AzTrials
AzTrials

Bottle FeedingOBS-IINCT02519179

Influence of Bottle-Type of Infant Feeding Behavior

A study testing Opaque, weighted bottle and Clear, conventional bottle in people with Bottle Feeding, run by California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective this research is to conduct a within-subject, experimental study that will describe mothers' feeding practices during typical bottle-feeding conditions and will examine whether removal of visual cues related to the amount of milk/formula in the bottle will alter these feeding practices. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 6 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Bottle Feeding
What is being tested?
Opaque, weighted bottle and Clear, conventional bottle
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2015to Aug 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 6 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Mothers must be 18 years or older
  • Infants must be between 0-6 months of age
  • Infants must be prior to the introduction of solid foods

Who cannot join

  • Preterm birth
  • Medical conditions that interfere with feeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • California Polytechnic State University

    San Luis Obispo, California, 93401

Other trials in United States

About this study

The objective this research is to conduct a within-subject, experimental study that will describe mothers' feeding practices during typical bottle-feeding conditions and will examine whether removal of visual cues related to the amount of milk/formula in the bottle will alter these feeding practices. The investigators hypothesize that mothers will show higher levels of infant-directed feeding practices and lower levels of mother-directed feeding practices when using opaque, weighted bottles compared to when using standard, clear bottles. The investigators also hypothesize that infants will consume less breast milk or formula when fed from opaque, weighted bottles compared to when fed from standard, clear bottles.

Conditions
Bottle Feeding
Being tested
Opaque, weighted bottle, Clear, conventional bottle
Medical subject headings
Bottle Feeding

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Opaque, weighted bottleBehavioural

    This is the experimental condition; mothers will be asked to feed their infants from an opaque, weighted bottle.

  • Clear, conventional bottleBehavioural

    This is the control condition; mothers will be asked to feed their infants from a clear, conventional bottle.

Study groups in NCT02519179
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional vs. Opaque, Weighted BottleExperimentalThis is a within-subject experiment; mothers will be asked to feed their infants from a clear, conventional bottle during one visit and an opaque, weighted bottle during the other visit. Order of conditions will be counterbalanced.
Receives: Behavioral: Opaque, weighted bottle; Behavioral: Clear, conventional bottle

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Infant intake

    Infant intake within a feeding (mL) assessed by weighing the bottle before and after a feeding.

    Measured: 3-hour period

  2. Maternal responsiveness

    Maternal responsiveness to infant cues during a feeding assessed by Nursing Child Assessment Satellite Training Parent-Child Interaction Feeding Scale.

    Measured: 3-hour period

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Maternal acceptance/perception of intervention

    Maternal perception/acceptance of the bottles during a feeding assessed through a mixed methods interview.

    Measured: 3-hour period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2015
  3. Primary completionSep 2017
  4. Study completionAug 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
This is a within-subject study; mothers are observed during both feeding conditions.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
48 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02519179
Sponsor's protocol ID
00000
Acronym
OBS-II
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
5 Aug 2015
Last updated
9 Oct 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Ventura AK, Pollack Golen R. A pilot study comparing opaque, weighted bottles with conventional, clear bottles for infant feeding. Appetite. 2015 Feb;85:178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.11.028. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

    PubMed 25445988

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Opaque, weighted bottle and Clear, conventional bottle in people with Bottle Feeding, run by California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Infant intake (time frame: 3-hour period). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02519179, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in