Respiratory InsufficiencyNCT02518230
Randomized Crossover of NAVA and Synchronized Intermittent Pressure Ventilation in Neonates and Infants
A study testing Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist and Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist in people with Respiratory Insufficiency and Infant, Newborn, Disease, run by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is a single center, prospective cohort crossover study comparing mechanically ventilated neonates and infants on Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure control plus pressure support (SIMV(PC) + PS) modes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 24 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Infant, Newborn, Disease
- What is being tested?
- Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist and Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Jun 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 24 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Neonates and infants, 22 weeks gestation age or older at birth
- Require mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in either SIMV (PC) + PS or NAVA modes
- Stable on the ventilator with a fractional inspired oxygen requirement (FiO2) of 0.60 or less.
- Stable on the ventilator with weaning or unchanged ventilatory support without need of escalation of ventilatory pressure or rate in prior 12 hours.
Who cannot join
- Major congenital anomalies
- Neurologic compromise of respiratory drive
- Phrenic nerve palsy
- Sedated enough to suppress respiratory drive
- Respiratory support with volume mechanical ventilation
- Respiratory support with high frequency oscillatory ventilation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Children's Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108
About this study
Official title: Respiratory Severity and Caloric Consumption on NAVA: Randomized Crossover Trial of NAVA and SIMV
This study is a single center, prospective cohort crossover study comparing mechanically ventilated neonates and infants on Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure control plus pressure support (SIMV(PC) + PS) modes.
This design will allow for direct comparison of two commonly used ventilator modalities in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to determine if one mode is superior to the other with regards to respiratory mechanics and estimated energy expenditure.
It is hypothesized that neonates and infants will have improved respiratory severity score (MAP X FiO2) utilizing NAVA compared to the SIMV (PC) + PS mode but will have increased estimated energy expenditure.
Read the detailed description
This single center, prospective cohort crossover study will involve mechanically ventilated neonates and infants who are determined to be on stable ventilator settings in either the NAVA or SIMV(PC) + PS modes. This design will allow for direct comparison of two commonly used ventilator modalities in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to determine if one mode is superior to the other with regards to respiratory mechanics and energy expenditure.
Infants will be screened for stability criteria including: being stable on the ventilator in either SIMV (PC) + PS or NAVA mode, on weaning or unchanged ventilatory support in previous 12 hours, and no need of escalation of ventilatory pressure or rate in prior 12 hours.
After screening criteria is met and consent has been obtained, data will be retrospectively collected for 12 hours prior to randomization. After the subject is randomized, the infant will be stabilized and data will be collected for 12 hours in the randomized mode. Data will then be collected for 12 hours afterwards in the crossover mode. Data will be collected in areas of patient demographics, diagnoses, indications for mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic variables and respiratory parameters. While in each mode, the patient will also have indirect calorimetry obtained to determine estimated energy expenditure of each mode.
- Being tested
- Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory AssistDevice
The subject will be crossed over from the baseline ventilator mode to Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist
Synchronized Interm. Mandatory AssistDevice
The subject will be crossed over from the baseline ventilator mode to Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Assist with Pressure Support
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist | Other | Subject will be randomized to NAVA ventilation. Intervention is mechanical ventilation with Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist for 12 hours. Receives: Device: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist; Device: Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist |
| Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist | Other | Subject will be randomized to SIMV(PC)PS ventilation. Intervention is mechanical ventilation with Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Assist with Pressure Support for 12 hours. Receives: Device: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist; Device: Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Respiratory Severity Score (MAP X FiO2)
The respiratory severity score will be calculated throughout 24 hour time frame prior to and after study initiation to determine the subject's respiratory severity prior to the randomization, after randomization and after crossover. The respiratory severity score (RSS) is a simplified severity score consisting of the mean airway pressure (MAP) multiplied by the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). This score ranges from 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating more severe disease.
Measured: 12 hours and 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Energy Expenditure
The subject will have indirect calorimetry performed twice during the study on each mode, 12 hours after randomization and 12 hours after crossover to determine the approximate amount of energy expenditure needed for each mode of mechanical ventilation.
Energy expenditure is calculated by using the Harris-Benedict equation, resulted in kcal/kg per day.
Measured: 12 hours and 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionJun 2015
- Study completionJun 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory InsufficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jamie L Rosterman, DO, Principal investigator, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02518230
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Crossover NAVA
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 3 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rosterman JL, Pallotto EK, Truog WE, Escobar H, Meinert KA, Holmes A, Dai H, Manimtim WM. The impact of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist mode on respiratory severity score and energy expenditure in infants: a randomized crossover trial. J Perinatol. 2018 Jan;38(1):59-63. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.154. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
PubMed 29072677
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Respiratory Severity and Caloric Consumption on NAVA: Randomized Crossover Trial of NAVA and SIMV
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02518230
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Crossover NAVA
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Jul 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a single center, prospective cohort crossover study comparing mechanically ventilated neonates and infants on Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure control plus pressure support (SIMV(PC) + PS) modes.
This design will allow for direct comparison of two commonly used ventilator modalities in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to determine if one mode is superior to the other with regards to respiratory mechanics and estimated energy expenditure.
It is hypothesized that neonates and infants will have improved respiratory severity score (MAP X FiO2) utilizing NAVA compared to the SIMV (PC) + PS mode but will have increased estimated energy expenditure.
Detailed description
This single center, prospective cohort crossover study will involve mechanically ventilated neonates and infants who are determined to be on stable ventilator settings in either the NAVA or SIMV(PC) + PS modes. This design will allow for direct comparison of two commonly used ventilator modalities in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to determine if one mode is superior to the other with regards to respiratory mechanics and energy expenditure.
Infants will be screened for stability criteria including: being stable on the ventilator in either SIMV (PC) + PS or NAVA mode, on weaning or unchanged ventilatory support in previous 12 hours, and no need of escalation of ventilatory pressure or rate in prior 12 hours.
After screening criteria is met and consent has been obtained, data will be retrospectively collected for 12 hours prior to randomization. After the subject is randomized, the infant will be stabilized and data will be collected for 12 hours in the randomized mode. Data will then be collected for 12 hours afterwards in the crossover mode. Data will be collected in areas of patient demographics, diagnoses, indications for mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic variables and respiratory parameters. While in each mode, the patient will also have indirect calorimetry obtained to determine estimated energy expenditure of each mode.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist | Other | Device: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, Device: Synchronized Interm. Mandatory AssistSubject will be randomized to NAVA ventilation. Intervention is mechanical ventilation with Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist for 12 hours. |
| Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist | Other | Device: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, Device: Synchronized Interm. Mandatory AssistSubject will be randomized to SIMV(PC)PS ventilation. Intervention is mechanical ventilation with Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Assist with Pressure Support for 12 hours. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 24 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Neonates and infants, 22 weeks gestation age or older at birth
- Require mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in either SIMV (PC) + PS or NAVA modes
- Stable on the ventilator with a fractional inspired oxygen requirement (FiO2) of 0.60 or less.
- Stable on the ventilator with weaning or unchanged ventilatory support without need of escalation of ventilatory pressure or rate in prior 12 hours.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Major congenital anomalies
- Neurologic compromise of respiratory drive
- Phrenic nerve palsy
- Sedated enough to suppress respiratory drive
- Respiratory support with volume mechanical ventilation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory AssistThe subject will be crossed over from the baseline ventilator mode to Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist | Device | Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist |
| Synchronized Interm. Mandatory AssistThe subject will be crossed over from the baseline ventilator mode to Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Assist with Pressure Support | Device | Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist |
Primary outcome
Respiratory Severity Score (MAP X FiO2)
Time frame: 12 hours and 24 hours
The respiratory severity score will be calculated throughout 24 hour time frame prior to and after study initiation to determine the subject's respiratory severity prior to the randomization, after randomization and after crossover. The respiratory severity score (RSS) is a simplified severity score consisting of the mean airway pressure (MAP) multiplied by the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). This score ranges from 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating more severe disease.
1 secondary outcome
Energy Expenditure
Time frame: 12 hours and 24 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29072677Rosterman JL, Pallotto EK, Truog WE, Escobar H, Meinert KA, Holmes A, Dai H, Manimtim WM. The impact of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist mode on respiratory severity score and energy expenditure in infants: a randomized crossover trial. J Perinatol. 2018 Jan;38(1):59-63. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.154. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
Related trials for Respiratory Insufficiency
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruiting
Regional Lung Ventilation During Prone Position in in Intubated Children
Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure
Not yet recruiting
Smartphone Camera Measurement of Breathing-Related Heart Rate Variability Compared With ECG in Healthy Adults
Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia, Heart Rate Variability
Not yet recruiting
Mechanical Ventilator Adjustments and Patient Dyspnea
Respiratory Failure, Dyspnea During Mechanical Ventilation
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jamie L Rosterman, DO principal investigator
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist and Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist in people with Respiratory Insufficiency and Infant, Newborn, Disease, run by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Respiratory Severity Score (MAP X FiO2) (time frame: 12 hours and 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02518230, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2021.