AzTrials
AzTrials

Urothelial CancerPhase 3NCT02516241

Study of MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) With or Without Tremelimumab Versus Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Urothelial Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing MEDI4736 (Durvalumab), Tremelimumab and Cisplatin in people with Urothelial Cancer, run by AstraZeneca at 222 sites in 24 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Multi-Center, Global Study of First-Line MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) Monotherapy and MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) in Combination with Tremelimumab Versus Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage IV Urothelial Cancer Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 130 years
Conditions the study is for
Urothelial Cancer
What is being tested?
MEDI4736 (Durvalumab), Tremelimumab and Cisplatin
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,126 participants
Where
222 sitesin 24 countries
Study dates
2 Nov 2015to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 130 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with histologically or cytologically documented, unresectable, Stage IV transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium who have not been previously treated with first-line chemotherapy.
  • Patients eligible or ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Cisplatin ineligibility is defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria: • Creatinine clearance (calculated or measured) <60 mL/min calculated by Cockcroft-Gault equation (using actual body weight) or by measured 24-hour urine collection for determination • Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade ≥2 audiometric hearing loss • CTCAE Grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy • New York Heart Association ≥Class III heart failure.
  • Tumor PD-L1 status, with Immunohistochemical (IHC) assay confirmed by a reference laboratory, must be known prior to randomization.

Who cannot join

  • Prior exposure to immune-mediated therapy, including but not limited to, other anti cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA 4), anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-PD-L2 antibodies, including therapeutic anticancer vaccines. Prior local intervesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy is allowed if completed at least 28 days prior to the initiation of study treatment.
  • History of allogenic organ transplantation that requires use of immunosuppressive agents.
  • Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders. The following are exceptions to this criterion: • Patients with vitiligo or alopecia • Patients with hypothyroidism (eg, following Hashimoto syndrome) stable on hormone replacement • Any chronic skin condition that does not require systemic therapy • Patients without active disease in the last 3 years may be included but only after consultation with AstraZeneca • Patients with celiac disease controlled by diet alone may be included but only after consultation with AstraZeneca.
  • Brain metastases or spinal cord compression unless the patient's condition is stable and off steroids for at least 14 days prior to the start of study treatment. Patients with suspected or known brain metastases at screening should have an MRI (preferred)/CT, preferably with IV contrast to access baseline disease status.
  • Active infection including tuberculosis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • Current or prior use of immunosuppressive medication within 14 days before the first dose of investigational product (IP). The following are exceptions to this criterion: • Intranasal, inhaled, topical steroids, or local steroid injections (eg, intra articular injection) • Systemic corticosteroids at physiologic doses not to exceed 10 mg/day of prednisone or its equivalent • Steroids as premedication for hypersensitivity reactions (eg, CT scan premedication).
  • Receipt of live attenuated vaccine within 30 days prior to the first dose of IP. Note: Patients, if enrolled, should not receive live vaccine during the study and up to 30 days after the last dose of IP.

Trial locations and contacts

222 sites in 24 countries.

222 sites in 24 countries

Japan31 sites
  • Research Site

    Akita, 010-8543

  • Research Site

    Bunkyō City, 113-8603

  • Research Site

    Fukuoka, 811-1347

  • Research Site

    Hakata-shi, 812-0033

  • Research Site

    Hirosaki-shi, 036-8563

  • Research Site

    Hiroshima, 730-8518

  • Research Site

    Izumo-shi, 693-8501

  • Research Site

    Kagoshima, 890-8520

  • Research Site

    Kanazawa, 920-8641

  • Research Site

    Kita-gun, 761-0793

  • Research Site

    Kobe, 650-0047

  • Research Site

    Koshigaya-shi, 343-8555

  • Research Site

    Kōtoku, 135-8550

  • Research Site

    Kumamoto, 860-0008

  • Research Site

    Kyoto, 606-8507

  • Research Site

    Matsuyama, 791-0280

  • Research Site

    Morioka, 028-3695

  • Research Site

    Nagasaki, 852-8501

  • Research Site

    Nagoya, 460-0001

  • Research Site

    Nagoya, 466-8560

  • Research Site

    Osaka, 541-8567

  • Research Site

    Osaka, 545-8586

  • Research Site

    Osakasayama-shi, 589-8511

  • Research Site

    Saga, 840-8571

  • Research Site

    Sagamihara-shi, 252-0315

  • Research Site

    Sakura-shi, 285-8741

  • Research Site

    Sapporo, 060-8648

  • Research Site

    Suita-shi, 565-0871

  • Research Site

    Takatsuki-shi, 569-8686

  • Research Site

    Yokohama, 232-0024

  • Research Site

    Yokohama, 236-0004

Other trials in Japan

China18 sites
  • Research Site

    Beijing, 100034

  • Research Site

    Beijing, 100039

  • Research Site

    Beijing, 100191

  • Research Site

    Changchun, 130012

  • Research Site

    Changsha, 410013

  • Research Site

    Chongqing, 400038

  • Research Site

    Hangzhou, 310009

  • Research Site

    Hangzhou, 310014

  • Research Site

    Nanjing, 210008

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, 200000

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, 200032

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, 200072

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, 200080

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, 200127

  • Research Site

    Shenyang, 110001

  • Research Site

    Tianjin, 300211

  • Research Site

    Xi'an, 710061

  • Research Site

    Xiamen, 361003

Other trials in China

United States16 sites
  • Research Site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Research Site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Research Site

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Research Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Research Site

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Research Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Research Site

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

  • Research Site

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38120

  • Research Site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • Research Site

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06520

  • Research Site

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Research Site

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Research Site

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68130

  • Research Site

    Seattle, Washington, 98101

  • Research Site

    Stanford, California, 94305

  • Research Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

Other trials in United States

Brazil13 sites
  • Research Site

    Barretos, 14784-400

  • Research Site

    Belo Horizonte, 30380-472

  • Research Site

    Ijuí, 98700-000

  • Research Site

    Itajaí, 88301-220

  • Research Site

    Porto Alegre, 90035-003

  • Research Site

    Porto Alegre, 90610-000

  • Research Site

    Porto Alegre, 91350-200

  • Research Site

    Rio de Janeiro, 20231-050

  • Research Site

    Rio de Janeiro, 22793-080

  • Research Site

    São José do Rio Preto, 15090-000

  • Research Site

    São Paulo, 01209-000

  • Research Site

    São Paulo, 01321-001

  • Research Site

    São Paulo, 01509-900

Other trials in Brazil

Canada13 sites
  • Research Site

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2

  • Research Site

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Research Site

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7

  • Research Site

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2

  • Research Site

    Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 5L3

  • Research Site

    Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 2P9

  • Research Site

    Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 2B9

  • Research Site

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 1C4

  • Research Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1R 3S1

  • Research Site

    Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4

  • Research Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Research Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

  • Research Site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6

Other trials in Canada

Russia13 sites
  • Research Site

    Moscow, 105229

  • Research Site

    Moscow, 115478

  • Research Site

    Murmansk, 183047

  • Research Site

    Nizhnyi Novgorod, 603001

  • Research Site

    Obninsk, 249036

  • Research Site

    Omsk, 644013

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 191014

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 191015

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 194354

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 199178

  • Research Site

    Ufa, 450054

  • Research Site

    Yaroslavl, 150054

Other trials in Russia

Spain13 sites
  • Research Site

    Badajoz, 06008

  • Research Site

    Badalona, 08916

  • Research Site

    Barcelona, 08003

  • Research Site

    Barcelona, 08243

  • Research Site

    Elche(Alicante), 03202

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 08035

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 28007

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 28040

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 28041

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 28050

  • Research Site

    Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223

  • Research Site

    Santiago de Compostela, 15706

  • Research Site

    Seville, 41013

Other trials in Spain

France10 sites
  • Research Site

    Bordeaux, 33000

  • Research Site

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Research Site

    Caen, 14076

  • Research Site

    Lyon, 69008

  • Research Site

    Marseille, 13273

  • Research Site

    Paris, 75475

  • Research Site

    Poitiers, 86021

  • Research Site

    Suresnes, 92151

  • Research Site

    Toulouse, 31059

  • Research Site

    Villejuif, 94805

Other trials in France

United Kingdom10 sites
  • Research Site

    Cambridge, CB2 0QQ

  • Research Site

    Cardiff, CF14 2TL

  • Research Site

    Glasgow, G12 0YN

  • Research Site

    Leeds, LS9 7TF

  • Research Site

    London, E1 1BB

  • Research Site

    London, SE1 9RT

  • Research Site

    Manchester, M20 4BX

  • Research Site

    Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, CH63 4JY

  • Research Site

    Sheffield, S10 2SJ

  • Research Site

    Southampton, SO16 6YD

Other trials in United Kingdom

Italy9 sites
  • Research Site

    Arezzo, 52100

  • Research Site

    Meldola, 47014

  • Research Site

    Milan, 20132

  • Research Site

    Milan, 20133

  • Research Site

    Naples, 80131

  • Research Site

    Orbassano, 10043

  • Research Site

    Pavia, 27100

  • Research Site

    Roma, 00152

  • Research Site

    San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013

Other trials in Italy

Netherlands8 sites
  • Research Site

    Amsterdam, 1066 CX

  • Research Site

    Amsterdam, 1081 HV

  • Research Site

    Breda, 4819 EV

  • Research Site

    Enschede, 7512 KZ

  • Research Site

    Groningen, 9713 GZ

  • Research Site

    Leiden, 2333 ZA

  • Research Site

    Maastricht, 6229 HX

  • Research Site

    Nijmegen, 6525 GA

Other trials in Netherlands

Poland8 sites
  • Research Site

    Gdansk, 80-462

  • Research Site

    Gdansk, 80-952

  • Research Site

    Gdynia, 81-519

  • Research Site

    Gliwice, 44-101

  • Research Site

    Olsztyn, 10-228

  • Research Site

    Otwock, 05-400

  • Research Site

    Szczecin, 70-111

  • Research Site

    Warsaw, 02-781

Other trials in Poland

Germany7 sites
  • Research Site

    Düsseldorf, 40225

  • Research Site

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Research Site

    Hanover, 30625

  • Research Site

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Research Site

    Jena, 07747

  • Research Site

    München, 81675

  • Research Site

    Münster, 48149

Other trials in Germany

Greece7 sites
  • Research Site

    Athens, 11528

  • Research Site

    Athens, 14564

  • Research Site

    Heraklion, 71110

  • Research Site

    Holargos, Athens, 155 62

  • Research Site

    Maroussi, Athens, 15125

  • Research Site

    Pátrai, 26500

  • Research Site

    Thessaloniki, 56 429

Other trials in Greece

South Korea7 sites
  • Research Site

    Incheon, 21565

  • Research Site

    Seongnam-si, 13620

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 02841

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 03080

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 03722

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 05505

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 06351

Other trials in South Korea

Mexico6 sites
  • Research Site

    Guadalajara, 44280

  • Research Site

    León, 37000

  • Research Site

    México, 04739

  • Research Site

    México, 06760

  • Research Site

    Mexico City, 01120

  • Research Site

    Monterrey, 64460

Other trials in Mexico

Taiwan6 sites
  • Research Site

    Kaohsiung City

  • Research Site

    Taichung, 00407

  • Research Site

    Tainan, 704

  • Research Site

    Taipei, 10002

  • Research Site

    Taipei, 112

  • Research Site

    Taoyuan City, 333

Other trials in Taiwan

Australia5 sites
  • Research Site

    Box Hill, 3128

  • Research Site

    Elizabeth Vale, 5112

  • Research Site

    Macquarie University, 2109

  • Research Site

    St Leonards, 2065

  • Research Site

    Waratah, 2298

Other trials in Australia

Israel5 sites
  • Research Site

    Haifa, 31096

  • Research Site

    Jerusalem, 91120

  • Research Site

    Petah Tikva, 4941492

  • Research Site

    Ramat Gan, 5265601

  • Research Site

    Tsrifin, 70300

Other trials in Israel

Belgium4 sites
  • Research Site

    Brussels, 1000

  • Research Site

    Brussels, 1200

  • Research Site

    Leuven, 3000

  • Research Site

    Liège, 4000

Other trials in Belgium

Denmark4 sites
  • Research Site

    Århus C, 8000

  • Research Site

    Herlev, 2730

  • Research Site

    København Ø, 2100

  • Research Site

    Odense C, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

Austria3 sites
  • Research Site

    Linz, 4010

  • Research Site

    Vienna, 1090

  • Research Site

    Vienna, 1140

Other trials in Austria

Portugal3 sites
  • Research Site

    Lisbon, 1649-035

  • Research Site

    Loures, 2674-514

  • Research Site

    Porto, 4099-001

Other trials in Portugal

Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
  • Research Site

    Ankara, 06230

  • Research Site

    Edirne, 22030

  • Research Site

    Izmir, 35100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Multi-Center, Global Study of First-Line MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) Monotherapy and MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) in Combination With Tremelimumab Versus Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Patients With Unresectable Stage IV Urothelial Cancer

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Multi-Center, Global Study of First-Line MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) Monotherapy and MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) in Combination with Tremelimumab Versus Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage IV Urothelial Cancer

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, open-label, controlled, multi-center, global Phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) monotherapy and MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) in combination with tremelimumab versus SoC (cisplatin + gemcitabine or carboplatin + gemcitabine doublet) first-line chemotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with histologically or cytologically documented, unresectable, Stage IV transitional cell carcinoma (transitional cell and mixed transitional/non-transitional cell histologies) of the urothelium (including renal pelvis, ureters, urinary bladder, and urethra) and to allow sufficient flexibility for Investigators and patients to select the agents that reflect their normal clinical practice and national guidelines. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive treatment with combination therapy, monotherapy, or SoC (cisplatin + gemcitabine or carboplatin + gemcitabine, based on cisplatin eligibility). Patients will be treated with MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) or MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) with tremelimumab, or treated with SoC until progressive disease (PD) is confirmed, unacceptable toxicity occurs, withdrawal of consent, or another discontinuation criterion is met. Patients will be followed for up to 2 years.

Being tested
MEDI4736 (Durvalumab), Tremelimumab, Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Gemcitabine
Keywords
Urothelial Cancer, Phase III

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02516241
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Combination TherapyExperimentalMEDI4736 (Durvalumab) + Tremelimumab
Receives: Drug: MEDI4736 (Durvalumab); Drug: Tremelimumab
MonotherapyExperimentalMEDI4736 (Durvalumab)
Receives: Drug: MEDI4736 (Durvalumab)
Standard of CareActive comparatorStandard of Care Chemotherapy Treatment
Receives: Drug: Cisplatin; Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Gemcitabine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To Assess the Efficacy of Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus SoC in Terms of OS in Full Analysis Set

    The OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause (ie, date of death or censoring - date of randomization + 1). Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis were censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  2. To Assess the Efficacy of Durvalumab Monotherapy Versus SoC in Terms of OS in PD-L1-High Analysis Set

    The OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause (ie, date of death or censoring - date of randomization + 1). Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis were censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

Secondary outcomes (38)
  1. OS, Full Analysis Set - Durvalumab Monotherapy vs SoC

    The OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause (ie, date of death or censoring - date of randomization + 1). Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis were censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  2. OS, PD-L1-High Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus SoC

    The OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause (ie, date of death or censoring - date of randomization + 1). Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis were censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  3. OS, PD-L1-Low/Negative Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus SoC and Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus Durvalumab Monotherapy

    The OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause (ie, date of death or censoring - date of randomization + 1). Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis were censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  4. Alive at 24 Months (OS24), Full Analysis Set

    Alive at 24 months (OS24) is defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months.

    Measured: From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to 24 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020).

  5. Alive at 24 Months (OS24), PD-L1-High Analysis Set

    Alive at 24 months (OS24) is defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months.

    Measured: From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to 24 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020).

  6. Alive at 24 Months (OS24), PD-L1-Low/Negative Analysis Set

    Alive at 24 months (OS24) is defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months.

    Measured: From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to 24 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020).

  7. PFS, Full Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Mono Therapy vs SoC

    Progression free survival (PFS) (per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by investigator) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy or receives another anticancer therapy prior to progression.

    Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  8. PFS, PD-L1-High Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Monotherapy vs SoC

    Progression free survival (PFS) (per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by investigator) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy or receives another anticancer therapy prior to progression.

    Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  9. PFS, PD-L1-Low/Negative Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus SoC and Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus Durvalumab Monotherapy

    Progression free survival (PFS) (per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by investigator) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the patient withdraws from randomized therapy or receives another anticancer therapy prior to progression.

    Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  10. Alive and Progression-free at 12 Months (APF12), Full Analysis Set

    Alive and progression-free at 12 months (APF12) was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by investigator) at 12 months.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to 12 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020).

  11. Alive and Progression-free at 12 Months (APF12), PD-L1-High Analysis Set

    Alive and progression-free at 12 months (APF12) was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by investigator) at 12 months.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to 12 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020).

  12. Alive and Progression-free at 12 Months (APF12), PD-L1-Low/Negative Analysis Set

    Alive and progression-free at 12 months (APF12) was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by investigator) at 12 months.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to 12 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020).

  13. PFS2, Full Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Mono Therapy vs SoC

    Time from randomization to second progression or death (PFS2) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression event subsequent to first subsequent therapy or death (ie, date of PFS2 event or censoring - date of randomization +1).

    Median PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until first confirmed disease progression, disease then assessed per local practice until 2nd progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  14. PFS2, PD-L1-High Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Monotherapy vs SoC

    Time from randomization to second progression or death (PFS2) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression event subsequent to first subsequent therapy or death (ie, date of PFS2 event or censoring - date of randomization +1).

    Median PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until first confirmed disease progression, disease then assessed per local practice until 2nd progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  15. PFS2, PD-L1-Low/Negative Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus SoC and Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus Durvalumab Monotherapy

    Time from randomization to second progression or death (PFS2) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression event subsequent to first subsequent therapy or death (ie, date of PFS2 event or censoring - date of randomization +1).

    Median PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until first confirmed disease progression, disease then assessed per local practice until 2nd progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  16. Objective Response Rate (ORR), Full Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Mono Therapy vs SoC

    Objective response rate ORR (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by investigator) is defined as the number (%) of patients with at least 1 visit response of CR or PR.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  17. Objective Response Rate (ORR), PD-L1-High Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Monotherapy vs SoC

    Objective response rate ORR (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by investigator) is defined as the number (%) of patients with at least 1 visit response of CR or PR.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  18. Objective Response Rate (ORR), PD-L1-Low/Negative Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus SoC and Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus Durvalumab Monotherapy

    Objective response rate ORR (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by investigator) is defined as the number (%) of patients with at least 1 visit response of CR or PR.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  19. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on BICR Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 - Responses Are Confirmed - Durvalumab Cisplatin Ineligible Population

    Objective response rate ORR (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by investigator) is defined as the number (%) of patients with at least 1 visit response of CR or PR.

    unconfirmed responses are excluded.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (01NOV2017, a maximum of 3 years).

  20. Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 6 Months, Full Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Mono Therapy vs SoC

    Disease control rate (DCR) at 6 months is defined as the percentage of patients who have a best objective response (BoR) of CR or PR, or who have demonstrated SD for a minimum interval of 24 weeks (-7 days, i.e., 161 days), following the start of study treatment.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to 6 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020).

  21. Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 6 Months, PD-L1-High Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Monotherapy vs SoC

    Disease control rate (DCR) at 6 months is defined as the percentage of patients who have a best objective response (BoR) of CR or PR, or who have demonstrated SD for a minimum interval of 24 weeks (-7 days, i.e., 161 days), following the start of study treatment.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to 6 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020).

  22. Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 6 Months, PD-L1-Low/Negative Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus SoC and Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus Durvalumab Monotherapy

    Disease control rate (DCR) at 6 months is defined as the percentage of patients who have a best objective response (BoR) of CR or PR, or who have demonstrated SD for a minimum interval of 24 weeks (-7 days, i.e., 161 days), following the start of study treatment.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to 6 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020).

  23. Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 12 Months, Full Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Mono Therapy vs SoC

    Disease control rate (DCR) at 12 months is defined as the percentage of patients who have a best objective response (BoR) of CR or PR, or who have demonstrated SD for a minimum interval of 48 weeks (-7 days, i.e., 329 days), following the start of study treatment.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to 12 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020)

  24. Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 12 Months, PD-L1-High Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Monotherapy vs SoC

    Disease control rate (DCR) at 12 months is defined as the percentage of patients who have a best objective response (BoR) of CR or PR, or who have demonstrated SD for a minimum interval of 48 weeks (-7 days, i.e., 329 days), following the start of study treatment.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to 12 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020).

  25. Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 12 Months, PD-L1-Low/Negative Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus SoC and Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus Durvalumab Monotherapy

    Disease control rate (DCR) at 12 months is defined as the percentage of patients who have a best objective response (BoR) of CR or PR, or who have demonstrated SD for a minimum interval of 48 weeks (-7 days, i.e., 329 days), following the start of study treatment.

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to 12 months or the data cut-off date (27JAN2020).

  26. Duration of Response (DoR), Full Analysis Set

    Duration of response (DoR) (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by investigator) was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression (i.e. date of PFS event or censoring - date of first response + 1).

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  27. Duration of Response (DoR), PD-L1-High Analysis Set

    Duration of response (DoR) (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by investigator) was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression (i.e. date of PFS event or censoring - date of first response + 1).

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  28. Duration of Response (DoR), PD-L1-Low/Negative Analysis Set

    Duration of response (DoR) (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by investigator) was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression (i.e. date of PFS event or censoring - date of first response + 1).

    Measured: Tumour scans performed at baseline then every 8 weeks since randomization until confirmed disease progression. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  29. Serum Concentrations of Durvalumab, Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set

    Blood samples were collected to determine the serum concentration of durvalumab.

    Measured: Pre-dose and within 1 hour after end of infusion at Week 0, 12 and 24, pre-dose at week 4, and at follow-up Month 3.

  30. Serum Concentrations of Tremelimumab, Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set

    Blood samples were collected to determine the serum concentration of tremelimumab.

    Measured: Pre-dose and within 1 hour after end of infusion at Week 0, 12 and 24, pre-dose at week 4, and at follow-up Month 3.

  31. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab, Safety Analysis Set - ADA Evaluable Patients

    Serum Samples will be measured for the presence of ADAs and ADA-neutralizing antibodies for Durvalumab using validated assays. Tiered analysis will be performed to include screening, confirmatory, and titer assay components, and positive-negative cut points previously statistically determined from drug-naïve validation samples will be used. Persistently positive is defined as having at least 2 post-baseline ADA positive measurements with at least 16 weeks (112 days) between the first and last positive measurements, or an ADA positive result at the last available assessment. Transiently positive is defined as having at least one post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive. The category may include patients meeting these criteria who are ADA positive at baseline.

    Measured: At week 0, 4, 12 and 24, and at follow-up Month 3.

  32. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Tremelimumab, Safety Analysis Set - ADA Evaluable Patients

    Serum Samples will be measured for the presence of ADAs and ADA-neutralizing antibodies for Tremelimumab using validated assays. Tiered analysis will be performed to include screening, confirmatory, and titer assay components, and positive-negative cut points previously statistically determined from drug-naïve validation samples will be used. Persistently positive is defined as having at least 2 post-baseline ADA positive measurements with at least 16 weeks (112 days) between the first and last positive measurements, or an ADA positive result at the last available assessment. Transiently positive is defined as having at least one post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive. The category may include patients meeting these criteria who are ADA positive at baseline.

    Measured: At week 0, 4, 12 and at follow-up Month 3.

  33. Change From Baseline in FACT-BL (Derived NFBlSI-18 Score, FACT-BL TOI, and FACT-BL Total Score) by MMRM Analysis, Full Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Mono Therapy vs SoC

    the change from baseline in the following total/index scores will be evaluated as secondary endpoints: FACT-BL TOI (refer to as TOI), FACT-BL Total score, and NFBlSI-18 score.

    All the 5 subscales (PWB (0-28), FWB (0-28), EWB (0-24), SWB (0-28), and BlCS(0-48)) are summed as the FACT-BL total score (range 0-156), while the sum of PWB, FWB and BICS constitutes the FACT-BL TOI (range 0-104).

    NFBlSI-18 (range 0-72) is based on the scores of 16 items (GP4, C2, BL1, GP3, GE6, GE1, C6, BL5, GF5, GP2, GP1, GP6, C3, GP5, GF3, GF7) and 2 extra items "I feel weak all overall" and "I feel light-headed (dizzy)". The range of each item is 0-4.

    Higher score represent worse outcome.

    Measured: At baseline then every 8 weeks until second progression/death, whichever comes first. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  34. Change From Baseline in FACT-BL (Derived NFBlSI-18 Score, FACT-BL TOI, and FACT-BL Total Score) by MMRM Analysis, PD-L1-High Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Mono Therapy vs SoC

    the change from baseline in the following total/index scores will be evaluated as secondary endpoints: FACT-BL TOI (refer to as TOI), FACT-BL Total score, and NFBlSI-18 score.

    All the 5 subscales (PWB (0-28), FWB (0-28), EWB (0-24), SWB (0-28), and BlCS(0-48)) are summed as the FACT-BL total score (range 0-156), while the sum of PWB, FWB and BICS constitutes the FACT-BL TOI (range 0-104).

    NFBlSI-18 (range 0-72) is based on the scores of 16 items (GP4, C2, BL1, GP3, GE6, GE1, C6, BL5, GF5, GP2, GP1, GP6, C3, GP5, GF3, GF7) and 2 extra items "I feel weak all overall" and "I feel light-headed (dizzy)". The range of each item is 0-4.

    Higher score represent worse

    Measured: At baseline then every 8 weeks until second progression/death, whichever comes first. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  35. Change From Baseline in FACT-BL (Derived NFBlSI-18 Score, FACT-BL TOI, and FACT-BL Total Score) by MMRM Analysis, PD-L1-Low/Negative Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Mono Therapy vs SoC

    the change from baseline in the following total/index scores will be evaluated as secondary endpoints: FACT-BL TOI (refer to as TOI), FACT-BL Total score, and NFBlSI-18 score.

    All the 5 subscales (PWB (0-28), FWB (0-28), EWB (0-24), SWB (0-28), and BlCS(0-48)) are summed as the FACT-BL total score (range 0-156), while the sum of PWB, FWB and BICS constitutes the FACT-BL TOI (range 0-104).

    NFBlSI-18 (range 0-72) is based on the scores of 16 items (GP4, C2, BL1, GP3, GE6, GE1, C6, BL5, GF5, GP2, GP1, GP6, C3, GP5, GF3, GF7) and 2 extra items "I feel weak all overall" and "I feel light-headed (dizzy)". The range of each item is 0-4.

    Higher score represent worse

    Measured: At baseline then every 8 weeks until second progression/death, whichever comes first. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  36. Improvement in Fatigue and Deterioration in Pain Per FACT-BL, Full Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Mono Therapy vs SoC

    Fatigue will be based on the question of "I have a lack of energy" and pain will be based on the question of "I have pain", according to GP1 and GP4 in PWB, respectively.

    Improvement in fatigue is defined at least 1 point improvement from baseline using GP1 of FACT-BL.

    Deterioration in pain is defined as at least 1 point deterioration from baseline using GP4 of FACT-BL.

    Measured: At baseline then every 8 weeks until second progression/death, whichever comes first. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  37. Improvement in Fatigue and Deterioration in Pain Per FACT-BL, PD-L1-High Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Mono Therapy vs SoC

    Fatigue will be based on the question of "I have a lack of energy" and pain will be based on the question of "I have pain", according to GP1 and GP4 in PWB, respectively.

    Improvement in fatigue is defined at least 1 point improvement from baseline using GP1 of FACT-BL.

    Deterioration in pain is defined as at least 1 point deterioration from baseline using GP4 of FACT-BL.

    Measured: At baseline then every 8 weeks until second progression/death, whichever comes first. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

  38. Improvement in Fatigue and Deterioration in Pain Per FACT-BL, PD-L1-Low/Negative Analysis Set -Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy vs SoC and Durvalumab Mono Therapy vs SoC

    Fatigue will be based on the question of "I have a lack of energy" and pain will be based on the question of "I have pain", according to GP1 and GP4 in PWB, respectively.

    Improvement in fatigue is defined at least 1 point improvement from baseline using GP1 of FACT-BL.

    Deterioration in pain is defined as at least 1 point deterioration from baseline using GP4 of FACT-BL.

    Measured: At baseline then every 8 weeks until second progression/death, whichever comes first. Assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Nov 2015
  3. Primary completion27 Jan 2020
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,126 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02516241
Sponsor's protocol ID
D419BC00001
Other IDs
2015-001633-24, 2015
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
13 Jul 2015
Last updated
14 Jul 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Publications

  • Powles T, van der Heijden MS, Castellano D, Galsky MD, Loriot Y, Petrylak DP, Ogawa O, Park SH, Lee JL, De Giorgi U, Bogemann M, Bamias A, Eigl BJ, Gurney H, Mukherjee SD, Fradet Y, Skoneczna I, Tsiatas M, Novikov A, Suarez C, Fay AP, Duran I, Necchi A, Wildsmith S, He P, Angra N, Gupta AK, Levin W, Bellmunt J; DANUBE study investigators. Durvalumab alone and durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (DANUBE): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Dec;21(12):1574-1588. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30541-6. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

    PubMed 32971005

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing MEDI4736 (Durvalumab), Tremelimumab and Cisplatin in people with Urothelial Cancer, run by AstraZeneca at 222 sites in 24 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 222 sites in Japan, China, United States, Brazil, Canada and 19 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 May 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To Assess the Efficacy of Durvalumab + Tremelimumab Combination Therapy Versus SoC in Terms of OS in Full Analysis Set (time frame: From randomization date until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27JAN2020, a maximum of 5 years).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02516241, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in