AzTrials
AzTrials

Renal CalculiNCT02519634

SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in people with Renal Calculi, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is recommended for kidney stones < 20 mm. However, the stone clearance of lower pole calculi after SWL is limited, thus leading to an extended indication for mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) even for stones between 10 and 20 mm in many centers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Renal Calculi
What is being tested?
Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
160 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Aug 2015to 31 Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 to 70 years
  • Normal renal function
  • Anesthesia rating(ASA) score 1 and 2
  • Absence of congenital abnormalities
  • Symptomatic lower pole calculi and diameter 10-20 mm

Who cannot join

  • Patients with solitary kidney
  • Patients with congenital anomalies, e.g. ectopic kidney, polycystic horseshoe, or mal-rotated kidney
  • Patients who underwent transplant or urinary diversion
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy and active urinary tract infection(UTI)
  • Patient undergoing any other surgical procedure during the same admission. (e.g. ureteroscopy)
  • If patients undergoing RIRS/SMP have purulent urine, we will place D-J stent (for RIRS) or nephrostomy tube (for SMP) and postpone the procedure and excluded the patients from the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510230

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (SMP) Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial (IAU-01)

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is recommended for kidney stones < 20 mm. However, the stone clearance of lower pole calculi after SWL is limited, thus leading to an extended indication for mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) even for stones between 10 and 20 mm in many centers. This trend is further promoted by introduction of super-mini PCNL (SMP), which is postulated to be less invasive compared to mini-PCNL due to the miniaturized instruments. However, this issue remains controversial.

On the other hand, improvements in endoscopy technology have made retrograde stone removal more attractive. This has led to an increasing use of RIRS as a primary treatment although it is recommended only as 2nd-line option by current guidelines. However, the treatment of symptomatic lower pole calculi is a challenge for RIRS because of lower clearance rates.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SMP and RIRS for the treatment for symptomatic lower pole calculi renal calculi measuring 10-20 mm.

Read the detailed description

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SMP and RIRS for the treatment for symptomatic lower pole calculi renal calculi measuring 10-20 mm.Investigators will do a multi-centers international randomized controlled trial(RCT),and investigators plan to perform this study in 10 hospitals,which are the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University of China, Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University of China, Shenzhen People's Hospital of China, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University of China, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University of China, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University of China, Jiangsu Province hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University of China, Zhejiang provincial people's hospital of china, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Training and Research Hospital of Turkey and Global Rainbow Healthcare of India respectively.

Investigators plan to beginning their study at August in 2015 and end at July in 2017.One hundred and sixty patients with symptomatic lower pole calculi renal calculi measuring 10-20 mm will be enrolled in this study. By simple random sampling technique, patients will be assigned to two 80-patient groups.All the patients will be diagnosed definitely before operations with non-contrast CT.Patients with positive preoperative urine culture should be treated with suitable antibiotics based on the culture sensitivity result for at least 72h before SMP/RIRS. Patients who have negative urine culture should receive a single dose of broad spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis just prior to the procedure.

Surgical technique

SMP

All the biochemistry tests and preoperative preparations are referenced to the mini-PCNL. Under general anesthesia a 6 French(Fr).Open end ureteral catheter is first inserted in to the relevant ureter. Patient is then turned into prone position and the desired calyx is punctured under fluoroscopic or sonographic guidance. Nephrostomy tract dilation is carried out using fascial dilators up to 12-14 Fr. as indicated. Corresponding size of suction-evacuation sheath was placed. The sheath is connected to the specimen collection bottle and the bottle then onto the aspirator. A rubber cap with a center aperture was placed at the proximal end of the sheath. The negative pressure aspirator was adjusted to a setting of 150-200 mm Hg. The miniature endoscope is inserted into the sheath through the cap. Stone is visualized and lithotripsy is performed using either Holmium-yttrium aluminum garnet(YAG) laser or pneumatic lithotripsy. At the end of procedure fluoroscopic images are obtained to assess stone clearance status. Double J ureteral stent is placed only in the presence of ureteral inflammatory polyp; evidence of ureteropelvic obstruction; presence of significant pyelocalyceal blood clots following lithotripsy; significant residual stones. Indications for nephrostomy tube placement included: significant residual stone fragments which would require a second look procedure; significant pyelocalyceal blood clots or bleeding after lithotripsy (because the nephrostomy tube could tamponade the access tract and drain the urine and clots).

RIRS

The patient is placed in the lithotomy position, Cystoscopy and retrograde pyelogram were preformed, and a 0.035'' flexible tip guidewire is placed into the renal pelvis. A 12 Fr/ 14 Fr ureteral access sheath (UAS) is advanced into the proximal ureter over the guidewire, and a P5 or P6 Olympus flexible ureteroscope is passed through the UAS. The stones are fragmented using a 200um holmium laser fibre at a 8-25 weeks energy setting. Some fragments are removed using a stone basket for stone analysis, and the remaining stone fragments smaller than 2 mm were left for spontaneous passage. A 5 Fr or 6Fr pigtail stent is placed at the conclusion of the procedure. Double J stents were removed post-operative 2 weeks.

Data collection

Data for the 2 groups-demographic characteristics,hemoglobin(HB) decrease, postoperative pain, duration of postoperative, hospital stay, complications (modified Clavien system), stone clearance (SFR after day 1 and final SFR) and the need for auxiliary treatment are compared.

Mean study endpoint: The primary endpoint was the SFR at 3-months after surgery.

Secondary endpoint: Complications, duration of postoperative and hospital stay. re-SMP, ureteroscopy and SWL are considered as auxiliary treatments. Demographic characteristics include age, sex, BMI, stone size and location, etc…

The stone size is defined as the maximum diameter as determined by CT scans.

Degree of hydronephrosis are assigned as follow: none (no calyx or pelvic dilation), mild (pelvic dilatation alone), moderate (mild calyx dilation), or severe (severe calyx dilation or calyx dilation accompanied by renal parenchyma atrophy).

Definition of operation time:

For SMP: recorded from the time of the first percutaneous renal puncture to the completion of the stone removal.

For RIRS: recorded from insertion of an endoscope into the urethra to the completion of stent placement.

Hospital stay are rounded to the nearest whole day and calculated from the day of surgery to the day of discharge.

Postoperative pain (visual analogue scale(VAS), use of analgesics) and Postoperative comfort scores (Bruggrmann comfort scale,BCS) will be recorded.

The rate of hemoglobin decrease is assessed by comparing the preoperative Hb level with 24-hour postoperative Hb level.

SFR is assessed by KUB and ultrasound at 1-day after operation.

Non-contrast CT is obtained for all patients at 3 month after the operation to evaluate the final SFR, allowing time for the spontaneous passage of stone fragments.

Stone-free status are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual stone fragments in the kidney which were defined as ≦ 3mm, asymptomatic, non-obstructive and non-infectious stone particles.

If the procedure is considered as successful, the pigtail stent is removed as outpatient after 2 weeks. Follow-up including non-contrast CT will be generally scheduled in 3 month.

Bleeding severity is judged by the treating physician, and transfusions are administered according to local practice guideline.

Complications of all patients are recorded according to modified Clavien classification system.

Conditions
Renal Calculi
Being tested
Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Keywords
Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, SMP, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, RIRS, Randomized Controlled Trial, RCT
Medical subject headings
Kidney Calculi

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Super-Mini Percutaneous NephrolithotomyProcedure or surgery

    Patients undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

  • Retrograde Intrarenal SurgeryProcedure or surgery

    Patients undergo Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Study groups in NCT02519634
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1OtherPatients in Group 1 undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Receives: Procedure: Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Group 2OtherPatients in Group 2 undergo Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Receives: Procedure: Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Stone free rate (SFR)

    Stone-free status are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual stone fragments in the kidney which were defined as ≦ 3mm, asymptomatic, non-obstructive and non-infectious stone particles.

    Measured: The primary endpoint was the SFR at 3-months after surgery.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Perioperative complications

    Complication is defined as any adverse event occurred intraoperatively or ≤3 month postoperatively.

    Measured: intraoperatively or ≤ 3 month postoperatively

  2. Operation time

    The operating time for SMP was recorded from the time of the first percutaneous renal puncture to wound closure;For RIRS,The operating time was recorded from insertion of an endoscope into the urethra to the completion of stent placement.

    Measured: intraoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Aug 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2017
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
160 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02519634
Sponsor's protocol ID
MRER(45)2015
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
3 Aug 2015
Last updated
1 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Zeng G, Zhang T, Agrawal M, He X, Zhang W, Xiao K, Li H, Li X, Xu C, Yang S, de la Rosette JJ, Fan J, Zhu W, Sarica K. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):1034-1040. doi: 10.1111/bju.14427. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

    PubMed 29873874

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in people with Renal Calculi, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Stone free rate (SFR) (time frame: The primary endpoint was the SFR at 3-months after surgery.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02519634, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in