Breast NeoplasmsNCT02521623
SurgiMend® vs. Strattice™ in Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction- A Prospective Randomized Trial
A study testing SurgiMend® Acellular Dermal Matrix and Strattice™ Acellular Dermal Matrix in people with Breast Neoplasms, run by Aarhus University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
An increasing number of women undergo an immediate breast reconstruction, where the mastectomy and the breast reconstruction are performed in the same surgery. To aid survival of the mastectomy skin flaps, and to provide better aesthetic results acellular dermal matrixes (ADMs) are used to reinforce the breast. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- SurgiMend® Acellular Dermal Matrix and Strattice™ Acellular Dermal Matrix
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Aug 2015to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient has been deemed eligible for an immediate breast reconstruction using implant and ADM by the responsible plastic and breast surgeon
- Patient is older than 18 years of age
- Patient understand enough Danish to comprehend the given information and to complete the study questionnaires
Who cannot join
- Current smokers (patients not having paused for a minimum of four weeks prior to surgery)
- Non-eligible patients, as assessed by operating surgeon
- High level of co-morbidity, as assessed by operating surgeon or anesthesiologist
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Dept. of Plastic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus C, Jutland, 8000
About this study
An increasing number of women undergo an immediate breast reconstruction, where the mastectomy and the breast reconstruction are performed in the same surgery. To aid survival of the mastectomy skin flaps, and to provide better aesthetic results acellular dermal matrixes (ADMs) are used to reinforce the breast. There are several different types of ADM available for this purpose. In this randomized clinical trial, the following study will investigate two different types of ADM (Strattice™ and SurgiMend®) in an immediate breast reconstructive setting. Sixty patients will be allocated on a 1:1 ratio to receive either Strattice™ or SurgiMend® ADM. Patients scheduled for immediate breast reconstruction with ADM at pt. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark will be offered participation. In total, 60 patients will be included. Outcome parameters of interest are complication rate, patient satisfaction, aesthetic result and cost of the procedure. Satisfaction and aesthetic result will be measured at 4 and 12 months post surgery.
Read the detailed description
Introduction
An increasing number of Danish women undergo genetic counseling for hereditary breast cancer. If the patient´s lifetime risk is evaluated to be more than 30%, the patient may choose to undergo a risk-reducing mastectomy (prophylactic mastectomy) to reduce the risk of developing breast cancer. The mastectomy is mostly performed as a skin-sparing procedure, where only the nipple area and the breast tissue is removed leaving the skin envelope intact, in order to preserve the breast skin for an immediate breast reconstruction. In select cases the surgery may be performed as a nipple-sparing procedure. Additionally, there is an increasing group of women diagnosed with multifocal DCIS who choose risk-reducing mastectomy with an immediate reconstruction.
In order for the risk-reducing mastectomy to be effective, it is of utmost importance that all the breast tissue is removed. This leaves the skin flaps covering the breast thin and vulnerable to necrosis, if not handled with utmost care. In order to spare the mastectomy skin flaps of some of the strain and pressure caused by the breast implants, acellular dermal matrixes (ADM) are increasingly used in this type of procedures. ADMs are derived from the skin of humans or animals, processed to an extent where their cellular components are completely removed, leaving only the extracellular scaffold, thus not inciting an immune response from the host. The ADM thus provides a scaffold, promoting integration of the patient's own connective tissue. In time the ADM will be repopulated and revascularized by the patient's own cells, essentially becoming an integrated part of the patients body. The ADM provides optimal definition of the breast borders, essentially allowing improved implant positioning as compared with a sub muscular coverage technique. If the circumstance of the breast reconstructions necessitates the placement of an expander implant, use of ADMs allows for a greater intraoperative expansion, and thus subsequently reduces the number of times the patients must attend the outpatient's clinic for expansion of the implant. Thus leading to a shorter time before the expander implant may be exchanged for a permanent implant. Furthermore, several studies have shown that use of ADM lowers the overall complication rate.
Several types of ADM are used in a breast reconstructive setting around the world. Strattice™ is a porcine derived ADM, and has been available in Europe and Denmark since late 2008. In order to find the best available ADM for use in a immediate breast reconstructive setting, both in terms of complication rates and patient satisfaction, it is crucial that new products are continuously evaluated. SurgiMend®, another type of ADM, was recently introduced on the Danish market. SurgiMend® ADM is derived from fetal bovine dermis, and recent studies show that the use of SurgiMend® ADM is associated with a low early complication rate. Furthermore, a recent study provided evidence that ADM derived from bovine have a higher mechanical stress tolerance when compared to porcine derived ADM at equivalent thickness.
Aim
The aim of the present study is to evaluate two types of ADM´s in an immediate breast reconstructive setting. The data from this study will possibly help to minimize complications and increase patient satisfaction by finding the optimal ADM for immediate breast reconstructions, thereby contributing to a faster recovery for women who undergo mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant and ADM.
Hypothesis
SurgiMend and Strattice™ provide equal results in regards to complication rates, patient reported outcome measures and aesthetic appearance in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction.
Methods
The project is conducted as a prospective randomized trial. Patients included in the study will be randomized to receive either Strattice™ or SurgiMend® ADM. Patients are allocated in a 1:1 ratio, with 30 patients receiving Strattice™ ADM and 30 patients receiving SurgiMend® ADM. The randomization is performed using a permuted block randomization. Randomization is blinded for the patients and the outcome assessor. Regardless of which type of ADM the patient is randomized to receive, the surgical procedure will be performed in the same way.
Patients included in the study will be asked to complete the BREAST-Q pre-reconstruction module before their breast reconstruction, and the BREAST-Q post-reconstruction module at 4 and 12 months after their breast reconstruction. The BREAST-Q is a patient reported outcome measure tool specifically designed and validated for use in breast reconstruction patients. The BREAST-Q modules consists of several scales, investigating the patients body image, satisfaction with breasts and satisfaction with care. The BREAST-Q modules are widely used and have been officially translated into the Danish language.
Participating patients will attend the same standard post-operative controls at 4 and 12 months after their breast reconstruction as non-participating patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction. In addition to being examined by their operating surgeon at these controls, the patients' aesthetic result will be evaluated by one of the investigators using a breast reconstruction outcome scale, previously developed at Dept. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. The scale consists of six questions evaluating the symmetry, feel, and aesthetic appearance of the reconstructed breasts.
Recruitment of participants
Patients seeking an immediate breast reconstruction are routinely seen in the Dept. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery patient clinic by both a consultant breast surgeon and a consultant plastic surgeon at the same time. If the breast and plastic surgeon deems the patient eligible for a primary breast reconstruction and the plastic surgeon evaluates the patient to be best suited with a breast reconstruction based on an implant and ADM, the patient will be offered a consultation with the clinical investigator for the project. If the plastic surgeon believes that a patient is a better candidate for another type of breast reconstructive procedure than implant and ADM, the patient will not be offered participation.
At the consultation with the investigator, or a well-instructed colleague, the patient will be given oral and written information about the research project. The patient will always be offered a period of at least 24 hours before deciding to give consent, but may also give her informed consent on site. Furthermore, the patient will be offered a second consultation, where the information about the project will be repeated and any questions regarding the research project she may have will be answered. The patient will also be encouraged to bring a family member or friend to the second meeting. The patient may at any time and without need of justification withdraw consent to participate, without affecting the present and/or future treatment of the patient.
Risks, side effects and disadvantages
As with all surgery, there is a risk of wound infection, blood clots and altered sensation in the operated area. This can lead to antibiotic treatment, or where appropriate, a second operation to stop bleeding or remove damaged tissue. These risks are, however, associated with the breast reconstruction itself, and not associated with participating in the current study.
Both types of ADM are well described in the medical literature, and both types of ADM have achieved good results compared to not using ADM in immediate breast reconstructions. The risks for the patients choosing to participate in the project are thus solely related to the breast reconstruction itself, and not to the participation in the current study.
Participating patients will have to spend approximately 10 minutes completing a questionnaire before the breast reconstruction. Additionally, the participating patients will be asked to complete another questionnaire (approximately 10 min) at 4 and 12 months after their breast reconstruction, as well as participate in an extra clinical examination at their routine follow-up examinations after 4 and 12 months. The extra examinations at the routine follow-up visits are expected to take approximately 15 min. per visit. While the questionnaire and the clinical follow-up may consume some of the patient's time, there are no risks associated with them.
Ethical considerations
It is expected that the number of women who choose an immediate breast reconstruction procedure will increase. Conducting studies that help bring down the complication rates for these types of surgery is of utmost importance, both for the individual patient undergoing the surgery and in a socio-economic setting.The proposed study will aid in finding the optimal method, both in terms of complication rate and patient reported outcome. All of the patients invited to participate in this study has been evaluated by experienced breast and plastic surgeons to be best suited with an immediate breast reconstruction with implant and ADM. The two types of ADMs evaluated in the study have shown good results in previous studies. As it is not expected that one of the tested ADMs is significantly better than the other, there is no predictable benefit for the individual patient in regards to participating in the study.
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasms
- Being tested
- SurgiMend® Acellular Dermal Matrix, Strattice™ Acellular Dermal Matrix
- Keywords
- Acelullar Dermal Matrix, Immediate Breast Reconstruction, Breast Implant
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SurgiMend® Acellular Dermal MatrixDevice
See arm description.
Strattice™ Acellular Dermal MatrixDevice
See arm description.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Surgimend | Experimental | Patients randomized to this arm will receive SurgiMend® Acellular Dermal Matrix in their direct to implant primary breast reconstruction. Receives: Device: SurgiMend® Acellular Dermal Matrix |
| Strattice | Active comparator | Patients randomized to this arm will receive Strattice™ Acellular Dermal Matrix in their direct to implant primary breast reconstruction. Receives: Device: Strattice™ Acellular Dermal Matrix |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complication Rate
The prevalence of complications to the BR.
Measured: 1 year from surgery
Secondary outcomes (3)
Patients reported satisfaction
Patient reported satisfaction as measured by the BREAST-Q.
Measured: 1 year
Aesthetic result
The aesthetic outcome of the BR as evaluated by a clinician using a study specific breast reconstruction outcome scale.
Measured: 1 year
Cost of Care
The total cost for the surgery
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2015
- Primary completionDec 2018
- Study completionDec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Aarhus University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aarhus University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alexander Juhl Andersen, Aarhus University Hospital
- Investigators
- Tine E Damsgaard, MD, PHD, Principal investigator, Plastic Surgery Research Unit, Dept. of Plastic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02521623
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 48607
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 10 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WL, Henzen-Logmans SC, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers MB, Bartels CC, Verhoog LC, van den Ouweland AM, Niermeijer MF, Brekelmans CT, Klijn JG. Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jul 19;345(3):159-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200107193450301.
PubMed 11463009Skytte AB, Cruger D, Gerster M, Laenkholm AV, Lang C, Brondum-Nielsen K, Andersen MK, Sunde L, Kolvraa S, Gerdes AM. Breast cancer after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. Clin Genet. 2011 May;79(5):431-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01604.x. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
PubMed 21199491Takami Y, Matsuda T, Yoshitake M, Hanumadass M, Walter RJ. Dispase/detergent treated dermal matrix as a dermal substitute. Burns. 1996 May;22(3):182-90. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(95)00123-9.
PubMed 8726254Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Sep;55(3):232-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000168527.52472.3c.
PubMed 16106158Salzberg CA. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Jul;57(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000214873.13102.9f.
PubMed 16799299Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, Menon NG. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 May;32(3):418-25. doi: 10.1007/s00266-008-9128-8.
PubMed 18338102Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Dec;124(6):1735-1740. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf803d.
PubMed 19952627Hanna KR, DeGeorge BR Jr, Mericli AF, Lin KY, Drake DB. Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;70(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f6765.
PubMed 21862915Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1170-1178. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c2f6.
PubMed 22094736Endress R, Choi MS, Lee GK. Use of fetal bovine acellular dermal xenograft with tissue expansion for staged breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):338-41. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823b68d0.
PubMed 22421474Macadam SA, Lennox PA. Acellular dermal matrices: Use in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2012 Summer;20(2):75-89. doi: 10.1177/229255031202000201.
PubMed 23730154Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, Hwang BH, Chan LS, Wong AK. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):346-56. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823f3cd9.
PubMed 22421476Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Sep;59(3):250-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31802f8426.
PubMed 17721209Bank J, Phillips NA, Park JE, Song DH. Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Dec;37(6):1194-201. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0213-2. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
PubMed 24091489Krishnan NM, Chatterjee A, Rosenkranz KM, Powell SG, Nigriny JF, Vidal DC. The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Apr;67(4):468-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.035. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
PubMed 24508194
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- SurgiMend® vs. Strattice™ in Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction- A Prospective Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02521623
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 48607
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Acelullar Dermal Matrix, Immediate Breast Reconstruction, Breast Implant
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Aarhus University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
An increasing number of women undergo an immediate breast reconstruction, where the mastectomy and the breast reconstruction are performed in the same surgery. To aid survival of the mastectomy skin flaps, and to provide better aesthetic results acellular dermal matrixes (ADMs) are used to reinforce the breast. There are several different types of ADM available for this purpose. In this randomized clinical trial, the following study will investigate two different types of ADM (Strattice™ and SurgiMend®) in an immediate breast reconstructive setting. Sixty patients will be allocated on a 1:1 ratio to receive either Strattice™ or SurgiMend® ADM. Patients scheduled for immediate breast reconstruction with ADM at pt. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark will be offered participation. In total, 60 patients will be included. Outcome parameters of interest are complication rate, patient satisfaction, aesthetic result and cost of the procedure. Satisfaction and aesthetic result will be measured at 4 and 12 months post surgery.
Detailed description
Introduction
An increasing number of Danish women undergo genetic counseling for hereditary breast cancer. If the patient´s lifetime risk is evaluated to be more than 30%, the patient may choose to undergo a risk-reducing mastectomy (prophylactic mastectomy) to reduce the risk of developing breast cancer. The mastectomy is mostly performed as a skin-sparing procedure, where only the nipple area and the breast tissue is removed leaving the skin envelope intact, in order to preserve the breast skin for an immediate breast reconstruction. In select cases the surgery may be performed as a nipple-sparing procedure. Additionally, there is an increasing group of women diagnosed with multifocal DCIS who choose risk-reducing mastectomy with an immediate reconstruction.
In order for the risk-reducing mastectomy to be effective, it is of utmost importance that all the breast tissue is removed. This leaves the skin flaps covering the breast thin and vulnerable to necrosis, if not handled with utmost care. In order to spare the mastectomy skin flaps of some of the strain and pressure caused by the breast implants, acellular dermal matrixes (ADM) are increasingly used in this type of procedures. ADMs are derived from the skin of humans or animals, processed to an extent where their cellular components are completely removed, leaving only the extracellular scaffold, thus not inciting an immune response from the host. The ADM thus provides a scaffold, promoting integration of the patient's own connective tissue. In time the ADM will be repopulated and revascularized by the patient's own cells, essentially becoming an integrated part of the patients body. The ADM provides optimal definition of the breast borders, essentially allowing improved implant positioning as compared with a sub muscular coverage technique. If the circumstance of the breast reconstructions necessitates the placement of an expander implant, use of ADMs allows for a greater intraoperative expansion, and thus subsequently reduces the number of times the patients must attend the outpatient's clinic for expansion of the implant. Thus leading to a shorter time before the expander implant may be exchanged for a permanent implant. Furthermore, several studies have shown that use of ADM lowers the overall complication rate.
Several types of ADM are used in a breast reconstructive setting around the world. Strattice™ is a porcine derived ADM, and has been available in Europe and Denmark since late 2008. In order to find the best available ADM for use in a immediate breast reconstructive setting, both in terms of complication rates and patient satisfaction, it is crucial that new products are continuously evaluated. SurgiMend®, another type of ADM, was recently introduced on the Danish market. SurgiMend® ADM is derived from fetal bovine dermis, and recent studies show that the use of SurgiMend® ADM is associated with a low early complication rate. Furthermore, a recent study provided evidence that ADM derived from bovine have a higher mechanical stress tolerance when compared to porcine derived ADM at equivalent thickness.
Aim
The aim of the present study is to evaluate two types of ADM´s in an immediate breast reconstructive setting. The data from this study will possibly help to minimize complications and increase patient satisfaction by finding the optimal ADM for immediate breast reconstructions, thereby contributing to a faster recovery for women who undergo mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant and ADM.
Hypothesis
SurgiMend and Strattice™ provide equal results in regards to complication rates, patient reported outcome measures and aesthetic appearance in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction.
Methods
The project is conducted as a prospective randomized trial. Patients included in the study will be randomized to receive either Strattice™ or SurgiMend® ADM. Patients are allocated in a 1:1 ratio, with 30 patients receiving Strattice™ ADM and 30 patients receiving SurgiMend® ADM. The randomization is performed using a permuted block randomization. Randomization is blinded for the patients and the outcome assessor. Regardless of which type of ADM the patient is randomized to receive, the surgical procedure will be performed in the same way.
Patients included in the study will be asked to complete the BREAST-Q pre-reconstruction module before their breast reconstruction, and the BREAST-Q post-reconstruction module at 4 and 12 months after their breast reconstruction. The BREAST-Q is a patient reported outcome measure tool specifically designed and validated for use in breast reconstruction patients. The BREAST-Q modules consists of several scales, investigating the patients body image, satisfaction with breasts and satisfaction with care. The BREAST-Q modules are widely used and have been officially translated into the Danish language.
Participating patients will attend the same standard post-operative controls at 4 and 12 months after their breast reconstruction as non-participating patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction. In addition to being examined by their operating surgeon at these controls, the patients' aesthetic result will be evaluated by one of the investigators using a breast reconstruction outcome scale, previously developed at Dept. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. The scale consists of six questions evaluating the symmetry, feel, and aesthetic appearance of the reconstructed breasts.
Recruitment of participants
Patients seeking an immediate breast reconstruction are routinely seen in the Dept. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery patient clinic by both a consultant breast surgeon and a consultant plastic surgeon at the same time. If the breast and plastic surgeon deems the patient eligible for a primary breast reconstruction and the plastic surgeon evaluates the patient to be best suited with a breast reconstruction based on an implant and ADM, the patient will be offered a consultation with the clinical investigator for the project. If the plastic surgeon believes that a patient is a better candidate for another type of breast reconstructive procedure than implant and ADM, the patient will not be offered participation.
At the consultation with the investigator, or a well-instructed colleague, the patient will be given oral and written information about the research project. The patient will always be offered a period of at least 24 hours before deciding to give consent, but may also give her informed consent on site. Furthermore, the patient will be offered a second consultation, where the information about the project will be repeated and any questions regarding the research project she may have will be answered. The patient will also be encouraged to bring a family member or friend to the second meeting. The patient may at any time and without need of justification withdraw consent to participate, without affecting the present and/or future treatment of the patient.
Risks, side effects and disadvantages
As with all surgery, there is a risk of wound infection, blood clots and altered sensation in the operated area. This can lead to antibiotic treatment, or where appropriate, a second operation to stop bleeding or remove damaged tissue. These risks are, however, associated with the breast reconstruction itself, and not associated with participating in the current study.
Both types of ADM are well described in the medical literature, and both types of ADM have achieved good results compared to not using ADM in immediate breast reconstructions. The risks for the patients choosing to participate in the project are thus solely related to the breast reconstruction itself, and not to the participation in the current study.
Participating patients will have to spend approximately 10 minutes completing a questionnaire before the breast reconstruction. Additionally, the participating patients will be asked to complete another questionnaire (approximately 10 min) at 4 and 12 months after their breast reconstruction, as well as participate in an extra clinical examination at their routine follow-up examinations after 4 and 12 months. The extra examinations at the routine follow-up visits are expected to take approximately 15 min. per visit. While the questionnaire and the clinical follow-up may consume some of the patient's time, there are no risks associated with them.
Ethical considerations
It is expected that the number of women who choose an immediate breast reconstruction procedure will increase. Conducting studies that help bring down the complication rates for these types of surgery is of utmost importance, both for the individual patient undergoing the surgery and in a socio-economic setting.The proposed study will aid in finding the optimal method, both in terms of complication rate and patient reported outcome. All of the patients invited to participate in this study has been evaluated by experienced breast and plastic surgeons to be best suited with an immediate breast reconstruction with implant and ADM. The two types of ADMs evaluated in the study have shown good results in previous studies. As it is not expected that one of the tested ADMs is significantly better than the other, there is no predictable benefit for the individual patient in regards to participating in the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Surgimend | Experimental | Device: SurgiMend® Acellular Dermal MatrixPatients randomized to this arm will receive SurgiMend® Acellular Dermal Matrix in their direct to implant primary breast reconstruction. |
| Strattice | Active comparator | Device: Strattice™ Acellular Dermal MatrixPatients randomized to this arm will receive Strattice™ Acellular Dermal Matrix in their direct to implant primary breast reconstruction. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient has been deemed eligible for an immediate breast reconstruction using implant and ADM by the responsible plastic and breast surgeon
- Patient is older than 18 years of age
- Patient understand enough Danish to comprehend the given information and to complete the study questionnaires
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Current smokers (patients not having paused for a minimum of four weeks prior to surgery)
- Non-eligible patients, as assessed by operating surgeon
- High level of co-morbidity, as assessed by operating surgeon or anesthesiologist
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SurgiMend® Acellular Dermal MatrixSee arm description. | Device | Surgimend |
| Strattice™ Acellular Dermal MatrixSee arm description. | Device | Strattice |
Primary outcome
Complication Rate
Time frame: 1 year from surgery
The prevalence of complications to the BR.
3 secondary outcomes
Patients reported satisfaction
Time frame: 1 year
Aesthetic result
Time frame: 1 year
Cost of Care
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2019.
- Background: PubMed 11463009Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WL, Henzen-Logmans SC, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers MB, Bartels CC, Verhoog LC, van den Ouweland AM, Niermeijer MF, Brekelmans CT, Klijn JG. Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jul 19;345(3):159-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200107193450301.
- Background: PubMed 21199491Skytte AB, Cruger D, Gerster M, Laenkholm AV, Lang C, Brondum-Nielsen K, Andersen MK, Sunde L, Kolvraa S, Gerdes AM. Breast cancer after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. Clin Genet. 2011 May;79(5):431-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01604.x. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
- Background: PubMed 8726254Takami Y, Matsuda T, Yoshitake M, Hanumadass M, Walter RJ. Dispase/detergent treated dermal matrix as a dermal substitute. Burns. 1996 May;22(3):182-90. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(95)00123-9.
- Background: PubMed 16106158Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Sep;55(3):232-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000168527.52472.3c.
- Background: PubMed 16799299Salzberg CA. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Jul;57(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000214873.13102.9f.
- Background: PubMed 18338102Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, Menon NG. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 May;32(3):418-25. doi: 10.1007/s00266-008-9128-8.
- Background: PubMed 19952627Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Dec;124(6):1735-1740. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf803d.
- Background: PubMed 21862915Hanna KR, DeGeorge BR Jr, Mericli AF, Lin KY, Drake DB. Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;70(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f6765.
- Background: PubMed 22094736Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1170-1178. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c2f6.
- Background: PubMed 22421474Endress R, Choi MS, Lee GK. Use of fetal bovine acellular dermal xenograft with tissue expansion for staged breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):338-41. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823b68d0.
- Background: PubMed 23730154Macadam SA, Lennox PA. Acellular dermal matrices: Use in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2012 Summer;20(2):75-89. doi: 10.1177/229255031202000201.
- Background: PubMed 22421476Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, Hwang BH, Chan LS, Wong AK. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):346-56. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823f3cd9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tine E Damsgaard, MD, PHD principal investigator
Plastic Surgery Research Unit, Dept. of Plastic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SurgiMend® Acellular Dermal Matrix and Strattice™ Acellular Dermal Matrix in people with Breast Neoplasms, run by Aarhus University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complication Rate (time frame: 1 year from surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02521623, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2019.