AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory InsufficiencyNCT02518230

Randomized Crossover of NAVA and Synchronized Intermittent Pressure Ventilation in Neonates and Infants

A study testing Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist and Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist in people with Respiratory Insufficiency and Infant, Newborn, Disease, run by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a single center, prospective cohort crossover study comparing mechanically ventilated neonates and infants on Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure control plus pressure support (SIMV(PC) + PS) modes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 24 months
What is being tested?
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist and Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
22 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2014to Jun 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 24 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Neonates and infants, 22 weeks gestation age or older at birth
  • Require mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in either SIMV (PC) + PS or NAVA modes
  • Stable on the ventilator with a fractional inspired oxygen requirement (FiO2) of 0.60 or less.
  • Stable on the ventilator with weaning or unchanged ventilatory support without need of escalation of ventilatory pressure or rate in prior 12 hours.

Who cannot join

  • Major congenital anomalies
  • Neurologic compromise of respiratory drive
  • Phrenic nerve palsy
  • Sedated enough to suppress respiratory drive
  • Respiratory support with volume mechanical ventilation
  • Respiratory support with high frequency oscillatory ventilation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Children's Mercy Hospital

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64108

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Respiratory Severity and Caloric Consumption on NAVA: Randomized Crossover Trial of NAVA and SIMV

This study is a single center, prospective cohort crossover study comparing mechanically ventilated neonates and infants on Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure control plus pressure support (SIMV(PC) + PS) modes.

This design will allow for direct comparison of two commonly used ventilator modalities in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to determine if one mode is superior to the other with regards to respiratory mechanics and estimated energy expenditure.

It is hypothesized that neonates and infants will have improved respiratory severity score (MAP X FiO2) utilizing NAVA compared to the SIMV (PC) + PS mode but will have increased estimated energy expenditure.

Read the detailed description

This single center, prospective cohort crossover study will involve mechanically ventilated neonates and infants who are determined to be on stable ventilator settings in either the NAVA or SIMV(PC) + PS modes. This design will allow for direct comparison of two commonly used ventilator modalities in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to determine if one mode is superior to the other with regards to respiratory mechanics and energy expenditure.

Infants will be screened for stability criteria including: being stable on the ventilator in either SIMV (PC) + PS or NAVA mode, on weaning or unchanged ventilatory support in previous 12 hours, and no need of escalation of ventilatory pressure or rate in prior 12 hours.

After screening criteria is met and consent has been obtained, data will be retrospectively collected for 12 hours prior to randomization. After the subject is randomized, the infant will be stabilized and data will be collected for 12 hours in the randomized mode. Data will then be collected for 12 hours afterwards in the crossover mode. Data will be collected in areas of patient demographics, diagnoses, indications for mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic variables and respiratory parameters. While in each mode, the patient will also have indirect calorimetry obtained to determine estimated energy expenditure of each mode.

Being tested
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory AssistDevice

    The subject will be crossed over from the baseline ventilator mode to Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist

  • Synchronized Interm. Mandatory AssistDevice

    The subject will be crossed over from the baseline ventilator mode to Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Assist with Pressure Support

Study groups in NCT02518230
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory AssistOtherSubject will be randomized to NAVA ventilation. Intervention is mechanical ventilation with Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist for 12 hours.
Receives: Device: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist; Device: Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist
Synchronized Interm. Mandatory AssistOtherSubject will be randomized to SIMV(PC)PS ventilation. Intervention is mechanical ventilation with Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Assist with Pressure Support for 12 hours.
Receives: Device: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist; Device: Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Respiratory Severity Score (MAP X FiO2)

    The respiratory severity score will be calculated throughout 24 hour time frame prior to and after study initiation to determine the subject's respiratory severity prior to the randomization, after randomization and after crossover. The respiratory severity score (RSS) is a simplified severity score consisting of the mean airway pressure (MAP) multiplied by the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). This score ranges from 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating more severe disease.

    Measured: 12 hours and 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Energy Expenditure

    The subject will have indirect calorimetry performed twice during the study on each mode, 12 hours after randomization and 12 hours after crossover to determine the approximate amount of energy expenditure needed for each mode of mechanical ventilation.

    Energy expenditure is calculated by using the Harris-Benedict equation, resulted in kcal/kg per day.

    Measured: 12 hours and 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2014
  3. Primary completionJun 2015
  4. Study completionJun 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02518230
Sponsor's protocol ID
Crossover NAVA
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
3 Aug 2015
Last updated
23 Jul 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Rosterman JL, Pallotto EK, Truog WE, Escobar H, Meinert KA, Holmes A, Dai H, Manimtim WM. The impact of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist mode on respiratory severity score and energy expenditure in infants: a randomized crossover trial. J Perinatol. 2018 Jan;38(1):59-63. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.154. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

    PubMed 29072677

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist and Synchronized Interm. Mandatory Assist in people with Respiratory Insufficiency and Infant, Newborn, Disease, run by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Respiratory Severity Score (MAP X FiO2) (time frame: 12 hours and 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02518230, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in