Bone FracturePhase 2NCT02521415
IN Sub-Dissociative Ketamine vs IN Fentanyl
A Phase 2 study testing ketamine, fentanyl and ibuprofen or acetaminophen in people with Bone Fracture, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This single center, randomized control, double blind trial will prospectively examine the feasibility of intranasal, sub-dissociative (IN) ketamine versus intranasal fentanyl for pain control in the pediatric emergency department setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Fracture
- What is being tested?
- ketamine, fentanyl and ibuprofen or acetaminophen
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 87 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2015to Nov 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- single suspected, isolated extremity fracture that requires analgesia
Who cannot join
- GCS < 15 at ED presentation,
- reported allergy or adverse reaction to ketamine or fentanyl,
- pregnancy,
- intoxication,
- hypotension (less than 70 mmHg +2x age or less than 90 mm Hg for patients greater than 11 years of age)
- weight > 70 kg
Show all 9Show fewer
- patients receiving opioid analgesia administered prior to arrival
- multiply injured patients (injuries to multiple extremities)
- aberrant nasal anatomy that precludes IN medications
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Carolinas Medical Center Main - Levine Children's Hospital Emergency Department
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Ketamine Compared to Intranasal Fentanyl for Analgesia in Children With Suspected, Isolated Extremity Fractures in the Pediatric Emergency Department
This single center, randomized control, double blind trial will prospectively examine the feasibility of intranasal, sub-dissociative (IN) ketamine versus intranasal fentanyl for pain control in the pediatric emergency department setting. The investigators hypothesize that IN ketamine may provide a safe and effective alternative to IN fentanyl for children with suspected, isolated extremity fractures.
Eighty children ages 3-17 years with a suspected, isolated extremity fracture that requires analgesia will be randomized to receive IN ketamine or IN fentanyl upon presentation to the emergency department and will be followed for 2 hours for efficacy and 6 hours for safety.
Read the detailed description
Intranasal medications are commonly used in place of parenteral opioids in children. IN fentanyl is the most commonly used intranasal analgesic medication in the pediatric population with demonstrated safety and efficacy comparable to IV fentanyl and IV morphine. IN ketamine, at sub-dissociative doses, offers similar safety and efficacy to IN fentanyl and the additional advantage of potentially reducing the total use of opioid agents during the emergency department visit. Ketamine is easily stored and has a wide therapeutic window with an extremely low risk of cardiorespiratory complications. This study will compare the safety and efficacy of IN ketamine to IN fentanyl in children with suspected, isolated extremity fractures in the pediatric emergency department.
The primary aim of the study is to examine the feasibility of future protocol expansion. The investigators will conclude that additional studies are NOT feasible if the observed rate of side effects for ketamine that exceeds fentanyl by three-fold or event rate of 5% or more for ketamine-related SAEs. The primary aim of the study will compare the frequency of adverse events over 6-hours among children randomized to receive either intranasal sub-dissociative ketamine (IN ketamine) or intranasal fentanyl (IN fentanyl) for pain control in the emergency department. The exploratory aim of the study will compare the efficacy of intranasal ketamine to intranasal fentanyl as measured by a reduction in age appropriate pain scale scores over 2-hours. The secondary aim of the study will compare the total dose of opioid pain medication in morphine equivalents/kg/hour required during the ED evaluation of children with suspected, isolated extremity fractures after randomization and treatment with IN ketamine or IN fentanyl.
Eighty children ages 3-17 years with a suspected, isolated extremity fracture that requires analgesia will be randomized to receive IN ketamine or IN fentanyl upon presentation to the emergency department and will be followed for 2 hours for efficacy and 6 hours for safety.
All participants will be premedicated with acetaminophen or ibuprofen and baseline data, including pain level, will be collected. The trial consists of two treatment arms. (IN ketamine 1 mg/kg or IN fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg). Randomization will follow a 1:1 ratio, with approximately 40 per group. Randomization will be stratified by ages 3-10 and 11-17. The participants will be assessed by a research coordinator for adverse events every 5 minutes using an adverse events checklist for the first fifteen minutes post study medication administration and every 30 minutes for the first two hours after drug administration. The vital signs and pain scale assessment will be repeated every 10 minutes for the first 30 minutes and then every 30 minutes for the first two hours after drug administration. A final assessment will be made 6 hours after the last dose of study drug or at discharge from the ED to assess for late side effects or adverse events. Study medication may be repeated times one at a reduced dose after 20 minutes when the full effects of the first dose are known. The decision to administer additional study medication (0.5 mg/kg ketamine or 0.75 mcg/kg fentanyl ) will at be at the discretion of the treating physician. Should a second dose of study medication be required, a new schedule of patient assessments will commence following the same schedule as for the first dose. Participant assessments will continue until the 2 hour endpoint is reached from the time of the last drug administration, with a final assessment at 6 hours after the last dose of study drug or at discharge from the ED to assess for late side effects or adverse events.
- Conditions
- Bone Fracture
- Medical subject headings
- Fractures, Bone
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ketamineDrug
Also called intranasal pain medication
intranasal (IN) sub-dissociative ketamine (1mg/kg)
fentanylDrug
Also called intranasal pain medication
Intranasal (IN) fentanyl (1.5 micrograms/kg)
ibuprofen or acetaminophenDrug
10 mg/kg of ibuprofen or 15 mg/kg of acetaminophen will be given to participants prior to the randomized intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ketamine | Experimental | ketamine (1mg/kg) Receives: Drug: ketamine; Drug: ibuprofen or acetaminophen |
| fentanyl | Active comparator | fentanyl (1.5 micrograms/kg) Receives: Drug: fentanyl; Drug: ibuprofen or acetaminophen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Outcome: Number of Participants With Minor Side Effects and Significant Adverse Events
We will conclude that such a study is NOT feasible if we observe a rate of side effects for ketamine that exceeds fentanyl by three-fold or event rate of 5% or more for ketamine-related significant adverse events. Side effects are common events experienced by patients receiving ketamine or fentanyl that do not change outcomes for the patient but may affect the patient experience. A significant adverse event (SAE) includes any adverse event that begins after the short form consent has been completed that causes a threat to life, limb or an organ system, causes prolongation of hospitalization, or requires new medical or surgical treatment to correct.
Measured: 60 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
Secondary Outcome: Total Dose of Opioid Pain Medication in Morphine Equivalents/kg/Hour
Compare the total dose of opioid pain medication in morphine equivalents/kg/hour required during the ED evaluation of children with suspected forearm fractures after randomization and treatment with IN ketamine or IN fentanyl.
Measured: participants will be followed during the emergency department length of stay, estimated to average 6 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2015
- Primary completionNov 2016
- Study completionNov 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bone FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Wake Forest University Health SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Carolinas Trauma Network Research Group, Charlotte, Houston, Milwaukee Prehospital Emergency Research Nodal Center-CHaMP-ERNC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stacy Reynolds, MD, Principal investigator, Carolinas Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02521415
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INK-2015
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Reynolds SL, Studnek JR, Bryant K, VanderHave K, Grossman E, Moore CG, Young J, Hogg M, Runyon MS. Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial of intranasal ketamine compared with intranasal fentanyl for analgesia in children with suspected, isolated extremity fractures in the paediatric emergency department. BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 8;6(9):e012190. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012190.
PubMed 27609854
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Ketamine Compared to Intranasal Fentanyl for Analgesia in Children With Suspected, Isolated Extremity Fractures in the Pediatric Emergency Department
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02521415
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INK-2015
- Conditions
- Bone Fracture
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Carolinas Trauma Network Research Group, Charlotte, Houston, Milwaukee Prehospital Emergency Research Nodal Center-CHaMP-ERNC
- Study start
- Dec 2015
- Primary completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Jul 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This single center, randomized control, double blind trial will prospectively examine the feasibility of intranasal, sub-dissociative (IN) ketamine versus intranasal fentanyl for pain control in the pediatric emergency department setting. The investigators hypothesize that IN ketamine may provide a safe and effective alternative to IN fentanyl for children with suspected, isolated extremity fractures.
Eighty children ages 3-17 years with a suspected, isolated extremity fracture that requires analgesia will be randomized to receive IN ketamine or IN fentanyl upon presentation to the emergency department and will be followed for 2 hours for efficacy and 6 hours for safety.
Detailed description
Intranasal medications are commonly used in place of parenteral opioids in children. IN fentanyl is the most commonly used intranasal analgesic medication in the pediatric population with demonstrated safety and efficacy comparable to IV fentanyl and IV morphine. IN ketamine, at sub-dissociative doses, offers similar safety and efficacy to IN fentanyl and the additional advantage of potentially reducing the total use of opioid agents during the emergency department visit. Ketamine is easily stored and has a wide therapeutic window with an extremely low risk of cardiorespiratory complications. This study will compare the safety and efficacy of IN ketamine to IN fentanyl in children with suspected, isolated extremity fractures in the pediatric emergency department.
The primary aim of the study is to examine the feasibility of future protocol expansion. The investigators will conclude that additional studies are NOT feasible if the observed rate of side effects for ketamine that exceeds fentanyl by three-fold or event rate of 5% or more for ketamine-related SAEs. The primary aim of the study will compare the frequency of adverse events over 6-hours among children randomized to receive either intranasal sub-dissociative ketamine (IN ketamine) or intranasal fentanyl (IN fentanyl) for pain control in the emergency department. The exploratory aim of the study will compare the efficacy of intranasal ketamine to intranasal fentanyl as measured by a reduction in age appropriate pain scale scores over 2-hours. The secondary aim of the study will compare the total dose of opioid pain medication in morphine equivalents/kg/hour required during the ED evaluation of children with suspected, isolated extremity fractures after randomization and treatment with IN ketamine or IN fentanyl.
Eighty children ages 3-17 years with a suspected, isolated extremity fracture that requires analgesia will be randomized to receive IN ketamine or IN fentanyl upon presentation to the emergency department and will be followed for 2 hours for efficacy and 6 hours for safety.
All participants will be premedicated with acetaminophen or ibuprofen and baseline data, including pain level, will be collected. The trial consists of two treatment arms. (IN ketamine 1 mg/kg or IN fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg). Randomization will follow a 1:1 ratio, with approximately 40 per group. Randomization will be stratified by ages 3-10 and 11-17. The participants will be assessed by a research coordinator for adverse events every 5 minutes using an adverse events checklist for the first fifteen minutes post study medication administration and every 30 minutes for the first two hours after drug administration. The vital signs and pain scale assessment will be repeated every 10 minutes for the first 30 minutes and then every 30 minutes for the first two hours after drug administration. A final assessment will be made 6 hours after the last dose of study drug or at discharge from the ED to assess for late side effects or adverse events. Study medication may be repeated times one at a reduced dose after 20 minutes when the full effects of the first dose are known. The decision to administer additional study medication (0.5 mg/kg ketamine or 0.75 mcg/kg fentanyl ) will at be at the discretion of the treating physician. Should a second dose of study medication be required, a new schedule of patient assessments will commence following the same schedule as for the first dose. Participant assessments will continue until the 2 hour endpoint is reached from the time of the last drug administration, with a final assessment at 6 hours after the last dose of study drug or at discharge from the ED to assess for late side effects or adverse events.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ketamine | Experimental | Drug: ketamine, Drug: ibuprofen or acetaminophenketamine (1mg/kg) |
| fentanyl | Active comparator | Drug: fentanyl, Drug: ibuprofen or acetaminophenfentanyl (1.5 micrograms/kg) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- single suspected, isolated extremity fracture that requires analgesia
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- GCS < 15 at ED presentation,
- reported allergy or adverse reaction to ketamine or fentanyl,
- pregnancy,
- intoxication,
- hypotension (less than 70 mmHg +2x age or less than 90 mm Hg for patients greater than 11 years of age)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ketamineAlso: intranasal pain medicationintranasal (IN) sub-dissociative ketamine (1mg/kg) | Drug | ketamine |
| fentanylAlso: intranasal pain medicationIntranasal (IN) fentanyl (1.5 micrograms/kg) | Drug | fentanyl |
| ibuprofen or acetaminophen10 mg/kg of ibuprofen or 15 mg/kg of acetaminophen will be given to participants prior to the randomized intervention | Drug | fentanyl, ketamine |
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome: Number of Participants With Minor Side Effects and Significant Adverse Events
Time frame: 60 minutes
We will conclude that such a study is NOT feasible if we observe a rate of side effects for ketamine that exceeds fentanyl by three-fold or event rate of 5% or more for ketamine-related significant adverse events. Side effects are common events experienced by patients receiving ketamine or fentanyl that do not change outcomes for the patient but may affect the patient experience. A significant adverse event (SAE) includes any adverse event that begins after the short form consent has been completed that causes a threat to life, limb or an organ system, causes prolongation of hospitalization, or requires new medical or surgical treatment to correct.
1 secondary outcome
Secondary Outcome: Total Dose of Opioid Pain Medication in Morphine Equivalents/kg/Hour
Time frame: participants will be followed during the emergency department length of stay, estimated to average 6 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27609854Reynolds SL, Studnek JR, Bryant K, VanderHave K, Grossman E, Moore CG, Young J, Hogg M, Runyon MS. Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial of intranasal ketamine compared with intranasal fentanyl for analgesia in children with suspected, isolated extremity fractures in the paediatric emergency department. BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 8;6(9):e012190. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012190.
Related trials for Bone Fracture
RecruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence of SI-BONE's iFuse TORQ TNT Advancing Treatment of Pelvic Ring Fractures
Fracture; Pelvic, Insufficiency Fractures
Not yet recruiting
A Decision Support Tool for Common Surgical Fixations of Hip Fractures
Hip Fracture Surgeries, High Risk Population of Hip Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery
Femur Neck Fracture, Hip Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Alloy Scaffold With Controlled Degradation for Periarticular Bone Defects
Periarticular Bone Defect, Proximal Humerus Fracture
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
GRACE II (General Retrospective Analysis of Commercial Experience With AGN1 LOEP)
Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stacy Reynolds, MD principal investigator
Carolinas Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing ketamine, fentanyl and ibuprofen or acetaminophen in people with Bone Fracture, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Outcome: Number of Participants With Minor Side Effects and Significant Adverse Events (time frame: 60 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02521415, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2022.