Mitral Stenosis With InsufficiencyNCT02520310
AVJ-514 Japan Trial
A study testing AVJ-514 in people with Mitral Stenosis With Insufficiency and Functional Mitral Regurgitation, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 6 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
The objective of the study is to confirm the reproducibility of the evidence of safety and efficacy of AVJ-514 System technology in Japanese subjects who have been deemed difficult for mitral valve surgery by the local site heart team. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Mitral Stenosis With Insufficiency, Functional Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Insufficiency
- What is being tested?
- AVJ-514
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- 7 Sep 2015to 31 May 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
- Age 20 years or older.
- Symptomatic moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe MR (4+) chronic Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation (DMR) or Functional Mitral Regurgitation (FMR) determined by assessment of a qualifying transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) obtained within 90 days and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) obtained within180 days prior to subject registration, with MR severity based principally on the TTE study and confirmed by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). The ECL may request a TEE.
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) is ≥ 30% within 90 days prior to subject registration, assessed by the site using any one of the following methods: echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, gated blood pool scan or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Note: The method must provide a quantitative readout (not a visual assessment).
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification is class II, class III, or ambulatory class IV.
- Subject is deemed difficult for mitral valve surgery due to either Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) surgical mortality risk for mitral valve replacement of ≥ 8% OR due to the presence of one of the following risk factors:
Show all 20Show fewer
- Porcelain aorta or mobile ascending aortic atheroma
- Post-radiation mediastinum
- Previous mediastinitis
- Functional MR with LVEF < 40%
- Over 75 years old with LVEF < 40%
- Re-operation with patent grafts
- Two or more prior cardiothoracic surgeries
- Hepatic cirrhosis
- Other surgical risk factor(s)
- Mitral valve area ≥ 4.0 cm2 assessed by ECL based TTE within 90 days prior to subject registration. The ECL may request a TEE.
- Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) is ≤ 60mm assessed by site based on the TTE obtained within 90 days prior to subject registration.
- The primary regurgitant jet is non-commissural based on TEE, and in the opinion of the AVJ-514 implanting investigator can successfully be treated by the AVJ-514. If a secondary jet exists, it must be considered clinically insignificant.
- Transseptal catheterization and femoral vein access is determined to be feasible by the treating physician.
- The subject or the subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board of the respective clinical site.
Who cannot join
- Subjects must not meet any of the following exclusion criteria:
- LVEF is < 30%
- Leaflet anatomy which may preclude AVJ-514 implantation, proper positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in MR by the AVJ-514 based. This evaluation is based on TEE evaluation of the mitral valve within 180 days prior to subject registration and includes:
- Insufficient mobile leaflet available for grasping with the AVJ-514 device
- Lack of both primary and secondary chordal support in the grasping area
- Evidence of significant calcification in the grasping area
Show all 33Show fewer
- Presence of a significant cleft in the grasping area
- Life expectancy < 1 year due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions
- Need for emergent or urgent surgery for any reason
- Prior open heart mitral valve leaflet surgery or any currently implanted prosthetic mitral valve or any prior transcatheter mitral valve procedure.
- Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
- Active endocarditis or active rheumatic heart disease or leaflets degenerated from rheumatic disease (i.e. noncompliant, perforated).
- Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization or significant myocardial ischemia or evidence of an acute myocardial infarction in the prior 90 days of registration.
- Cerebrovascular accident within 180 days prior to registration
- Severe symptomatic carotid stenosis (> 70% by ultrasound)
- Any cardiac surgery within 180 days prior to registration
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the last 30 days prior to registration
- Implant of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Cardioverter Defibrillator (CRT-D) pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)within the last 30 days prior to registration.
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) within the last 30 days prior to registration.
- Severe tricuspid regurgitation or aortic valve disease requiring surgical treatment.
- In the judgment of the Investigator, the femoral vein cannot accommodate a 24 F catheter or presence of ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
- Hemodynamic instability defined as systolic pressure < 90 mmHg without afterload reduction drug or cardiogenic shock or intra-aortic balloon pump.
- History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or subject will refuse blood transfusions.
- Active infections requiring current antibiotic therapy (if temporary illness, patients may enroll at least 14 days after discontinuation of antibiotics). Patients must be free from infection prior to treatment. Any required dental work should be completed a minimum of 21 days prior to treatment.
- Intravenous drug abuse or suspected inability to adhere to follow-up.
- Patients in whom TEE is contraindicated.
- A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to study or procedure medications which cannot be adequately managed medically.
- In the judgment of the Investigator, subjects in whom the presence of a permanent pacemaker or pacing leads would interfere with placement of the test device or the placement of the test device would disrupt the leads.
- Subject intends to participate in any other investigational or invasive clinical study within a period of 1 year following the AVJ-514 procedure.
- Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints. (Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials).
- In the opinion of the investigator or designee, subject is unable to comply with the requirements of the study protocol or is unsuitable for the study for any reason.
- In the opinion of the anesthesiologist, general anesthesia is contraindicated.
- Pregnant or planning pregnancy within next 1 year.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
Japan6 sites
Shonan Kamakura General Hospital
Kanagawa
Sendai Kosei Hospital
Miyagi
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
Osaka
Keio University Hospital
Tokyo
Sakakibara Heart Institute
Tokyo
Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital
Tokyo
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Evaluation of the AVJ-514 System for the Treatment of Symptomatic Chronic Severe Mitral Regurgitation
The objective of the study is to confirm the reproducibility of the evidence of safety and efficacy of AVJ-514 System technology in Japanese subjects who have been deemed difficult for mitral valve surgery by the local site heart team.
Read the detailed description
This study is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical evaluation of the AVJ-514 System for the treatment of symptomatic chronic severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in Japanese subjects deemed difficult for mitral valve surgery by the local site heart team.
Patients will be evaluated at baseline, discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years in Japanese Medical Centers.
- Conditions
- Mitral Stenosis With Insufficiency, Functional Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Insufficiency, Mitral Valve Incompetence, Mitral Valve Regurgitation
- Being tested
- AVJ-514
- Keywords
- Mitral Regurgitation, mitral valve surgery, AVJ-514 Delivery System, Symptomatic Heart Failure, Heart Valve Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Heart Valve Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AVJ-514Device
Patients receiving AVJ-514 device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AVJ-514 | Experimental | The AVJ-514 system Receives: Device: AVJ-514 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Acute Procedure Success (APS)
APS is defined as successful implantation of the AVJ-514 device(s) with resulting MR severity of 2+ or less as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL) assessment of a discharge echocardiogram. Subjects who die or who undergo mitral valve surgery before discharge are an APS failure.
Measured: On day 0 (the day of procedure)
Secondary outcomes (225)
Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAE) at 30 Days
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access. This outcome measure calculates the percentage of participants with MAE at 30 days (= total subjects with MAE/total subjects enrolled).
Measured: 30 days
Percentage of Participants With MAE at 1 Year
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access. This outcome measure calculates the percentage of participants with MAE at 30 days (= total subjects with MAE/total subjects enrolled).
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With MAE Occurring After the Femoral Vein Puncture for Transseptal Access
MAE listed below will be adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee at 30 days:
- Death
- Stroke
- Myocardial infarction
- Renal failure
- Non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Stenosis Requiring Surgery
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm^2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Stenosis Not Requiring Surgery
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm^2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA) Requiring Surgery
SLDA is defined as attachment of one mitral valve leaflet to the AVJ-514 device.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA) Not Requiring Surgery
SLDA is defined as attachment of one mitral valve leaflet to the AVJ-514 device.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect
Defined as defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention.
Measured: 30 days
Percentage of Participants With Device Implant Rate
Defined as the rate of successful delivery and deployment of one or more AVJ-514 device with echocardiographic evidence of leaflet approximation and retrieval of the delivery catheter.
Measured: On the day of procedure
Device Procedure Time
Defined as the time elapsed from the start of the transseptal procedure to the time the Steerable Guide Catheter is removed.
Measured: On the day of procedure
Total Procedure Time
Defined as the time elapsed from the first of any of the following: intravascular catheter placement, anesthesia or sedation, or transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), to the removal of the last catheter and TEE.
Measured: On the day of procedure
Device Time
Defined as the time the Steerable Guide Catheter is placed in the intra-atrial septum until the time the AVJ-514 Delivery System (CDS) is retracted into the Steerable Guide Catheter.
Measured: On the day of procedure
Fluoroscopy Duration
Defined as the duration of exposure to fluoroscopy during the AVJ-514 procedure.
Measured: On the day of procedure
Length of Stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)/Critical Care Unit (CCU)/Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (ICU/CCU/PACU)
Length of stay in ICU/CCU/PACU is cumulative hours of Hospital stay in (PACU/CCU/ICU)
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Length of Hospital Stay Excluding Rehabilitation Stay
Length of hospital stay excluding rehabilitation stay = Length of hospital stay (Date of Discharge - Date of Admission)
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Length of Rehabilitation Stay
Cumulative days of rehabilitation stay during hospitalization.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Percentage of Participants With Discharge Status
Location to which subject was discharged (home or another facility).
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Length of Stay (Not at Baseline Facility)
If subject discharged to another facility (different from baseline facility), length of stay at facility to which subject was discharged. Length of Stay (not at baseline facility) = Sum for all eligible log lines which had been entered in Electronic Data Capture (EDC) for ICU/CCU/PACU and rehabilitation.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Number of Participants With Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Severity Grade
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography. MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits. The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat. MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography. MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits. The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat. MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography. MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits. The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat. MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography. MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits. The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat. MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
Measured: 6 months
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography. MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits. The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat. MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
Measured: 1 year
MR Severity Grade
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography. MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits. The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat. MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
Measured: 24 months
MR Severity Grade
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography. MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits. The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat. MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
Measured: 3 years
MR Severity Grade
Mitral regurgitation severity is determined based on the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Recommendations for Evaluation of The Severity of Native Valvular Regurgitation with Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography. MR severity grade was assessed by the core lab using the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at baseline, discharge and subsequent follow-up visits. The severity of MR is determined by the amount of blood being pushed back into the left atrium when it should be circulating through the left ventricle with each heart beat. MR severity is typically classified as mild (grade 1+), moderate (grade 2+), moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+).
Measured: 4 years
MR Severity Grade
Measured: 5 years
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Regurgitant volume as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves. The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Regurgitant volume as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves. The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Regurgitant volume as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves. The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
Measured: 30 days
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Regurgitant volume as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves. The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
Measured: 6 months
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Regurgitant volume as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves. The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
Measured: 1 year
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Regurgitant volume as determined by the site. In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves. The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
Measured: 24 months
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Regurgitant volume as determined by the site. In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves. The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
Measured: 3 years
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Regurgitant volume as determined by the site. In the presence of regurgitation of one valve, without any intracardiac shunt, the flow through the affected valve is larger than through other competent valves. The difference between the two represents the regurgitant volume.
Measured: 4 years
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Measured: 5 years
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
Measured: 30 days
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
Measured: 6 months
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
Measured: 1 year
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). Left Ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). Left Ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). Left Ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 30 days
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). Left Ventricular enddiastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 6 months
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). Left Ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 1 year
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the site. Left Ventricular enddiastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 24 months
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the site. Left Ventricular enddiastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 3 years
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) as measured by the site. Left Ventricular enddiastolic volume (LVEDV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-diastole (frame before mitral valve closure or maximum cavity dimension) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 4 years
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Measured: 5 years
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 30 days
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 6 months
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 1 year
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the site. Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 24 months
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the site. Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 3 years
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) as measured by the site. Left Ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured using 2-dimensional echocardiography. The endocardium is traced at end-systole (frame prior to mitral valve opening or the minimum cavity area) in the 2- and 4-chamber views to calculate volumes.
Measured: 4 years
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Measured: 5 years
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: 30 days
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: 6 months
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: 1 year
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the site.
Measured: 24 months
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the site.
Measured: 3 years
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) as measured by the site
Measured: 4 years
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Measured: 5 years
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the ECL.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the ECL.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the ECL.
Measured: 30 days
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the ECL.
Measured: 6 months
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the ECL.
Measured: 1 year
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the site.
Measured: 24 months
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the site.
Measured: 3 years
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) as measured by the site.
Measured: 4 years
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Measured: 5 years
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the ECL.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the ECL.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the ECL.
Measured: 30 days
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the ECL.
Measured: 6 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the ECL.
Measured: 1 year
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the site.
Measured: 24 months
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) as measured by the site.
Measured: 3 years
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Measured: 4 years
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Measured: 5 years
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP). PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP). PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP). PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
Measured: 30 days
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP). PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
Measured: 6 months
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP). PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
Measured: 1 year
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP). PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
Measured: 24 months
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP). PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
Measured: 3 years
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP). PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
Measured: 4 years
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) is presented in place of Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP). PASP is equal to RVSP in the absence of pulmonic stenosis.
Measured: 5 years
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
It is the orifice area of the mitral valve.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
It is the orifice area of the mitral valve.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
It is the orifice area of the mitral valve.
Measured: 30 days
Mitral Valve Area(MVA)
It is the orifice area of the mitral valve.
Measured: 6 months
Mitral Valve Area(MVA)
It is the orifice area of the mitral valve.
Measured: 1 year
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
It is the orifice area of the Mitral Valve
Measured: 24 months
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
It is the orifice area of the Mitral Valve.
Measured: 3 years
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
It is the orifice area of the Mitral Valve.
Measured: 4 years
Mitral Valve Area (MVA)
Measured: 5 years
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: 30 days
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: 6 months
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: 1 year
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the site.
Measured: 24 months
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the site.
Measured: 3 years
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Defined as the mean and peak pressure gradients across the mitral valve as measured by the site.
Measured: 4 years
Mean Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient (MVG)
Measured: 5 years
Number of Participants With Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the ECL.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Number of Participants With Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the ECL
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Number of Participants With Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the ECL
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants With Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the ECL
Measured: 6 months
Number of Participants With Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the ECL
Measured: 1 year
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the site.
Measured: 24 months
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the site.
Measured: 3 years
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve is measured by the site.
Measured: 4 years
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Measured: 5 years
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle per heartbeat.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle per heartbeat.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle per heartbeat.
Measured: 30 days
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle per heartbeat.
Measured: 6 months
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Defined as the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle per heartbeat.
Measured: 1 year
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Measured: 24 months
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Measured: 3 years
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Measured: 4 years
Forward Stroke Volume (FSV)
Measured: 5 years
Cardiac Output (CO)
Cardiac output as measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Cardiac Output (CO)
Cardiac output as measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Cardiac Output (CO)
Cardiac output as measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
Measured: 30 days
Cardiac Output (CO)
Cardiac output as measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
Measured: 6 months
Cardiac Output (CO)
Cardiac output as measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL). Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
Measured: 1 year
Cardiac Output (CO)
Cardiac output as measured by the site. Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
Measured: 24 months
Cardiac Output (CO)
Cardiac output as measured by the site. Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
Measured: 3 years
Cardiac Output (CO)
Cardiac output as measured by the site. Cardiac output is the product of forward stroke volume and heart rate.
Measured: 4 years
Cardiac Output (CO)
Measured: 5 years
Cardiac Index (CI)
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area. Cardiac Index was measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Cardiac Index (CI)
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area. Cardiac Index was measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Cardiac Index (CI)
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area. Cardiac Index was measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: 30 days
Cardiac Index (CI)
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area. Cardiac Index was measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: 6 months
Cardiac Index (CI)
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area. Cardiac Index was measured by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL).
Measured: 1 year
Cardiac Index (CI)
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area. Cardiac Index was measured by the site.
Measured: 24 months
Cardiac Index (CI)
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area. Cardiac Index was measured by the site.
Measured: 3 years
Cardiac Index (CI)
Cardiac index is defined as cardiac output divided by body surface area. Cardiac Index was measured by the site.
Measured: 4 years
Cardiac Index (CI)
Measured: 5 years
Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality
Measured: 1 year
All-cause Mortality
Measured: 24 months
All-cause Mortality
Measured: 3 years
All-cause Mortality
Measured: 4 years
All-cause Mortality
Measured: 5 years
Number of Participants With the Primary Safety Composite of MAE at 1 Year
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, MI, renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access. No of Participants with the MAEs at 12 months. One death and One Renal Failure was reported in two subjects.
Measured: 12 months
Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite of MAE
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, MI, renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access.
Measured: 24 months
Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite of MAE
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, MI, renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access.
Measured: 3 years
Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite of MAE
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, MI, renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access.
Measured: 4 years
Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite of MAE
MAE is a composite of death, stroke, MI, renal failure, and non-elective cardiovascular surgery for device or procedure related adverse events occurring after the femoral vein puncture for transseptal access.
Measured: 5 years
Number of Patients With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Number of Participants With NYHA Functional Class
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants With NYHA Functional Class
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Measured: 6 months
Number of Participants With NYHA Functional Class
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Measured: 1 year
NYHA Functional Class
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Measured: 24 months
NYHA Functional Class
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Measured: 3 years
NYHA Functional Class
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Measured: 4 years
NYHA Functional Class
Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Measured: 5 years
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Quality of Life (KCCQ QoL) Scores
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life. This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies. A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant. Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status. Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
KCCQ QoL Scores
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life. This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies. A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant. Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status. Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
Measured: 30 days
KCCQ QoL Scores
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life. This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies. A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant. Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status. Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
Measured: 6 months
KCCQ QoL Scores
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life. This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies. A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant. Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status. Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
Measured: 1 year
Change in KCCQ QoL Scores From Baseline to 1 Year
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life. This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies. A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant. Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status. Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
Measured: Baseline to 1 Year
KCCQ QoL Scores
KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life. This questionnaire is a reliable and responsive health status measure used in various cardiovascular research studies. A minimum mean group difference in KCCQ score of ≥5 is considered to be clinically significant. Each question responses are coded sequentially (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) from worst to best status. Scores are generated by adding points for all questions and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status.
Measured: 24 months
KCCQ QoL Scores
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.
Measured: 3 years
KCCQ QoL Scores
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.
Measured: 4 years
KCCQ QoL Scores
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.
Measured: 5 years
SF-36 QoL Scores
The Short Form(SF) (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
The physical \& mental functions were assessed by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score \& Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Normal PCS and MCS scores vary depending on the demographics of the population studied. The PCS\&MCS norms for 65-75 year old are 44 \& 52, respectively while the norms for congestive heart failure (CHF) population are 31 \& 46, respectively.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
SF-36 QoL Scores
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
The physical \& mental functions were assessed by the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score \& Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Normal PCS and MCS scores vary depending on the demographics of the population studied. The PCS\&MCS norms for 65-75 year old are 44 \& 52, respectively while the norms for CHF population are 31 \& 46, respectively.
Measured: 30 days
SF-36 QoL Scores
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Measured: 6 months
SF-36 QoL Scores
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Measured: 1 year
Change in SF-36 QoL Scores From Baseline to 1 Year
Measured: From baseline to 1 year
SF-36 QoL Scores
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Measured: 24 months
Change in SF-36 QoL Scores From Baseline
Measured: At 24 months
Number of Participants Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery
Measured: Through 5 years
Number of Participants With Additional Mitra Clip Device Intervention
Measured: Through 5 years
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
Measured: 6 months
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
Measured: 1 year
Changes in Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance From Baseline to 1 Year
Measured: Baseline to 1 year
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
Measured: 24 months
Changes in Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance From Baseline
Measured: At 24 months
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
Measured: 3 years
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
Measured: 4 years
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
Measured: 5 years
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Surgery
Surgical access to repair or replace the mitral valve. Measured per occurrence.
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Surgery
Surgical access to repair or replace the mitral valve. Measured per occurrence.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Additional AVJ-514 Device Intervention
Number of participants with any additional AVJ-514 procedure after the index procedure. Measured per occurrence.
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants With Additional AVJ-514 Device Intervention
Number of participants with any additional AVJ-514 procedure after the index procedure. Measured per occurrence.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Hospitalizations and Reason for Hospitalization
Measured: 1 year post index procedure
Number of Hospitalizations
Measured: 24 months
Number of Hospitalizations
Measured: 3 years
Number of Hospitalizations
Measured: 4 years
Number of Hospitalizations
Measured: 5 years
Number of Participants With Mitral Stenosis
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
Measured: 1 year
Mitral Stenosis
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the site.
Measured: 24 months
Mitral Stenosis
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
Measured: 3 years
Mitral Stenosis
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
Measured: 4 years
Mitral Stenosis
Defined as a mitral valve orifice of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory.
Measured: 5 years
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) That Requires Intervention
Defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention (repair of ASD completed at the time of surgery for other reasons, but not as the primary reason for surgery, is not counted as ASD.)
Measured: 12 months
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant ASD That Requires Intervention
Defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention (repair of ASD completed at the time of surgery for other reasons, but not as the primary reason for surgery, is not counted as ASD.)
Measured: 24 months
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant ASD That Requires Intervention
Defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention (repair of ASD completed at the time of surgery for other reasons, but not as the primary reason for surgery, is not counted as ASD.)
Measured: 3 years
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant ASD That Requires Intervention
Defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention (repair of ASD completed at the time of surgery for other reasons, but not as the primary reason for surgery, is not counted as ASD.)
Measured: 4 years
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant ASD That Requires Intervention
Defect ('hole') in the septum between the left and right atria; considered clinically significant if it requires percutaneous or surgical intervention (repair of ASD completed at the time of surgery for other reasons, but not as the primary reason for surgery, is not counted as ASD.)
Measured: 5 years
Number of Participants With Major Bleeding
Major bleeding is defined as bleeding ≥ Type 3 based on a modified Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition.
Type 3:
- Type 3a (i) Overt bleeding plus hemoglobin drop of 3 to <5 g/dL* (provided hemoglobin drop is related to bleed) (ii) Any transfusion with overt bleeding
- Type 3b (i) Overt bleeding plus hemoglobin drop ≥5 g/dL* (provided hemoglobin drop is related to bleed) (ii) Cardiac tamponade (iii) Bleeding requiring surgical intervention for control (excluding dental/nasal/skin/hemorrhoid) (iv) Bleeding requiring intravenous vasoactive agents
- Type 3c (i) Intracranial hemorrhage (does not include microbleeds or hemorrhagic transformation, does include intraspinal) (ii) Subcategories confirmed by autopsy or imaging or lumbar puncture (iii) Intraocular bleed compromising vision
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants With Major Bleeding
Major bleeding is defined as bleeding ≥ Type 3 based on a modified Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition.
Type 3:
- Type 3a (i) Overt bleeding plus hemoglobin drop of 3 to <5 g/dL* (provided hemoglobin drop is related to bleed) (ii) Any transfusion with overt bleeding
- Type 3b (i) Overt bleeding plus hemoglobin drop ≥5 g/dL* (provided hemoglobin drop is related to bleed) (ii) Cardiac tamponade (iii) Bleeding requiring surgical intervention for control (excluding dental/nasal/skin/hemorrhoid) (iv) Bleeding requiring intravenous vasoactive agents
- Type 3c (i) Intracranial hemorrhage (does not include microbleeds or hemorrhagic transformation, does include intraspinal) (ii) Subcategories confirmed by autopsy or imaging or lumbar puncture (iii) Intraocular bleed compromising vision
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Usage of Concomitant Cardiac Medications
Number of participants with any change in type of medication from baseline to follow-up. Measured in overall counts.
Measured: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Number of Participants With Usage of Concomitant Cardiac Medications
Number of participants with any change in type of medication from baseline to follow-up. Measured in overall counts.
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants With Usage of Concomitant Cardiac Medications
Number of participants with any change in type of medication from baseline to follow-up. Measured in overall counts.
Measured: 6 months
Number of Participants With Usage of Concomitant Cardiac Medications
Number of participants with any change in type of medication from baseline to follow-up. Measured in overall counts.
Measured: 1 year
Rate of Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the 1 Year Post-AVJ-514 Procedure Compared to the 1 Year Prior
Measured: 1 Year Pre and Post Index Procedure
Number of Participants With Device Embolization Requiring Surgery
Device embolization is defined as detachment of the deployed AVJ-514 device from both mitral leaflets.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Device Embolization Not Requiring Surgery
Device embolization is defined as detachment of the deployed AVJ-514 device from both mitral leaflets.
Measured: 1 year
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the site. Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
Measured: 2 year
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the site. Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
Measured: 3 year
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Regurgitant fraction as determined by the site. Regurgitant fraction is defined as the regurgitant volume divided by the forward stroke volume through the regurgitant valve.
Measured: 4 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study start7 Sep 2015
- Primary completionJul 2016
- Study completion31 May 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mitral Stenosis With InsufficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abbott Medical DevicesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ryohei Yozu, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Keio UniversityMorimasa Takayama, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Sakakibara Heart InstitutePeter Staehr, MD, Study director, Abbott Vascular, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02520310
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AVJ-514
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 11 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hayashida K, Yasuda S, Matsumoto T, Amaki M, Mizuno S, Tobaru T, Jujo K, Ootomo T, Yamaguchi J, Fukuda K, Saito S, Foster E, Qasim A, Kitakaze M, Yozu R, Takayama M. AVJ-514 Trial - Baseline Characteristics and 30-Day Outcomes Following MitraClip(R) Treatment in a Japanese Cohort. Circ J. 2017 Jul 25;81(8):1116-1122. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0115. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
PubMed 28321004
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Evaluation of the AVJ-514 System for the Treatment of Symptomatic Chronic Severe Mitral Regurgitation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02520310
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AVJ-514
- Conditions
- Mitral Stenosis With Insufficiency, Functional Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Insufficiency, Mitral Valve Incompetence, Mitral Valve Regurgitation
- Keywords
- Mitral Regurgitation, mitral valve surgery, AVJ-514 Delivery System, Symptomatic Heart Failure, Heart Valve Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical DevicesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Sep 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the study is to confirm the reproducibility of the evidence of safety and efficacy of AVJ-514 System technology in Japanese subjects who have been deemed difficult for mitral valve surgery by the local site heart team.
Detailed description
This study is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical evaluation of the AVJ-514 System for the treatment of symptomatic chronic severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in Japanese subjects deemed difficult for mitral valve surgery by the local site heart team.
Patients will be evaluated at baseline, discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years in Japanese Medical Centers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AVJ-514 | Experimental | Device: AVJ-514The AVJ-514 system |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Age 20 years or older.
- Symptomatic moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe MR (4+) chronic Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation (DMR) or Functional Mitral Regurgitation (FMR) determined by assessment of a qualifying transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) obtained within 90 days and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) obtained within180 days prior to subject registration, with MR severity based principally on the TTE study and confirmed by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory (ECL). The ECL may request a TEE.
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) is ≥ 30% within 90 days prior to subject registration, assessed by the site using any one of the following methods: echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, gated blood pool scan or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Note: The method must provide a quantitative readout (not a visual assessment).
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification is class II, class III, or ambulatory class IV.
- Subject is deemed difficult for mitral valve surgery due to either Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) surgical mortality risk for mitral valve replacement of ≥ 8% OR due to the presence of one of the following risk factors:
Key exclusion criteria (33 listed)
- LVEF is < 30%
- Leaflet anatomy which may preclude AVJ-514 implantation, proper positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in MR by the AVJ-514 based. This evaluation is based on TEE evaluation of the mitral valve within 180 days prior to subject registration and includes:
- Life expectancy < 1 year due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions
- Need for emergent or urgent surgery for any reason
- Prior open heart mitral valve leaflet surgery or any currently implanted prosthetic mitral valve or any prior transcatheter mitral valve procedure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AVJ-514Patients receiving AVJ-514 device | Device | AVJ-514 |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Acute Procedure Success (APS)
Time frame: On day 0 (the day of procedure)
APS is defined as successful implantation of the AVJ-514 device(s) with resulting MR severity of 2+ or less as determined by the Echocardiographic Core Laboratory (ECL) assessment of a discharge echocardiogram. Subjects who die or who undergo mitral valve surgery before discharge are an APS failure.
225 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAE) at 30 Days
Time frame: 30 days
Percentage of Participants With MAE at 1 Year
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Participants With MAE Occurring After the Femoral Vein Puncture for Transseptal Access
Time frame: 30 days
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Stenosis Requiring Surgery
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Participants With Mitral Valve Stenosis Not Requiring Surgery
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Participants With Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA) Requiring Surgery
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Participants With Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA) Not Requiring Surgery
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Participants With Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect
Time frame: 30 days
Percentage of Participants With Device Implant Rate
Time frame: On the day of procedure
Device Procedure Time
Time frame: On the day of procedure
Total Procedure Time
Time frame: On the day of procedure
Device Time
Time frame: On the day of procedure
Fluoroscopy Duration
Time frame: On the day of procedure
Length of Stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)/Critical Care Unit (CCU)/Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (ICU/CCU/PACU)
Time frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Length of Hospital Stay Excluding Rehabilitation Stay
Time frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Length of Rehabilitation Stay
Time frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Percentage of Participants With Discharge Status
Time frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Length of Stay (Not at Baseline Facility)
Time frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Number of Participants With Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Severity Grade
Time frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Time frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Time frame: 30 days
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Time frame: 6 months
Number of Participants With MR Severity Grade
Time frame: 1 year
MR Severity Grade
Time frame: 24 months
MR Severity Grade
Time frame: 3 years
MR Severity Grade
Time frame: 4 years
MR Severity Grade
Time frame: 5 years
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time frame: 30 days
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time frame: 6 months
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time frame: 1 year
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time frame: 24 months
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time frame: 3 years
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time frame: 4 years
Regurgitant Volume (RV)
Time frame: 5 years
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time frame: At baseline (Within 14 days prior to the AVJ-514 procedure)
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time frame: At Discharge (≤ 14.4 ± 8.5 days post index procedure)
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time frame: 30 days
Regurgitant Fraction (RF)
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jun 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28321004Hayashida K, Yasuda S, Matsumoto T, Amaki M, Mizuno S, Tobaru T, Jujo K, Ootomo T, Yamaguchi J, Fukuda K, Saito S, Foster E, Qasim A, Kitakaze M, Yozu R, Takayama M. AVJ-514 Trial - Baseline Characteristics and 30-Day Outcomes Following MitraClip(R) Treatment in a Japanese Cohort. Circ J. 2017 Jul 25;81(8):1116-1122. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0115. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
Related trials for Mitral Stenosis With Insufficiency
RecruitingObservational study
Management and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Severe Mitral Valve Disease Not Suitable for Surgery
Mitral Valve Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of a Management Algorithm for TAVI Patients With Concomitant Mitral or Tricuspid Regurgitation
Aortic Stenosis, Mitral Regurgitation
Recruiting
The MITRAL II Pivotal Trial (Mitral Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLves).
Mitral Annular Calcification, Mitral Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Prophylactic Suture Line Sealing With NE'X Glue R-eco in Cardiac and Vascular Surgery
Aortic Aneurysm, Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal
Recruiting
Influence of Lung Ultrasonography on the Prognosis and Postoperative Outcomes in Cardiac Surgical Patients
Ischemic Heart Disease, Aortic Stenosis, Severe
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ryohei Yozu, MD, PhD principal investigator
Keio University
Morimasa Takayama, MD, PhD principal investigator
Sakakibara Heart Institute
Peter Staehr, MD study director
Abbott Vascular, Inc.
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing AVJ-514 in people with Mitral Stenosis With Insufficiency and Functional Mitral Regurgitation, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 6 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 33 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Acute Procedure Success (APS) (time frame: On day 0 (the day of procedure)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02520310, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2021.