AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyBALvalNCT02515591

Validating the Use of Disposable Bronchoscopes for Research Bronchoalveolar Lavage

An observational study of Healthy, run by Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Validation study to use the disposable bronchoscopes in healthy volunteer research bronchoscopies to ensure adequate sample and cell yield. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Bronchoalveolar Lavage validation study
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Jul 2015to Nov 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Healthy Volunteers, male and Non pregnant female, aged between 18-55 years old.

Who may be able to join

  • Capacity to provide written consent before any study procedures are performed and can understand and comply with the requirements of the study.
  • Males and non-pregnant females, between 18 and 55 years of age, inclusive.
  • Body mass index (BMI) 18.0 to 30.0 kg/m2, inclusive.
  • Fluent in English, ability to understand the procedures and convey any adverse events effectively to the research team.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects with hepatic, pulmonary, metabolic, neurologic, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, haematological, or psychiatric system, or any significant condition that may preclude nasal or oral intubation with a bronchoscope ,in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Subjects with any report of acute illness or febrile event that has not resolved 72 hours before bronchoscopy.
  • Subjects with any use of, or intent to use, medications, including prescription, over the counter, herbal preparations, or vitamin/mineral supplementation, for 3 days before the bronchoscopy with the exception of contraception medication.
  • Subjects who have had previous adverse reactions to benzodiazepines or anaesthetic agents (lidocaine) including reversal agents such as flumazenil.
  • Subjects who have participated (taken investigative drug and/or device) in another clinical trial within 30 days or within drug's 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, before the study procedure.
  • Subjects with any elevation of liver test results above 2 times the upper limit of normal; isolated elevation of bilirubin levels without elevation of direct bilirubin level is acceptable.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Subjects with a haemoglobin level <12.0 g/dL and prothrombin time < 13 seconds.
  • Subjects with very poor venous access.
  • Subjects who have used cigarettes (including vapour / e-cigarettes), cigars, and nicotine-containing products within 3 months before bronchoscopy and have a smoking history of >10 pack years.
  • Subjects who have not abstained from alcoholic beverages or alcohol-containing products for at least 72 hours before bronchoscopy.
  • Female subjects with a positive urine pregnancy test at screen and/or prior to bronchoscopy.
  • Subjects who are employees of the study unit or their close family members, students who are working in the study unit, or close family members of the investigator or sponsor.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Royal Liverpool Hospital Clinical Research Facility

    Liverpool, L7 8XP

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Validating the Use of Disposable Flexible Intubation Bronchoscopes for Research Bronchoalveolar Lavage

Validation study to use the disposable bronchoscopes in healthy volunteer research bronchoscopies to ensure adequate sample and cell yield.

Read the detailed description

Research bronchoscopies are traditionally performed using conventional flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopes. The technique for obtaining bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) from healthy volunteers for research purposes has been developed by our group since 1999 and has been performed in > 1,000 subjects in the UK and Malawi including healthy volunteers.

Fibreoptic bronchoscopy with BAL using manual hand held suction enables the removal of non-adherent cells and lung lining fluid from the mucosal surface. In research environments, BAL allows sampling of innate (lung macrophage), cellular (B- and T- cells), and humoral (immunoglobulin) responses within the lung. Further applications include determining protein and drug levels, with the latter being a key parameter in early phase 'lung tissue active' drug development.

The BAL technique uses gentle hand-held suction of instilled fluid; this is designed to maximize BAL volume returned, and to apply minimum shear force on ciliated epithelia in order to preserve the structure and function of cells within the BAL fluid. This technique is also intended to preserve viability to facilitate the growth of cells in ex vivo culture. The research technique therefore uses a larger volume of warmed normal saline instillate (typically in the order of 200 ml) and employs manual suction to reduce cell damage.

At the Royal Liverpool Hospital (RLBUHT) ≥120 healthy volunteer BALs have been performed. Available data suggest that from 200 ml of instillate the following volume yields are retrieved: mean 100-120 ml, median 120 - 125 ml with ~ 19% of BALs returning <100 ml yield. The preferable BAL volume yield is >100 ml, a yield of >150 ml is considered excellent; yields >170 ml have not been recorded. There is no linear relationship between the cell yield and volume yield. Yields of <100 ml are in our experience, more likely to lead to side effects such as cough, chest pain and fever. Subjects with yields of <100 ml are advised to be recovered in the left lateral position to aid postural drainage of remaining instillate. There have been no serious adverse events (SAEs) reported; and notably there have been no post procedure hospitalisations or antibiotics required for suspected pneumonia.

Single-use flexible intubation bronchoscopes are used throughout United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) trusts. They are predominantly used within the intensive care and anaesthetic (theatre) setting for both emergency and elective airway intubation. The flexible fibreoptic bronchoscope with sterile single-use disposable-sheath endoscope system has the potential to be more cost-effective and reduce the risk, however negligible, of cross-infection during the sterilisation procedure. Eliminating the need for high-level disinfection processing between procedures reduces maintenance costs (equipment and staff), and scope downtime and provides the flexibility more suited for research in healthy volunteers.

The content of this study proposal has been peer reviewed by two senior research associates based in Malawi and the UK who have deemed the scientific review criteria to be sound.

Currently many new drug and therapeutics discovery and development projects are blighted by the absence of robust predictive pre-clinical models. For example, promising anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs and drug combinations have been clinically trialled based on current in vitro and in vivo models, only to find that they lack clinical efficacy; and conversely effective anti-TB drugs such as linezolid had poor or modest efficacy in testing usingin vitro and in vivo models. To mitigate these issues we have therefore developed dynamic pharmacodynamic in vitro models based on high content imaging that are able to measure macrophage intracellular tubercular growth and killing rates. Pharmacodynamic (PD) and Pharmacokinetics (PK) modelling of these models more closely resemble clinical measurements for known first line anti-TB; therefore we now wish to further develop this platform into a more physiological model by using alveolar macrophages (AMs) obtained from human subjects.

The purpose of using human AMs will be to compare the drug effects of known and new anti-TB compounds in human AMs to other in vitro models. This work will enable us to obtain better, more clinically relevant parameters to predict the outcome of drug dynamics. By using the AMswe can assess how reliable our current model systems are, and assess considerations of drug action in clinically relevant tissue samples. These cells can then be manipulated ex vivo to desired clinical scenarios e.g. dual TB and HIV-infections monitoring TB responses over time to a range of novel drugs and novel drug combinations. The outputs of these studies will be used directly to inform new clinical trials on drug regimens.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Bronchoalveolar Lavage validation study
Keywords
Healthy volunteer, Respiratory, Bronchoalveolar lavage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bronchoalveolar Lavage validation studyOther

    Bronchoalveolar lavage involved the washing out of the right middle lobe of the lung of a healthy volunteer with 200mls of warmed normal saline with or without sedation.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Volume Retrieved

    Yield-ml

    Measured: Immediately post-bronchoscopy. Assessed at LSTM upon receipt. Up to 2 hours post bronchoscopy

  2. Cell Yield and Viability

    Cell yield and viability (Total cell count and differential cell count of alveolar macrophages [AMs] and lymphocytes)

    Measured: Immediate retrieval. Assessed at LSTM upon receipt. Up to 4hours post bronchoscopy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2015
  3. Primary completionNov 2015
  4. Study completionNov 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02515591
Sponsor's protocol ID
15/NW/0019
Acronym
BALval
Status last verified
Aug 2015
First submitted
21 Jul 2015
Last updated
9 Jun 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Zaidi SR, Collins AM, Mitsi E, Reine J, Davies K, Wright AD, Owugha J, Fitzgerald R, Ganguli A, Gordon SB, Ferreira DM, Rylance J. Single use and conventional bronchoscopes for Broncho alveolar lavage (BAL) in research: a comparative study (NCT 02515591). BMC Pulm Med. 2017 May 5;17(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0421-7.

    PubMed 28476111

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Healthy, run by Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Volume Retrieved (time frame: Immediately post-bronchoscopy. Assessed at LSTM upon receipt. Up to 2 hours post bronchoscopy). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02515591, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in