields are retrieved: mean 100-120 ml, median 120 - 125 ml with ~ 19% of BALs returning <100 ml yield. The preferable BAL volume yield is >100 ml, a yield of >150 ml is considered excellent; yields >170 ml have not been recorded. There is no linear relationship between the cell yield and volume yield. Yields of <100 ml are in our experience, more likely to lead to side effects such as cough, chest pain and fever. Subjects with yields of <100 ml are advised to be recovered in the left lateral position to aid postural drainage of remaining instillate. There have been no serious adverse events (SAEs) reported; and notably there have been no post procedure hospitalisations or antibiotics required for suspected pneumonia.
Single-use flexible intubation bronchoscopes are used throughout United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) trusts. They are predominantly used within the intensive care and anaesthetic (theatre) setting for both emergency and elective airway intubation. The flexible fibreoptic bronchoscope with sterile single-use disposable-sheath endoscope system has the potential to be more cost-effective and reduce the risk, however negligible, of cross-infection during the sterilisation procedure. Eliminating the need for high-level disinfection processing between procedures reduces maintenance costs (equipment and staff), and scope downtime and provides the flexibility more suited for research in healthy volunteers.
The content of this study proposal has been peer reviewed by two senior research associates based in Malawi and the UK who have deemed the scientific review criteria to be sound.
Currently many new drug and therapeutics discovery and development projects are blighted by the absence of robust predictive pre-clinical models. For example, promising anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs and drug combinations have been clinically trialled based on current in vitro and in vivo models, only to find that they lack clinical efficacy; and conversely effective anti-TB drugs such as linezolid had poor or modest efficacy in testing usingin vitro and in vivo models. To mitigate these issues we have therefore developed dynamic pharmacodynamic in vitro models based on high content imaging that are able to measure macrophage intracellular tubercular growth and killing rates. Pharmacodynamic (PD) and Pharmacokinetics (PK) modelling of these models more closely resemble clinical measurements for known first line anti-TB; therefore we now wish to further develop this platform into a more physiological model by using alveolar macrophages (AMs) obtained from human subjects.
The purpose of using human AMs will be to compare the drug effects of known and new anti-TB compounds in human AMs to other in vitro models. This work will enable us to obtain better, more clinically relevant parameters to predict the outcome of drug dynamics. By using the AMswe can assess how reliable our current model systems are, and assess considerations of drug action in clinically relevant tissue samples. These cells can then be manipulated ex vivo to desired clinical scenarios e.g. dual TB and HIV-infections monitoring TB responses over time to a range of novel drugs and novel drug combinations. The outputs of these studies will be used directly to inform new clinical trials on drug regimens.
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Bronchoalveolar Lavage validation study
- Keywords
- Healthy volunteer, Respiratory, Bronchoalveolar lavage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bronchoalveolar Lavage validation studyOther
Bronchoalveolar lavage involved the washing out of the right middle lobe of the lung of a healthy volunteer with 200mls of warmed normal saline with or without sedation.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Volume Retrieved
Yield-ml
Measured: Immediately post-bronchoscopy. Assessed at LSTM upon receipt. Up to 2 hours post bronchoscopy
Cell Yield and Viability
Cell yield and viability (Total cell count and differential cell count of alveolar macrophages [AMs] and lymphocytes)
Measured: Immediate retrieval. Assessed at LSTM upon receipt. Up to 4hours post bronchoscopy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2015
- Primary completionNov 2015
- Study completionNov 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02515591
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15/NW/0019
- Acronym
- BALval
- Status last verified
- Aug 2015
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 9 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Zaidi SR, Collins AM, Mitsi E, Reine J, Davies K, Wright AD, Owugha J, Fitzgerald R, Ganguli A, Gordon SB, Ferreira DM, Rylance J. Single use and conventional bronchoscopes for Broncho alveolar lavage (BAL) in research: a comparative study (NCT 02515591). BMC Pulm Med. 2017 May 5;17(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0421-7.
PubMed 28476111
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validating the Use of Disposable Flexible Intubation Bronchoscopes for Research Bronchoalveolar Lavage
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02515591
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BALval / 15/NW/0019
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Keywords
- Healthy volunteer, Respiratory, Bronchoalveolar lavage
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOther government
- Collaborators
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
- Study start
- Jul 2015
- Primary completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Validation study to use the disposable bronchoscopes in healthy volunteer research bronchoscopies to ensure adequate sample and cell yield.
Detailed description
Research bronchoscopies are traditionally performed using conventional flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopes. The technique for obtaining bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) from healthy volunteers for research purposes has been developed by our group since 1999 and has been performed in > 1,000 subjects in the UK and Malawi including healthy volunteers.
Fibreoptic bronchoscopy with BAL using manual hand held suction enables the removal of non-adherent cells and lung lining fluid from the mucosal surface. In research environments, BAL allows sampling of innate (lung macrophage), cellular (B- and T- cells), and humoral (immunoglobulin) responses within the lung. Further applications include determining protein and drug levels, with the latter being a key parameter in early phase 'lung tissue active' drug development.
The BAL technique uses gentle hand-held suction of instilled fluid; this is designed to maximize BAL volume returned, and to apply minimum shear force on ciliated epithelia in order to preserve the structure and function of cells within the BAL fluid. This technique is also intended to preserve viability to facilitate the growth of cells in ex vivo culture. The research technique therefore uses a larger volume of warmed normal saline instillate (typically in the order of 200 ml) and employs manual suction to reduce cell damage.
At the Royal Liverpool Hospital (RLBUHT) ≥120 healthy volunteer BALs have been performed. Available data suggest that from 200 ml of instillate the following volume yields are retrieved: mean 100-120 ml, median 120 - 125 ml with ~ 19% of BALs returning <100 ml yield. The preferable BAL volume yield is >100 ml, a yield of >150 ml is considered excellent; yields >170 ml have not been recorded. There is no linear relationship between the cell yield and volume yield. Yields of <100 ml are in our experience, more likely to lead to side effects such as cough, chest pain and fever. Subjects with yields of <100 ml are advised to be recovered in the left lateral position to aid postural drainage of remaining instillate. There have been no serious adverse events (SAEs) reported; and notably there have been no post procedure hospitalisations or antibiotics required for suspected pneumonia.
Single-use flexible intubation bronchoscopes are used throughout United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) trusts. They are predominantly used within the intensive care and anaesthetic (theatre) setting for both emergency and elective airway intubation. The flexible fibreoptic bronchoscope with sterile single-use disposable-sheath endoscope system has the potential to be more cost-effective and reduce the risk, however negligible, of cross-infection during the sterilisation procedure. Eliminating the need for high-level disinfection processing between procedures reduces maintenance costs (equipment and staff), and scope downtime and provides the flexibility more suited for research in healthy volunteers.
The content of this study proposal has been peer reviewed by two senior research associates based in Malawi and the UK who have deemed the scientific review criteria to be sound.
Currently many new drug and therapeutics discovery and development projects are blighted by the absence of robust predictive pre-clinical models. For example, promising anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs and drug combinations have been clinically trialled based on current in vitro and in vivo models, only to find that they lack clinical efficacy; and conversely effective anti-TB drugs such as linezolid had poor or modest efficacy in testing usingin vitro and in vivo models. To mitigate these issues we have therefore developed dynamic pharmacodynamic in vitro models based on high content imaging that are able to measure macrophage intracellular tubercular growth and killing rates. Pharmacodynamic (PD) and Pharmacokinetics (PK) modelling of these models more closely resemble clinical measurements for known first line anti-TB; therefore we now wish to further develop this platform into a more physiological model by using alveolar macrophages (AMs) obtained from human subjects.
The purpose of using human AMs will be to compare the drug effects of known and new anti-TB compounds in human AMs to other in vitro models. This work will enable us to obtain better, more clinically relevant parameters to predict the outcome of drug dynamics. By using the AMswe can assess how reliable our current model systems are, and assess considerations of drug action in clinically relevant tissue samples. These cells can then be manipulated ex vivo to desired clinical scenarios e.g. dual TB and HIV-infections monitoring TB responses over time to a range of novel drugs and novel drug combinations. The outputs of these studies will be used directly to inform new clinical trials on drug regimens.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Healthy Volunteers, male and Non pregnant female, aged between 18-55 years old.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Capacity to provide written consent before any study procedures are performed and can understand and comply with the requirements of the study.
- Males and non-pregnant females, between 18 and 55 years of age, inclusive.
- Body mass index (BMI) 18.0 to 30.0 kg/m2, inclusive.
- Fluent in English, ability to understand the procedures and convey any adverse events effectively to the research team.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Subjects with hepatic, pulmonary, metabolic, neurologic, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, haematological, or psychiatric system, or any significant condition that may preclude nasal or oral intubation with a bronchoscope ,in the opinion of the investigator.
- Subjects with any report of acute illness or febrile event that has not resolved 72 hours before bronchoscopy.
- Subjects with any use of, or intent to use, medications, including prescription, over the counter, herbal preparations, or vitamin/mineral supplementation, for 3 days before the bronchoscopy with the exception of contraception medication.
- Subjects who have had previous adverse reactions to benzodiazepines or anaesthetic agents (lidocaine) including reversal agents such as flumazenil.
- Subjects who have participated (taken investigative drug and/or device) in another clinical trial within 30 days or within drug's 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, before the study procedure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bronchoalveolar Lavage validation studyBronchoalveolar lavage involved the washing out of the right middle lobe of the lung of a healthy volunteer with 200mls of warmed normal saline with or without sedation. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Volume Retrieved
Time frame: Immediately post-bronchoscopy. Assessed at LSTM upon receipt. Up to 2 hours post bronchoscopy
Yield-ml
Cell Yield and Viability
Time frame: Immediate retrieval. Assessed at LSTM upon receipt. Up to 4hours post bronchoscopy
Cell yield and viability (Total cell count and differential cell count of alveolar macrophages [AMs] and lymphocytes)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jun 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28476111Zaidi SR, Collins AM, Mitsi E, Reine J, Davies K, Wright AD, Owugha J, Fitzgerald R, Ganguli A, Gordon SB, Ferreira DM, Rylance J. Single use and conventional bronchoscopes for Broncho alveolar lavage (BAL) in research: a comparative study (NCT 02515591). BMC Pulm Med. 2017 May 5;17(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0421-7.
Related trials for Healthy
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Healthy, run by Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Volume Retrieved (time frame: Immediately post-bronchoscopy. Assessed at LSTM upon receipt. Up to 2 hours post bronchoscopy). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02515591, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2022.