AzTrials
AzTrials

Skin and Connective Tissue DiseasesPhase 2NCT02518048

A Psoriasis Plaque Test Trial With LEO 90100 Compared to Betesil® in Patients With Psoriasis Vulgaris

A Phase 2 study testing LEO 90100 Aerosol foam and Betesil® 2.25 mg in people with Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases, run by LEO Pharma at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the anti-psoriatic effect of LEO 90100 aerosol foam compared with Betesil® medicated plaster Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
What is being tested?
LEO 90100 Aerosol foam and Betesil® 2.25 mg
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
35 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Aug 2015to Jan 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed and dated informed consent has been obtained
  • Subjects with a diagnosis of psoriasis vulgaris with preferably three lesions (plaques) located on arms, legs and/or trunk or at least two lesions (plaques) located on arms, legs and/or trunk. For subjects with three lesions, each lesion must have a size suitable to accommodate 2 test sites (test site area 5 cm2, distance between two test sites at least 2 cm). For subjects with two lesions, one lesion must have a size suitable to accommodate 4 test sites, and the other lesion must accommodate 2 test sites.
  • Age 18 years or above
  • Outpatients
  • Female subjects must be of either
  • non-childbearing potential, i.e. post-menopausal or have a confirmed clinical history of sterility (e.g. the subject is without a uterus or has tubal ligation) or,
  • child-bearing potential provided there is a confirmed negative pregnancy test prior to trial treatment to rule out pregnancy.

Who cannot join

  • Female subjects who are breast feeding
  • Systemic treatment with biological therapies, whether marketed or not, with a possible effect on psoriasis vulgaris within the following time periods prior to randomisation:
  • Etanercept - within 4 weeks prior to randomisation and during the trial
  • Adalimumab, infliximab - within 8 weeks prior to randomisation and during the trial
  • Ustekinumab - within 16 weeks prior to randomisation and during the trial
  • Other products - within 4 weeks/5 half-lives prior to randomisation and during the trial (whichever is longer)
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Systemic treatment with all other therapies than biologicals, with a potential effect on psoriasis vulgaris (e.g., corticosteroids, retinoids, immunosuppressants) within the 4-week period prior to randomisation and during the trial
  • Subjects using phototherapy within the following time periods prior to randomisation and during the trial:
  • PUVA: 4 weeks
  • UVB: 2 weeks
  • Subjects using one of the following topical drugs for the treatment of psoriasis within the 4 week period prior to randomisation and during the trial:
  • Potent or very potent (WHO group III-IV) corticosteroids
  • Subjects using one of the following topical drugs for the treatment of psoriasis within 2 weeks prior to randomisation and during the trial:
  • WHO group I-II corticosteroids (except if used for treatment of scalp and/or facial psoriasis)
  • Topical retinoids, Vitamin D analogues, Topical immunomodulators (e.g. calcineurin inhibitors), Tar products, Salicylic acid
  • Subjects using emollients on the selected plaques within 1 week before randomisation and during the trial
  • Initiation of, or expected changes to concomitant medication that may affect psoriasis vulgaris (e.g., beta blockers, antimalarial drugs, lithium and ACE inhibitors) within 2 weeks prior to the randomisation and during the trial
  • Subjects with current diagnosis of guttate, erythrodermic, exfoliative or pustular psoriasis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Centre de Pharmacologie Clinique Appliquée à la Dermatologie (CPCAD)

    Nice, 06000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2a Trial Evaluating the Anti-psoriatic Effect of LEO 90100 Aerosol Foam Compared to Betesil® Medicated Plaster in the Treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the anti-psoriatic effect of LEO 90100 aerosol foam compared with Betesil® medicated plaster

Read the detailed description

The products will be applied on 6 test sites (each product on 3 test sites) once daily 6 days a week (except Sundays) for 4 weeks. The application sites for each product will be determined according to random assignment. Depending on the size of the psoriasis plaques, 2 or 4 test sites will be located within the same plaque; the treatment assignment will be done pair-wise.

Being tested
LEO 90100 Aerosol foam, Betesil® 2.25 mg
Keywords
Psoriasis
Medical subject headings
Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases, Psoriasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LEO 90100 Aerosol foamDrug

  • Betesil® 2.25 mgDrug

Study groups in NCT02518048
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LEO 90100 Aerosol foamActive comparatorCalcipotriol (as monohydrate) 50 mcg/g and betamethasone (as dipropionate) 0.5 mg/g (LEO 90100 Aerosol foam)
Receives: Drug: LEO 90100 Aerosol foam
Betesil® 2.25 mgActive comparatorBetamethasone (as valerate). Each 7.5 cm x 10 cm medicated plaster contains: 2.250 mg of betamethasone valerate (corresponding to 1.845 mg of betamethasone).(Betesil® )
Receives: Drug: Betesil® 2.25 mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Absolute Change in Total Clinical Score (TCS) of Clinical Signs (Sum of Erythema, Scaling, Infiltration) Absolute Change in Total Clinical Score (TCS) of Clinical Signs (Sum of Erythema, Scaling, and Infiltration) at End of Treatment Compared to Baseline

    The investigator assessed the severity of the clinical signs erythema, scaling, and infiltration for each test site by using a 7-point scale with half-mark values from 0 (no evidence) to 3.0 (severe).

    The total TCS was calculated for each test site by summing the scores for erythema, scaling, and infiltration for that particular test site.

    Each test site was assessed at Baseline and on Days 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, 25, and 29 (EoT).

    The mean TCS at Baseline was 6.6 for both groups.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 29

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change in TCS at Individual Visits

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 29

  2. Change in Score of Erythema, Scaling, and Infiltration at Individual Visits

    The investigator assessed the severity of the clinical signs erythema, scaling, and infiltration for each test site by using a 7-point scale with half-mark values from 0 (no evidence) to 3.0 (severe).

    Erythema: 0 (no evidence - normal skin color) to 3 (severe - intense red). Scaling: 0 (no evidence - no scaling) to 3 (severe - coarse, thick scales). Infiltration: 0 (no evidence - no infiltration) to 3 (severe - very marked infiltration).

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 29

  3. Change in Total Skin Thickness and Echo-poor Band Thickness From Baseline to EoT

    Skin thickness ultrasound measurements of the test sites were performed at Baseline and End of Treatment.

    Two skin parameters were calculated using ultrasound:

    • The mean total skin thickness
    • The mean echo-poor band thickness

    Measured: Baseline to End of Treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completionJan 2016
  4. Study completionJan 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
35 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02518048
Sponsor's protocol ID
LP0053-1227
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
5 Aug 2015
Last updated
10 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Queille-Roussel C, Rosen M, Clonier F, Norremark K, Lacour JP. Efficacy and Safety of Calcipotriol Plus Betamethasone Dipropionate Aerosol Foam Compared with Betamethasone 17-Valerate-Medicated Plaster for the Treatment of Psoriasis. Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Apr;37(4):355-361. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0489-5.

    PubMed 27995521

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing LEO 90100 Aerosol foam and Betesil® 2.25 mg in people with Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases, run by LEO Pharma at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Absolute Change in Total Clinical Score (TCS) of Clinical Signs (Sum of Erythema, Scaling, Infiltration) Absolute Change in Total Clinical Score (TCS) of Clinical Signs (Sum of Erythema, Scaling, and Infiltration) at End of Treatment Compared to Baseline (time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 29). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02518048, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in